Enter your username and password.
New York, 9:05 PM
Sat Dec 5
24 posts in the last 24 hours

Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
04/03/09
04/03/09
04/03/09
04/03/09
Or maybe it's just hidden in the darkness on the edge of town.
04/03/09
04/03/09
01/20/09
Impeccable sources.
01/20/09
Ooops. We aren't suposed to tell.
01/19/09
01/19/09
Good job on not mentioning his height on this one. That's classy.
01/19/09
01/19/09
There are a couple of CNBC reporters who are mostly fraudulent. Gasparino is one -- his "sources" consisting of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg or whomever just put out the story that he goes on TV yelling about. Faber and Bartiromo have real contacts, and maybe Becky Quick too. The rest of them I never trust. They are just thieves.
01/20/09
01/19/09
I'm perfectly prepared to believe that CNBC reporting is FoS and having a policy that just says "trust us" doesn't help.
But I'm wondering about the other majors. Do other networks and newspapers publish their rules for sourcing?
Save me some research here.
01/23/09
AP Statement On Anonymous Sources
New York Times Policy On Confidential Sources
At a glance. I tried to find Reuters, but was unable to.
01/23/09
Happy reading!
01/19/09
01/19/09
The only inference I can make from the latest announcement is that some form of treatment is under consideration during the six months which may prevent him making day to day operational management decisions for a short period. Therefore a statement has to be made about the management implication of that, and a deputy explicitly identified. That's been done, and his medical advisers are now immediately free to have first call on his body and time, ahead of Apple, to pursue whatever treatment they decide, including surgery if required, during the next 6 months. Nevertheless, he's still expected to have plenty of time to work on Apple strategy.
But I repeat: when the board (which includes SJ) know he probably can't do his job any more for medical reasons, they have to disclose. Any reporter who says they have such undisclosed knowledge is saying the board of Apple are criminals. Better have good reasons.
01/20/09
01/19/09
Could be Goldman was duped!
01/20/09
01/20/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/05/09
Jobs previously had surgery for pancreatic cancer, which is nearly always deadly.
The pancreas produces insulin.
Insulin is a hormone.
Jobs has a 'hormonal imbalance'.
Hmmmm.......
01/07/09
01/05/09
01/05/09