I swear I am not a complete food nazi, but really people, is it so hard to make a bowl of oatmeal in the morning? Buy it in the bulk bin and it is the perfect recession breakfast food.
@pony_express: OR hit your local truck stop for their $2.99 special of eggs fried in yesterday's ham grease, bacon so crisp it's a two-snapper, home-fries, and a side o'biscuits with gravy! C'mon people, it's not that hard! (And for $1 more, you can add a six-ounce steak on the side!)
@pony_express: Amen! I have a massive, massive box I bought at Sam's club almost a year ago. It cost me $5 and nearly a year later, I'm only halfway through it. Economical! Tasty! Healthy!
@pony_express: My ten year-old would gladly eat bowls of oatmeal, but my four year-old would prefer one of the Cheerios or Kix.
(In addition to nutritional labeling, we also limit artificial colors and this rules out a lot of cereals)
@SybilDisobedience: While cheap, I think it'd be difficult to get kids to eat the same breakfast, every day for a year and kids do seem to be this program's aim.
The aisles of my local supermarket seem to have lots of non-crap breakfast options - whole wheat bread, yogurt, Cheerios, Chex, fruit, etc. These sugary brands have been around for 40 years and sane parents didn't buy them back then either.
@CParis: I was just pointing out that oatmeal every day would get boring for a kid and could be unpalatable to the very young. Not to mention that the flavored, instant stuff isn't any healthier than some cereals, plus I believe they contain artificial colors.
Around my house, nutritional labeling and the ingredient lists are king. They reign supreme.
From what I understand about "Smart Choice", the foods will have some minimum standards and though I think it's a cute marketing ploy to get you to look beyond the top "healthy" brands, I don't really see anything wrong with it, as long as you read the label.
And with all that said, I'll add that though my kids have never had them, I'm almost fifty and was raised on Froot Loops, while my brother preferred Apple Jacks and neither of us are any worse for wear.
@ShanghaiLil: Not sure what happened but...
For instance: plastic grocery bags, small parts of metal toys, lead paint chips, rabid squirrel and heroin. Compared to these things, Froot Loops is indeed a "smarter choice" for breakfast.
Well, Froot Loops, for example. It's a cereal so patently un-fruity, its creators have to spell their product's name incorrectly in order to avoid possibly misleading consumers of it actually containing any fruit.
The only people who eat so-called nutritious and healthy foods are effete homosexuals and shameless people who aspire to be effete homosexuals and live the gay lifestyle. What we need here is to use the sound principles of trickle-down health. Scientific studies show that as rich people consume expensive but nutritious foods and stay healthy, their health gently trickles down into the mouths of the obese and diabetic poor. Socialized nutrition should not be allowed to destroy America!
@ShanghaiLil: *Gasp* Okay, first off, that is no way to talk to the Lord, thy God. Secondly, your vivid description of the previous night's (sinful, natch) activities simply make no sense given who you say you are. This is all too much for me to figure out. So I'm just gonna call you an agent of Satan and settle this. Also, I unleash a plague of horny cougars upon thee!
@Paul_Is_Drunk: It happens elsewhere, it's hard enough to get news about wars we're not in so one would expect that foreign food content scandals would rarely make it into our stream of info.
Also, the world is just starting to learn about the food monstrosities we've created.
See the checkmark on the food industry's cock is a good for you product, now suck on it bitch. Oh yeah that's good OH YES. CHECK MARK THE HOTDOGS OH YES OH YES LIMA BEANS GET AN X OH YES OH YES CIGARETTES ARE HEALTH-EEEEEEE. Omg that was great.
This is horrible considering the diabetes and obesity epidemic. Dr. Kennedy should be let go from Tufts. As a public health educator she has the professional and ethical responsibility to properly educate the public not help to dupe them.
"The checkmark means the food item is a ‘better for you' product, as opposed to having an x on it saying ‘Don't eat this,' " Dr. Kennedy said.
What is this moron a "doctor" of, I wonder? How does that statement even make sense, are there regions of the country where foodstuffs are actually labelled with an "X" to counter-indicate consumption?
It's phony nutritional relativism. If there was any 'truth in advertising', this would be "NABA" labelling, and products would have to list the things they are comparatively "Not As Bad As...", i.e., "These Pop-Tarts are NABA a bag of pork rinds, or NABA a can of Ready Whip for breakfast!"
09/06/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
(In addition to nutritional labeling, we also limit artificial colors and this rules out a lot of cereals)
@SybilDisobedience: While cheap, I think it'd be difficult to get kids to eat the same breakfast, every day for a year and kids do seem to be this program's aim.
09/06/09
The aisles of my local supermarket seem to have lots of non-crap breakfast options - whole wheat bread, yogurt, Cheerios, Chex, fruit, etc. These sugary brands have been around for 40 years and sane parents didn't buy them back then either.
09/07/09
Around my house, nutritional labeling and the ingredient lists are king. They reign supreme.
From what I understand about "Smart Choice", the foods will have some minimum standards and though I think it's a cute marketing ploy to get you to look beyond the top "healthy" brands, I don't really see anything wrong with it, as long as you read the label.
And with all that said, I'll add that though my kids have never had them, I'm almost fifty and was raised on Froot Loops, while my brother preferred Apple Jacks and neither of us are any worse for wear.
09/05/09
I have this problem every time I go to the Froot Loops and Donuts supermarket. There just aren't enough options.
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
For instance: plastic grocery bags, small parts of metal toys, lead paint chips, rabid squirrel and heroin. Compared to these things, Froot Loops is indeed a "smarter choice" for breakfast.
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/06/09
09/05/09
So what's Grape Nuts' excuse? :[]
09/05/09
09/05/09
"Reese's Puffs -- now with nutrients!"
09/05/09
I wonder how you sleep at night, Dr. Sell-out.
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
09/06/09
09/07/09
09/05/09
Glad to see it's not that rare.
Side-note: Why does this crap only happen in the US?!
09/05/09
Also, the world is just starting to learn about the food monstrosities we've created.
They think we're fat because we're lazy.
MWAHAHAHAHAHA
09/05/09
Your money is on the bedstand, c'ya next week.
09/05/09
09/06/09
09/05/09
What is this moron a "doctor" of, I wonder? How does that statement even make sense, are there regions of the country where foodstuffs are actually labelled with an "X" to counter-indicate consumption?
It's phony nutritional relativism. If there was any 'truth in advertising', this would be "NABA" labelling, and products would have to list the things they are comparatively "Not As Bad As...", i.e., "These Pop-Tarts are NABA a bag of pork rinds, or NABA a can of Ready Whip for breakfast!"