<![CDATA[Gawker: jonathan safran foer]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: jonathan safran foer]]> http://gawker.com/tag/jonathansafranfoer http://gawker.com/tag/jonathansafranfoer <![CDATA[Dead Animal Helps Pan Book Decrying Animal Death]]> Yes, that was a real pig's head illustrating the New York Times' negative review of Jonathan Safran Foer's anti-meat-eating book, Gawker contributor Joshua David Stein has confirmed. The letters to the editor should be especially entertaining next Sunday.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5406027&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eleven Things You Could Do Instead of Reading Jonathan Safran Foer's Book about Not Eating Meat]]> 1. Eat a cheeseburger.

2. Eat some pork buns.

3. Eat some steak.

4. Eat some Gray's Papaya.

5. Eat some wings.

6. Eat some tacos. Pork tacos.

7. Eat some bacon (but don't be obnoxious about it).

8. Eat a bacon cheeseburger.

9. Eat some turkey. Some jive turkey.

10. Just be a vegetarian, and understand that most meat-eaters do respect your views, but that they're not as complicated and complex as you'd like to think they are, and that most people are actually, yes, quite aware of the arguments you'd like to "respectfully" make, what they're doing, the various reasons why it's uncool, and that we should eat more vegetables, and that we don't need to be guilted about it, and if we did, we'd read Michael Pollan's book instead, or at the very worst, Elizabeth Kolbert's New Yorker review of Jonathan Safran Foer's book, which is both (A) quite great and (B) will save you $15 or $20 and save us from hearing you opine on what you read by the guy that wrote Everything is Illuminated talking down to all of us about eating our vegetables.

11. STFU.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5399435&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Food Trivia]]> Jonathan Safran Foer: big fan of breast milk.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5239185&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who's Afraid of Jonathan Safran Foer?]]> The Guardian examines the phenomenon of Schadenfoer, also known as hatred of the rich young Brooklyn author Jonathan Safran Foer, he of the twee literary style and his seemingly charmed life.

To be sure, some Schadenfoer is actually literary jealousy over what some (correctly) view as undeserved success. But! While the Guardian asks, "Is this a case of Foer having reached a level of fame that makes him fair game for cultural lampooning?" we must point out that it's hard to feel sorry for someone who's actually, earnestly been quoted as saying, "too many people hate art." Whatever; let us present the case against him.


Literature:

Well, have you read it? Have you? In case not, a review from the New York Press a while back: "extremely cloying and incredibly false."

This NYT Op-Ed that he wrote: My Life As a Dog. It's about leash laws, I think? "Maybe one day we will be able to genetically engineer dogs that do not wish to run free. Maybe. But will those futures make us feel, in the best sense of the word, human?"

Lifestyle:

While some people may indeed be jealous that he lives in beautiful Park Slope with his wife and kid—let's be real, that is the most self-satisfied, smug, annoying neighborhood in Brooklyn. Then there was this total rumor from a while back about why they purchased a new house: "Well," [writer wife Nicole Strauss] said, "you know, we're planning to have at least two kids, and obviously we all need our own floor."

Attitude:

There was the time he got all undermine-y in Vanity Fair about his buddy's new play: "his play is hilarious and great. I hope it's bigger than The Lion King."

As he told the NYT, "I'm not funny. 'People assume that because my books are funny, I'll be funny in real life." Nope.

Wonkette suggested that you could recogize Jonathan and his brothers by "their wire-rim glasses, sensible-but-disheveled style of dress, carefully cultivated air of quiet superiority, and the smuggest little smirk you've ever seen." Heh.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jonathan Safran Foer and the Secret of the Mystery Book]]> A renovation of a grand Fifth Avenue apartment by a very creative architectual designer, Eric Clough, resulted in a scavenger-hunt puzzle being built into the place. The apartment—for a young family—was secretly outfitted by the designer with coded messages, scrolls, and and an original mystery book that gave clues. It was a magical game for the kids to solve—and the parents didn't even know it was being built into their house! Who was asked to be involved? And who turned it down? Why, Brooklyn novelist Jonathan Safran Foer.

In assembling talents for his project, Mr. Clough aimed high. His first choice for the author of the book, which contains clues to the scavenger hunt in addition to the mystery story, was Jonathan Safran Foer, whose work contains its own sort of coded narrative pyrotechnics. Mr. Clough sent him a little tease, a Rubik’s Cube of a sculpture made of anodized aluminum, encased in an acrylic cube that opens into a puzzle stamped with his firm’s phone number and the word “Please.”

Mr. Foer was intrigued and gave him a call. In an e-mail recently, Mr. Foer recalled that his daughter had just been born, and he was adrift in a fog of new parenthood. “It was a very good piece of mail that came at a very bad time,” he wrote. “I was losing and ignoring all kinds of things that I shouldn’t have. Did we speak on the phone? The whole thing was so dreamy I can’t really remember. In fact, the project was never described to me as simply as you did in your e-mail. Had it been, I would have rushed to do it. I suppose that’s the price one pays for being as mysterious as Clough is. Or as skeptical as I am.”

In case you missed it, that was a NEG. That said, the over 40 people involved in creating the fantastically complicated built-in house-puzzle were not paid.

Mystery on Fifth Avenue [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5015920&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jonathan Safran Foer Has The Shingles]]> ...according to a tipster who says this shocking fact was "revealed in an email to the writing class he's teaching at yale." Also: "heard he's very grumpy and said this week's essays had better make life worth living." Anyone else have more details? Is this our fault? Did we give him the shingles with our psychic ill-will?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372449&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[JONATHAN SAFRAN FOER, UNDERMINER]]> In response to Vanity Fair's earlier item about the play by an old friend of novelist Jonathan Safran Foer, about how novelist Jonathan Safran Foer suddenly got very rich and famous while his old friend did not, Foer says, "his play is hilarious and great. I hope it's bigger than The Lion King." [VF, Earlier]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372040&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Someone Wrote a Play About Jonathan Safran Foer!]]> From lovable Brooklynite novelist Jonathan "Safran" Foer (the hip one!) to New Republic editor Franklin Foer (he's the serious one!) to stunt-rememberer and baby brother Joshua Foer (he will come up with some way to bother us later!), everyone loves the Foer Brothers. Everyone except, apparently, playwright Itamar Moses, who has written a play about how much he hates his successful old band camp buddy Jonathan Safran Foer. Vanity Fair noticed that the two main characters in Moses's The Four of Us are quite a bit like Moses and Foer, as one is a mostly unknown playwright and the other is a ridiculously successful young novelist. There is some jealousy. Then Moses makes fun of Liev Schreiber!


Sure enough, Scene Two takes place inside the apartment of the actor who has optioned Benjamin's book. The scene opens with David remarking, "I've never been in an apartment where the owner has so many pictures of his own face on the walls."

Amusingly, VF's Michael Hogan tried to reach Schreiber and Foer for comment on this bitchy play that makes fun of them, but they were unavailable, as they were having a money fight.

The play ends, appropriately, with playwright "David" and novelist "Benjamin" leaving the play itself.

"How could you write about me?," Benjamin demands.

David's response says it all: "How could you not write about me?"

Answer: Mr. Moses, you do you appear to speak in a whimsical pidgin English. We assume you're Jewish, though, so you're halfway there.

There is a good lesson here for aspiring playwrights, though. Bratty autobiographical playwriting is only fun when it mocks someone we can all hate on.

Literary Feud Watch: Jonathan Safran Foer vs. Itamar Moses [VF]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371900&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Being a Brooklyn Writer turns out to be...]]> Being a Brooklyn Writer turns out to be exactly how you imagine it to be, if debut novelist Porochista Khakpour's Facebook status update is to be believed.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318948&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA["Yale Visiting Professor Jonathan Safran...]]> "Yale Visiting Professor Jonathan Safran Foer" has a nice ring to it! According to one Yale English prof: "He's got quite a buzz surrounding him right now in literary circles." Oh! Hmm. Also! "Although Foer was rejected from Yale as a high school senior and attended Princeton University as an undergraduate, his brother Joshua Foer '04 said he thinks Jonathan and Yale will be a better match this time around." [Yale Daily News]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312531&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['Page Six Magazine': The Glossy Publication Of Our Functionally Retarded Generation]]> The best way to describe the brand new Page Six Magazine is New York as told to Life & Style, a verdict we would have delivered sooner if the president of Iran had not provided such irresistible fodder for our celebrity. fashion. feminism. website.* To be sure, we hear the News Corp overlords gave the editorial team approximately forty-seven minutes to launch the thing, but on the other hand, the editorial team was stocked with alums of Jane and Radar and the magazine reads like it's vying to steal the transit authority's lucrative "Learn English" account. In a way, it's almost appealingly illiterate: snotty society types like Arden Wohl and Carine Roitfeld feel more like footballer's wives in the large, bubbly fonts offset by subheads laden with retarded "Six" puns. (SIXaholic! SIX and the City!)

astleypagesix092507.jpgThere's also something to be said for the ingeniousness of its editorial-advertising department synergy: in one six-page (ooh, see what we did there?) feature, "Fall Fashion Picks from the Pros," the magazine actually enlists executives at five major department stores to assemble seasonal "looks" from clothes, accessories and cosmetics all entirely available at their respective employers. (Also intriguingly, the stylist on the feature appears to have been paid by the department stores themselves?) But where the magazine exercises editorial independence it falls flat: its warmed-over list of the 25 best-dressed ladies at New York Fashion Week included Teen Vogue editor Amy Astley, whom we've pictured here so you can ogle all that personal style she is exuding. Its columnists, too, are still clearly finding their voices: an item by "Socializer" columnist Kelly Killoren Bensimon contains the puzzling rumination: "You can't afford cigarettes or taxis anymore. Might as well walk outside. Might as well walk outside and inhale the toxic fumes. I look at it as the new nicotine." Huh. However, as with any middling celebrity tabloid, P6TM serves up a few little nuggets of gold blissfully un-couched by editorial commentary. Like for instance here's author Jonathan Safran Foer complaining about the movie Liev Schrieber made from his book:

"There's an old saying. Don't f—- a pig in the a— and then bitch and moan when your d—- smells like s—- the next day."
Uhhhhh, no comment!

*And also, to be sure, if we hadn't been writing a miniscule item for the magazine earlier, because we have a lot of friends who work there, at least we did before we wrote this review.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=303441&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Jewish Cabal Of Publishing]]> Hey, have you ever noticed that famous bestselling authors like Michael Chabon, Jonathan Safran Foer, Nathan Englander, Nicole Krauss, and Myla Goldberg all have something in common? That's right: Jewiness. I know, you're shocked. But did you also know that an under-the-radar Jewish organization called the Jewish Book Council may be somewhat responsible for these young heebs' rises to fame and fortune? In a column that will run in this Sunday's book review headlined 'Star Search' (heh!), Rachel Donadio explains the inner workings of the Jewish Book Network, which holds American Idol-style cattle call auditions, described as "somewhere between J-Date and a camel auction," for Jewish authors. The winners then get to tour Jewish book fairs around the country, which doesn't sound like such a prize until you learn, as we just did from a publicist, that authors can sell "up to 300 books" at each of these events, which is nothing to sneeze at. The Jew tour does have its perils, though, as one author learned: "Do not follow the woman who has just published a book on how all her children were murdered in Treblinka. It's much preferable to follow the woman who has 100 halvah recipes." Oh, those nutty Jews and their culturally-specific brand of humor!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=271378&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Joshua Ferris Running Scared Of Foer-Krauss Mafia]]> ThenWeCame Young Joshua Ferris's debut about working at an ad agency at the tail end of the dot-com boom is one of our favorite books we've read in a while, so it pains us to have to acknowledge that he is a pussy. At his book party, he told us in no uncertain terms that Jonathan Safran Foer and Nicole Krauss "deserve all the shit you guys heap on them." Ok, it was a festive occasion and perhaps the celebratory cocktails had loosened Ferris's lips, but! Here's his current take on whether or not The Most Important, Rich, and Precocious Literary Couple Of Our Time deserve to be mocked: "Whatever shit they may or may not have deserved is far less than the shit I deserve for having said publicly that they deserved any shit whatsoever. I spoke unnecessarily of a very minor matter about which I knew very little, and so despite the likelihood that my comments didn't even reach them, I'm glad you asked, so that I can set the record straight: I'm the shitheel." I'll say!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265163&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jonathan Safran Foer and Nicole Krauss Need Their Space]]> Oh, those crazy Safran Foer Krausses! We had almost managed to convince ourselves that they didn't matter anymore—after all, they've been too busy pooping out little scribblers to crank out any irritatingly overhyped books lately. But last night we heard this tidbit, from a source close to the writers, that made us feel the inadequacy of our lives and real estate holdings as sharply as we did when we first read of their acquisition of a $6.7 million Park Slope brownstone. Apparently, Nicole was recently asked why she and Jon found it necessary to move from their old house, a $3 millionish brownstone a block away. "Well," she said, "You know, we're planning to have at least two kids, and obviously we all need our own floor."

Earlier: Extremely Large and Incredibly Expensive

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=244444&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Glaring Literary Power Couple Omission]]> Yesterday, we asked you to choose your least favorite among the Jonathans, Bens and Davids of the literary world and their lovely writer-spouses. You voted for Jonathan Safran Foer and Nicole Krauss by a pretty substantial margin, spanking runners-up Davendela and Michayelet. Nicole wins a signed copy of the execrable Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, and Jonathan will receive a signed copy of the 'we hear it's not bad but we have a deep-seated antipathy towards anything contemporary with 'Love' in the title which always strikes us as a marketing gimmick' The History of Love. The couple will also receive a free lifetime subscription to nonexistent UnderCover magazine as well as the privilege of being henceforth referred to as Jonicole. Unfortunately, we didn't include every lit-scene power pair in our poll; a commenter wrote in Salman and Padma (how could we forget her contribution to the canon, Tangy Tart Hot and Sweet?). But the omission we feel worst about has got to be this one:

Regarding all our uber-jealousies of powerful literary couples, what about Alice Sebold (The Lovely Bones, Lucky, and a forthcoming novel from Little, Brown) and Glen Davis Gold (a novelist and McSweeney's vet)? Admission: I work for Sebold's literary agent, so I'm biased as can be.
We'd never really considered this pair to be annoying before — but who are we to contradict someone who works for Sebold's agent? We'll be reading between the lines of the press she does for her forthcoming dead-child tearjerker for clues now, that's for sure.


Earlier:
Annoying Literary Lovebirds Poll

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228332&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Annoying Literary Lovebirds Poll]]> For a long time, we've dreamt of a magazine called UnderCover, which would basically be Us Weekly but for literary "celebrities." The whole thing would be like "Jennifer Egan loses the baby weight!" and telephoto lens shots of Jonathan Franzen Safran Foer (admit it, you can't keep 'em all straight either) and Nicole Krauss's Park Slope manse. Sadly, the market could never sustain such a thing, but we figure the least we can do in order to keep the dream alive is to do a poll inspired by your response to our item about Heidi Julavitz yesterday. In it, we called Heidi and her dh, Ben Marcus, our "fourth least favorite literary power couple," and it got us to wondering: who's your fourth least favorite literary power couple? And while we're at it, who's your most least favorite l. p. c.? There is only one way to find out.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

The members of the winning couple will receive a signed copy of their significant other's latest novel and a lifetime subscription to UnderCover, and an annoying composite nickname (ex: Davendela).

Earlier:
Heidi Julavitz: There's So Much More To Me Than Sanctimonious Scolding

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228171&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Joshua Foer Sells Film Rights to Unwritten Memoir]]> joshua-foer_bookcase_150.jpgSo yeah, Slate scribe and Jonathan Safran Foer sib Joshua sold his memoir about memorizing shit to Anne Godoff for a cool 1.2 million, like we said.
Today we learn that film rights to the book, now tentatively titled Moonwalking with Einstein, have sold to Paramount.

The book sold on the basis of a proposal, which we hear was rather scanty and unimpressive. But maybe Joshua's a really kickass writer whose work is worth a ton of money. Let's dip into our own archives and see if we can come up with any evidence either way . . . ah, here we go. Joshua Foer, on Conor Oberst:
That first song, "The Big Picture," with its lo-fi hollering that sounds like it's pouring out of a blood-splattered shower, is both a self-referential homage to the raw pubescent angst that first brought a 13-year-old Oberst to the attention of the music establishment and a mature reflection on the album's central theme: the relationship between art and artifice.
Fuck it, we're changing our last name to Foer, wiping our ass, and then selling the tp to the highest bidder.

Par Pix Nabs Foer Memoir [Variety]

Earlier: Who Loves Bright Eyes More?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213970&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sara Gruen To Find Out What Happens When Monkeys Stop Being Polite, Start Getting Real]]> A tipster informs us that the author of summertime sleeper hit Water For Elephants has sold her next two books, the first of which, The Ape House, is about "monkeys who live together in a house," to Cindy Spiegel at Spiegel and Grau, for the highly improbable-seeming (but hey, whatever) sum of 5.2 million, making Joshua Foer's 1.2 million deal (a memoir which sold to Ann Godoff yesterday, and yes he's JSF's little bro) look like a bargain. Bookscan has Elephants at a totally respectable but not mindblowing 132,503 — Bookscan, of course, is always sorta wrong — and foreign rights to it sold all over the place. Still, 5.2 million for a follow-up to a book which — well, we'll let this book blogger sum it up: "the plot is non-existent, the characters are superficial, there is too much talk of penises and it is just a completely non-memorable basic quick read." So what we want to know is: really? And, if so, was it because of penises? Tell us.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=211659&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bookish Brooklyn Party to Feature Jonathans, Maclarens]]> Recipe for September 16 Brooklyn Book Fest:

Ingredients:
Jonathan Safran Foer and wife, Nicole Krauss
Jonathan Lethem
Jhumpa Lahiri
Rick Moody
Colson Whitehead
Gary Shteyngart
Marty Markowitz

Place bylines and egos in Borough Hall; stir for three seconds or until pretentious. Serve chilled.

Brooklyn Will Soon Fete Its Literary Stars [NY Sun]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=194561&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jonathan Safran Foer Will Not Stop Until You Renounce Meat]]>
We're not normally in the business of alerting you to horrifying videos of mistreated animals — we prefer to limit ourselves to only presenting that sort of footage when it has to do with magazine assistants. So we'll spare you the graphic video we just watched about a kosher slaughterhouse, even if the footage is narrated by the eerily calm Jonathan Safran Foer ("These animals had their throats ripped out while they were still fully conscious").

Instead, we'll go with the more lighthearted behind-the-scenes reel, in which Foer talks about how being a vegetarian is "as easy as easy could be." Wish we could say the same for watching the video, which requires you to look directly at the overly precious JSF for an uncomfortable length of time.

If you still want to see Foer's tour of the bovine bloodshed, you can do so here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165353&view=rss&microfeed=true