<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Jargon]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/jargon</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged 'jargon']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Fifteen Most Useless Internet Euphemisms]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2008/07/thumb160x_boingboing460x276.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />"We didn't attempt to silence Violet. We unpublished our own work." That's how the geek culture blog Boing Boing defended their decision to <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/01/that-violet-blue-thi.html">delete every post</a> referring to sex writer Violet Blue for no given reason. The team's refusal to explain further turned this obscure event into a giant blog fight: because a couple of bloggers hid behind mealy-mouthed words instead of coming out firing all weapons, like proper Internet talk is supposed to go. Driven by the same old ass-covering impulse, anyone trying to make a buck uses bland business-speak online: "Restructuring" for mass layoffs, "brand advertising" for ads that no one clicks. Below are over a dozen such terms and their true definitions.</p>

<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/odd_stuff/The_Fifteen_Things_You_Can_t_Say_on_the_Internet" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
<ul>
<li><img alt="boingboing-logo.png" src="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/boingboing-logo.png" width="154" height="47" class="left"><b>Unpublished: Blacklisted.</b> Made famous by Boing Boing, who insists that they didn't <a href="http://valleywag.com/5021146/did-the-internets-free+speech-guardians-try-to-hush-up-a-girl+on+girl-love-affair">violate their standards of openness by hushing someone up</a>.<br clear="all"></li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Brand advertising:</b> Bad clickthroughs. "We have a clickthrough rate of one in ten thousand, but we're more of a brand destination."</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Influential:</b> Unread. If a site isn't popular, it insists its small audience is made of "influentials" or "early adopters."</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Update:</b> Fix. On a blog or in a program, an update means something was broken.</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Experimental:</b> Failed. Everyone secretly hopes their projects take off, so they can say "Oh, it was just a fun little project!" More often, the project gets just the attention it deserved: none.</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><img alt="long_tail_graph.jpg" src="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/long_tail_graph.jpg" width="154" height="112" class="left"><b>Long tail: Obscure.</b> Because it's a book title, "long tail" has a cache that hides its actual meaning: things that get very little attention and only matter in aggregate.<br clear="all"></li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><img alt="popcorn-hoax.png" src="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/popcorn-hoax.png" width="154" height="123" class="left"><b>Stealth marketing:</b> Hoax. "Viral campaigns" like the <a href="http://gawker.com/tag/hoax/?i=395434&t=whos-trying-to-convince-everyone-that-cell-phones-pop-popcorn">dubious ad for headsets</a> that showed phones popping popcorn (a scientific impossibility) are just fraudulent hoaxes. Putting them on YouTube doesn't change that.<br clear="all"></li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Platform:</b> Vague idea. Instead of a useful tool, a tool for other people to make useful tools. Possibly a cash cow, but boring. (For a geekier set, a platform is for those too lazy to code; an API is for those too lazy to write a platform.)</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Pile-on:</b> Unanimous criticism we're ignoring. Used by Boing Boing to imply that the lucrative commercial six-person blog had no chance to defend themselves from the masses of powerful, uh, blog commenters.</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Stepping up:</b> Stepping down. Used when a CEO is pushed out and exiled to the board or made "president."</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Beta:</b> Broken. <a href="http://twitter.com">For</a> <a href="http://youtube.com">some</a> <a href="http://flickr.com">web services</a>, "beta" is as regular as PMS until Google buys the company.</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><img alt="coke-and-mentos.jpg" src="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/coke-and-mentos.jpg" width="154" height="124" class="left"><b>Viral:</b> Cheap. Of course, sometimes that's the kind of ad a brand deserves. Note which brand was faster to jump on viral videos: Not Coke, but Mentos.<br clear="all"></li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>Restructuring:</b> Mass layoffs. Even shiftier than "downsizing."</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><b>User-generated:</b> Quality-deprived. Or "can't afford an NBC deal." Except for a few impressive exceptions, user-generated content is a swamp not worth slogging through, which is why sites like YouTube set up a partner program for "better" producers.</li>
<li style="list-style: none"><br></li>
<li><img alt="contextual-ads.png" src="http://gawker.com/assets/resources/2008/07/contextual-ads.png" width="154" height="66" class="left"><b>Contextual advertising:</b> Bottom-of-the-barrel ads. What's left over after "brand advertising" and served with "user-generated" content.<br clear="all"></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/397797/the-fifteen-most-useless-internet-euphemisms]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-397797]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boingboing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[euphemisms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:55:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Douglas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=397797&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders: Michael Arrington, Web 2.0 midwife]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.valleywag.com/images/2006/05/3peep.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<ul>
<li>The new "Get a Mac" ads (pictured) starring a dorky office guy as a PC and a generic-Tobey-Maguire as a Mac? Pretty cute. So is that "new camera from Japan," anyone got her number? [<a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/">Apple</a>]</li>
<li>TechCrunch celebrates Newsy-Bloggy-Startup Launch Day: <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/01/new-blog-search-engine-sphere-launches/">1</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/01/a-new-look-at-personalized-news/">2</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/01/blogburst-to-launch-tomorrow/">3</a>, Mikey likes 'em! [<a href="http://techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a>]</li>
<li>The Beeb and the Times both dig ATM cards that handle virtual-world money and real-world cash. Sounds fun, until a server crashes and you suddenly can't pay your real rent. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4953620.stm">BBC</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/02/arts/02entr.html?ex=1304222400&en=9eca89c89620dd84&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">NYT</a>]</li>
<li>Jargon watch: it's not just a "schedule," it's a "time map!" [<a href="http://juliemorgenstern.com/newsletter/2006/ezine0506.htm#may">Julie Morgenstern</a> via <a href="http://cyrusfarivar.com/blog/">Cyrus Farivar</a>]</li>
<li>Intel shoots for the under-$400 PC. Apple continues shooting for the $40,000 Mac. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/02/technology/02chip.html?ex=1304222400&en=1ca0f704c89842a1&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">NYT</a>]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.gawker.com/171130/remainders-michael-arrington-web-20-midwife]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-171130]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jargon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michael arrington]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 May 2006 21:10:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ndouglas]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=171130&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
