NYT Story: 'Officer Who Shot Suspect Is Firearms Expert'
McKinley of the Times from Killeen: "Sergeant Munley, who is 34, is an expert in firearms and a member of the SWAT team for the civilian police department on the base, officials said.
She received two wounds in each thigh and one to her right wrist. The base’s fire chief applied torniquets to stop her bleeding, and she was taken to a hospital that the officials did not identify, where she was reported in stable condition on Tuesday."
This woman is the poster child for female heroes. She will be embraced, rightly so, by women's advocates everywhere.
I hope for her speed recovery, ney-sayers of New Gonzo Drifter. #forthood
Kim Munley's Twitter bio: "I live a good life....a hard one, but I go to sleep peacefully @ night knowing that I may have made a difference in someone's life." #forthood
And lastly, now that new details have emerged since this post's -- uhh -- orginally posting, the cop who shot Hasan is NOW OFFICIALLY A HERO, HAVE SHOT HIM WHILE WOUNDED HERSELF.
That is courage under fire. And nothing can be countered on that point.
This is dedicated to the uber leftist blowhards who accused me of blasphemy, of being a provocateur, of being an a**hole (see several hundreds comments below on this thread), and of shamelessly plugging my site, [lesneuhaus.com], I have garnered several hundred hits today.
Thanks lefty crazies.
Signed,
Moderate-to-left New Gonzo Drifter, nutter of the highest order! #forthood
I'm not sure why this has to be something that joins the long list of things liberals and conservatives fight over. It sucks when people kill for religion. It sucks when people kill because they can't get laid. It sucks when people kill because they get picked on at school. It sucks when people kill because they feel socially ostracized. It sucks when people kill so they can get their picture on the news. It sucks when people kill because their boss made them work overtime. It sucks when people kill because a TV host told them the government was going to take away their guns. It sucks when people kill because the IRS is unconstitutional blah blah fucking blah.
To me, I'm bored senseless by the "why" of the nihilistic disregard for human life displayed by all these fuckers, the absolute narcissism of thinking your "reasons" trump anyone else's right to continue living. Fuck no.
Muhammad told you to kill your fellow soldiers? Fuck him. Jesus wanted you to invade a country and take out a few hundred thousand civilians? Fuck him. Lord Krishna order you to torch that mosque and take back your temple? Fuck him and fuck your temple. Fuck your mosque, your church, your synagogue, your scripture, your holy places and your heritage. Fuck your cause.
Because if this is the service your God asks of you, your God is an asshole.
@Mediahohoho: Yours is an entertaining rant, but devoid of any legit intellectual value. Empty calories, like gulping down a soda that feels satisfying in the moment but has zero nutritional value. You're bulldozing over the complex meaning and purpose of religious affiliation with a storm of F words. I'm not sure how this makes us smarter, not Fox News-dumber, but whatever. #nidalmalikhasan
@snugbug: "You're bulldozing over the complex meaning and purpose of religious affiliation with a storm of F words."
That's not at all what she's doing. If killing isn't a service your god asks of you then your god isn't an asshole!
But, arguably, it's not your god but you whose the asshole in that equation, right? So god's off the hook! Unless even the good gods are as much a projection of their believers as the bad ones--something that does go toward understanding the complexities of religious affiliation, but not one that the religiously affiliated would appreciate. Too bad. #nidalmalikhasan
@Mediahohoho: I don't think your rant is "devoid of any legit intellectual value". It is making a great point, of being tired of hearing about the Whys of murder, as if there is a philosophical/religious excuse for randomly killing strangers/coworkers/passersby/etc. No need for a sympathetic psychological/sociological history of major religions to make the point. Maybe part of the problem is that organized religion gets far too much sympathy. #nidalmalikhasan
@Bulkington: Very good. Exactly. God is never the problem; man/womankind is. We invented God and then proceeded to put words into his mouth. I realize this last statement doesn't make much logical sense--you need to read it as a koan of some sort. I specialize in koans, you see. #nidalmalikhasan
@Bulkington: What the fuck are you people even talking about? Who are you saying this to? It astounds me that what amounts to little more than a quasi-poem scrawled in the margins of a Psychopathic Records notebook could be called a "comment of the century." So you've demonstrated that you can be despondent about shit. Awesome. Let's pat ourselves on the back some more. We've done a great job here.
It's bullshit like this that makes embarrassed to be an atheist, sometimes. But then, there are short-sighted nitwits in every group that reflect badly on the whole, amirite?
Anyway, the serious point to make is, it's monumentally stupid to boil down something like this to simple religion. It's never that simple. The foulest thing about this whole mess is that no one will learn from it. Islamic nationalism / militarism has little to nothing to do with Islam, and everything to do with elements of regional cultures violently resisting western encroachment. The idea of a global network of religious extremist only kind of came into reality after 9/11, when the Bush Administration became the proverbial bull in the china shop of the Middle East. The seeds of it were sewn long before that, in Cold War politicking and CIA meddling, in the side effects of American economic imperialism. This is all international politics.
"Al Qaeda" didn't spring from whole cloth. They were a locally-focused group who, after failing as a popular movement (fancy that, a bunch of devout muslims not deciding democratically to submit to ultraconservatives!) decided they'd use violence against their regional states, and ultimately came to the (probably accurate) conclusion that they would never come to power with Western nations involved in local events.
But the point is, it's kind of ridiculous and typical of lazy atheists to think that a person just picks up a holy book and becomes a violent warrior of faith. Yes, there is history behind it. Yes, there is sociology behind it. There's got to be an explanation why there are some muslims who never murder anyone and some who have the desire to murder everyone. It's grotesque and dishonest to paint them with the same brush.
What if we find out that this particular murderer was not part of a terrorist cell, but acted on his own spontaneously? It would make more sense to assume that there was something about his job, something about the war that pushed him irrevocably to the edge. But that's too difficult to think about, isn't it? Best to just sever that Gordian Knot. What's the worst that can happen? Yeah, fuck this nebulously defined group of astounding breadth. Punk rock!
@snugbug: @John Thompson: You both pretty much missed the point of everything I was saying. But you seem pretty satisfied with yourselves so enjoy. #nidalmalikhasan
@Mediahohoho: Oh no, I didn't miss it. You're angered by religiously inspired violence. We (well, at least I) was just reacting to the fact that you seem to have condemned entire religions & their base on account of the actions of a handful of cuckoo fringe lunatics that identified themselves as followers. Fair? Also, I'm never satisfied. Never, ever. Gimme more! #nidalmalikhasan
@snugbug: I really don't think that Mediahohoho condemned entire groups of religious people, only the mouthpieces of religion (fuck Muhammad, fuck Jesus, fuck Vishnu, not fuck Muslims, fuck Christians, fuck Hindus), and more importantly, s/he put it in the form of a conditional: IF your god tells you to kill, then fuck your god. S/he never said that "obviously the bible/koran/rig veda/norse sagas/dianetics led xyz to kill a bunch of people" #nidalmalikhasan
@snugbug: No, it was more in the line of stating my opinion that neither religion nor any of the other aforementioned reasons ascribed to mass murderers matter, are cogent or need to be dwelt upon by as serious elements of thoughtful discourse. I thought it was obvious.
For the record, my problem with religions has everything to do with their hijackers, the fundamentalists, who use these dogmas for their own selfish, narcissistic purposes. I think most people in all religions couldn't really give a shit, go through the motions and are embarrassed by their co-religionists' misuse of their various dogmas.
And I reiterate my opinion that anyone who undertakes the murder of unsuspecting, unarmed people really doesn't have an excuse grounded in any wothwhile philosophical or metaphysical paradigm because it is, by definition, an act of insanity. To me, Charles Whitman, Tim McVeigh and this prick have nothing to say to me because they're all just nuts.
But again, I'm not here to harsh on anyone who gets off on feeling intellectually superior to me. It's the least I can do, right? #nidalmalikhasan
Can't we leave gender out of it and say that anyone, male or female, who is a selfless, heroic bad ass should be allowed in combat to protect the rest of us who would be peeing in their pants? #forthood
that Hasan's rampage was an act of Islamist terrorism
Terrorism? The guy was attacking the military. How is that terrorism, which is almost exclusively defined as attack against civilian targets? #nidalmalikhasan
@beercheck: Well, yes? Attacking the military is generally thought of as an act of war, not terrorism. Although there's a lot of gray area when you are a lone shooter and you attack them at a doctor's office, you might just call this guy an act of crazy? #nidalmalikhasan
@DannyOcean: I'd say that's at least a little closer. Particularly since the (intended) victims were unarmed and included civilian(s). #nidalmalikhasan
I have a sort of wild suggestion. What if women who were qualified and capable of doing a job were allowed to do the job, whatever it may be? Sounds crazy right?
@morninggloria: Pardon me, but that's a facile analogy followed by a glib statement. God/Allah is real because people believe in it. Their belief is what makes God real in a more urgent sense that it would be if it had a concrete physical presence. #nidalmalikhasan
@snugbug: And furthermore, it's not "glib" to suggest that the violence carried out by people in the name of organized religion is horrible and senseless.
@morninggloria: Santa is defined as a perceptible physical entity that can fly, travel around the world in one night, and do a lot of other physically impossible things. Kids of 5 or 6, with their basic 'folk' knowledge of physics, usually cannot believe in such a thing.
It is part of the definition of God (and dark matter) that it is undetectable and imperceptible.
It is not impossible for something imperceptible to exist, even as part of the world described by physics.
Therefore (although I lean more on the atheist side), there is nothing inherently stupid or wrongheaded about a belief that God does exist (mind-independently).
Of course, is very difficult to defend that belief, as it is very difficult to defend a believe in many entities posited by theoretical physics. But we can argue about it civilly without calling people morons. #nidalmalikhasan
@sumreent001: Fair enough. This sort of shit makes me angry. Like, Hulksmash angry.
Sometimes I find myself immediately faulting religion without considering the fact that some people are just crazy and will figure out a way to carry out their crazy regardless of what they believe or do not believe. #nidalmalikhasan
@snugbug: Huh? Neither are real in a "real" actually existing sense. Which means they're made up like Santa or Peter Pan. The idea that people need to make up fairy tales and join a cult to explain their existence is a little irrational in itself. #nidalmalikhasan
@morninggloria: "Matt, I mean morninggloria, don't be glib!" (A tiny ray of sunshine in this otherwise deadly serious discussion..)
I'd argue that God was invented primarily to reconcile human beings to the mystery of their transitory nature. It was invented because us, humans, need to find a way to explain death to ourselves. The strong emphasis on coercive morality and such is a prominent tenet of Judeo-Christian-Muslim religions, but hardly as emphasized in Hinduism, Buddhism, and countless "pagan" or "native" systems of belief.
I do agree that organized religions often begets senseless violence. That doesn't negate the vital importance of spiritual/religious belief systems. ("Religion causes way too much fuckery to be justifiable.")
@morninggloria: Yes, I understand the anger. I'm pissed today too. Maybe because I expect military bases to be safe. It's how I felt when I heard that kids were murdered at daycare. Or those poor Jazzercising moms gunned down. It's genuinely fucked up and I wish I could stop it. #nidalmalikhasan
@sumreent001: I don't want to get deeper into an bigger argument about God's existence or non-existence on an internet post about a man who took the lives of a bunch of people who didn't deserve it. I would like to point out the fact that there is no universally agreed upon definition of Santa, or God (or the Tooth Fairy, or Osiris, or Vishnu or the Easter Bunny). You can't say with authority that one or the other is or isn't a physical presence or a purely metaphysical being. Different people have different ideas of what each of these things are, even within populations of believers. #nidalmalikhasan
@morninggloria: The fact that we can or cannot establish the "physical presence" of any deities in a scientific sense is not the point. If you believe in something, and it motivates you to move and act in the world, if it inspires you to do both good and evil, that "something" is real to YOU. You're right, maybe this is not the time or the place to get into a complex philosophical discussion about the nature of God. I wish more of us were familiar with the writings of mythologists like Joseph Campbell, or historians of religion like Mircea Eliade. There is nothing irrational, stupid or lame about faith and belief. #nidalmalikhasan
@morninggloria: Obviously we have different feelings about the value/veracity of God's existence, but I need to point out that condemning faith as the cause of "fuckery" is sort of the same as condemning the Muslim faith as the cause of this particular episode of violence- and as this article expressed, that is an overly simplified, dangerous, and ultimately wrong point.
I offer that this sort of complete refusal to consider something at more than a shallow depth is more worthy of blame in a situation such as this- by all accounts this guy was, for lack of a better word, bullied by his colleagues after 9/11 because of his Muslim background, which he may or may not have even personally embraced as a practicing member of the faith, and his superiors either weren't able to help him or weren't willing to, and he felt trapped in the institution, and it would appear that he snapped. None of this absolves his actions, however I think the analogy that is more apt than any religiously based violence is to the Columbine shootings , and if we are looking at something to pin blame on we would be best to look at the propensity for people to be cruel to other people who don't fit into some perceived category of "acceptable". #nidalmalikhasan
@morninggloria: I absolutely agree. That's not a point I would have expected a nonphilosopher to make. You can only argue for or against God insofar as you are arguing for or against a specific conception of what the term 'God' refers to. You cannot argue against "every intended referent of the word 'God'" because the word might be used to refer to my sandwich. But I know people who do that! It's like supposing that everyone who talks about "dark matter" is referring to a massive compact halo object. Some are referring to weakly interacting massive particles.
(When I speak of God in most casual settings, I'm speaking of the Omnipotent, Omniscience, Omnibenelovent imperceptible thing that the Abrahamic religions posit. I don't think that thing exists on purely conceptual grounds.)
I think Spinoza's different, 'heretical' conception of God as part of the natural world is way more plausible. I'm digressing a hell of a lot! #nidalmalikhasan
NPR reported this morning that earlier in his career he had given an outrageous "Grand Rounds" presentation on the Koran, citing approvingly comments like "Infidels will be beheaded." It was so outre that other Muslims in the audience raised their hands to point out that not all of them believe the Koran literally; NPR also reported that it caused a great deal of discussion at the time and caused people to wonder if he was going to do something violent. #nidalmalikhasan
@sumreent001: Oh, yeah, because we all know there's nothing violent in the Bible or the Koran, so I must be making that up. You might want to check with Saudi Arabia, because I believe they've got a couple of beheadings with crucifixions scheduled. Find out what they call it. #nidalmalikhasan
@Novaload: Did you even read my comment? I listed violent punishments in the Quran. Wait, maybe you are replying to the comment further up?
I never claimed that there was no violence in either book, and you have no grounds to say that I did. I expressed surprise, as a nontheist who was raised Muslim and knows about all the weird rules, including the one where your prayer is invalidated by audible or smelly farting (Hadith Bukhari), that the Quran mentioned beheadings. Is this some kind of Gawker custom/joke, attributing to commenters things that they didn't say? I don't get it. #nidalmalikhasan
@sumreent001: You don't get it. If you read the life and deeds of The "Prophet," he frequently engaged in it and condoned it. Surely he was not in error! #nidalmalikhasan
@GreyEminence: Also, did you know the enemy can smell menstruating women? Totally true, I swear it. Some conservative told me this in all seriousness. #forthood
The real reason why it is difficult for women to serve in combat is that the military depends on the use of misogyny to build unit cohesiveness which is necessary to combat success.
It is well known amongst military trainers that men in ferocious combat situations do not fight for nobility of the cause - they fight for each other. An important part of preparing soldiers for combat is to build unit cohesiveness. And the military uses misogyny as one of their tools to build that cohesiveness.
Just look at New Gonzo Drifter's comments below. How he blames the women he trained with for the fact that some of the soldiers he was training with had sex - with each other. As if the male soldiers had nothing to do with. They were consumed by the female soldier's voracious sexual appetites. And of course the female's voracious sexual appetite weakens the cohesiveness of the unit and its potential combat effectiveness. #forthood
@intime:
It really does remind me of the attitudes towards black soldiers in the '40s and '50s. The only way to overcome those prejudices was to force the military to confront them head on. 60 years later, I think success speaks for itself. #forthood
@ArmCandy: Please show me where I devalued anything.
"Civilian" and "contract" were the terms used by Ft. Hood officers in the press conferences I've been watching. "Rent-a-cop" is a perfectly common way to refer to them.
If you need to add something to my comments so you can whine about them, you have a personal problem. #forthood
@Jes St.Lawrence: @ArmCandy: Rent-a-cop is a perfectly common way to refer to people who carry flashlights and ride Segways in the mall. I think it's irreverent, derogatory and inappropriate in the context of talking about a woman who shot an armed gunman while saving the lives of soldiers from a crazed murderer.
JSL, while I think it wasn't your intention to belittle Ms. Munley, I think just saying civilian contractor = "rent-a-cop" did sort of come across that way.
I expect everyone to use colloquial expressions and to exhibit a black sense of humor on Gawker, even at times like these, because that's what I've seen them do. #forthood
11/06/09
McKinley of the Times from Killeen: "Sergeant Munley, who is 34, is an expert in firearms and a member of the SWAT team for the civilian police department on the base, officials said.
She received two wounds in each thigh and one to her right wrist. The base’s fire chief applied torniquets to stop her bleeding, and she was taken to a hospital that the officials did not identify, where she was reported in stable condition on Tuesday."
This woman is the poster child for female heroes. She will be embraced, rightly so, by women's advocates everywhere.
I hope for her speed recovery, ney-sayers of New Gonzo Drifter. #forthood
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
That is courage under fire. And nothing can be countered on that point.
Right? #forthood
11/06/09
Thanks lefty crazies.
Signed,
Moderate-to-left New Gonzo Drifter, nutter of the highest order! #forthood
11/06/09
To me, I'm bored senseless by the "why" of the nihilistic disregard for human life displayed by all these fuckers, the absolute narcissism of thinking your "reasons" trump anyone else's right to continue living. Fuck no.
Muhammad told you to kill your fellow soldiers? Fuck him. Jesus wanted you to invade a country and take out a few hundred thousand civilians? Fuck him. Lord Krishna order you to torch that mosque and take back your temple? Fuck him and fuck your temple. Fuck your mosque, your church, your synagogue, your scripture, your holy places and your heritage. Fuck your cause.
Because if this is the service your God asks of you, your God is an asshole.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
That's not at all what she's doing. If killing isn't a service your god asks of you then your god isn't an asshole!
But, arguably, it's not your god but you whose the asshole in that equation, right? So god's off the hook! Unless even the good gods are as much a projection of their believers as the bad ones--something that does go toward understanding the complexities of religious affiliation, but not one that the religiously affiliated would appreciate. Too bad. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
And I concur. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
Hmmmm....how about man made god long ago out of ignorance and fear?? #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
It's bullshit like this that makes embarrassed to be an atheist, sometimes. But then, there are short-sighted nitwits in every group that reflect badly on the whole, amirite?
Anyway, the serious point to make is, it's monumentally stupid to boil down something like this to simple religion. It's never that simple. The foulest thing about this whole mess is that no one will learn from it. Islamic nationalism / militarism has little to nothing to do with Islam, and everything to do with elements of regional cultures violently resisting western encroachment. The idea of a global network of religious extremist only kind of came into reality after 9/11, when the Bush Administration became the proverbial bull in the china shop of the Middle East. The seeds of it were sewn long before that, in Cold War politicking and CIA meddling, in the side effects of American economic imperialism. This is all international politics.
"Al Qaeda" didn't spring from whole cloth. They were a locally-focused group who, after failing as a popular movement (fancy that, a bunch of devout muslims not deciding democratically to submit to ultraconservatives!) decided they'd use violence against their regional states, and ultimately came to the (probably accurate) conclusion that they would never come to power with Western nations involved in local events.
But the point is, it's kind of ridiculous and typical of lazy atheists to think that a person just picks up a holy book and becomes a violent warrior of faith. Yes, there is history behind it. Yes, there is sociology behind it. There's got to be an explanation why there are some muslims who never murder anyone and some who have the desire to murder everyone. It's grotesque and dishonest to paint them with the same brush.
What if we find out that this particular murderer was not part of a terrorist cell, but acted on his own spontaneously? It would make more sense to assume that there was something about his job, something about the war that pushed him irrevocably to the edge. But that's too difficult to think about, isn't it? Best to just sever that Gordian Knot. What's the worst that can happen? Yeah, fuck this nebulously defined group of astounding breadth. Punk rock!
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
For the record, my problem with religions has everything to do with their hijackers, the fundamentalists, who use these dogmas for their own selfish, narcissistic purposes. I think most people in all religions couldn't really give a shit, go through the motions and are embarrassed by their co-religionists' misuse of their various dogmas.
And I reiterate my opinion that anyone who undertakes the murder of unsuspecting, unarmed people really doesn't have an excuse grounded in any wothwhile philosophical or metaphysical paradigm because it is, by definition, an act of insanity. To me, Charles Whitman, Tim McVeigh and this prick have nothing to say to me because they're all just nuts.
But again, I'm not here to harsh on anyone who gets off on feeling intellectually superior to me. It's the least I can do, right? #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Crazy Religious Does Something Crazy, Religious. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
Terrorism? The guy was attacking the military. How is that terrorism, which is almost exclusively defined as attack against civilian targets? #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Ones who are not, will not.
I dunno, that's just me. #forthood
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
01:15 AM
11/06/09
Religion causes way too much fuckery to be justifiable. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I feel like Matt Lauer. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
It is part of the definition of God (and dark matter) that it is undetectable and imperceptible.
It is not impossible for something imperceptible to exist, even as part of the world described by physics.
Therefore (although I lean more on the atheist side), there is nothing inherently stupid or wrongheaded about a belief that God does exist (mind-independently).
Of course, is very difficult to defend that belief, as it is very difficult to defend a believe in many entities posited by theoretical physics. But we can argue about it civilly without calling people morons. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
Sometimes I find myself immediately faulting religion without considering the fact that some people are just crazy and will figure out a way to carry out their crazy regardless of what they believe or do not believe. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I'd argue that God was invented primarily to reconcile human beings to the mystery of their transitory nature. It was invented because us, humans, need to find a way to explain death to ourselves. The strong emphasis on coercive morality and such is a prominent tenet of Judeo-Christian-Muslim religions, but hardly as emphasized in Hinduism, Buddhism, and countless "pagan" or "native" systems of belief.
I do agree that organized religions often begets senseless violence. That doesn't negate the vital importance of spiritual/religious belief systems. ("Religion causes way too much fuckery to be justifiable.")
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I offer that this sort of complete refusal to consider something at more than a shallow depth is more worthy of blame in a situation such as this- by all accounts this guy was, for lack of a better word, bullied by his colleagues after 9/11 because of his Muslim background, which he may or may not have even personally embraced as a practicing member of the faith, and his superiors either weren't able to help him or weren't willing to, and he felt trapped in the institution, and it would appear that he snapped. None of this absolves his actions, however I think the analogy that is more apt than any religiously based violence is to the Columbine shootings , and if we are looking at something to pin blame on we would be best to look at the propensity for people to be cruel to other people who don't fit into some perceived category of "acceptable". #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
(When I speak of God in most casual settings, I'm speaking of the Omnipotent, Omniscience, Omnibenelovent imperceptible thing that the Abrahamic religions posit. I don't think that thing exists on purely conceptual grounds.)
I think Spinoza's different, 'heretical' conception of God as part of the natural world is way more plausible. I'm digressing a hell of a lot! #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I never claimed that there was no violence in either book, and you have no grounds to say that I did. I expressed surprise, as a nontheist who was raised Muslim and knows about all the weird rules, including the one where your prayer is invalidated by audible or smelly farting (Hadith Bukhari), that the Quran mentioned beheadings. Is this some kind of Gawker custom/joke, attributing to commenters things that they didn't say? I don't get it. #nidalmalikhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
It is well known amongst military trainers that men in ferocious combat situations do not fight for nobility of the cause - they fight for each other. An important part of preparing soldiers for combat is to build unit cohesiveness. And the military uses misogyny as one of their tools to build that cohesiveness.
Just look at New Gonzo Drifter's comments below. How he blames the women he trained with for the fact that some of the soldiers he was training with had sex - with each other. As if the male soldiers had nothing to do with. They were consumed by the female soldier's voracious sexual appetites. And of course the female's voracious sexual appetite weakens the cohesiveness of the unit and its potential combat effectiveness. #forthood
11/06/09
It really does remind me of the attitudes towards black soldiers in the '40s and '50s. The only way to overcome those prejudices was to force the military to confront them head on. 60 years later, I think success speaks for itself. #forthood
11/06/09
11/06/09
He only attacked once his ass was getting sent to Iraq. Hardly noble, even if you do think suicide bombers are noble. #maliknidalhasan
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
"Civilian" and "contract" were the terms used by Ft. Hood officers in the press conferences I've been watching. "Rent-a-cop" is a perfectly common way to refer to them.
If you need to add something to my comments so you can whine about them, you have a personal problem. #forthood
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
JSL, while I think it wasn't your intention to belittle Ms. Munley, I think just saying civilian contractor = "rent-a-cop" did sort of come across that way.
Sorry that turned into a rant. #forthood
11/06/09
I expect everyone to use colloquial expressions and to exhibit a black sense of humor on Gawker, even at times like these, because that's what I've seen them do. #forthood
11/06/09
11/06/09