Amazon's reviews can be wickedly entertaining as well. Case in point, Looking For - Best of David Hasselhoff: [www.amazon.com] (Be prepared to waste an hour or so.)
The song "Hot Shot City" is particularly good. (1,042 people can't be wrong.)
1.) Mana pool - Powered by pure venture capitalist gullibility.
2.) Big spender - How many programmers does a topsite script need? Fully-insured, Bonded, American coders? They blow through more cash a year than wikipedia! Where the hell did all this money go? They could have outsourced to India, instead they hired friends in the valley.
3.) Top secret business strategy - Real business's grow incrementally, while others don't. They don't get venture, they grow because they're solid. Instead, let's just inject $10M into that shit.
4.) Userbase - Defective gene pool - The parents of the children that inhabit the site are likely subprime mortgage "Bailout" people.
I feel a resurgence in free market principles coming on. People want to see natural selection have their way. . . You've taken psychology before, you know what defense mechanisms are, all you're going to get is denial.
These worthless seeds swindled gullible venture capitalist to what amounts to giving PHP developers a sandbox.
Digg is nothing. Essentially a PHP version of what we would call a "top site" script in the web 1.0 days. People would click links and "vote" for their favorite sites.
Good idea? Clean website? No one gives a shit. That's not capital. I would have thought people of learned their lesson back in 2000-01.
Web 2.0 taught us all another lesson - users have very little of value contribute other than circus acts and a lot to talk about.
Even the community side of Digg is flawed. As it grows, it becomes more and more prone to being gamed. There's resentment for "power users." Spammers try to subvert the service. Digg will have to rejigger its innards to try to maintain the integrity of the service while cracking down on troublemakers. They're screwed in all directions, because no matter what they choose, they'll alienate some core group of loyal readers.
Hell, my Digg account was deleted, apparently under suspicion of spamming, and I'm not even up to any mischief. Less than eight total submissions in three years -- I mostly stayed logged in so it would remember my idiot filtering for the comments. It didn't matter much to me, but all it takes is that kind of crap happening on a larger scale for the erosion of Digg's goodwill to really pick up.
So maybe Digg will solve its problems by killing its own golden goose.
Show me any company who was able to get profitable by having outside ad sales staffs. Well put Owen, I mean seriously, it is hard to get companies to part with any money nowadays. After I reported the news yesterday on www.scommerce.com I was flooded with people asking me why I seeming happy about the layoffs, when in fact I wasn't at all. Was just being condescending. Your article was extremely well written, and couldn't have said it any better!
@Craig Agranoff: No one's happy about the layoffs. I know people who work at Digg. Rose never wanted to deal with the realities of running a business, and by relying on outsiders to sell ads, Adelson just put off the reckoning. He was, no doubt, hoping to sell the company and make it someone else's problem. Now, he needs to have his own salespeople. But you can't snap your fingers and create a sales force.
@Craig Agranoff: If they used their VC more wisely (outsourcing codemonkey jobs to India, for instance) instead of shelling out 120K PHP jobs h00kups to valley friends, they wouldn't be there.
$5M+ is what you pay to develop a prototype of the spruce goose or a cancer/AIDS drug to go into testing.
A website for arrogant college shits to hang out? THAT IS WHY WE'RE IN A FUCKING DEPRESSION.
03/25/09
The song "Hot Shot City" is particularly good. (1,042 people can't be wrong.)
01/23/09
1.) Mana pool - Powered by pure venture capitalist gullibility.
2.) Big spender - How many programmers does a topsite script need? Fully-insured, Bonded, American coders? They blow through more cash a year than wikipedia! Where the hell did all this money go? They could have outsourced to India, instead they hired friends in the valley.
3.) Top secret business strategy - Real business's grow incrementally, while others don't. They don't get venture, they grow because they're solid. Instead, let's just inject $10M into that shit.
4.) Userbase - Defective gene pool - The parents of the children that inhabit the site are likely subprime mortgage "Bailout" people.
I feel a resurgence in free market principles coming on. People want to see natural selection have their way. . . You've taken psychology before, you know what defense mechanisms are, all you're going to get is denial.
01/23/09
These worthless seeds swindled gullible venture capitalist to what amounts to giving PHP developers a sandbox.
Digg is nothing. Essentially a PHP version of what we would call a "top site" script in the web 1.0 days. People would click links and "vote" for their favorite sites.
Good idea? Clean website? No one gives a shit. That's not capital. I would have thought people of learned their lesson back in 2000-01.
Web 2.0 taught us all another lesson - users have very little of value contribute other than circus acts and a lot to talk about.
01/23/09
01/23/09
Hell, my Digg account was deleted, apparently under suspicion of spamming, and I'm not even up to any mischief. Less than eight total submissions in three years -- I mostly stayed logged in so it would remember my idiot filtering for the comments. It didn't matter much to me, but all it takes is that kind of crap happening on a larger scale for the erosion of Digg's goodwill to really pick up.
So maybe Digg will solve its problems by killing its own golden goose.
01/23/09
01/23/09
01/23/09
$5M+ is what you pay to develop a prototype of the spruce goose or a cancer/AIDS drug to go into testing.
A website for arrogant college shits to hang out? THAT IS WHY WE'RE IN A FUCKING DEPRESSION.
01/23/09