This is Oscar's favorite trick. He waits until the prize is overdue, and then gives it to ya for your least appealing work. This way you know you deserved it, but everyone else gets support for their give me a break argument.
Yes, I know Oscar isn't one dude. (kicks dust around)
I thought Wall-E was the best movie of the year by far. It was gorgeous to look at, laugh-at-loud funny, and sweetly romantic. To me, it represented the purest form of "motion picture" - the epitome of visual, emotional (but also thoughtful) storytelling. It won't win Best Picture, but it would deserve to.
@llililill: agreed. i appreciated it because at least the nolans tried to rise above the comic book dreck. however, it still had a lot of problems. too long, choppy editing in the first act, and the ending? meh. and i know i'm going to get hosed for this, i thought ledger was okay. not legendary. just okay. he should get nominated but downey jr. should win it.
but then again, these are the oscars. so fuck it all.
There is a big danger in promoting Wall-E further by awarding it Oscars. What American viewers, and apparently critics, consistently remain blind to will be obvious to viewers the world over: those obese humanoids with ingrown legs and arms, illiterate, floating on the flying armchairs while having their vision restricted to the images on the screens in front of their noses, and slurping liquefied chemically enhanced nutrients are actually depicting current Americans.
Aren't Americans these days required to be better than totally careless about their global image?
Can they please give the Oscar to a mega-blockbuster just once? "The Dark Knight" is gloomy and serious, like those small flicks they like to nominate, without the smallness. They've been complaining their ratings are sinking because they nominate obscure movies no one watches, so there you go.
@postnocomments: Can they please give the Oscar to a mega-blockbuster just once?
Just in the last twenty years, The Lord of the Rings, Titanic, Gladiator, Forrest Gump, Braveheart, and The Silence of the Lambs have all made loads of money and won best picture at the Oscars. Most of them have also kind of sucked. If they're really concerned about declining viewership, the Academy should cut back on the excesses of the ceremony, not the quality of the movies they're nominating.
Also, was I the only person who thought that The Dark Knight was good until you actually thought about it? The acting was great, the cinematography was great, but in the end, wasn't it kind of pretentious? And weren't the weird political parallels kind of off-putting (by this I mean Batman=Bush, which I found almost impossible not to read in it)?
Richard, I hope you didn't tell the whole Wall - E story up there, because I haven't seen it, and Pixar beats Disney like a Chicago pimp finding his ho's last two dollars. So, uh, yeah that's a must see for me.
Also, kudos to you for Let the Right One in. Between 30 Days of Night and this Twillight blasphemy I thought the real vamp-makers started working for TV creating shows like My Own Worst Enemy or some such nonsense. Hope has been restored.
@Spirit Fingers: you didn't see Wall-E??? Please see it as soon as humanly possible. You will laugh, you will cry, you will be in awe of the landscapes...it's stunning and heartwarming. Holy crap, I think I just wrote the back of the DVD boxed set.
Definitely Milk. Not only is it extremely critically acclaimed, I think some voters will see it as a chance to make up for the HUGE mistake that was Crash winning over Brokeback Mountain.
@smartastic: Yeah, but it lost to Silence of the Lambs, which had slightly more cannibalism and inspired a far better stage musical: [www.jonandal.com]
@SisterMaryMartha: I remember seeing it in a shitty one-screen theater and being completely awed by how beautiful the first sequence was. And the fact that a spunky, book-loving girl was the heroine was the icing on the cake.
Since obviously the Academy Awards don't actually mean anything, I say Wall-E is perfect. There are artier films, more adventurous films, maybe even better films -- but right now, all I really want to do is watch a movie where robots fall in love and it turns out we're not screwed, after all.
That being said, isn't Milk actually the most zeitgeist-y film? Or has Hollywood still not gotten over their whole "gay people make us uncomfortable so we'll just give this prize to the movie where Sandra Bullock is racist" thing?
@eatsshootsleaves: Is Milk getting good reviews? I was super excited for All the King's Men and then suffered a serious dissapointment. I was kind of expecting the same here, but would be very happy to know that Sean Penn is back.
@Iceland_Spar: I think it is. I don't really know. Every review I've read of it has been good, especially for Sean Penn.
@apocalypse-nowish: I don't know, it seemed pretty squarely mediocre to me. And it certainly wasn't as good as Brokeback Mountain -- or, for that matter, any of the other films nominated.
@eatsshootsleaves: Milk is going to be the redemption of the Academy for Brokeback Mountain (Yes, I'm STILL bitter): It's historical, it's artistic, name-director, and ensemble cast, topical due to Prop 8 AND the kind of film that will be studied by film students in years to come = OSCARS all around.
I am especially hopeful for Emile Hirsch who embodied his character with such style he deserves a Best Supporting nomination at the very least.
12/10/08
Yes, I know Oscar isn't one dude. (kicks dust around)
12/10/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
The Dark Knight (for bitter Neo-Cons)
W. (for a still-bitter nation)
MILK (for bitter gays)
Wall-E (for largely successful environmentalists still working through their bitterness)
Revoluntionary Road (for bitter Kate Winslet fans)
12/09/08
12/09/08
but then again, these are the oscars. so fuck it all.
12/09/08
Bye-bye troublesome and troubled egomaniacal sociopaths and bloated salaries. Hello, endearing and maleable animated characters.
12/09/08
Aren't Americans these days required to be better than totally careless about their global image?
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
Just in the last twenty years, The Lord of the Rings, Titanic, Gladiator, Forrest Gump, Braveheart, and The Silence of the Lambs have all made loads of money and won best picture at the Oscars. Most of them have also kind of sucked. If they're really concerned about declining viewership, the Academy should cut back on the excesses of the ceremony, not the quality of the movies they're nominating.
Also, was I the only person who thought that The Dark Knight was good until you actually thought about it? The acting was great, the cinematography was great, but in the end, wasn't it kind of pretentious? And weren't the weird political parallels kind of off-putting (by this I mean Batman=Bush, which I found almost impossible not to read in it)?
12/09/08
I'd also like to take this opportunity to continue my one man campaign to get Steve McQueen's Hunger more recognition.
12/09/08
Richard, I hope you didn't tell the whole Wall - E story up there, because I haven't seen it, and Pixar beats Disney like a Chicago pimp finding his ho's last two dollars. So, uh, yeah that's a must see for me.
Also, kudos to you for Let the Right One in. Between 30 Days of Night and this Twillight blasphemy I thought the real vamp-makers started working for TV creating shows like My Own Worst Enemy or some such nonsense. Hope has been restored.
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
That being said, isn't Milk actually the most zeitgeist-y film? Or has Hollywood still not gotten over their whole "gay people make us uncomfortable so we'll just give this prize to the movie where Sandra Bullock is racist" thing?
12/09/08
12/09/08
12/09/08
@apocalypse-nowish: I don't know, it seemed pretty squarely mediocre to me. And it certainly wasn't as good as Brokeback Mountain -- or, for that matter, any of the other films nominated.
12/09/08
12/09/08
I am especially hopeful for Emile Hirsch who embodied his character with such style he deserves a Best Supporting nomination at the very least.