<![CDATA[Gawker: Laziness]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: Laziness]]> http://gawker.com/tag/laziness http://gawker.com/tag/laziness <![CDATA[ Laziness Is Not Your Fault ]]> Like obesity, alcoholism and voting Republican, laziness now has a genetic explanation. Maybe. The research is still as preliminary as the draft of your great American novel but, according to Time, an unimprovably named scientist, J. Timothy Lightfoot, has "identified 20 different genomic locations that work in tandem to influence activity levels in mice." The alpha rodents ran 5 to 8 miles a day on the treadmill (the equivalent of the 40-50 or so miles that Barack Obama runs), while the betas did more creative things with their workout equipment, such as turn it into a bed or toilet, or use it to get a better look at the weird machines monitoring their every non-movement. As ever, my money's on the inquisitive fatty.

[G]enes may affect either the way muscles work — perhaps causing them to use energy more efficiently and preventing fatigue — or some higher-order biochemical circuit in the brain, such as levels of the neurotransmitters dopamine or serotonin. Researchers have examined the muscle tissue of the mice in the study, however, and early data, which has not yet been published, suggests there's no difference in their function. So researchers' best guess is that the drive to exercise is at least partly influenced by brain chemicals...

Not to worry. Natural born sluggards can still smoke themselves thin.

[Time]

]]>
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:37:13 EDT Michael Weiss http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031016&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Where Does Page Six Get Its Sterling Prose? ]]> axlrose.jpegHere's the lead to Page Six's item today about Dr. Pepper's Guns N' Roses PR stunt: "TIRED of a world in which Americans idolize wannabe singers, and where musicals about high school students pass as rock 'n' roll, Dr Pepper is begging Axl Rose to finally release this year his 17-years-in-the-making album, "Chinese Democracy." Such powerful language! Now here's the lead to the press release announcing the same event:

Tired of a world in which Americans idolize wannabe singers and musicals about high schoolers pass as rock 'n roll music, Dr Pepper is encouraging (ok, begging) Axl Rose to finally release his 17-year-in-the-making belabored masterpiece, Chinese Democracy, in 2008.

Awesome work.

]]>
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:24:21 EDT Hamilton Nolan http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372656&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 'Time Out' Thanks You For Writing Their Stories For Them ]]> tony.jpg"Hello there. This is Michael Freidson, deputy editor at Time Out New York. I'm writing with a few questions. Can you please take a moment to answer, for an urgent feature story?," began an email spammed to a group that Michael Friedson identified as "New York's top opinion-makers" on Tuesday. Judging from the questionnaire that follows, Time Out has decided to eliminate the use of troublesome freelancers by just having their sources write their articles.

"We're doing an issue devoted to critics and bloggers, and, since you're one of New York's top opinion-makers, we want to include your thoughts. Please answer the questions below and send back to me by Monday, November 26 (or even better, before you run off for the holiday). Your answers can be as long as you'd like, though a graph or two is fine. We're going to compile everyone's answers and present different takes in the magazine."

Sure! Let me just ... jot down my deep-thinky responses to eight questions ranging from "We're at this crossroads, where print and online content are intertwined, and no one's sure how it all falls out. In this environment, what is the essential question facing the future of criticism?" to "What basic pre-requisities should all critics have to meet? And how should a consumer deal with the different (undefined) standards for online critic-bloggers and print critics? How should they know who to trust?" (Shut up, college!) to "How does one make an impact online?" as I'm running to catch the Acela! No problem whatsoever.

"The above questions are very general. Surely, we missed something. Have anything to add? Please do." the email concludes. You know, there does seem to be something missing here.

]]>
Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:30:43 EST Emily Gould http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325446&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Joe MacLeod, America's best newspaper columnist, ... ]]> blogger!Joe MacLeod, America's best newspaper columnist, proves his mettle today by phoning in a column nearly entirely composed of Gawker comments about his last column. "This fucking gawker gets people to click on their shit and they make money on that, with ads, so that's, like, stealing from me, so even more-plus, I don't have to write anything this week, har!" We can only aspire to such transparency regarding our equally strong desire to not work! You win this round, MacLeod. [Baltimore City Paper]

]]>
Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:00:54 EST Choire http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Will Elijah Pollack Ever Get A Day Off? ]]> elijahWe recently launched a sneak attack against daddy-author Neal Pollack's adorable 4-year-old son, Elijah. Or more accurately, we launched a sneak attack against author Neal Pollack shamelessly exploiting Elijah for his own literary ambitions. Pollack responded. Fark weighed in. Facebook profiles were updated. Pollack expressed a realization: That his constant blogging of Elijah exposes the little tyke—or rather, the trite twee petite-bourgeoise portrayal of him—to public scorn. One might think this would prevent Pollack from sending little Elijah back into the baby mines. But then one would be wrong.

From Pollack's latest post on Epicurious:

went to the grocery store with my family today and wandered around in the haze of my most recent public identity crisis, dutifully loading the cart with apples, bananas, and whatever else Regina told me to get. My exchanges with Elijah were minimal. I swore that I wouldn't mine this trip for blog material. Enough already.

And then we reached the checkout line. Or at least my body did. My mind was somewhere far away, in a place full of waterfalls and self-pity. I heard Regina's voice echo in my skull.

"Neal," she said.

"Huh?"

"Look what your son is doing."

I turned around. Elijah was sitting in the shopping cart, smelling a pack of bacon, and going "mmmmmmmmm."

"Elijah," I said. "Why are you smelling the bacon?"

"Because it smells so good," he said.

He turned the package over.

"And the back of it smells even better," he said.

"Is he not supposed to be doing that?" I asked Regina.

"Well," she said, "it's a little weird, but I don't see how it's harmful."

So we let him smell the bacon until we had to put it on the conveyor belt. Later, at home, there was ham for dinner, at least for the boy. Regina and I knew that our dinner would be too spicy for him.

We're having a realization of our own. Neal Pollack simply hates actually working.

]]>
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:22:56 EDT Joshua Stein http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306069&view=rss&microfeed=true