media, ; can host LBS ads'html

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

manchops
01:20 PM

In reply to Nation's Biggest Publisher of Gay Newspapers Closes
Want to point this out--and I come from a background with a lot of employment in gay print media. Though there is big sadness about this, mainly the history and struggle of gays and lesbians to get their voices printed and distributed, mainly to reach those in small towns, rural areas (to reach suicidal teenagers ESPECIALLY) but also to organize a community to fight for its rights and very existence (see: AIDS), the times have changed. Mainly, duh, the internet

And the one thing with the gays, say what you will, but in terms of media and communication, it's a group that has always been 100 steps ahead. The death of gay print has been SOOO obvious for so long to gays and lesbians who have been all over the internet since it was born (compare the amount of friends your gay friends have on facebook vs. your straight friends). Yes hook-ups and sex ads are a part of this. But keep in mind: As a minority group unidenifiable by skin color, etc., the internet is the ultimate way for us to find each other and to know what places to patronize that are not only "friendly" but safe. Sorry gay print media. And mostly, sorry for those of you who still had or have jobs in it. #washingtonblade
Reply

manchops was starred manchops was unstarred

se7a7n7
12:30 PM

In reply to How to Turn a Correction into an Exclusive
I remember when the I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapsed in early 2007. Lou Dobbs talked about it and actually said something to the effect of...

We have to ask ourselves. If our bridges are not safe, are our borders safe? This story reminds us that we need to strengthen our borders.... #newyorkpost
Reply

se7a7n7 was starred se7a7n7 was unstarred

If_I_Had_a_Poodle
12:29 PM

In reply to Nation's Biggest Publisher of Gay Newspapers Closes
What if they had switched from Windows Media to Mac? #washingtonblade
Reply

If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred

drunkexpatwriter
12:05 PM

In reply to Nation's Biggest Publisher of Gay Newspapers Closes
And yet Details survives.

Is the basic deal on this that these newspapers used to be kept in business by personal ads that other newspapers wouldn't accept but now Craigslist Casual Encounters has doomed them? #washingtonblade
Reply

drunkexpatwriter was starred drunkexpatwriter was unstarred

If_I_Had_a_Poodle
12:32 PM

@drunkexpatwriter: How much that and how much that gays, as a market, are both more and less separately defined?

Big brands wanting gay dollarz can pretty much go MSM now #washingtonblade
Reply

If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred

Trai_Dep
11:59 AM

In reply to Nation's Biggest Publisher of Gay Newspapers Closes
This really is sad, in that many stories too "niche-y" (read: g-a-y) for the mainstream media were broken by these publishers, before becoming national stories. #washingtonblade
Reply

Trai_Dep was starred Trai_Dep was unstarred

El_Gato
11:45 AM

In reply to How to Turn a Correction into an Exclusive
The ny post is known for it's variety of exclusives. One of its most famous was the unbylined story it ran back in 2004 on John Kerry selecting Dick Gephardt as his vp running mate -- what many in the biz call a "Permanent Exclusive." Then there was the time it ran that bogus story about Bernie Madoff having terminal cancer, a bullshit exclusive. #newyorkpost
Reply

El_Gato was starred El_Gato was unstarred

MrInBetween
12:17 PM

@El_Gato: Actually, it's called an "Eternal Exclusive" The alliteration makes the phrase, though "Bullshit Exclusive" also works. #newyorkpost
Reply

MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred

Princess Sparkle Pony
11:38 AM

In reply to Nation's Biggest Publisher of Gay Newspapers Closes
especially one with the reputation for excellence that the Blade had

Well, until their previous editor started hiring people like Jeff Gannon, anyway. #washingtonblade
Reply

Beau Nerd
11:51 AM

@Princess Sparkle Pony: Say what you will about Gannon, but the man had a real way with softballs. #washingtonblade
Reply

Beau Nerd was starred Beau Nerd was unstarred

LatestBy
10:43 AM

In reply to How to Turn a Correction into an Exclusive
$8 million will buy a lot of bricks for your Mexi-wall, Lou. #newyorkpost
Reply

LatestBy was starred LatestBy was unstarred

Valerie Flame
10:42 AM

In reply to How to Turn a Correction into an Exclusive
That's a reporting trick, not something that's supposed to play out in print. So, what's your reaction to being caught stealing $30,000 from the city? Oh, it was only $15,000? Confirmed. #newyorkpost
Reply

Valerie Flame was starred Valerie Flame was unstarred

Edward Lionheart
11/13/09

In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
Vicki Bosie, I love you, seriously. It's a cliche, right? The golden rule? Only it's not. It's what we're supposed to be about. And you've invoked it at the right time and in the right place. Now if only there were a capitalist Prince Charming who could deliver you into his kingdom... #newsweek
Reply

Edward Lionheart was starred Edward Lionheart was unstarred

TheUptightMidwesterner
11/13/09

In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
I hope I can be this cool and noble when I get laid off.
I am more of a sobbing-loudly/leaving-bags- of- flaming pooh kind of gal. #newsweek
Reply

PontiusPirate
11/13/09

In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
This is why you ALWAYS cut off the employees IT and badge access DURING the termination.

"Vicki, come on in and sit down - just have a seat here while I send this email to IT. Click. There we go. Now, about your future with the company." #newsweek
Reply

PontiusPirate was starred PontiusPirate was unstarred

BowlingForDollars
11/13/09

In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
Corporate America: It's The Same Everywhere. #newsweek
Reply

BowlingForDollars was starred

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
Mr. Rohde's situation in this video is a lot like the one he faced when held captive. The picture he painted of that experience was a dark and undecipherable as you can imagine. His insight that our view of the Taliban as some static organization is wholly inaccurate was chilling. It seems to be an ever-changing mass, coming together almost transactionally, and then spinning itself into its next iteration. This kind of inherent confusion was buttressed by the realization that the man who kidnapped Rohde was the man he was supposed to interview, a fact he didn't come into possession of until well into his captivity.

I don't know what a shit storm looks like, but the more I read about Afghanistan/Pakistan and the marauding hordes that rule its nether regions, I am definitely getting an image.

And it is not pretty. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: It frustrates me when Rohde gives the impression that everyone thinks of the Taliban as a strict hierarchy. I know that when I was in Afghanistan, none of the people I worked with thought of it that way, and we all worked to get a better understanding of the various networks and the differing operational methods between each. For Rohde to come back and say how foolish we all are, and please, let him tell us how it really is, is incredibly irritating. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy promoted this comment Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

@Adah: I appreciate your frustration, but what if what he is reporting is accurate in the sense that our perceptions are inherently flawed because the thing we are trying to perceive defies static perception? That it is morphing every day into something that defies categorization, let alone a coherent policy for engaging militarily.

I, for one, wouldn't want Mr. Rohde's job, not so much for the obvious danger posed but because the act of communicating what he is learning as the result of being embedded as he is has to be beyond comprehension to most people. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: Well, of course the insurgency is constantly changing. But from reading Mr. Rohde's five part series from a few weeks ago, I'm not sure his understanding of it is as great as he thinks it is. He was kept in various rooms for seven months, and his main source of information appears to come from the low level men guarding him. The appearances of high level leaders in Rohde's narrative were remarkable because, by his own admission, they were fairly rare. Now, who knows, maybe when his book inevitably comes out, I'll be proven wrong and Rohde will reveal some remarkable details from these conversations with high level leaders. But he certainly didn't have anything terribly revealing in his Times piece that hasn't been said better and with a greater understanding in many other books. #davidrohde
Reply

Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

@Adah: I don't see how you can take issue with Mr. Rohde for the lack of high-level leaders being conspicuously absent from his narrative. I dare say he was playing the cards he was dealt, so to speak. I think you're losing sight of the fact that his core mission was to interview the man who ultimately kidnapped him as part of an on-going series of reports. A reporter in the field functioning as Mr. Rohde did is per force sending back a mosaic of what he sees. Over-arching analysis isn't the immediate by-product of the kind of reportage he was responsible for. He is essentially a scout, hopefully a very insightful, well-informed one, but given the environmental obstacles to performing that task, i.e., staying alive, I think he did yeoman's work. What his pieces as they appeared in the NYTs revealed was the insanity of our presence there as currently constituted.

I would hope that people like yourself would wait for Mr. Rohde to have the luxury of some time to distill the sheer viscerality of that experience, and then see what analysis he puts forth. Given what he has been through, it not only seems fair but necessary if we are going to learn anything beyond what he has already imparted. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: I think it's unlikely that he got the larger picture of how the insurgency functions from talking to some guards. I understand he goes in for a mosaic piece, but you seem to think this will contribute to ground-breaking changes in how we view the Taliban and the Haqqani Network. I disagree. Rohde went in with an outdated and inaccurate impression of Afghan culture and local Taliban politics. That's what got him kidnapped - that and his threat assessment appeared to be limited to asking the advice of one French reporter who'd interviewed the same Taliban leader a few years ago. Rohde failed to update his own understanding of how the Taliban works. I'm not sure that reflects on the U.S. government's or even better informed citizens and reporters' impression of the Taliban.

I would recommend Seth Jones's book In the Graveyard of Empires for a much better understanding of our situation in Afghanistan right now, and how our actions along with local Pashtun culture and history have contributed to the rise of the insurgency in the last few years.

[www.amazon.com] #davidrohde
Reply

Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: Bollocks. Most Afghanis aren't kosher with the Taliban's world view. The Taliban are a foreign influence on Afghanistan from the tribal regions. In the 1970s Afghanistan was a place where hippies used to go to listen to live music and smoke hash. Afghans don't burn down girls schools, the influence of outside Islamist forces (and first-world foreign occupiers) have led to that.
Reply

Edited by gawkimo at 11/13/09 7:08 PM gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@gawkimo: In the cities, sure. But the country has always been more traditional and rural, even predating the Soviet invasion. The Afghan monarchy basically controlled the large cities and left huge areas of the population for the local tribes to control. When the Soviets invaded, and during the war that followed, those middle and creative classes left the country en masse, most never to return. Those cities are all a lot less hippie-ish today. About one million fled to Iran, about three million to Pakistan. The Taliban emerged out of those Pakistani refugee camps along the border, from Peshawer down to Balochistan. In that instance, I suppose you're right, but the Taliban was always a Pashtun power, and in some ways that's more important than what side of the border it originated on. Most Pashtuns consider the Pashtun area of Pakistan to practically be part of Afghanistan anyway. In addition, many of these insurgents were already radicalized in the 1970s. It's not al Al Qaeda coming in and changing the poor defenseless Pashtun people. See Gulbuddin Hekmatyr in the 1970s and 1980s.

I didn't mean to imply that all Afghans are Taliban sympathizers. In this you are correct. But they're a lot more scared of the Taliban than they are of us. If the Taliban (and I'm using Taliban as shorthand for the various insurgent networks active in Afghanistan) tells them to never breathe a word when Americans are around or they'll kill their family, you can bet they're not going to be overly helpful. On top of this, the rural areas are still much more conservative and more likely to be sympathetic to the Taliban than they are to us. Our COIN strategy, if we choose to keep following it, has us supposedly withdrawing from these areas as they are so hard to control. These are the areas where you get your battles of Wanat or battle at COP Keating. #davidrohde
Reply

Edited by Adah at 11/13/09 7:34 PM Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: Even in the traditional, rural countryside: they don't like the Taliban any more than the foreign occupiers. These are tribal folks who will side with anyone (Muslim or otherwise) who a.) Leave them alone and b.) pay them more. These folks don't sympathize with the Taliban for being "more conservative" -- they sympathize with anyone who adheres to a.) and b.). #davidrohde
Reply

gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: I would also point out that the Mughal Empire basically began in Afghanistan (well, Samarkand, but mostly in what we call Afghanistan today) and those Muslims drank alcohol and depicted Muhammad in paintings. Afghanistan is not the Whahabbist Kingdom we portray it to be. They are moderates when it come to religion -- they are radicals when it come to foreign intervention -- we can thank the Russians for that. #davidrohde
Reply

gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

Cecil's Wielder
11/13/09

In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
But who is going to play him in the movie adaptation?! #davidrohde
Reply

Cecil's Wielder was starred Cecil's Wielder was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#media #canhostlbsadshtml

Gawker

#media#canhostlbsadshtml

Gawker

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment

#media #canhostlbsadshtml