• Profile logout login

#media#http#wwwstichtingzondagbe#quot

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 6:14 AM
Mon Nov 16
19 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Edward Lionheart Edward Lionheart
    11/13/09

    In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
    Vicki Bosie, I love you, seriously. It's a cliche, right? The golden rule? Only it's not. It's what we're supposed to be about. And you've invoked it at the right time and in the right place. Now if only there were a capitalist Prince Charming who could deliver you into his kingdom... #newsweek
     Reply
    Edward Lionheart was starred Edward Lionheart was unstarred
    Image of TheUptightMidwesterner TheUptightMidwesterner
    11/13/09

    In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
    I hope I can be this cool and noble when I get laid off.
    I am more of a sobbing-loudly/leaving-bags- of- flaming pooh kind of gal. #newsweek
     Reply
    TheUptightMidwesterner was starred TheUptightMidwesterner was unstarred
    Image of PontiusPirate PontiusPirate
    11/13/09

    In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
    This is why you ALWAYS cut off the employees IT and badge access DURING the termination.

    "Vicki, come on in and sit down - just have a seat here while I send this email to IT. Click. There we go. Now, about your future with the company." #newsweek
     Reply
    PontiusPirate was starred PontiusPirate was unstarred
    Image of BowlingForDollars BowlingForDollars
    11/13/09

    In reply to Newsweek Employee Calls Company Rude and Ungrateful in Goodbye Memo
    Corporate America: It's The Same Everywhere. #newsweek
     Reply
    BowlingForDollars was starred BowlingForDollars was unstarred
    Image of TheSometimesWhy TheSometimesWhy
    11/13/09

    In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
    Mr. Rohde's situation in this video is a lot like the one he faced when held captive. The picture he painted of that experience was a dark and undecipherable as you can imagine. His insight that our view of the Taliban as some static organization is wholly inaccurate was chilling. It seems to be an ever-changing mass, coming together almost transactionally, and then spinning itself into its next iteration. This kind of inherent confusion was buttressed by the realization that the man who kidnapped Rohde was the man he was supposed to interview, a fact he didn't come into possession of until well into his captivity.

    I don't know what a shit storm looks like, but the more I read about Afghanistan/Pakistan and the marauding hordes that rule its nether regions, I am definitely getting an image.

    And it is not pretty. #davidrohde
     Reply
    TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred
    Image of Adah Adah
    11/13/09

    @TheSometimesWhy: It frustrates me when Rohde gives the impression that everyone thinks of the Taliban as a strict hierarchy. I know that when I was in Afghanistan, none of the people I worked with thought of it that way, and we all worked to get a better understanding of the various networks and the differing operational methods between each. For Rohde to come back and say how foolish we all are, and please, let him tell us how it really is, is incredibly irritating. #davidrohde
     Reply
    TheSometimesWhy promoted this comment Adah was starred Adah was unstarred
    Image of TheSometimesWhy TheSometimesWhy
    11/13/09

    @Adah: I appreciate your frustration, but what if what he is reporting is accurate in the sense that our perceptions are inherently flawed because the thing we are trying to perceive defies static perception? That it is morphing every day into something that defies categorization, let alone a coherent policy for engaging militarily.

    I, for one, wouldn't want Mr. Rohde's job, not so much for the obvious danger posed but because the act of communicating what he is learning as the result of being embedded as he is has to be beyond comprehension to most people. #davidrohde
     Reply
    TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred
    Image of Adah Adah
    11/13/09

    @TheSometimesWhy: Well, of course the insurgency is constantly changing. But from reading Mr. Rohde's five part series from a few weeks ago, I'm not sure his understanding of it is as great as he thinks it is. He was kept in various rooms for seven months, and his main source of information appears to come from the low level men guarding him. The appearances of high level leaders in Rohde's narrative were remarkable because, by his own admission, they were fairly rare. Now, who knows, maybe when his book inevitably comes out, I'll be proven wrong and Rohde will reveal some remarkable details from these conversations with high level leaders. But he certainly didn't have anything terribly revealing in his Times piece that hasn't been said better and with a greater understanding in many other books. #davidrohde
     Reply
    Adah was starred Adah was unstarred
    Image of TheSometimesWhy TheSometimesWhy
    11/13/09

    @Adah: I don't see how you can take issue with Mr. Rohde for the lack of high-level leaders being conspicuously absent from his narrative. I dare say he was playing the cards he was dealt, so to speak. I think you're losing sight of the fact that his core mission was to interview the man who ultimately kidnapped him as part of an on-going series of reports. A reporter in the field functioning as Mr. Rohde did is per force sending back a mosaic of what he sees. Over-arching analysis isn't the immediate by-product of the kind of reportage he was responsible for. He is essentially a scout, hopefully a very insightful, well-informed one, but given the environmental obstacles to performing that task, i.e., staying alive, I think he did yeoman's work. What his pieces as they appeared in the NYTs revealed was the insanity of our presence there as currently constituted.

    I would hope that people like yourself would wait for Mr. Rohde to have the luxury of some time to distill the sheer viscerality of that experience, and then see what analysis he puts forth. Given what he has been through, it not only seems fair but necessary if we are going to learn anything beyond what he has already imparted. #davidrohde
     Reply
    TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred
    Image of Adah Adah
    11/13/09

    @TheSometimesWhy: I think it's unlikely that he got the larger picture of how the insurgency functions from talking to some guards. I understand he goes in for a mosaic piece, but you seem to think this will contribute to ground-breaking changes in how we view the Taliban and the Haqqani Network. I disagree. Rohde went in with an outdated and inaccurate impression of Afghan culture and local Taliban politics. That's what got him kidnapped - that and his threat assessment appeared to be limited to asking the advice of one French reporter who'd interviewed the same Taliban leader a few years ago. Rohde failed to update his own understanding of how the Taliban works. I'm not sure that reflects on the U.S. government's or even better informed citizens and reporters' impression of the Taliban.

    I would recommend Seth Jones's book In the Graveyard of Empires for a much better understanding of our situation in Afghanistan right now, and how our actions along with local Pashtun culture and history have contributed to the rise of the insurgency in the last few years.

    [www.amazon.com] #davidrohde
     Reply
    Adah was starred Adah was unstarred
    Image of gawkimo gawkimo
    11/13/09

    @Adah: Bollocks. Most Afghanis aren't kosher with the Taliban's world view. The Taliban are a foreign influence on Afghanistan from the tribal regions. In the 1970s Afghanistan was a place where hippies used to go to listen to live music and smoke hash. Afghans don't burn down girls schools, the influence of outside Islamist forces (and first-world foreign occupiers) have led to that.
     Reply
    Edited by gawkimo at 11/13/09 7:08 PM gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred
    Image of Adah Adah
    11/13/09

    @gawkimo: In the cities, sure. But the country has always been more traditional and rural, even predating the Soviet invasion. The Afghan monarchy basically controlled the large cities and left huge areas of the population for the local tribes to control. When the Soviets invaded, and during the war that followed, those middle and creative classes left the country en masse, most never to return. Those cities are all a lot less hippie-ish today. About one million fled to Iran, about three million to Pakistan. The Taliban emerged out of those Pakistani refugee camps along the border, from Peshawer down to Balochistan. In that instance, I suppose you're right, but the Taliban was always a Pashtun power, and in some ways that's more important than what side of the border it originated on. Most Pashtuns consider the Pashtun area of Pakistan to practically be part of Afghanistan anyway. In addition, many of these insurgents were already radicalized in the 1970s. It's not al Al Qaeda coming in and changing the poor defenseless Pashtun people. See Gulbuddin Hekmatyr in the 1970s and 1980s.

    I didn't mean to imply that all Afghans are Taliban sympathizers. In this you are correct. But they're a lot more scared of the Taliban than they are of us. If the Taliban (and I'm using Taliban as shorthand for the various insurgent networks active in Afghanistan) tells them to never breathe a word when Americans are around or they'll kill their family, you can bet they're not going to be overly helpful. On top of this, the rural areas are still much more conservative and more likely to be sympathetic to the Taliban than they are to us. Our COIN strategy, if we choose to keep following it, has us supposedly withdrawing from these areas as they are so hard to control. These are the areas where you get your battles of Wanat or battle at COP Keating. #davidrohde
     Reply
    Edited by Adah at 11/13/09 7:34 PM Adah was starred Adah was unstarred
    Image of gawkimo gawkimo
    11/13/09

    @Adah: Even in the traditional, rural countryside: they don't like the Taliban any more than the foreign occupiers. These are tribal folks who will side with anyone (Muslim or otherwise) who a.) Leave them alone and b.) pay them more. These folks don't sympathize with the Taliban for being "more conservative" -- they sympathize with anyone who adheres to a.) and b.). #davidrohde
     Reply
    gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred
    Image of gawkimo gawkimo
    11/13/09

    @Adah: I would also point out that the Mughal Empire basically began in Afghanistan (well, Samarkand, but mostly in what we call Afghanistan today) and those Muslims drank alcohol and depicted Muhammad in paintings. Afghanistan is not the Whahabbist Kingdom we portray it to be. They are moderates when it come to religion -- they are radicals when it come to foreign intervention -- we can thank the Russians for that. #davidrohde
     Reply
    gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred
    Image of Cecil's Wielder Cecil's Wielder
    11/13/09

    In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
    But who is going to play him in the movie adaptation?! #davidrohde
     Reply
    Cecil's Wielder was starred Cecil's Wielder was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    11/13/09

    In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
    2nd Amendment! #charlieleduff
     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of Mr.choppers - Delenda Carthago Est Mr.choppers - Delenda Carthago Est
    11/13/09

    In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
    Is there a Green Zone? #charlieleduff
     Reply
    Mr.choppers - Delenda Carthago Est was starred Mr.choppers - Delenda Carthago Est was unstarred
    Image of Dickdogfood Dickdogfood
    11/13/09

    In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
    I won't be convinced that Time is at all serious about their brand of stupid unless they name Glenn Beck Man of the Year. Even "The Angry American" won't cut it. #media
     Reply
    Dickdogfood was starred Dickdogfood was unstarred
    Image of Michael Bauser Michael Bauser
    11/13/09

    In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
    Another fun "How violent is Detroit?" factoid: Half the City Council plans to be carrying concealed weapons next year:

    [www.freep.com]

    Even the minister who was elected says he receives death threats.

    (I actually work a lot in Detroit's residential neighborhoods. The only safety precaution my employer allows is... a rape whistle. I get some laughs when I tell the locals that.) #charlieleduff
     Reply
    Michael Bauser was starred Michael Bauser was unstarred
    Image of sanyucat sanyucat
    11/13/09

    In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
    How is Time still in print? It's the journalistic equivalent of scrapple. #media
     Reply
    sanyucat was starred sanyucat was unstarred
    Image of Steverino Begins Steverino Begins
    11/13/09

    In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
    Wouldn't be surprised if their POTY was a hashtag. Like #iranelection. #lame #media
     Reply
    Steverino Begins was starred Steverino Begins was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/13/09

    In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
    Have you watched the CNN online newscast? It's two college kids doing the news from the bridge of the Enterprise but with most of the props missing. #media
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of AzureTexan AzureTexan
    11/13/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: It's dead, Jim. #media
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy promoted this comment AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    11/13/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: If there was no event that I was watching on one of their live channels, I've actually been known to leave the stationary shot of the White House or some other quiet thing open, rather than listen to the newbies blather. #media
     Reply
    Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/13/09

    @Magister: Yeah, they make Wolf Blitzer sound like Edward R. Murrow. #media
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    11/13/09

    @TheBusinessGuy: More like Wolf Blitzer's producer because whenever I watch him, I can totally imagine Holly Hunter in his ear. #media
     Reply
    Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/13/09

    @Magister: I know what you mean. I love Blitzer's idiotic tags to stories. For example, if Earth were blown up by the Martians, Blitzer would say on the outro, "The Earth has been blown up. Certainly a tragedy, and we will be following this." Jack Cafferty always looks at him as if he's a fly in Cafferty's soup. #media
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of Magister Magister
    11/13/09

    @TheBusinessGuy:
    What gets me is when he's "interviewing" a reporter or analyst to provide background and asks questions which he should be able to answer, if he's half as smart as his audience, but some producer's obviously telling him there's an interesting factoid somebody, somewhere may not have heard.

    The anchors on cnn.com were much the same way, except unlike Blitzer, I never expected them to know.
     Reply
    Edited by Magister at 11/13/09 3:14 PM Magister was starred Magister was unstarred
    Image of TheBusinessGuy TheBusinessGuy
    11/13/09

    @Magister: After watching Blitzer for five minutes, you really don't expect him to know much of anything. Actually, the only CNN headliners with real heft are Amanpour and Zakaria--especially Zakaria, whose Sunday show always feel like the ideal seminar at the Kennedy School. #media
     Reply
    TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred
    Image of A Message To Rudy A Message To Rudy
    11/13/09

    In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
    I would pile on more on Detroit, but I live in Chicago, so... #charlieleduff
     Reply
    A Message To Rudy was starred A Message To Rudy was unstarred
    Image of AndPreciousLittleofThat AndPreciousLittleofThat
    11/13/09

    In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
    It bears repeating: "Robocop" was a documentary. #charlieleduff
     Reply
    AndPreciousLittleofThat was starred AndPreciousLittleofThat was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.