losers, of money

posts about #losersofmoney more →
Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

abettertomorrow
05/13/09

In reply to Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer
yeah, what's the over/under that someone at BA AQMD decided they wanted their money back and 'anonymously' pushed this to that LAT reporter?
Reply

abettertomorrow was starred abettertomorrow was unstarred

i'm a bottle
05/13/09

In reply to Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer
Seriously, the NY Press polemic against Friedman is one of the best things I've read all week on the Internet.

[www.nypress.com]
Reply

i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred

Tremonius
05/13/09

@i'm a bottle: It's my introduction to Friedman, as I wrote him off a long time ago and have never been inclined to go through a single of his columns since, let alone any of his hardbound musings. Thanks for the misery.
Reply

Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred

Tremonius
05/13/09

In reply to Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer
Well, the Flat Earth Society is big in the Bay Area, although they might not be able to meet his fee, but at least they are not a lobbying group, and they're looking for someone to replace Sherri Shepherd, however I'm out of conjunctions ...
Reply

Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred

flossy
05/13/09

In reply to Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer
Looks like somebody's going to be giving out fifteen thousand $5.00 mustache rides today!
Reply

flossy was starred flossy was unstarred

TheHonJudgeSmails
05/13/09

@flossy: Leave my mother out of this.
Reply

TheHonJudgeSmails was starred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#losersofmoney

Gawker

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Thomas Friedman Is $75,000 Poorer

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment