Bloomy is doing radio promos for the all-news AM station in Toronto, identifying himself only as founder of Bloomberg Media. I think the station must have recently signed with Bloomberg for business news reports.
I believe they exposed this problem in the 1990 film "Ski Patrol," in which a diverse bandy of fun-loving ski bums take on the big bad ski resort developer.
@Botswana Meat Commission FC: Actually, I think it all began when Lane Meyer, pursued by a debt-collecting paperboy, raced Roy Stalin to the bottom of the K-12.
I wouldn't expect anyone who received that e-mail to send it Gawker's way -- by and large they were either staff photographers or the more regular freelancers, most of whom deeply respect Mike and his role at the News. Some of us are minorly terrified of him, yes, but he's a great guy and I don't think anyone who has _actually_ worked under him for any extended period of time would disagree. He simply expressed his appreciation for his staff -- particularly the assignment editor -- and informed us that he was moving to marketing.
I'm really really disappointed by the poopstorm that has been spewed about Mike Lipack. He's one of the nicest guys on the planet and no matter what you think of him - NO ONE DESERVES TO BE FIRED ON A HOSPITAL BED. If anyone couldn't stand working for him, then maybe they just weren't cut out for working at the News. I've known him and his family for a very long time and every time I've seen him interact with his staff, they've talked as though they were family and had deep respect for each other. I'm with Tart of Darkness - you're not just cold people, you're downright inhuman. Maybe you should be spending more time doing your jobs rather than ripping apart a physically ill man on the web.
1- Gretchen is not a Brit, she's American. She happens to be working in the UK at this time.
2- I am really surprised to hear such negativity about Lipack. I have been a stringer for NYDN for a few years and he has always been kind and encouraging towards me, and pushed me to go father than I thought I could. Very much a mentor in an industry full of criticizers and complainers. As far as I can see, he spoke lovingly about his staff and had a lot of pride in his department. I'll miss working with him and talking with him.
Don't listen to the haters who can't take the heat of working at a New York tabloid. How do you celebrate someone's firing/demotion while he's in the hospital? Yes, he was tyrannical and there was certainly no lost love between us, but I am (and I am sure a vast majority of the people who have worked for him, whether they will openly admit it or not) a stronger photojournalist and person as a result of having worked under him. Mike Lipack definitely has this ex-Daily Newser's best wishes during this time of transition for him.
@garyhe: Do not take my opinion of him as not being able to "take the heat" of working at a New York tabloid.
That's as offensive a statement as his continued existence.
I took the heat, I thrived on the heat, I am better for the heat. His version of it was not a raised temperature, it was a pure and simple, abject depravity stoked by his desire to lord over his perceived underlings.
You may feel that his abuse made you better, but there are far greater methods to push people in the right direction.
Never forget, his professional sadism was just that. If you somehow benefited from that, good for you. It's not the way to run a department and he's hurt more people than he's helped.
Not a matter of tough-love. He did it all for his own benefit, and that's what makes him reprehensible.
What a shocker! Martin Dunn replacing an American beloved employee with another Brit! He's just filling the place with Brits, (like himself) preferably ones with blind loyalty to him. All the guy cares about is whether you'll obey him blindly and whether you'll ever leak anything about him to the media. I guess Mike stood up to Dunn's bad decisions one time too many. And since Dunn's a coward, he preferred firing him while he was out. And as far as still having a job, I'm sure it's at lower pay.
@oopsidoo: As much as I love your Mad Men-esq ‘British = EVIL' sentiment, in Viehmanns defence she was born and raised in New York is well qualified for the job (she was the director of photography at the Post for over 8 years) Maybe I’m wrong but I can't imagine the fact that she has lived and worked in Britain had much bearing on Dunn’s decision to hire her.
To all inclined to feel sorry for Mr. Lipack...(and to Mr. Kamer, who wrote "(Lipack is)...very, very well-regarded by Daily News photogs and reporters alike"):
Ask any non-staff photojournalist that has had the poor fortune to have their career-path wind through Lipack's turf (there are dozens) about their experience and you will hopefully come to understand that old Mikey has just received only a fraction of the shit karma coming back on him on return.
This is a man who - from the much I've heard from friends who work/ed for him - consistently behaves in an abusive, belittling and cruel manner.
He deserves no pity at this point.
@PennyNickledime: To be fair, he deserves the pity reserved for people with no discernible talent or professionalism, who've only worked at one place their entire lives and fear losing their jobs so much they're willing to sell their mother out for a continued paycheck.
There was a revolving door of non-staff shooters, dozens to the Nth degree, mostly because they couldn't stand the abuse he inflicted. Every one of them was the latest dog for him to kick to get his dick hard. He even did it to some staffers too. Especially the ones he didn't hire.
I was unfortunate enough to witness this as I worked under him in a different capacity. More than a handful of people knew the Lipack shtick of how, when he knew he was wrong, he'd yell at you more to make up for his bruised ego.
I personally witnessed him praise a shooter one minute, and when an editor asked a fairly innocuous question about why a certain shot wasn't taken, he called said shooter and told him he should sell his gear and get a different job.
If I listed every vile thing I witnessed him do, it would make "War and Peace" look like a pamphlet. I don't feel comfortable, even despite the venting, telling some of the things he did.
I had been on the receiving end of his attempt to belittle me more than once. And when he would drag me into his office, go on a tirade, and stick his stubby, fat little finger in my face, I never once flinched. That would infuriate him more, as I didn't grovel the way he wanted folks to, and he'd go ballistic. It was the only way to battle him because it's not like he could fire me for NOT reacting, but it was a drain having to deal with such puerile, schoolyard-bully behavior on top of actually having a job to do.
Believe me, if you'd never had the displeasure of reporting to him, the stories pale in comparison to the real thing.
I was told once by someone, before having to actually work under him, that he was the most evil boss that person had ever worked for. I thought that was hyperbole until I discovered it was a mild description.
12/17/09
I guess in the third term, anything goes.
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/16/09
12/15/09
Hijinks did indeed ensue.
12/15/09
12/15/09
3. Where we will then go to experience second-hand the twee epiphanies of the overprivileged?
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
2- I am really surprised to hear such negativity about Lipack. I have been a stringer for NYDN for a few years and he has always been kind and encouraging towards me, and pushed me to go father than I thought I could. Very much a mentor in an industry full of criticizers and complainers. As far as I can see, he spoke lovingly about his staff and had a lot of pride in his department. I'll miss working with him and talking with him.
12/13/09
#tips
12/13/09
12/13/09
That's as offensive a statement as his continued existence.
I took the heat, I thrived on the heat, I am better for the heat. His version of it was not a raised temperature, it was a pure and simple, abject depravity stoked by his desire to lord over his perceived underlings.
You may feel that his abuse made you better, but there are far greater methods to push people in the right direction.
Never forget, his professional sadism was just that. If you somehow benefited from that, good for you. It's not the way to run a department and he's hurt more people than he's helped.
Not a matter of tough-love. He did it all for his own benefit, and that's what makes him reprehensible.
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
Ask any non-staff photojournalist that has had the poor fortune to have their career-path wind through Lipack's turf (there are dozens) about their experience and you will hopefully come to understand that old Mikey has just received only a fraction of the shit karma coming back on him on return.
This is a man who - from the much I've heard from friends who work/ed for him - consistently behaves in an abusive, belittling and cruel manner.
He deserves no pity at this point.
12/13/09
12/13/09
There was a revolving door of non-staff shooters, dozens to the Nth degree, mostly because they couldn't stand the abuse he inflicted. Every one of them was the latest dog for him to kick to get his dick hard. He even did it to some staffers too. Especially the ones he didn't hire.
I was unfortunate enough to witness this as I worked under him in a different capacity. More than a handful of people knew the Lipack shtick of how, when he knew he was wrong, he'd yell at you more to make up for his bruised ego.
I personally witnessed him praise a shooter one minute, and when an editor asked a fairly innocuous question about why a certain shot wasn't taken, he called said shooter and told him he should sell his gear and get a different job.
If I listed every vile thing I witnessed him do, it would make "War and Peace" look like a pamphlet. I don't feel comfortable, even despite the venting, telling some of the things he did.
I had been on the receiving end of his attempt to belittle me more than once. And when he would drag me into his office, go on a tirade, and stick his stubby, fat little finger in my face, I never once flinched. That would infuriate him more, as I didn't grovel the way he wanted folks to, and he'd go ballistic. It was the only way to battle him because it's not like he could fire me for NOT reacting, but it was a drain having to deal with such puerile, schoolyard-bully behavior on top of actually having a job to do.
Believe me, if you'd never had the displeasure of reporting to him, the stories pale in comparison to the real thing.
I was told once by someone, before having to actually work under him, that he was the most evil boss that person had ever worked for. I thought that was hyperbole until I discovered it was a mild description.