If you cannot finagle a simple intercontinental love affair with all the privileges of elected office at your disposal and the wretched state of South Carolina backing up your treachery, much as they did for Ol' Jesse Helms since two days before God made Adam, then you, sir, are unfit to govern. Step down and make way for someone with better trade craft, asshole.
Please. Much as I'd love to see this guy forced out of office for being a fucking moral majority hypocrite, what he did isn't at issue. It's that he got CAUGHT. How many of the Republicans and Democrats calling for his head are sneaking off for liaisons right now?
@SybilDisobedience: They are not considering impeachment because he stuck his willy in a woman other than his wife. They are pursuing the ethics claims because of misuse of government funds and equipment.
I could care less about the liaison, but I do care about using tax dollars to fund a booty call.
@momof3wildkids: Oh, I totally agree. I was just bitching about all the clowns lamenting his affair when I imagine a good chunk of them are conducting liaisons themselves. I totally agree that the ethics violations should be the focus here.
@momof3wildkids: They are pursing the ethics claims for one reason, and one reason only: they think it makes them look good in the next election if they do so - same as he thought during the Lewinsky [sham/circus/parade]. Lest you forget (as if you could) the Atty General of my fine state tried to lock up Craigslist's owners for facilitating prostitution just weeks before he announced his bid for the Governor's seat - and he's just one representative of the all-show, no-go type of politician that's kept us in the running for dead-last-in-everything for far too damned long.
@buttons: You want an ethical pursuit of an ethics inquiry by a politician? That's rich. What are they trying to be? A public servant or some such nonsense?
@SybilDisobedience: Dems get a walk on such charges since, except for the so-called Blue Dogs, their hypothetical escapades lack the hypocrisy component.
@Brad Brown: I read that as 'how many hand jobs were saved.' I suppose only his staff knows how many times he had his stick peeled, looking for fire ants.
I hope they nail him to the wall. I could care less if he was boning some Argentine booty, but he should be impeached for the ethics violations.
As much as I think Sanford is a tool, his desire for Clinton to be impeached was based, at least in part, on the stupid lie he told rather than the affair itself. [www.huffingtonpost.com]
@momof3wildkids: Amen sister, karma's a bitch!! I feel bad for his wife, but I think it's kinda funny that she kicked HIM out of the Governor's mansion for a while.
Letterman's kid is a victim of his father's poor self control, and his wife. Also, morals and ethics took another hit. Moral relativity in Hollywood is something that people outside can't understand. Good for them. If Letterman threatened him if he said anything, out of disgust, he might have threatened back. He said, he said. I think it reveals Dave's hypocrisy, and moreover, that he hasn't been funny for a long time. Alan Coulter has been gross for years. Dave needs to retire with his millions to his ranch and let Ferguson take the show. He's been up front with his issues, hasn't mocked children, and he's funny with little to work with. Dave takes 10 minutes of his show advertising. I mean really, Dave's a d-bag.
It's almost always impossible to prove coercion or lack thereof in these cases, and a subordinate might reasonably fear retribution even when no threat is made -- would you really want to risk your career on the chance that your superior won't take rejection personally?
This is why workplace relationships between employer and employee are just a bad idea, period. Sure, it might start out fine, but what if it ends badly and the superior can't resist taking revenge? What if the subordinate acquires undue influence? What if s/he receives a deserved promotion, but everybody knows s/he's sleeping with the boss and doesn't take it seriously?
It's just a huge mess and a bad idea and Letterman's pretty stupid for not realizing that.
I only poke my head in here occassionally these days, because Gawker is disintegrating, and it's difficult to watch that happen. This item might be the worst one yet. Just shameful, awful, and pathetic.
@lobstr: who wouldn't be? everyone made stupid decisions about who they slept with in their early twenties- it is when you are figuring out what it means to be sexual in a world where status and power don't always line up with physical beauty (I mean, theoretically, I have no experience of that).
@ms_priestypants: And this is one of the things that makes it creepy. "Oh, you're a pretty girl with no status trying to figure out where to go from here? Allow me to help you, little lady."
If people in the entertainment industry didn't have consensual sex with each other -- and even sometimes *gasp* with our employees or bosses -- none of us would have any sex at all.
Who else do we have time to meet?
Unless he's been drugging and raping interns, who cares?
If this is recent activity, it's pretty much between Letterman and his wife. And I hope she makes him miserable...
The women having sex with Letterman must have forced. Let's face it; he isn't pretty. Who here dares to say he's attractive?
And he says HE felt "menaced"....
There's a difference between sexual congress and sexual harassment. He's not a political leader who preached morality, he wasn't married, these weren't hookers using CBS budget money and to our knowledge this was all consensual, so where's the scandal or hypocrisy exactly?
@Macloserboy: The fact that the author of this article didn't understand in what context the word "creepy" was being used is a big indicator that someone is being more reactive than reasonable.
I sort of feel compelled to go and look at Andrews other posts to get a better idea of just how ridiculous he might be.
11/19/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Every picture I see of Sanford reminds me of Frank Burns from M*A*S*H*.
11/19/09
11/19/09
I could care less about the liaison, but I do care about using tax dollars to fund a booty call.
11/19/09
#tips
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
(Well played, btw.)
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
As much as I think Sanford is a tool, his desire for Clinton to be impeached was based, at least in part, on the stupid lie he told rather than the affair itself. [www.huffingtonpost.com]
11/19/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
This is why workplace relationships between employer and employee are just a bad idea, period. Sure, it might start out fine, but what if it ends badly and the superior can't resist taking revenge? What if the subordinate acquires undue influence? What if s/he receives a deserved promotion, but everybody knows s/he's sleeping with the boss and doesn't take it seriously?
It's just a huge mess and a bad idea and Letterman's pretty stupid for not realizing that.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
[www.huffingtonpost.com]
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
Who else do we have time to meet?
Unless he's been drugging and raping interns, who cares?
If this is recent activity, it's pretty much between Letterman and his wife. And I hope she makes him miserable...
10/02/09
And he says HE felt "menaced"....
10/02/09
The only real issue is he was/is the boss. But you'd think someone would have sued by now if it was otherwise. That's Viacom money, baby.
10/02/09
The only real issue is he was/is the boss. You'd think someone would have sued by now if it was otherwise. That's Viacom money.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/02/09
I sort of feel compelled to go and look at Andrews other posts to get a better idea of just how ridiculous he might be.
10/02/09
10/02/09