Enter your username and password.
New York, 2:41 PM
Thu Nov 12
64 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
05/06/09
The broadsheet is the classic homeless guy blanket. Tabloid works in a pinch but it's sort of the Ladies model of last ditch shelter.
And you can't take that away, apple.
05/06/09
Amazon. Contrary to popular bloglief, there is more than one innovative technology company on planet Earth.
05/06/09
05/06/09
03/25/09
03/26/09
03/25/09
03/26/09
03/25/09
(replies not working)
03/25/09
It’s obnoxious that he didn’t acquire a permit. Billionaires understand that they have to obey the law. They also understand that they can afford not to. I am sure he views the legal limit of fines and the de facto limit of legal fees as a (possibly) necessary expense of the project.
03/25/09
03/08/09
03/09/09
03/08/09
03/09/09
03/08/09
03/08/09
Twitter should charge "twit identities" that use it to pimp/plug their business. For example: See Guy Kawasaki/Alltop. Charge a nominal fee, like Craigslist does to advertise jobs for profit making companies.
03/08/09
I like your idea about monetizing Twitter (yick, I just said monetize ... what next, "impactful"?). Maybe they could charge for every account linked to an email address within a corporate domain?
How about this: every time a post mentions a brand name or product, a fee is charged to an escrow account. If there is no money in the account, then the post doesn’t get published. It doesn’t matter who pays into the brand-related accounts, though, obviously, the companies whose products are being mentioned are the ones who should pay. They could scale it so that the price-per-mention goes down with more mentions. The prices should be very low — it’d be all about volume.
Of course, spam from competitors could deplete the accounts. A l33t filter might be necessary to. I don’t know ... this kind of thing could piss a lot of people off.
03/08/09
03/08/09
03/08/09
03/08/09
03/08/09
02/04/09