Well, it's not popular to admit, but I don't think O'Reilly is to blame for this. His coverage of Tiller was sort of dickish, as per usual, but calling the guy "Tiller the Baby Killer" doesn't mean he wanted him dead. He's just a TV blowhard, and TV blowhards like to trash people they disagree with.
If one of Olbermann's Worst Persons In the World were killed, would we be pointing the finger at him? Hell, if Bush had been assassinated, would we have accepted the blame that FOX would surely have heaped on the anti-Bush crowd? No, even though Bush caused the deaths of 10,000s of Iraqi civilians, and I have regularly applauded the speakers who have pointed this out.
Debates can get can heated. I don't think the participants should be blamed for those lunatics listening in the crowd who take the argument too far.
I don't understand why this blathering man is anti-abortion. He doesn't strike me as somebody who really gives a shit about abortion, women or the situation of poor children in America. If anything, this fucker should be promoting free abortions for poor women (especially blacks and Hispanics): that would be more consistent with this fucker's world view.
I cannot even bring myself to hit the play button because I have a profound hatred of this man anyway and I will hurl my laptop out the window if I watch this clip. Please let this be the beginning of the end of this hateful buffoon's career.
Calling Tiller a killer is cowardly, for if he called him a murderer, like you know he wants to, O'Reilly would surely go to the poorhouse for libel and defamation.
Do O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Palin, et al know that a lot of aborted fetuses would've grown up to be black people and Latinos? That might cause them to rethink their positions.
@wholenuther: Srsly, just tell all the wingnuts that 99% of abortions are Negresses and Mexicans and we've got ourself eternal legal abortion! Hell, they'll probably fundraise to build a clinic next to every KFC & Popeye's in the nation.
@foodandshoes: Yes, satire. Due to the latest KFC/Popeye chicken debacles, Rethugs like Bill O' Reilly would of course think they are the Minority Meccas of the universe.
@wholenuther: Hahah OMG LOL. Yeah if they hated black people so much maybe they should give them free abortions, not oppose abortion like so many do. Obviously white people hate black people, that's why so many of them use the racism inherrent in abortion statistics to denounce it. Oh look, as evidence I submit and article written by a White pastor from North Carolina doing just that. You people need to get out more.
"... fetuses who will never become American citizens." Now that's something we could march to. 'Cause American fetuses are obviously worth more than those other, unamerican, fetuses. Right, Bill?
@pilf: Actually, the label relates back to the historical fact that abortion was illegal in the Roman era because it was killing a Roman citizen protected by Roman law. They had the technology back then, but it was illegal. And now you know.
To clarify, abortion wasn't illegal in the Roman empire. It was illegal for a woman to have an abortion without her husband's permission. Your husband owned your body and the fetus, so whatever he said was ok. They also had infanticide (by leaving babies out in the woods), again, as long as the pater familias was down with it. They were just a little more honest about the abortion debate coming down to ownership over women's bodies.
For the record, this is the first time the class I took in law school, Roman Law: abortion, homosexuality and the death penalty, has come in handy. Now I'm so glad I never took bankruptcy law.
Interestingly, the positions BO ascribes to "the far left loons" of America can safely be attributed to between 65 and 70% of the population. So he might want to rethink his terms.
These dickwads unleash the hounds of hell and then profess innocence, blaming the victim. Maybe secession is the best solution-they can have the middle, the rational folks get each coast.
@Lord Humongous: Fuck you. As a midwesterner who now lives on the Left Coast, I am sick of this attitude about the so-called "fly over states." There are a lot of progressives in the "middle" just as there are a lot of dickwads on the coasts. Where do you think the headquarters of FAUX News are? Not Kansas City or Chicago.
Oh, yeah, and Iowa vs California. Now which one is progressive?
@foodandshoes: Totally agree! Wouldn't it make sense to have a late term abortion clinic in California or New York, where there are not any clinic bombings? Yes, but no one in those states has the courage to do what Dr. Tiller did. He was a good, law abiding, midwestern Christian. Let's not forget that.
@bluebears: Well that's just logical. Women have PMS and so they are unable to make decisions for themselves. Therefore it really has to be left to the more rational sex.
The sad thing is that is how some people actually think.
Your keen powers of observation were correct that both prolife individuals on BO's show had penises. Good for you. That doesn't mean that there aren't prolife women out there AND it doesn't mean they are out for gays and lesbians.
I am prolife and I believe that all couples should be able marry if they so choose, regardless of gender. I'm also against the death penalty.
You all sound as ridiculous as Bill O'Reilly here. Life isn't that black and white. However, if these nonsensical rants are read by a conservative-killer that offs me, I'll be sure to have my estate track you all down and sue for inciting violence.
@crazy_lady: We come at this from two different points of view. Your's is that a woman has an absolute right to control her body, which is truly a women's issue. Mine is that no one has a right to take another's life, which is an issue that doesn't have any gender issues.
I'm actually very sympathetic to your position. I certainly don't want anyone to have a say, other than myself, of what happens to my body. Unfortunately, the issue of when life begins is hardly a black and white issue and that what muddles the whole damn thing up for me.
When you look at it from a when does life begin position as opposed to a women's body control issue, BO certainly is entitled to an opinion, penis or not.
@momof3wildkids: Your's is that a woman has an absolute right to control her body, which is truly a women's issue.
Good to know. I'll tell my husband to stop caring about it.
The point of bluebears pointing this out is that far too often, the anti-choice movement is represented by well-off middle-aged white men, who have never and will never be in a position to be told what they can and cannot do with their bodies in such a fashion. Most of the time I hear their rhetoric, the strongest underlying current is "that slut had it coming because she had sex", regardless if the woman whose body they want to have dominion over is married or not. According to their logic, because I'm not in a position in my life where I could become a parent, my husband and I should just hold off on all sex. 99% of the time, the same men on O'Reilly's show are also the ones ranting against comprehensive and medically accurate sex ed being taught in schools or de-stigmatizing birth control methods and making them cheap and easily available to everyone. If 25% of the people having abortions are teenagers, it just makes sense to make birth control available to them as much as possible. But not to this pack of holier-than-thous. It's much more fun and profitable to engage in slut-shaming and enraged innocence on cable TV.
@Ipomoea: How often do you watch O'Reilly? I've never seen anyone on his show (but I only catch it a couple times per month; perhaps you view it more often) rant and rave that married couples shouldn't have sex if they aren't ready to be parents.
I do agree with you that our public schools could do a better job with sex ed and birth control should be easily accessible. I will add however that birth control is hardly foolproof -- I have several nieces and nephews to prove it. I don't have a problem with teaching abstinence, in conjunction with a comprehensive sex ed cirriculum, because if a teenager's birth control fails they might not be adequately prepared to deal with the consequences. Our bodies develop the ability to procreate long before we are developmentally and emotionally prepared to do so.
@momof3wildkids: It's not married couples-- there's plenty of married people who aren't in a financial or emotional state to have kids (look at my parents for the first seven years of their marriage, look at me and my husband). The message of "don't have sex if you aren't willing to be a parent" is simplistic and has been proven not to work for hundreds of years. No matter what culture, no matter what time, there have always been children out of wedlock and there have always been abortions. The difference is that now, we have the technological know-how to provide much more effective birth control, as well as the medical knowledge necessary to provide safe, sterile abortions to women who need them. The abortion rate hasn't changed from when it was illegal, but the rate of both the pregnant woman and the fetus dying has. Making abortion illegal won't make it stop, it'll just mean that hospitals have to bring back the ward specifically for women who are suffering from complications of illegal abortions. (See also: [www.nytimes.com] . Looks like criminalizing abortion in Tanzania's really worked out.)
I tuned in for a couple of minutes on the off chance that he would be responding to the situation. I was pretty amazed at how on the offensive he was. But, when he got to the part about Dr. Tiller performing 60,000 abortions over 35 years, I became insanely pissed. Then I did the math, and it came to 21.3 abortions a day for 35 years. With no vacations, holidays etc.
Then I got even more pissed at the absurdity of that, and tried to find proof for the number 60,000. I could only find a crappy website that quoted a man who claimed to have overheard Dr. Tiller "bragging," about performing 60,000 abortions. And this shit gets network airtime?
I guess the real question is....is 39 too old to be surprised?
@Steve Holt's Mother Part Deux: Hey, now. Unlike you, Bill O'Reilly reports the honest truth! He says so himself, and that's good enough for me.
But seriously, I'm so with you. It's beyond disgusting that he can throw such hateful lies out there, and in the next breath try to discredit his critics by accusing them of not doing their research. It turns my stomach.
@Steve Holt's Mother Part Deux: I've never heard O'Reilly mention that Tiller also did standard preventative care as well, which was the main body of his practice. He wasn't just killing precious fetuses, he was also writing birth control prescriptions for the harlots of Wichita.
06/02/09
If one of Olbermann's Worst Persons In the World were killed, would we be pointing the finger at him? Hell, if Bush had been assassinated, would we have accepted the blame that FOX would surely have heaped on the anti-Bush crowd? No, even though Bush caused the deaths of 10,000s of Iraqi civilians, and I have regularly applauded the speakers who have pointed this out.
Debates can get can heated. I don't think the participants should be blamed for those lunatics listening in the crowd who take the argument too far.
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/01/09
06/01/09
06/01/09
06/01/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
You had me until your last sentence "zinger."
06/02/09
06/02/09
[www.renewamerica.us]
06/02/09
If Renew America is your idea of a trustworthy source, so do you.
06/01/09
06/01/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
To clarify, abortion wasn't illegal in the Roman empire. It was illegal for a woman to have an abortion without her husband's permission. Your husband owned your body and the fetus, so whatever he said was ok. They also had infanticide (by leaving babies out in the woods), again, as long as the pater familias was down with it. They were just a little more honest about the abortion debate coming down to ownership over women's bodies.
For the record, this is the first time the class I took in law school, Roman Law: abortion, homosexuality and the death penalty, has come in handy. Now I'm so glad I never took bankruptcy law.
06/02/09
He actually might have killed a jihadist fetus! What do you think of that, Bill?
06/01/09
06/02/09
[www.gallup.com]
06/02/09
And the other half are happily watching Bill O'Reilly spout off about their friends, neighbors and co-workers. Good to know.
06/01/09
06/01/09
No brains, no balls.
06/01/09
06/01/09
How did that go?
06/02/09
Oh, yeah, and Iowa vs California. Now which one is progressive?
06/02/09
06/01/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
The sad thing is that is how some people actually think.
06/02/09
Your keen powers of observation were correct that both prolife individuals on BO's show had penises. Good for you. That doesn't mean that there aren't prolife women out there AND it doesn't mean they are out for gays and lesbians.
I am prolife and I believe that all couples should be able marry if they so choose, regardless of gender. I'm also against the death penalty.
You all sound as ridiculous as Bill O'Reilly here. Life isn't that black and white. However, if these nonsensical rants are read by a conservative-killer that offs me, I'll be sure to have my estate track you all down and sue for inciting violence.
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
One of the loudest mouthpieces of the pro-life movement is O'Reilly, a male.
Look to other pro-life groups, and you will also notice that the most prominent people speaking about the issue of abortion are also male.
While men can have a voice in the abortion debate, don't pretend that they can have an equal voice as compared to women in an abortion debate.
They shouldn't be leading this debate. At all.
06/02/09
I'm actually very sympathetic to your position. I certainly don't want anyone to have a say, other than myself, of what happens to my body. Unfortunately, the issue of when life begins is hardly a black and white issue and that what muddles the whole damn thing up for me.
When you look at it from a when does life begin position as opposed to a women's body control issue, BO certainly is entitled to an opinion, penis or not.
06/02/09
Good to know. I'll tell my husband to stop caring about it.
The point of bluebears pointing this out is that far too often, the anti-choice movement is represented by well-off middle-aged white men, who have never and will never be in a position to be told what they can and cannot do with their bodies in such a fashion. Most of the time I hear their rhetoric, the strongest underlying current is "that slut had it coming because she had sex", regardless if the woman whose body they want to have dominion over is married or not. According to their logic, because I'm not in a position in my life where I could become a parent, my husband and I should just hold off on all sex. 99% of the time, the same men on O'Reilly's show are also the ones ranting against comprehensive and medically accurate sex ed being taught in schools or de-stigmatizing birth control methods and making them cheap and easily available to everyone. If 25% of the people having abortions are teenagers, it just makes sense to make birth control available to them as much as possible. But not to this pack of holier-than-thous. It's much more fun and profitable to engage in slut-shaming and enraged innocence on cable TV.
06/02/09
I do agree with you that our public schools could do a better job with sex ed and birth control should be easily accessible. I will add however that birth control is hardly foolproof -- I have several nieces and nephews to prove it. I don't have a problem with teaching abstinence, in conjunction with a comprehensive sex ed cirriculum, because if a teenager's birth control fails they might not be adequately prepared to deal with the consequences. Our bodies develop the ability to procreate long before we are developmentally and emotionally prepared to do so.
06/02/09
06/01/09
Then I got even more pissed at the absurdity of that, and tried to find proof for the number 60,000. I could only find a crappy website that quoted a man who claimed to have overheard Dr. Tiller "bragging," about performing 60,000 abortions. And this shit gets network airtime?
I guess the real question is....is 39 too old to be surprised?
06/01/09
But seriously, I'm so with you. It's beyond disgusting that he can throw such hateful lies out there, and in the next breath try to discredit his critics by accusing them of not doing their research. It turns my stomach.
06/02/09