I had to back up off of it and sit the front of book down/sidebars and graphics, yeah, I'm fucked up, now/But it ain't no stoppin/the Review's still poppin/Harvard's got columnists from the city of Cambridge/to serve me...
Clearly the only sensible way for Men's Health to settle this is to arrange a photoshoot involving Statham, Taylor, wrestling singlets and sweaty, masculine supervised combat.
And extended, comprehensive photoshoot.
So long as Zinczenko isn't airbrush-enhancing the model's abs or digitally enlarging their fulsome, manly genital bulges. Because if that were the case, I don't think I could take the shock and disappointment.
As much as I applaud these reporters suing the post and hope that they can add to the post's already ballooned financial deficit for murdoch's privilege of publishing his hate and bile, I still have to sorta wonder...what were you thinking taking a job at that crapfest in the first place?
@manchops: The same reason any of us have careers and/or jobs in the first place, I suppose. Once you commit to a "dream" or idea, you get stuck in a way until you have that my-life-sucks-and-this-isn't-how-its-supposed-to-be moment. Once that drops, you look around for things to be pissed about. If you find them, you win that stage in the big ol' game of life. If not, you wait on that whole "401k thing" I hear old people talk about from time to time.
@Tru Invincible: Oh I hear you so loud and clear on all that. And I've certainly cashed paychecks from companies that have most likely been involved in real hateful things.
But I guess, as a gay at least, the Post has through the years been so extreme that I would have to wear a wig and glasses into work there and lie to all my friends. (and get me some hot log cabin republican ass on the weekends)
I'm thinking instead of an office, a desk, phone or a computer, they just hand their new minority workers a broom and a high-five with a hearty "now go get-em!"
But were the exact same articles inside too? That's a little more serious to me than having similar covers. A similar cover only - that's a mistake. The same exact magazine inside and out - that's fucking lazy.
01:59 PM
01:58 PM
12:57 PM
01:08 PM
12:35 PM
And extended, comprehensive photoshoot.
12:24 PM
12:23 PM
12:16 PM
Very log cabin republican. Very.
12:22 PM
12:35 PM
12:39 PM
But I guess, as a gay at least, the Post has through the years been so extreme that I would have to wear a wig and glasses into work there and lie to all my friends. (and get me some hot log cabin republican ass on the weekends)
12:14 PM
12:12 PM
12:07 PM
Perish the thought!
12:05 PM
12:10 PM
12:13 PM
I'm thinking instead of an office, a desk, phone or a computer, they just hand their new minority workers a broom and a high-five with a hearty "now go get-em!"
11:44 AM
But trust me when I tell you that it all makes sense because it's leverageable and synergistic.
Also, it all dovetails nicely with the hyperextended enterprise. Do you know what that means? No? I thought not.
01:09 PM
11:42 AM
11:12 AM
11:08 AM