Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
New York, 9:36 PM
Thu Dec 17
50 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip Your Editors:
Tipline: 646-214-8138
Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |
West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |
Contributing Editors:
Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |
Media:
Hamilton Nolan |
Politics:
Alex Pareene |
Investigations:
John Cook |
Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |
Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |
Weekends:
Foster Kamer |
Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/08/09
10/07/09
Bwahaha. Fuck Gregory. Shame about the ratings. Has there been time enough past to say Tim Russert was a hack and a courtesan of the powerful, without a single original thought as he introduced endless guests telling us how we needed to brutalize the people of Iraq without mercy or human decency? Because of fake imaginary weapons?
Yes, it's time enough. Fuck Tim Russert, salesman for the Iraq war. Too bad there's a line of people waiting to replace him. Talking the hawkish tawk on behalf of the military-industrial complex. Genial spokesperson for blasting the fuck out of some other foreign country.
Oh, but apparently he was a jolly fellow when he wasn't inviting people on camera to advocate a disastrous war. Ho-ho, Tim was one them, that tiny Beltway crowd with their entitlement and heads firmly up their own asses.
10/09/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Well, you have you seen David Gregory host, right? If I was an NBC suit, I'd have been shitting bricks too.
10/07/09
Tim Russert was a disservice to the news industry. Jack Welch and his Irish-cabal at NBC are notoriously bad at actual news, Russert included.
He was a terrible newsman who never actually did any good reporting and served to misinform the public under the guise of being a "nice guy." He may have been a nice man in person, but he was indeed a terrible "newsman." Hence, the tone of the post.
Next thing you know, Olbermann will close his show with Morrow's signature line.
10/07/09
Yet you wrote this on October 7, 2009:
"He was a ... a watchdog ... an institution ... a towering genius."
Is there not an inconsistency here?
PS. - GO BULLS!
10/07/09
10/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
08/07/09
07/13/09
democrats talk shit all the time too, but they can never collectively get their story straight. Oh, if only air america hadn't crumbled into dust.
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
I have the feeling that the GOP keeps her around for the same reason they keep Limbaugh -- it riles up the base. The base that probably accepts her byzantine reasons for stepping down as pure gospel. But I can't see the actual leaders of the GOP (ahem, assuming there are any, at this point) seeing her move as anything but bizarre and erratic, and I don't think they'll be taking the chance again of having her on their top ticket.
But, again, that's assuming there's actually someone at the top orchestrating all the Orwellian double-speak. Maybe no one's driving the cart anymore, and the horses are just running how they've been trained.
07/13/09
Glad that worked out for him.
07/14/09
07/13/09
Even so, I'd much rather John McCain be obliviously defending his running mate choice than anywhere near the button as President. Anybody remember that this swaggering buffoon actually led Obama in the RCP national average polls going into mid-September 2008?
07/13/09
There is no silver lining. Sarah Palin is not leaving politics -- which actually confuses me, because I thought one of the points teased out of her incoherent speech was that she was leaving politics. Ah, it must be that mean-ol' media lying to me again.
BTW, this is an entertaining read. Lock up your pets when Sarah's around, folks, and not because she'll shoot them from the air, either!
07/13/09
I'm adoring this inability to course correct on the part of Republicans. They're waist deep in the Big Muddy, and the big fools keep pushing on.
07/13/09
07/12/09
07/13/09
07/12/09
hm.. I dunno, I think there was a lot more shit about him beyond his Palin pick that made his chances an uphill battle. Him being an olde, Bush royally fucking up the image of the Republican party, and the general awesomeness that was Obama are all pretty campaign-crumbling contributors.
07/12/09
07/12/09
07/12/09
07/12/09
I guess what I'm trying to say is it wasn't the Palin pick itself that doomed him, it was his wholesale drinking of the Bill Kristol Kool-Aid that led to the pick that doomed him.
07/13/09
07/13/09
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five
he U.S. Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s was the failure of 747 savings and loan associations (S&Ls) in the United States. The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around $160.1 billion, about $124.6 billion of which was directly paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.[1] The accompanying slowdown in the finance industry and the real estate market may have been a contributing cause of the 1990-1991 economic recession. Between 1986 and 1991, the number of new homes constructed per year dropped from 1.8 million to 1 million, the lowest rate since World War II.[2]
The Keating Five scandal was prompted by the activities of one particular savings and loan: Lincoln Savings and Loan Association of Irvine, California. Lincoln's chairman was Charles Keating, who ultimately served five years in prison for his corrupt mismanagement of Lincoln.[3] In the four years after Keating's American Continental Corporation (ACC) had purchased Lincoln in 1984, Lincoln's assets had increased from $1.1 billion to $5.5 billion.[4] Such savings and loan associations had been deregulated in the early 1980s, allowing them to make highly risky investments with their depositors' money. Keating and other savings and loan operators took advantage of this deregulation.[4][5] Savings and loans established connections to many members of Congress, by supplying them with needed funds for campaigns through legal donations.[5] Lincoln's particular investments took the form of buying land, taking equity positions in real estate development projects, and buying high-yield junk bonds.[6
.... On April 9, 1987, a two-hour meeting[4] with three members of the FHLBB San Francisco branch was held, again in DeConcini's office, to discuss the government's investigation of Lincoln.[7][11] Present were Cranston, DeConcini, Glenn, McCain, and additionally Riegle.[7] The regulators felt that the meeting was very unusual and that they were being pressured by a united front, as the senators presented their reasons for having the meeting.[7] DeConcini began the meeting by saying, "We wanted to meet with you because we have determined that potential actions of yours could injure a constituent."[13] McCain said, "One of our jobs as elected officials is to help constituents in a proper fashion. ACC [American Continental Corporation] is a big employer and important to the local economy. I wouldn't want any special favors for them.... I don't want any part of our conversation to be improper." Glenn said, "To be blunt, you should charge them or get off their backs," while DeConcini said, "What's wrong with this if they're willing to clean up their act? ... It's very unusual for us to have a company that could be put out of business by its regulators."[7] The regulators then revealed that Lincoln was under criminal investigation on a variety of serious charges, at which point McCain severed all relations with Keating.[7]
07/13/09
By the way, I don't think I've yet mentioned that it's a pleasure to see you back. I know you've been back for a few weeks now, but it's nice to see Olde Gawker crew around again.
(Which is not meant as a slight to the new bunch, btw)
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
Plus, I think people started to tire of the standard out-of-touch Olde sittin' there with his typewriter and slide-rule running a country full of people who use electronic communication just to say "good morning" to their spouses :[]