• Profile logout login

#joshquittner

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:01 AM
Sun Nov 8
10 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #joshquittner more →

    Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?

    How Not to Save Newspapers

    Time magazine reporter uncovers identity of "You Suck at Photoshop" spoofs

    Ex-Business 2.0 editor leaves Fortune for Time

    Fortune columnist fails to disclose Arrington tie

    Ex-Business 2.0 editor dumping Fortune for housing blog?

    Quittner "silenced," says Fortune colleague

    Facebook's foolish foes

    Fortune editor in town to boss ex-B2 staff around

    CBS Web chief bored when not buying startups
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Jackson West Jackson West
    06/25/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    Well, at least now I know who to snub at the Whole Foods in Mill Valley.
     Reply
    Jackson West was starred Jackson West was unstarred
    Image of Motoko Kusanagi Motoko Kusanagi
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    Time is like the Lotus Notes of media properties.
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi was starred Motoko Kusanagi was unstarred
    Image of Drunken Economist Drunken Economist
    06/25/09

    @Motoko Kusanagi: So when are you going to mention bynkii.com then?
     Reply
    Drunken Economist was starred Drunken Economist was unstarred
    Image of Pinekatz Pinekatz
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    Owen dished it, too.


    He poked at people, made fun of other journalists, ridiculed people for their physical characteristics and regularly fought with some beloved commenters.


    Ryan, you guys run in a rough crowd!


    Owen will be okay. I kind of hope this turns into a spy v. spy scenario where they regularly light each other on fire.

     Reply
    Pinekatz was starred Pinekatz was unstarred
    Image of Helman Helman
    06/24/09

    @Pinekatz: Extremely well put, my friend.
     Reply
    Helman was starred Helman was unstarred
    Image of Mount_Prion Mount_Prion
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    To answer your question, no, you do not. OT is no longer part of the above "we".
     Reply
    Mount_Prion was starred Mount_Prion was unstarred
    Image of unclevanya unclevanya
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    Not to be a party-pooper, but didn't Owen sort of start it? Who wouldn't take Owen's first article personally, since he apparently had an ax to grind?


    I'm sensing a Perez/Will.I.Am mojo working here, only substitute "nerd" for "gay".


    (I know I'm going to get my head chopped off, but what the hell..work is slow tonight)

     Reply
    unclevanya was starred unclevanya was unstarred
    Image of Helman Helman
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    No comment.
     Reply
    Helman was starred Helman was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    06/24/09

    @Helman: Heh.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    06/24/09

    @Helman: But what an asshole thing for Quittner to do, eh?
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of Helman Helman
    06/24/09

    @Aaron Altman: I've done it in my head.
     Reply
    Helman was starred Helman was unstarred
    Image of Helman Helman
    06/24/09

    @Aaron Altman: But, ok, yes, it was asshole-y.
     Reply
    Helman was starred Helman was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    06/24/09

    @Aaron Altman: @Helman:


    Hi guys!


    Coming to the Top Chef Masters live-blog tonight?


    Hope so.

     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    06/24/09

    @MisterHippity: Um. I think it was asshole-y too.
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of Helman Helman
    06/24/09

    @MisterHippity: It was funny!
     Reply
    Helman was starred Helman was unstarred
    Image of Sargasm Sargasm
    06/24/09

    @Helman: Your star! It shines so brightly now that somebody's moved on!
     Reply
    Sargasm was starred Sargasm was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    06/24/09

    In reply to Do We Need a Restraining Order Against Josh Quittner?
    Quality control you pizza-fueled orangutans!


    Where's the video? There's a link down the post that takes us to a review of a sony virtual world.


    How is Second Life these days by the way? Do they have a stable user base or has it gone kaputski? Are they making any money?

     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    i'd pay for stuff that was worth reading


    but the same old, "republicans are telling obama what to do" when obama won and they lost is worthless in print or online


    new model needs to include new content, which has at least glancing contact with reality

     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Figaro Figaro
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    Micropayments don't work. They've never worked and never will. So many startups have tried it and failed.


    I bet it has something to do with human psychology... but I can't put my finger on it.

     Reply
    Figaro was starred Figaro was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    02/05/09

    @Figaro:


    Perhaps someone could set up a basic account with a line of micropayment options, like texting on cell phones.

     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    I think they ought to pay the readers five cents for making it through a Maureen Dowd column.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    Maybe an all-issue sponsor is the way to go, like that issue of The New Yorker where all the large display ads were from Target.
     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of markscottmusic markscottmusic
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    I think micro payments are exactly the way NOT to go. You will decrease readership and time on site by making people think before each click "do I really want to pay 3 cents for this story." The beauty of the web (and old fashioned print newspapers and magazines) is that if an article is boring or not what you thought, you move on to another one with nothing lost except the cost of the overall subscription. But if you get burned 10 or 12 times with articles it turns out you didn't want to read but wasted money on anyway, you'll stop going to that site all together. Americans are much happier paying a one-time subscription knowing that during the course of that subscription they will read things that interest them than they are willing to potentially waste money on articles they end up paying for but not wanting to read. Even if the pay-per-story model ends up costing the reader less money, the fact that they may be actively wasting money will be more important to them than passively wasting it.
     Reply
    markscottmusic was starred markscottmusic was unstarred
    Image of LatestBy LatestBy
    02/05/09

    @markscottmusic: Exactly. And it will mean that less-important-but-drier stories end up getting read less than "Britney in rehab!", which means that over time everything devolves into US Weekly.
     Reply
    LatestBy was starred LatestBy was unstarred
    Image of LatestBy LatestBy
    02/05/09

    @LatestBy: That should be "more important".
     Reply
    LatestBy was starred LatestBy was unstarred
    Image of MrInBetween MrInBetween
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    Outstanding post, Owen. And that fish looks unhappy having Friedman and Dowd gumming up its gills.
     Reply
    MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred
    Image of izzyrowlands izzyrowlands
    02/05/09

    In reply to How Not to Save Newspapers
    Whatever you say Mr. Thomas, but that is a pretty sweet cover.
     Reply
    izzyrowlands was starred izzyrowlands was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    02/05/09

    @izzyrowlands:


    Is that a red snapper in there?

     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of sample032 sample032
    02/05/09

    @Smitros:


    I bet the Times takes the box.

     Reply
    sample032 was starred sample032 was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    02/05/09

    @sample032:


    Now that's a find.


    I think taking the box has been the prevailing business model at the Times for a while, alas.

     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of nirreskeya nirreskeya
    02/05/09

    @Smitros: Should have been a red herring.
     Reply
    nirreskeya was starred nirreskeya was unstarred
    Image of Smitros Smitros
    02/05/09

    @nirreskeya:


    Ha!


    Or a flounder.

     Reply
    Smitros was starred Smitros was unstarred
    Image of ifstone ifstone
    02/05/09

    @izzyrowlands: The legend, "A Modest Proposal" does not belong on the cover, and not on that cover.
     Reply
    ifstone was starred ifstone was unstarred
    Earlier threads | All threads | Show hidden threads | Show featured threads only | Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.