• Profile logout login

#lindsaylohan#howwillitbeplayedhtml

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 3:00 AM
Tue Dec 8
50 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of gobblegirl gobblegirl
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    The pressure's on, so I'm going to make an official statement:
    I have not slept with Tiger Woods. So that's one girl down.
     Reply
    gobblegirl was starred gobblegirl was unstarred
    Image of Poop Cooper Poop Cooper
    12/07/09

    @gobblegirl: ...and one mountain left to conquer.
     Reply
    Poop Cooper was starred Poop Cooper was unstarred
    Image of atotalcad atotalcad
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    I'd hit it, tape it and spank it while watching the playback.
     Reply
    atotalcad was starred atotalcad was unstarred
    Image of SuperBien SuperBien
    12/07/09

    @atotalcad: Susan Boyle?
     Reply
    SuperBien was starred SuperBien was unstarred
    Image of cpjones cpjones
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    The only ones that keep track of D or C list status are Kathy Griffin and the CDaN gossip guy.
     Reply
    cpjones was starred cpjones was unstarred
    Image of amoureuse est heureuse amoureuse est heureuse
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    Sing it Tiger:

    Course I love you.. I love all y'all
    Hehehe, hehehe, f'real

    I love girls, girls, girls, girls
    Girls, I do adore
    Yo put your number on this paper cause I would love to date ya
    Holla at ya when I come off tour
     Reply
    amoureuse est heureuse was starred amoureuse est heureuse was unstarred
    Image of Juancho Juancho
    12/07/09

    @amoureuse est heureuse: is Elin his project chick?
     Reply
    Juancho was starred Juancho was unstarred
    Image of Fuzzy Dunlop Fuzzy Dunlop
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    In other Woods news, a mystery lady says through her layer . . .

    Wouldn't that be Woods himself?
     Reply
    Fuzzy Dunlop was starred Fuzzy Dunlop was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    It's way early for me here on the west coast so forgive me for being extremely amused at the idea that women are going around "not denying" they had sex with Tiger Woods. I suspect that the number of women who are not denying they had sex with Tiger Woods is almost infinitely higher than the number of women affirming the same.
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    No. seriously, I swear this is true. Ever since Tiger Woods' "car accident" the photos that are used to illustrate stories about them show him to be darker skinned than back when he was a golf hero. Case in point the one above. Not only does his skin tone seem darker, his face is in shadow so he is starting to get Mandingo-like qualities.

    Wanda Sykes called this one a looooong time ago.
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    12/07/09

    @Tart of Darkness:

    Just the Rupert Murdochs of the world stirring up racial tensions as the economies melt down and tensions rise. Nothing to see here.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of Pope John Peeps II Pope John Peeps II
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    Susan Boyle does it to herself. Nobody cares about that carnival sideshow anymore. Her eventual total breakdown and institutionalization will be treated with as much surprise and interest as the eight billionth snickers bar coming out of the snickers bar factory.
     Reply
    Pope John Peeps II was starred Pope John Peeps II was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    12/07/09

    @Pope John Peeps II: But I still feel for her. She's a mentally fragile woman who was able to keep herself together in the small life she led in her small town. And like so many other performers who have similar temperaments she no longer has anyone around her that cares enough about her rather than the money they can make from her to give her some perspective that would help her avoid to crash and burn that seems so inevitable.

    We protect animals from having this done to them, but people are fair game whether they are capable of comprehending the consequences of seeking and then actually getting famous in the realm of satellite TV where we are all Kings commanding our fools to sing and dance for our amusement.

    Next on the list: Taylor Swift
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of Pope John Peeps II Pope John Peeps II
    12/07/09

    @Tart of Darkness: She's pretty much a fully functioning human being though, able to make informed choices. If she's not willing to stop doing something that makes her unhappy or unstable, there's really not anything anybody can do, and she really does not deserve much sympathy.

    It's like dealing with an addict. They're sad and stupid and weak, but eventually you have to abandon trying to help them if they don't help themselves.
     Reply
    Pope John Peeps II was starred Pope John Peeps II was unstarred
    Image of bboston88 bboston88
    12/07/09

    @Tart of Darkness: I actually don't think so with Taylor. She's very mature and seems fairly well adjusted.
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness promoted this comment bboston88 was starred bboston88 was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    12/07/09

    @bboston88: I hope that you are right. She's also very young so we will see.
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of Tart of Darkness Tart of Darkness
    12/07/09

    @Pope John Peeps II: Addiction, by clinical definition is not a choice. And yes addicts use up all of the people around them and are pathetic and so forth, but I feel sympathy for them.

    But I'm glad you're posting all of this 'cause I've been trying to prove to 5ftoffury that there are people in the world who exist who have no sympathy for others and they cannot be educated to create it where it is lacking.
     Reply
    Tart of Darkness was starred Tart of Darkness was unstarred
    Image of Pope John Peeps II Pope John Peeps II
    12/07/09

    @Tart of Darkness: Well now you're just being a bit of a cock, aren't you?

    Addiction, by clinical definition is a disease, but only assholes like you would say that people who choose NOT to get help deserve nothing but sympathy and coddling. Do you think you're helping them by saying "it's not your fault, you have no control"? Do you think that's how an intervention happens? People need to want help. If they don't, it fails. If they do, it succeeds.

    Do you think that's helping Susan Boyle? She's handicapped, but only slightly, and none of that means she's incapable of making choices to run her own life. Or would you like everyone in the world who's slightly handicapped to have a handler, so that they can live their lives as weak and patronized, so that you can feel good about yourself that you're protecting people that you have serious unconscious contempt for. I have sympathy for people who want and need help, for people who choose help. But until they do, I feel bad for them, but I have nothing to offer them. Should I feel bad for Susan Boyle? No. She chose her own path then, and is choosing her own actions now, so she can live with the consequences. Just like every other human being.
     Reply
    Pope John Peeps II was starred Pope John Peeps II was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    12/07/09

    In reply to Now a Porn Star 'Won't Deny' That She Had Sex With Tiger, Too
    You find some dirt in the tips and then go google around for other links to post and neglect to credit the tipster? Classy, Nikki Finke!
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of Uncle_Billy_Slumming Uncle_Billy_Slumming
    12/07/09

    @Uncle_Billy_Slumming:

    Not in the tips proper:

    [gawker.com]

    Ja, ja, I know... you've got a zillion feeds and you picked it out yourself.
     Reply
    Uncle_Billy_Slumming was starred Uncle_Billy_Slumming was unstarred
    Image of bodegacat bodegacat
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    I call bullshit that ABC didn't know what Adam was going to do. AP reporter Derrik J. Lang came out with an article about Adam's rehearsals BEFORE the AMAs were broadcast and wrote about the crotch grab. As for the kissing - impromptu kissing between women has become so common as to be cliched, and impromptu hetero kissing is, of course de rigueur. Awards shows live for unscripted moments - as long as they're hetero or between women (which hetero men love).

    Note that Adam's performance came on the heels of the OUT magazine controversy where editor Aaron Hicklin (and many, many others) accused Adam of not being gay enough, which made international news.

    Derrik J. Lang - quoted from his AP article on ADAM'S REHEARSAL PERFORMANCE:

    "When he begins performing "For Your Entertainment," the first single and title track from his album out Monday, Lambert's domination turns outrageous.
    At one point, he thrusts a leather-clad male backup dancer's face toward his crotch, and later flashes a knowing smile as he strokes the same dancer's cheek after plowing through a door that swings both ways.
    This is not your typical award show routine.
    "There are a lot of double standards as far as that goes," the openly gay singer says backstage, a few days before his Sunday performance. "We've seen female pop and rock performers do that for the last 10 years. They've been very provocative, owning their power and sexuality. You just don't see men doing it very often. And I'm hoping to break down that double standard with this number."


    The press were paying attention to Adam's rehearsals - where was ABC? Oh, that's right, telling everyone how provocative Adam's performance would be. Then after the fact some homophobe(s) in power got pissed/scared and weren't going to allow that sort of equality malarky. Adam has allowed all the blame to fall on his shoulders, repeating ad nauseam that he got carried away and doesn't blame ABC, his CD promo tour becoming an exercise in self-flagellation.

    ABC's decision to cancel Adam on the GMAs and then continue the emasculation by canceling Jimmy Kimmel and New Year's Rockin' Eve is homophobic hypocrisy. And now GLAAD has supported them.

    Adam is the current whipping boy of choice from BOTH sides of the argument - he's either too gay or not gay enough. Why don't we just make Adam wear a big red G on his chest and be done with it? How dare he be out and proud of it.

    eta: more nearly, how dare he be out, proud and seeking or expecting equality. Off with his head!
     Reply
    Edited by bodegacat at 12/04/09 3:01 PM bodegacat was starred bodegacat was unstarred
    Image of ngonzogo ngonzogo
    12/04/09

    @bodegacat: Totally agree. I think what we see in GLAAD's floating position is a display of competeing agendas. There are plenty of gays who want to mainstream homosexuality by removing any context or action that might be offensive to the straight community. That has always been true. They want to convince straight America that we're just like them, that we all have 9-5 jobs, wear suits and ties, go to church, want to buy a house in the 'burbs, get married and have our 2.5 kids and a dog. They're convinced that's the way to attaining civil rights equality. In the meantime, anything that reminds straights we're not like them is to be shoved back in the closet.
     Reply
    bodegacat promoted this comment ngonzogo was starred ngonzogo was unstarred
    Image of bodegacat bodegacat
    12/04/09

    @ngonzogo: very true. That, and homophobes prefer their gays served cold, groveling, ashamed and self-loathing. And many are willing to oblige.

    I think Adam is most threatening because he's been upbeat, positive and proud. It feels like ABC has been beating him into submission and it really ticks me off, not least because it reminds me of things I heard when visiting certain areas of this country as a child - about minorities needing to "know their place." Which reminds me of bigots who say they don't mind gays, they just don't want it "shoved in their faces." In other words - they should "know their place." Like a closet.

    As for GLAAD? Any delusions I had about their integrity are gone.
     Reply
    bodegacat was starred bodegacat was unstarred
    Image of iplaudius iplaudius
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    I was actually offended when Adrian Brody kissed Halle Berry in the 2003 Oscars, because he obviously forced himself on her.

    No consent = bad touch. Tell mom! Stop, drop, and roll!
     Reply
    iplaudius was starred iplaudius was unstarred
    Image of Brad Brown Brad Brown
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    Here's your chance, gay entrepreneur! Create a "We're about to kiss" t-shirt. Then the heterosexual public can't complain when you engage in public relations. Brilliant...what else do I have?
     Reply
    Brad Brown was starred Brad Brown was unstarred
    Image of DahlELama DahlELama
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    Taylor Lautner is actually hosting SNL next week; this week, it's Blake Lively, because someone's gotta make Taylor Lautner look good.
     Reply
    DahlELama was starred DahlELama was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    His skin looks really rough. Dude needs a facial. No, not that kind, the other kind.
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of sweetpickles sweetpickles
    12/04/09

    In reply to GLAAD's Okay with ABC's Lambert Ban, Because Not All Gay Kisses Are Created Equal
    Lambert's music is so banal, he might have made the right move in courting some media attention. Because his time is just about up.
     Reply
    sweetpickles was starred sweetpickles was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.