• Profile logout login

#liskulacohen

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:48 PM
Fri Dec 18
45 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #liskulacohen more →

    Google Will Snitch On Your Anonymous Skank Blog, Says Attorney

    Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out

    Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here

    Lady Calling Other Lady Skank Is Big Morality Play Somehow

    Skankblogger Revealed to be Acquaintance of Alleged Skank Model

    Skankblogger Ordered to Say That To Her Face

    Censorship, Ho! The Blank of the Skank

    Lawsuit Threatens Right to Call Out Bastards, Seedy Tramps, Big Skanks

    Model Sues Google Over "Skank" Blog Post
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Dominant Glee Club Dominant Glee Club
    09/16/09

    In reply to Google Will Snitch On Your Anonymous Skank Blog, Says Attorney
    Forget revealing her identity. When will Google be revealing more of these pictures?
     Reply
    Dominant Glee Club was starred Dominant Glee Club was unstarred
    Image of MarthaMessalla MarthaMessalla
    09/15/09

    In reply to Google Will Snitch On Your Anonymous Skank Blog, Says Attorney
    The First Amendment does not say anything about a right to anonymity, much less guarantee it. It protects you against libel suits, assuming what you said was true (an oversimplification) but it doesn't say that you are guaranteed to be anonymous. It also says the CONGRESS shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. So even if Google, which is not the U.S. Congress, wanted to stand up for the First Amendment, it would have nothing to say here because this case was not about a law enacted by Congress and because the issue was anonymity, not freedom of speech.
     Reply
    Tremonius promoted this comment MarthaMessalla was starred MarthaMessalla was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    09/15/09

    @MarthaMessalla: You seem to have missed about a hundred years of mission creep, there. The redneck owners of diners down south were not the gumint, neither, yet could they be bound over for denying equal protection of the law for deciding by race who was worthy of their rancid greaseburgers. Same with lynchlaw. Same with - and this one flabbergasts me, who am unflabbergastable - a private mall of corporate entities cannot halt the dispensing of idiot pamphlets in its environs. Private property owners are held to the First Amendment. Then we go into the workplace ...

    I don't think I've seen unflabbergastable on Gawker before.
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    09/08/09

    In reply to Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out
    This might be the wrong case to yell about, as it is...actual fraud.
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of Perhaps Not Perhaps Not
    09/08/09

    In reply to Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out
    How long until "skank" becomes a meme (verb) for outing some libelous creep masquerading as a real person on the internet, cf, "She badmouthed Carrie on a blog in Carrie's name, so Carrie skanked her?"

    I give it a week.
     Reply
    Perhaps Not was starred Perhaps Not was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    09/08/09

    In reply to Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out
    Perhaps I'm overlooking it, but is there a link for the developer case?
     Reply
    Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of ziffelbat ziffelbat
    09/08/09

    In reply to Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out
    Come on, if google tried to fight all of these vigorously they'd be bankrupt in months.
     Reply
    Seeräuber Jenny promoted this comment ziffelbat was starred ziffelbat was unstarred
    Image of Seeräuber Jenny Seeräuber Jenny
    09/08/09

    @ziffelbat:

    What about the people who have to hire lawyers to litigate against the subpoena issuers? That, too, could get really expensive. A company can write off litigation costs as a business expense.
     Reply
    Seeräuber Jenny was starred Seeräuber Jenny was unstarred
    Image of Deric Deric
    09/08/09

    In reply to Everybody Wants Google to Rat Someone Out
    I love you, Gawker. Please don't sue.

    -Anonymous Deric
     Reply
    Deric was starred Deric was unstarred
    Image of The Lone Scout The Lone Scout
    08/25/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    Ms. Port's lame miming of the "hand-job-with-my-mouth" technique in the above photograph makes me ache for Kari.
     Reply
    Edited by The Lone Scout at 08/25/09 12:05 PM The Lone Scout was starred The Lone Scout was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    Also, what they didn't doesn't qualify as a TOS violation, right?
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    08/24/09

    @BlinkyMcChuck: did, that is.
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of BlinkyMcChuck BlinkyMcChuck
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    She ain't gonna get it. Google's dealt with her kind a ton, and worse, and paid nothing.
     Reply
    BlinkyMcChuck was starred BlinkyMcChuck was unstarred
    Image of Edward Lionheart Edward Lionheart
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    Not much sympathy for Rosemary here--although for my money she's rather cuter than her foe, but PLEASE do not libel our giant Japanese lizard thingie out of this. MechaGodzilla would have destroyed the Earth, not to mention Tokyo, whereas the G-man after a rocky start in the '50s was ultimately on our side and had little Japanese kids cheering him on.
     Reply
    Edward Lionheart was starred Edward Lionheart was unstarred
    Image of NigelAstydameia NigelAstydameia
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    There's an old saying, Rosemary: "Think before you act (like a stupid, vindictive child)." Okay, I added that last part so maybe you'd get it.
     Reply
    NigelAstydameia was starred NigelAstydameia was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    By the way, HamNo, "blow job" is two words. Don't rush.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of SpyMagician SpyMagician
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    Did the skank died?
     Reply
    SpyMagician was starred SpyMagician was unstarred
    Image of bowel_and_the_obstructors bowel_and_the_obstructors
    08/24/09

    In reply to Skankblogger Is The Real Victim Here
    Did we ever actually settle the question of whether or not this woman is, in fact, a skank? I'm sorry the case resolved the way it did. I was really looking forward to discovery on that.
     Reply
    Phyllis Nefler promoted this comment bowel_and_the_obstructors was starred bowel_and_the_obstructors was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.