I understand that older gay men sometimes need to live out the “gay adolescence” they never had, but to me the person in the first two pictures is more attractive and intriguing than the one in the following thirteen, this pouty depilated exhibitionist caricature of a man.
Is there some sort of gay rule that if you like Deborah Cox, Abercrombie polos, and teh buttsecks that you MUST paste your hair into one of those half-up-half-down fauxhawks?
@ektorp: He's a bit of an asshole. But so are a lot of people.
I wouldn't say epic.
Any case he's not a person who's put himself "out there" as a public figure -- which used to be the (alleged) Gawker standard -- and as such doesn't merit this treatment.
"Valleywag" hasn't broken a story since god knows when, so I guess this kind of trifling, mean-spirited bs is what they're reduced to.
@jackbarber: you do realize that you are posting on an article on Gawker. The site with the masthead "Gossip from Manhattan and the Beltway to Hollywood and the Valley"
personal lives of public figures are a mainstay of gossip sites, the more personal the life and public the figure the better
@Private Hangnail: It's a sad state of affairs in this country when perfectly coiffed guys with shaved chests can't shirtlessly embrace each other while wearing bowties with rhinestones glued to themselves without someone coming along and pigeonholing them somehow. When will this county simply accept us men without trying to think in narrow notions of gender performance?
10/13/09
Whose memory stick has the *real* incriminating photographs?
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
I'm not particularly fond of the guy but WTF.
This isn't news, or even snark. It's just kind of mean-spirited and trashy.
Pls review the merit of this at your next editorial meeting. Thanks.
10/12/09
10/13/09
I wouldn't say epic.
Any case he's not a person who's put himself "out there" as a public figure -- which used to be the (alleged) Gawker standard -- and as such doesn't merit this treatment.
"Valleywag" hasn't broken a story since god knows when, so I guess this kind of trifling, mean-spirited bs is what they're reduced to.
10/14/09
personal lives of public figures are a mainstay of gossip sites, the more personal the life and public the figure the better
10/14/09
I am however well aware of where I'm "posting."
Maybe you should actually read my comment -- point being he's not a public figure by any reasonable definition.
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
And then, he. should. call. me.
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09