Can anyone explain why we all insist on labeling people like Jon Voight "conservatives?" They look and sound like wild-eyed revolutionaries to me. They certainly don't sound like they're interested in conserving anything.
@Ron_Obvious: Extremism meshed with conservativism kind of got meshed together during the Bush administration, a wild-haired freak show of thieving scumbaggery and loose cannon overreaching if there ever was one.
Oh jeez, is this going to be another day of the nut farm red highlighted comments? It's almost too much for a Monday and is making me kind of miss Chillbear.
I hope the dems have assigned a team to record and watch everything Huck says. That maniac is the only guy with enough charisma to win back the White House. It's going to take a whole lot of first-class ammo to stop him.
Man, I must be missing all of these crazy mandates that the government is handing down from Capitol Hill. I just bought a new car and... well, maybe he was busy that day, but I didn't get a phone call from Obama telling me what to get.
Oh, and free will. How ironic. God gave us the best gift of free will so that we could choose to be anything but homosexual. Free will, so that a teenage mother could be forced into raising a child that she knows she cannot support fully. Free will, so that if we choose to prefer peace over war, we're labelled hippies and dangerous to the America that "courageous" men and women like Jon Voight and Mike Huckabee have fought so hard to protect.
An article in the Washington Post, I believe, a few weeks back... in one sentence they mentioned the American soldiers and the families that they've left behind when going to overseas. They actually had the nerve to then refer to Voight in the next sentence as something of a warrior himself. I thought I was going to vomit.
@croush1211: Thanks for pointing that out. I see that Gawker is doing the same slavish bullshit the rest of the media has been doing for years, which is taking this fucking nutjob piece of shit Moonie paper seriously.
Fox News I guess I can see, but I refuse to take seriously anything that appears in the paper owned by the Korean reincarnation of Jesus Christ. It lacks the depth and objectivity of WorldNetDaily, and yet the abject hacks who work there work all the networks as if they didn't get their marching orders from a tax cheating cult leader.
Translation: I'm rich and can afford health care without worrying about insurance. My investment portfolio includes health insurance companies and pharmaceuticals gouging people who aren't rich to make me richer. All this makes sense because I have done massive amounts of drugs.
I overheard the most ridiculous rant at a wedding two weeks ago (in the church! moments after the ceremony!) "He's destroying the very fiber of this country! He's an Acorn, ACLU supporting socialist who is undoing everything this country is about!" I had to wait two more minutes to overhear him say "Obama" to clarify exactly what he was talking about before this man launched into the Sotomayor choice: "What a disaster this woman is! Every single decision she's made in her life is a complete disaster! He's absolutely destroying America" and on and on as the all too polite elder gentleman he was speaking to tried to redirect the idle chat he had somehow turned into a landmine. I had to walk away because I was getting angry and couldn't decide whether to get into or laugh in his face. Needless to say that was the sore loser Republican side of the aisle. Jon Voight, I'd give you the guys number if I knew who he was.
@Mediahohoho: Well, when your party platform consisted of "Do it this way, or else Democracy dies!" you're actually behaving rationally because you hold the maxim that anything opposite to your ideology is lethal. The difference between parties isn't even about ideologies anymore, as much as it is that one stands for "American ideals," whatever that means, and the other stands for "non-American ideals."
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
fixed.
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
Oh, and free will. How ironic. God gave us the best gift of free will so that we could choose to be anything but homosexual. Free will, so that a teenage mother could be forced into raising a child that she knows she cannot support fully. Free will, so that if we choose to prefer peace over war, we're labelled hippies and dangerous to the America that "courageous" men and women like Jon Voight and Mike Huckabee have fought so hard to protect.
An article in the Washington Post, I believe, a few weeks back... in one sentence they mentioned the American soldiers and the families that they've left behind when going to overseas. They actually had the nerve to then refer to Voight in the next sentence as something of a warrior himself. I thought I was going to vomit.
EDIT: Washington Times, not Post.
08/31/09
Fox News I guess I can see, but I refuse to take seriously anything that appears in the paper owned by the Korean reincarnation of Jesus Christ. It lacks the depth and objectivity of WorldNetDaily, and yet the abject hacks who work there work all the networks as if they didn't get their marching orders from a tax cheating cult leader.
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/31/09
06/11/09
Oh wait...
06/10/09
06/10/09
It's called a free and fair election.
The entire anti-Obama movement consists of sour grapes.
06/10/09
Never said it was a good maxim to hold though...
06/10/09
He's not one of us real Americans. It's not hard to figure out what it's really about.