<![CDATA[Gawker: jewelry]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: jewelry]]> http://gawker.com/tag/jewelry http://gawker.com/tag/jewelry <![CDATA[PR Lady Thief Was Really Big Thief]]> Oh shoot, fashion PR person Mallory Montilla was some sort of career criminal or possibly a kleptomaniac, if you believe the cops, at least. Or is she a sad victim of mean girls?

Last week Mallory was arrested for boosting nearly $100k worth of jewelry belonging to clients of the PR firm where she used to work. Daily Intel posited that hey, maybe she was the victim of mean girls at her job. Those mean girls must be really mean, and also well connected in law enforcement, because now Mallory's also charged with stealing $13,000 worth of clothes from Bergdorf Goodman when she worked in PR for them two years ago.

The names of all the designers of things that she's accused of stealing do show up in the news stories. But that's probably not so much "devious fashion PR girls wiping out an enemy and getting client media placement in one fell swoop" as it is "in the police report." We're guessing!

In any case PR people are criminals and swag is poison.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5351788&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PR Lady Is Jewel Thief!]]> It's getting so you can't even trust PR people any more: Cops say that Mallory Montilla, a 24 year-old flack at Whisper PR in NYC, stole almost $100,000 worth of jewelry. From clients! The swag corrupted her mind!

Montilla, a University of Central Florida grad, worked in PR for Bergdorf Goodman before getting a job at fashion-and-jewelry specialist Whisper two years ago. Being around all those fancy trinkets drove her stone cold crazy. (Not quite Lindsay Lohan crazy, but close). Her job was to make sure that jewelry on loan from designers made it to magazines for photo shoots, and back. The Post reports that she took advantage of this position to launch this crafty criminal scheme:

But law-enforcement sources say that instead of shipping the jewelry via a bonded courier to the magazines, she simply kept it.

Clever. But not foolproof. Eventually her bosses were like, "Hey, where is that $97,000 worth of jewelry that should be in our company safe but is not in our company safe?" Then, using detective tactics, they traced it to the girl who was supposed to be putting the jewelry in the safe but was not: Mallory Montilla.

It's just more proof that journalists and flacks should have to pass some kind of test before being allowed to be around swag. Leave them alone in a room for an hour with a cookie. If they eat it—no swag license.
[Pics: Stylecaster, Facebook]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5350162&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Post-Bling Era?]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.How poor are people, these days? So poor that rappers can't afford to wear half-million-dollar chains any more! That's the thesis of a story which is surely false (nobody could ever really afford to wear a half-million-dollar chain), but it raises the question: what is the post-bling thing?

The WSJ finds that the comically oversized pendant industry may be in peril:

"A lot of these rappers simply don't have the money for real stuff anymore," says Jason Arasheben, who crafts custom jewelry for wealthy clientele, including Saudi royals and Hollywood movie stars, at his California boutique called Jason of Beverly Hills. "It's to the point where they are wearing imitation jewelry, and that's ridiculous."

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Consider what's at stake here: we would lose the opportunity to idly play "Who has the most idiotic chain?" (Answer: Rick Ross, pictured, with himself as a pendant). Luckily for rappers, there is a template to follow in this situation. Country music has known how to combine flashy style and low cash for decades. Meet the future of hip hop fashion totems:


The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

[WSJ. Related: Since when did the WSJ start hiring reporters who can casually use hip hop slang in stories and sound competent, rather than sounding humorously stiff like, you know, WSJ reporters trying to use hip hop slang in stories? WHAT'S THE WORLD COMING TO YO?]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5270141&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Diamonds Surprisingly Unpopular Now]]> De Beers thought that buying diamond jewelry would be a popular activity during this recession, but you know what? It isn't.

We're going out on a limb a little bit here in order to project our voice further unto the countryside as we shout that the idea that everybody would buy diamond jewelry as they get poorer because it's such a great gift and investment was incredibly stupid from the beginning. It doesn't look like De Beers had a blockbuster holiday season, and we know their competition didn't: "Tiffany & Co.'s fiscal fourth-quarter net income dropped 76% on restructuring costs and plunging sales."

It's because people don't have money, you see.

Even models can't afford diamonds these days. America's last luxury item is deodorant.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5180588&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Paula Abdul: Live On Late Night/Early Morning TV]]> Paula Abdul worked the midnight shift on Saturday night on HSN, selling her Forever Your Girl jewelry line. As it was live TV, we knew we needed to watch it closely.

She wasn't as loopy as past performances on her previous TV home QVC, but she definitely had her slurred-speech moments.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5110652&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Ruthless Millionaire Jewel Thieves Are The New Folk Heroes]]> In these days of Kool-Aid and poverty, we all dream of easy, dirty money. That's why a violent gang of Eastern European jewel thieves called the "Pink Panthers" are the new darlings of the media!

This loosely-connected group of a couple hundred hardened criminals from the former Yugoslavia are now vying with the Somali Pirates for the public's hearts! They first made a big splash with their daring smash-and-grab robbery of Harry Winston in Paris earlier this month, where they made off with $100 million in jewels. Some of them dressed up like ladies and everything—why this is just like Ocean's 11!

The heist-movie-come-to-life element meant the authorities just had to dub them the "Pink Panthers," which almost guarantees each and every last guy a book deal, should he so desire.

Defense lawyers for some thieves who have been arrested insist that the name Pink Panthers is an invention of drama-loving law enforcement authorities. But investigators say there are about 200 members in the group — linked by village and blood — and they blame the group for scooping up jewels worth more than $132 million in bold robberies in Dubai, Switzerland, Japan, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain and Monaco. They live all over Europe, with some working in mundane jobs as hospital cleaners, waiting to be summoned for the next discount flight to a foreign capital, they said.

And that Dubai robbery, where they drove an Audi full speed into the front window of a jewelry store? It's a Youtube hit. How modern!




Watch out, Somali pirates: the media's found another gang of ruthless, plundering international criminals to crush on. And these guys have jewelry too! [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5109552&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Calling Bullshit On The Obama Ring Story]]> President-elect Obama—allegedly a 'man of the people'—is allegedly buying a fancy $30,000 ring for his fancy wife, allegedly! It was in the trusty Daily Mail, and now it's the top story on Drudge, meaning it is the single most important news story in all the world. Elitist Obama drops 30K on bling for his wife during a recession—and this bling will be made out of rhodium, the world's most expensive metal! This story is almost certainly bullshit, and we will tell you exactly why. [Updates below—we were right]:

1. The setup—Say, for argument's sake, that Obama did order an expensive, custom-made ring to thank his wife for her help in the campaign. Would the chosen designer of that ring run out and immediately tell the press all about it? Not just the press, but the Daily Mail, a sleazeball London tabloid? No, because that designer would subsequently be destroyed by Barack Obama, the president of the US.

2. The story itself—
What's the sourcing for this big story? Did Obama sheepishly acknowledge his gift with a smile once it broke? No. The sole source is a "spokesman" for the "designer" of the ring. Who also gave this ridonkulous quote:

'For obvious privacy reasons I cannot reveal the cost of the ring but bearing in mind it is made from rhodium or black gold and encrusted with diamonds you can be sure it will cost thousands of pounds.'

Mmm hmm. Classy. It's also painfully clear that the story is filled out by fun facts about rhodium pulled off some press release. Did you know that "rhodium was chosen as the material for the disc presented to Beatle Paul McCartney for being history's all-time best-selling songwriter and recording artist"? Barack Obama obviously did, which is why he insisted on ordering this here ring!

3. The designer—Supposedly Obama has ordered this ring to be specially made by Giovanni Bosco, an "A-list" Italian designer. Really? If he's so A-list, why has his name never—never!—appeared in Nexis, the database of all things media? If he's so A-list, why does his website look so D-list? And why does the "Press" section seem to be full mostly of his own ads? Decidedly non-Presidential.

So the worldwide media has bitten big-time on a story that was almost certainly planted by this jewelry designer himself, or a very enterprising flack. And everybody wins ("everybody" meaning "Right wing media outlets" and "Giovanni Bosco")! Good show, Giovanni Bosco. Thanks to all this press you will probably be able to sell some rings that are real. [Pic via]

[UPDATE: And the Obama camp just denied it.]

[UPDATE 2, via Politico: Tommy Christopher at AOL got a head-scratching statement from the spokesman for the jeweler in question, who also denies the story as reported:

I regret to inform you that because of reports so wrong and clearly different from the reality of our statements, we decided to not issue statement on this matter.

Unfortunately, we were negatively affected by read on national and foreign media news stories that have no basement[sic], and in excess of the objective reality.

I inform you that we have no intention to disseminate more information about this story.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100784&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Anne Hathaway's Tainted Jewelry]]> The Smoking Gun got hold of the FBI's list of jewelry that pixieish actress Anne Hathaway (referred to only as a "girlfriend" or "individual") had to surrender because her ex-boyfriend, holy swindler Raffaello Follieri, bought it for her with his fraudulent proceeds. He was very generous with other people's money! There are a dozen items on the list, which must be worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Money is no object when investors are paying unknowingly! The full list, Rolexes and all:


Notable: some of these items were taken from the storage locker that also allegedly held a stash of nude photos of Hathaway. None of which have leaked yet.

[TSG]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048018&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Diamonds: Nice And Cheap, Or Big And Evil?]]> jewelry7.jpegHip hop mogul Russell Simmons reportedly had a suitcase full of his jewelry stolen from a downtown apartment yesterday. Considering the fact that the case contained "three diamond rings, a pendant, three sets of earrings and two bracelets," from Simmons' own jewelry company, the reported total value—$15,000—is pretty meager. That's partly because Simmons is involved a much-derided effort to improve the reputation of the diamond industry, which somehow trickles down to his own company in the form of cheap jewelry that gives a cut of its (relatively small) profits to charity. Which is better: Charitable, uglier, cheaper jewelry, or much shinier jewelry that embraces nothing but out-and-out materialism? These questions are important to moguls. To help you decide, there's a collection after the jump; Simmons' company's jewelry versus some pieces from Jacob the Jeweler—hip hop's gaudiest diamond guy. Each is terrible in its own way:

Simmons Jewelry


jewelry.jpeg

jewelry2.jpeg

jewelry3.jpeg



Jacob the Jeweler:


jewelry4.jpeg

jewelry5.jpeg

jewelry6.jpeg

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=396076&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[We Are All Made Of Diamonds]]> lifegem3.jpegIf having your loved one cremated and poured into a jar that sits in your house isn't enough remembrance for you, LifeGem has a better idea: take those ashes, subject them to a huge amount of force, and create a diamond to wear around. You'll always know the gem was made from, as the company puts it, a very special "carbon source"—that means your loved one! You can even get them for your pets, which are also diamond-worthy carbon sources. Once your order is delivered, we imagine, you sing a creepy little song about "the diamond within you," and cackle maniacally. Strange business. As TNR points out, this would be an apt fate for Charlton "Soylent Green" Heston. Below, some of the company's gently persuasive sales pitch, which is somehow hair-raising. There's no right way to sell this product.

Why choose a Precious Pet LifeGem diamond?

lifegem.jpeg

Because I'll always remember... how you preferred a milk jug to an expensive toy. how you ate everything I couldn't stand. how you protected me with your life, but secretly hid when I was gone. how you helped "break in" all of the new furniture. how you were always there for a hug when I needed it most. how you gave me a reason to come home. how I loved you with all my heart, but you always loved me more.

lifegem2.jpeg

For the love you share... If you have been searching for the most unique and priceless connection to the one you love, the LifeGem® is right for you. Each LifeGem®, created from the carbon in a lock of hair, symbolizes your precious and personal bond with another. With this closeness offered only by a LifeGem®, you will have your loved one with you and in your life at all times.
]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Walmart Diamonds Are the New Trucker Hats]]> 20051121walmart.jpgThis morning's Times reports the mildly terrifying news that Walmart, in a bid to expand its consumer base into slightly classier folks, has begun selling high-priced jewelry on its website.

Sometime soon, somewhere in the country, an aspiring groom will go down on bended knee, present a ribboned blue box to his sweetheart and watch as she beholds the yellow diamond ring on which he spent $10,000.

And unless his fianc e has a highly refined sense of irony, somewhere in that gentleman's mind he'll be hoping she doesn't ask where he got it.

But if she does have a highly refined sense of irony? Whoa, Nelly. She'll just love it. High-low! Trashy chic!

And we're sure your Williamsburg gal's Park Avenue parents will love you for it, too.

Where Is Wal-Mart's Fancy Stuff? Try Online [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=138490&view=rss&microfeed=true