The real problem is not that Jimmy isn't funny (though too often he isn't); the real problem is that Jimmy is not bright.
Leno and Letterman are hardly Rhodes scholars, but they're much more intellectually well-rounded. Conan is very well-educated and bright. Kimmel is sharp and thoughtful, and I assume about as well-educated as Jon Stewart, who takes top prize as a profoundly intellect working in comedy.
And all that matters a great deal when you have to tell topical jokes and carry on interesting conversations every night. If the funniest comics made the best late night hosts, The Chris Rock show never would have gone off the air.
Fallon is a calculation aimed at getting younger viewers in front of the tube--but it's a terribly short-sighted bet. He can speak their language, sure, but he won't be able to grow with them. Rather they will outgrow him, and fast, while the next batch of fickle youngsters will want out one of their own--or someone on top of their game.
Rather than betting on Fallon, or hoping to bribe Stewart into selling out, a better investment would have been to incubate a new late night format entirely. The first network to hatch an intrepid formula that works could own late night for generations to come.
I personally think it's great the Fallon's take on the Late-Night show is shaping up to be different than the norm, be it purposefully or not. I appreciate his slightly awkward sense of humor, plus having the Roots as his house band is completely bananas. It's easy to forget that many of the people we think of today as the Kings of Late Night had questionable moments during their first seasons, too.
@ɟɹnsǝɥʇɥdɹnɯ: I love the vertical orientation of your name! Also, I too am enjoying Fallon's show, much to my shame. He can be quite funny sometimes. He's very good at accents and songs! Needs to stop getting his showbiz pals on and coasting, though.
@Judgy McJudger: He played a goofy HS teacher in Fever Pitch and, I have to admit, pretty much nailed it. I think his character's subject was math, though.
@bananaballs: I admit he comes off like a wreck on the show but I went to the taping yesterday and he's actually really really funny. All of his guests were cracking up. True story.
@imnotreallyabianca: He was interviewing another (former?) SNL guy, I forget the name, but they were just sort of riffing off each other. It was like they were hanging out and they didn't really regard the fact that there was an audience. It was dead silent.
I'm not saying he isn't funny, I smiled a few times, but he doesn't quite grasp the concept of "interview with a live studio audience." Who knows, maybe he just got carried away because him and the guy had a lot of stuff in common? Either way, I felt like a walked in on 2 guys have a bro-tastic conversation. About show bizness.
03/31/09
I think I'm turning Japanese
I really think so."
03/31/09
Leno and Letterman are hardly Rhodes scholars, but they're much more intellectually well-rounded. Conan is very well-educated and bright. Kimmel is sharp and thoughtful, and I assume about as well-educated as Jon Stewart, who takes top prize as a profoundly intellect working in comedy.
And all that matters a great deal when you have to tell topical jokes and carry on interesting conversations every night. If the funniest comics made the best late night hosts, The Chris Rock show never would have gone off the air.
Fallon is a calculation aimed at getting younger viewers in front of the tube--but it's a terribly short-sighted bet. He can speak their language, sure, but he won't be able to grow with them. Rather they will outgrow him, and fast, while the next batch of fickle youngsters will want out one of their own--or someone on top of their game.
Rather than betting on Fallon, or hoping to bribe Stewart into selling out, a better investment would have been to incubate a new late night format entirely. The first network to hatch an intrepid formula that works could own late night for generations to come.
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
I'm not saying he isn't funny, I smiled a few times, but he doesn't quite grasp the concept of "interview with a live studio audience." Who knows, maybe he just got carried away because him and the guy had a lot of stuff in common? Either way, I felt like a walked in on 2 guys have a bro-tastic conversation. About show bizness.
03/31/09
03/31/09