Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 9:23 AM
Sun Nov 8
10 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email
Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email
Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email
Investigations:
John Cook | Email
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email
Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/27/09
It would be interesting to see some detailed demographics on all of that lost circulation. Just how many subscriptions have vanished due to otherwise-loyal readers moving to nursing homes, Boca Raton, or their local cemeteries? #printisdead
10/27/09
Cigarettes in the US are having a similar issue; not so much internationally. #printisdead
10/27/09
I'd be more interested to look at figures for circ vs. press run, because if that margin has tightened up, that could actually be a good thing for the business. But if a paper is still printing copies and delivering them to customers that are no longer paying (as I noted yesterday), then a lot of people are just kidding themselves.
For years, the business model had subscribers merely covering the cost of printing and delivering the paper; most of the overhead was borne by advertisers, and single-copy sales contributed little, if anything. That has to change if newspapers are going to survive, but I don't see how that will happen, with possible exceptions to be found in the largest nationals (WSJ, NYT) and the most intensely local papers (eg. the Newport experiment). #printisdead
10/27/09
I think where newspapers have failed is to reach out to the next generation of newspaper readers. They have had an arrogant attitude of always "being an institution" and never marketed to younger readers. So those younger readers never came on board and their older readers are dying off.
I don't know if that can be reversed at all, but I'd like to think that newspapers will still be around. It's going to suck to have to wade through my laptop for news every morning at the breakfast table. #printisdead
10/27/09
The arrogance also plays into their reluctance to adapt to the effects of new media. The 'news' parts are, by their very nature, going to be 'old news' by the time papers go to print. So why are they - I'm looking at you, Chicago Tribune - phasing out things like the Books section? That should be played up as unique content and used to gain more readers, since the news stories aren't necessarily going to do that anymore. #printisdead
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
Not everyone can afford a Klunky Kindle. Those who can can't always download morning news in the mornings.
There are grocery coupons online, but they're a pain in the ass. The Style section looks boring online, and it's meant to be read in your underwear in a dimly lit room on a Sunday morning, on a sofa with a cat and a big mug of coffee within easy reach. Try all that in a desk chair.
Papers are tactile and don't flash the news in your face without giving you a chance to think about it. (Oh, wait.)
Poor or older people can afford to inform themselves with the paper - it's free in any library. Where are they supposed to get their news? Fox? (Oh, wait.)
Newsday, for all of its suckitude, does have a good local events section. The Times does too.
Not sure how any of this can actually be replaced, and I'm guessing there will be some demand for some time. #printisdead
10/27/09
This is part of why they're failing. Nobody believes or relates to that voice anymore -- the one you used to hear on 1010 WINS over the sound of the teletype, the one you used to hear on TV news, the one you used to hear in your head when you turned the newsprint smelling pages on the subway #printisdead
10/27/09
10/27/09
Old media have lost the credibility that was the underpinning of that Voice of God diction; the times, they have changed. #printisdead
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
09/05/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
Wait, did "I Am Legend" really happen?
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
I never watched this show, but Mankiewicz is fine on TCM, nothing special, but perfectly pleasant. I remember when TCM supposedly had a major search for a host for the weekend program and came up with someone who clearly was an insider. When I saw that the other show had been staffed with two insiders, I threw up my hands.
08/06/09
08/06/09
True Ben M. is okay on TCM. He at least knows what he speaketh of.
Having seen a pirated version of "I am Legend", and not ever seen Ben Lyons, I can only ask is he retarded or does he just enjoy having a studio's hand up his ass?