I'm going to side with the douchebag on this one (ok, I should clarify: the passerby, not the reporter). You're out doing a LIVE SHOT somewhere, you are subjecting yourself to the elements, be it rain, sleet, or jackasses. There is absolutely no reason this kind of piece needs to be done live, even the set up, if they're going to surround themselves by jackasses. It's a public street, and that drunk clod can stand around all day in this guy's shot if he wanted .. The reporter had absolutely no right to smack that guy even though it's kinda funny.
Fremont St. was the worst choice for that kind of standup. He should have gone to the Strip, where there's a much better class of stumbling outdoor drunk. But I can understand his fear of being happened upon by Criss Angel.
Fremont Street's ground zero for America's Bluehairs, Assorted Sleaze, and Those Who Want To Remember Vegas As It Was 30 Years Ago (and who was going to Vegas 30 years ago and enjoying it?). Tourists who go there - let alone those who go there to get drunk in the middle of the day - are nothing short of some of The Worst. The headshove in question represents the exact sentiments of every local who's ever had to deal with shit like this. Stupid tourists support the Vegas economy - which needs every penny it can get these days - but goddamn if they don't need to be knocked in the dome every now and then. Huzzah.
That's it? That's all that happened? Disappointing. Arthur Chien (formerly of CBS2) dropping the F-bomb on those two radio douchebags who were interrupting his report was way more gangsta than this.
As a resident of one of the Oranges (West), I can assure you that although these suburbs may be obscure, a good portion of the residents moved from New York City and still work in New York City. This is basically a NYC neighborhood - it takes less time to get here from Midtown than it does to parts of Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx (or Manhattan, if you count Washington Heights).
I read that the LA Times has online revenue exceeding its editorial costs, minus printing. That means if they went strictly online, they'd be profitable. And I read the NY Times is approaching that balance.
If you can pay for your Justin Blairs and Judy Millers without crushing trees and smearing them with ink, well then?
Reminds me of the fax. What's the use of the fax? it's a pacifier for those who grew up with the office copier. A long-range Xerox. Have to bring these people along slowly.
@Tremonius: No it doesn't mean an online-only LA Times would be profitable. There's a lot of other costs involved in newsgathering: lawyers, travel, computers, foreign bureaus, salaries for the ad sales dept, real estate, etc.
Newspapers still make most of their money by selling ads for their print edition.
@derek: The statement didn't include a balance sheet, but when I read "editorial expenses" I guessed that meant all of the above which didn't involve physical printing. Maybe I'll go look for the numbers now, but the intent of the column I read was that, were Tribune to cut off the presses like a used booster rocket, they'd be in the money!
@Tremonius: Yep, I was ahead of the curve on this one, which was a fastball anyhow. It's just a signpost along the way, not a break-even point.
@Bradley - Here's a direct quote from Russ Stanton, from an email he sent me earlier this morning, in response to many requests from around the social media realm for clarification about his revenue comment at USC last week.
"Our digital revenue this year [for the Los Angeles Times] will be equal to our newsroom payroll (web and print) and that is salaries only."
Those are actual numbers for 2008. Our business folks are projecting that digital revenue will exceed total newsroom payroll in 2009.
Russ adds, "We're still years away from able to even consider shutting down our presses, and the ink-stained wretch in me hopes we can figure out a way to sustain this centuries-old medium for several more centuries."
God, these people jsut don't get it. Instead of launching this where there's no real competition, they go after a Googler. How's that Google war been going for you so far NYT?
07/01/09
There's a whole collection of these:
[www.haxxor.tv]
07/01/09
+ Watch video
07/01/09
07/01/09
My favorite is when Lil' Sis goes, "Yeah I got it on my car", and the reporter goes, "It was being installed on her car".
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
+ Watch video
07/01/09
07/01/09
Fremont Street's ground zero for America's Bluehairs, Assorted Sleaze, and Those Who Want To Remember Vegas As It Was 30 Years Ago (and who was going to Vegas 30 years ago and enjoying it?). Tourists who go there - let alone those who go there to get drunk in the middle of the day - are nothing short of some of The Worst. The headshove in question represents the exact sentiments of every local who's ever had to deal with shit like this. Stupid tourists support the Vegas economy - which needs every penny it can get these days - but goddamn if they don't need to be knocked in the dome every now and then. Huzzah.
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
GitEmSteveDave; helping people post pics since 2007. *ting* [lifehacker.com]
07/01/09
07/01/09
07/01/09
I once saw footage of a Los Angeles reporter, Miriam Hernandez pushing a guy out of the street behind her. She never even skipped a syllable.
06/30/09
Of alcohol perhaps, but probably not of Michael Jackson or ABC13 Action News or Steve Ryan.
04/01/09
Yes, I am a Deadspin commenter, why do you ask?
03/02/09
02/28/09
If you can pay for your Justin Blairs and Judy Millers without crushing trees and smearing them with ink, well then?
Reminds me of the fax. What's the use of the fax? it's a pacifier for those who grew up with the office copier. A long-range Xerox. Have to bring these people along slowly.
02/28/09
Newspapers still make most of their money by selling ads for their print edition.
03/01/09
03/01/09
@Bradley - Here's a direct quote from Russ Stanton, from an email he sent me earlier this morning, in response to many requests from around the social media realm for clarification about his revenue comment at USC last week.
"Our digital revenue this year [for the Los Angeles Times] will be equal to our newsroom payroll (web and print) and that is salaries only."
Those are actual numbers for 2008. Our business folks are projecting that digital revenue will exceed total newsroom payroll in 2009.
Russ adds, "We're still years away from able to even consider shutting down our presses, and the ink-stained wretch in me hopes we can figure out a way to sustain this centuries-old medium for several more centuries."
[www.buzzmachine.com]
03/02/09
02/28/09
02/28/09