Seriously. And whatever happened to "viral marketing," NBC? I'm surprised they didn't leak this weeks ago and do some dumb video posted anonymously to Williamsboard to get us excited. Dud.
the moment a girl brings up a random un-aforementioned kidney disease and the magazine she works for in the same sentence in mid-kiss, is the moment she gets escorted to the actual hallway, sans hotdog.
Even ol' beardy in the clip kinda has a look like "uh, what?" instead of one of sympathy.
That was the hot dog reference? There's a scene of someone buying a hot dog in every single episode of Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Law & Order: Trail by Jury and Law and Order: Munchausen By Proxy.
I was disappointed in the episode. It was only halfway through that I realized this was going to be the Hipster Grifter one. I saw no effort in being "hipster" and I think that the storyline would've been better for L&O CI. *Sigh* I have no life.
By the by, you don't actually have to show ID to the police in New York State unless they are detaining you.
I am not a lawyer, but I've read New York State's stop-and-identify law (NY CLS CPL §140.50(1)), and it refers to officers detaining suspects, which requires "reasonable suspicion" that you've committed a crime.
See also the case People v. De Bour, which lays out four tiers of police intrusion and what the police are allowed to do, and what justification they need to prove to allow them to do it. Simply put, they can approach anyone and talk to them. And cops can ask for ID and other information, but you don't necessarily have to show it to them. If a cop has "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot", they can ask more intrusive questions, but still can't compel you to identify yourself, and you're free to leave at any time.
Under the third tier, if there's "reasonable suspicion", it's the equivalent of a Terry stop, and they can compel you to show ID, and they can detain you.
The fourth tier requires "probable cause" and is essentially an arrest, if i'm reading it correctly.
However, the upshot is that lots of people get arrested and worse for "contempt of cop", and I wonder how far flexing your rights and asking police to adhere to the law will go. If the cops arrest you, rightly or wrongly, and the judge throws it out, you'll still have gone to jail and have your evening/day/weekend ruined.
@i'm a bottle: That's exactly right, and why a lawyer is a better person to talk to than li'l ol' me. But it remains that a police officer has a higher hurdle to clear when detaining you or making you show ID than when he's just talking to you or asking you questions.
"I do not consent to a search" and "Am I free to go?" are good things to remember. That's no guarantee that it won't antagonize the cop, however...and like I said, being arrested would ruin your day, regardless of whether or not it's a bogus arrest.
Repeat after me: "I don't consent to any search." That is all you have to say. No more, no less, whether you have anything illegal on you or not! Watch the ACLU Busted video. Get all of your friends to watch it - the more we know about our rights, the better we are as a country.
@hibiscusflower: The problem is that all the cop has to state to establish probable cause -- the prerequisite for a body search -- is that the person's eyes were bloodshot or glassy, or that the person was slurring his/her words. The DA will take the cops statement as a fact and you'll have to try your luck -- and shell out thousands of dollars -- to fight that supposition in front of a jury, which will probably believe the cop if s/he actually finds something. It's a fucked up system. It all comes down to the policy that we arrest people for minor things like having a few drinks or smoking a little dope.
@cockeyed: That's not true. Here's the scoop:
No Requirement to Carry ID
TX Penal Code: Sec. 38.02. Failure to Identify.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
(1) lawfully arrested the person;
(2) lawfully detained the person; or
(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time of the offense, the offense is a Class B misdemeanor.
Ed. Note: Here's what this law means in plain English.
(1) You don't have to carry a driver's license or other ID, if you're not driving.
(2) If you've been arrested you have to give your name, address, and date of birth to a police officer who requests it. (They'll police ask you for lots more than this, but these three items are all you're legally required to give them.)
(3) If you've just been detained, not arrested, you don't have to give thm squat. But refusing to identify might cause them to arrest you anyway and take you downtown so they can determine who you really are. If this happens, you still won't be charged with failing to carry ID, because there is no such crime.
(4) It's a crime to give false information about your identity, whether you've been arrested or just detained..
late to the game, but for new yorkers who spend more time walking about, riding public transit and whatnot when they might otherwise be "compromised", try not carrying identification. it's the first thing nypd ask for when they suspect anything. you could also try affecting a foreign accent, and they'll probably pass you up for most anything--too much paperwork.
A Cop that pulled over... [cough cough] a few friends of mine in Duchess County asked them if they had anything 'illegal' and said that he "probably wouldn't even write a ticket" if they were were honest with him. Unfortunately they had expired out of state registration, so he was already Kosher to search the car. Knowing Cops to be liers, and already in 'bracelets,' they did exactly as this article suggests and when he found what he was looking for he wrote them all tickets and told them that "if you had only been honest, you'd already be on your way right now." In short, you can't win. Luckily, a few phone calls later, Duchess County realized how wealthy and white they were, and all was fine.
Good rule of thumb: It never helps to volunteer information about yourself to the police (beyond maybe name and ID which can be the difference between a summons and a trip to the precinct). If they want to arrest you and they can arrest you, you can not talk yourself or help yourself out of it, no matter how much they say that you can. If they want to arrest you but they can't arrest you, you can, however, talk yourself and help yourself into it. And most people do.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
Even ol' beardy in the clip kinda has a look like "uh, what?" instead of one of sympathy.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
[www.brandonbird.com]
This is an incredibly absurd stretch.
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/06/09
....I was hoping for a crazy tattoo. Oh well.
10/06/09
10/06/09
08/11/09
I am not a lawyer, but I've read New York State's stop-and-identify law (NY CLS CPL §140.50(1)), and it refers to officers detaining suspects, which requires "reasonable suspicion" that you've committed a crime.
See also the case People v. De Bour, which lays out four tiers of police intrusion and what the police are allowed to do, and what justification they need to prove to allow them to do it. Simply put, they can approach anyone and talk to them. And cops can ask for ID and other information, but you don't necessarily have to show it to them. If a cop has "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot", they can ask more intrusive questions, but still can't compel you to identify yourself, and you're free to leave at any time.
Under the third tier, if there's "reasonable suspicion", it's the equivalent of a Terry stop, and they can compel you to show ID, and they can detain you.
The fourth tier requires "probable cause" and is essentially an arrest, if i'm reading it correctly.
However, the upshot is that lots of people get arrested and worse for "contempt of cop", and I wonder how far flexing your rights and asking police to adhere to the law will go. If the cops arrest you, rightly or wrongly, and the judge throws it out, you'll still have gone to jail and have your evening/day/weekend ruined.
08/11/09
08/11/09
"I do not consent to a search" and "Am I free to go?" are good things to remember. That's no guarantee that it won't antagonize the cop, however...and like I said, being arrested would ruin your day, regardless of whether or not it's a bogus arrest.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
No Requirement to Carry ID
TX Penal Code: Sec. 38.02. Failure to Identify.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
(1) lawfully arrested the person;
(2) lawfully detained the person; or
(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time of the offense, the offense is a Class B misdemeanor.
Ed. Note: Here's what this law means in plain English.
(1) You don't have to carry a driver's license or other ID, if you're not driving.
(2) If you've been arrested you have to give your name, address, and date of birth to a police officer who requests it. (They'll police ask you for lots more than this, but these three items are all you're legally required to give them.)
(3) If you've just been detained, not arrested, you don't have to give thm squat. But refusing to identify might cause them to arrest you anyway and take you downtown so they can determine who you really are. If this happens, you still won't be charged with failing to carry ID, because there is no such crime.
(4) It's a crime to give false information about your identity, whether you've been arrested or just detained..
08/11/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09