• Profile logout login

#layoffs#html

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 11:09 AM
Tue Dec 1
57 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of sweetpickles sweetpickles
    11/25/09

    In reply to Martha Stewart Caught in Bed With Big Government
    Do magazines think people want to wait for their regurgitated content on a monthly basis again? No. They do not. Silly magazines. You're going to have to offer people subscriptions to a bunch of your sites. And not .pdfs.
     Reply
    sweetpickles was starred sweetpickles was unstarred
    Image of momof3wildkids momof3wildkids
    11/25/09

    In reply to Martha Stewart Caught in Bed With Big Government
    From the looks of the picture, Martha Stewart is in bed with something other than the State Dept.

    With that stick, it is no wonder she doesn't need a man.
     Reply
    momof3wildkids was starred momof3wildkids was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/25/09

    In reply to Tipster Confirms Ten Layoffs at the New York Post
    Back in the 80s, my first real job was a reporter for a local bi-weekly up in Putnam county. The only other reporter on the staff of that paper - hired the same time I was was - is now a reporter for the New York Post.

    Although I haven't to him in over 20 years, I hope he's not on this layoff list. He probably isn't though, since the Post hired him only a year ago, and he's really good.
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of MisterHippity MisterHippity
    11/25/09

    @MisterHippity: I know that was probably interesting to nobody but me, but I just felt like sharing it. It's the "reminiscence disease." Comes with age, I guess.
     Reply
    MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred
    Image of gawkimo gawkimo
    11/25/09

    In reply to Tipster Confirms Ten Layoffs at the New York Post
    "the dismissals are not economically motivated"

    Of course not. Has the Post ever made money?
     Reply
    gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred
    Image of hgitty hgitty
    11/25/09

    In reply to Tipster Confirms Ten Layoffs at the New York Post
    There aren't any minorities at the Post, anymore.
     Reply
    GlasgowRose approved this comment hgitty was starred hgitty was unstarred
    Image of GlasgowRose GlasgowRose
    11/25/09

    Not so: there's at least one lesbian racist in the bunch.
     Reply
    GlasgowRose was starred GlasgowRose was unstarred
    Image of kappakappaspankme kappakappaspankme
    11/25/09

    In reply to Tipster Confirms Ten Layoffs at the New York Post
    I'm a bit confused. The tipster states that these people should have been released a while ago. Then he/she goes on to say that most of them are minorities.

    Were these employees tapped to be right-sized out of the building due to poor performance? Were they given the shitty assignments because they were minorities?

    Given the tipster's comments, I'm not sure if we should be upset that minorities are being unfairly targeted or if we should simply feel badly for yet another round of layoffs.
     Reply
    kappakappaspankme was starred kappakappaspankme was unstarred
    Image of hannapdx hannapdx
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    Oh no! I'm getting married in 2011, how will I ever know how to plan my own wedding without the help of overpriced wedding mags?!!!
     Reply
    hannapdx was starred hannapdx was unstarred
    Image of 2Winners 2Winners
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    This is actually great for all celebrity brides. Haven't we all heard of the InStyle Weddings Curse? (Jennifer Morrison from "House," I'm looking in your direction)
     Reply
    sarrible promoted this comment 2Winners was starred 2Winners was unstarred
    Image of sarrible sarrible
    11/24/09

    @2Winners: Luckily, Christina Hendricks just killed the magazine, not her own relationship.
     Reply
    sarrible was starred sarrible was unstarred
    Image of Perhaps Not Perhaps Not
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    In a related story, jeepers h. christmas Christina Hendricks is so unbelievably hot I'm afraid my monitor is going to melt and fuse with me desk.
     Reply
    Perhaps Not was starred Perhaps Not was unstarred
    Image of manchops manchops
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    more and more reasons to LEGALIZE GAY MARRIAGE!
    I mean, seriously! Start submitting the mag titles now, this could SAVE the whole industry!
     Reply
    manchops was starred manchops was unstarred
    Image of rmric0.wedding.photographer.and.manny rmric0.wedding.photographer.and.manny
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    I really don't understand how you couldn't make money on a bridal magazine. Your readers only get them for a year (unless they've gone way overboard) and then you can start recycling content (with some new pictures and up to date references). The only work to be done is selling ad space.
     Reply
    rmric0.wedding.photographer.and.manny was starred rmric0.wedding.photographer.and.manny was unstarred
    Image of manchops manchops
    11/24/09

    @rmric0.wedding.photographer.and.manny: because the demo is so directly targeted (as in: I just got proposed to! I need to plan a huge wedding! Where do I start? What do I do?) the advertising in these mags was huge! and at top rates. Sorta like a mag for people who just won a million dollars and had never heard of a retail store.
     Reply
    manchops was starred manchops was unstarred
    Image of ArtfulSlinger ArtfulSlinger
    11/24/09

    @manchops: Shouldn't then the magazine just become more targeted in region? So the ads could coordinate with the content, like New York Mag. You do a few editions, have local affiliates, etc.

    Im here all week Time Inc, whatever you need from me.
     Reply
    ArtfulSlinger was starred ArtfulSlinger was unstarred
    Image of manchops manchops
    11/24/09

    @ArtfulSlinger: You're right, and that's probably what's happening. Local mags and newspapers always do special wedding supplements and are teaming with all those tuxedo rental, caterer kinda ads. Face it, the big glossy wedding mags were basic nuptial porn. Hard to afford these days...
     Reply
    manchops was starred manchops was unstarred
    Image of ArtfulSlinger ArtfulSlinger
    11/24/09

    @manchops: Not only that not at all helpful compared to the blogs. There are hundreds of blogs just focused on printed collateral, let alone dresses, decor, rings, etc.
     Reply
    ArtfulSlinger was starred ArtfulSlinger was unstarred
    Image of manchops manchops
    11/24/09

    @ArtfulSlinger: basically the demo got younger, like all the demos, and use the internet. I've been in magazines for a dozen years and could never believe how they just sat back and let this happen.
     Reply
    manchops was starred manchops was unstarred
    Image of sweetpickles sweetpickles
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc. Folding InStyle Weddings
    Another piece of the straight marriage industrial complex's soul: ripped to shreds! Now our lady partners will have to consult gay blogs to see which napkins are hot this season.
     Reply
    sweetpickles was starred sweetpickles was unstarred
    Image of louise louise
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc's Pre-Thanksgiving Layoffs
    Let's hope the SI/Fortune PTB don't follow their HBO brethren's example and have the HR head do a victory lap w/her VP showing off new mink coats purchased with their bonuses.
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle promoted this comment louise was starred louise was unstarred
    Image of dreweverett dreweverett
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc's Pre-Thanksgiving Layoffs
    At least one print outlet is being "resurrected." From TPM - "Staff of the Southern Voice, a gay weekly in Atlanta and one of the handful of publications shut down abruptly by parent company Window Media last week, have received a $12,000 matching grant to start a new publication. "

    Anyway, thought some good news would be in order...

    [tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com]

    #Tips
    #The Gays
    #Thingswelike
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle promoted this comment dreweverett was starred dreweverett was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/24/09

    In reply to Time Inc's Pre-Thanksgiving Layoffs
    Naturally the horrible murders in the Philippines dwarfs anything else in this post--the enormity of the evil is staggering. But to deal with what my mind can wrap itself around, does anyone else remember when companies--even magazine companies--had sufficient humanity to wait until after the holidays to do layoffs? Now the objective is just to get 'em off the expense side before the new budget kicks in. I always wonder how the executioner executives can watch or read A Christmas Carol unironically.
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of Pesti-Esti Pesti-Esti
    11/24/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: I would argue that it is still before the holidays. After what date would you no longer lay people off? November 1? Labor Day? Yeah, laying someone off on December 15 is kinda prickish, but lets get a handle on extending the holidays t0 over 15% of the year.

    On the bright side, at least they were laid off before they did their shopping. In a way, it's probably better than being laid off on January 10. Not that being laid off anytime doesn't suck.
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy promoted this comment Pesti-Esti was starred Pesti-Esti was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/24/09

    @Pesti-Esti: I think laying someone off two days before Thanksgiving is dickish. What should be the cutoff? In the old days, it was usually November 1.

    #tips
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    11/24/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: Fortune laid me off a couple of weeks before my wife gave birth, so I wouldn't go looking for a lot of humanity there.
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    11/24/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: +1111111111111
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    11/24/09

    @Mediahohoho: Sadz
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/24/09

    @Mediahohoho: Yeah, that is awful. Anytime a company refers to its employees as "our family," I reach for my pistol.

    #tips
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.