<![CDATA[Gawker: michael kinsley]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: michael kinsley]]> http://gawker.com/tag/michaelkinsley http://gawker.com/tag/michaelkinsley <![CDATA[Michael Kinsley Finds Steady Paycheck]]> Michael Kinsley—a smart columnist who's maybe not the world's best manager—has been hired by The Atlantic as "editor-in-chief of a new digital media property" that's launching next year. He'll also write a column. Good for us, regardless. [Politico]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5357393&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Hefner Selling Playboy to Support Barbie Addiction]]> In your practically-weekend Friday media column: Playboy could be yours, Michael Kinsley wants to fight newsweeklies, a new type of journalism that will fail, and the police department will run your local paper OR ELSE:

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.THE HEF is reportedly floating his Playboy Enterprises empire for sale, for a bargain-basement price of $300 million. That's way more than the company's actually worth—porn is free, nowadays—but THE HEF needs all the extra cash to continue paying his concubines until he collapses. Seriously, that's why he's asking for so much.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Michael Kinsley says that the new Newsweek redesign hasn't changed the fact that the magazine is a waste of time, which is true, and that Time is also a waste of time, which is true, but that Time is a waste of time mostly because they canned Michael Kinsley, which is false. The Historical Jesus is not mentioned.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.All those projects that are hacked-to-the-bone online relaunches of local news outlets by refugees from folded newspapers? Those are all going to fail. We're calling it now. Sorry.

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Ha, the San Diego paper sold recently, astoundingly, to a private equity firm. A big investor in that firm is the pension fund of LA police officers. Now the pension fund demands that the paper fire its editorial writers because they hate cops or something. It will only take a few more incidents like this for the acquisition of the San Diego paper to go down as the last great failed newspaper acquisition. It has a good chance!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5266040&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Micropayments Stupid, Says Editor Who Tried Them]]> Michael Kinsley tried making readers pay for news. Didn't work!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5150571&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Discussing The 'Times' Discussing John McCain's Lobbyist Problem]]> Michael Kinsley's column about the reaction to the Times' story about John McCain's alleged lobbyist romance is annoying, because it is a Michael Kinsley column in Slate, but it is also pretty spot-on in its parody of New York Times Kremlinology: "I may be creating the possibility that some people might worry that other people might think that I have created the appearance of suggesting that the New York Times has created the possibility that some people might worry that other people might think that McCain has created the appearance that some people might worry that other people might think that there could be an appearance that McCain was having an affair with a lobbyist." Funny cause it's innuendo! Meanwhile, Michael Isikoff's Newsweek story on same suffers from having its most newsworthy scoop sacrificed to the web last week, but it has a couple entertaining details:

First off, lobbyist Iseman is a flirt: "'You always wanted to be lobbied by Vicki,' recalls one longtime Democratic committee aide who often invited her into his office and did not want to be identified acknowledging that he found her attractive."

Secondly, former McCain campaign head John Weaver, who is McCain's old and dear friend, either sparked this whole story through ineptitude or bitterness at his ouster or maybe repressed bad feelings. He emailed the Times on the record about the weird Union Station meeting with Iseman during which he told her to stay the hell away from the candidate.

Finally, that New Republic piece about the Times piece that many say caused the Times to rush their story into print? TNR editor and noted Foer Franklin Foer says TNR would never have ran the piece if the Times hadn't ran their story because TNR is not in the business of running stories with unsubstantiated rumors of sexual impropriety. At least, the Foer-edited TNR isn't in that business.

With Friends Like These... [Newsweek]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360499&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[When Even The Contributors Are Critics]]> Joanne Lipman may be deaf to warnings from her colleagues. (The embattled Portfolio editor ran a poorly-sourced rehash of a 21-year-old story in the latest issue of the Conde Nast business magazine, despite protests from fact checkers and editors.) But that doesn't stop others from volunteering advice. The brittle editrix approached Michael Kinsley, editor of The New Republic in its heyday, about a freelance piece. She got something else. Says Kinsley: "I was talking to Joanne Lipman—who I'd never met—and she talked to me about writing a piece and I said I’ll write you a memo about what I think of the first few issues and what problems you have; I could just be another voice. I’m sure more criticism is just what’s she's in the mood for." And I'm sure that Lipman even more delighted by Kinsley's willingness to share their private conversation with the New York Observer.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5002610&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Kinsley on Hitchens: "!!!!!"]]> In tomorrow's Book Review, Slate founder/TIME columnist Michael Kinsley explains to us the magic behind "the Christopher Hitchens phenomenon." Who would have guessed—apparently the secret is logic.

"The big strategic challenge for a career like this is to remain interesting, and the easiest tactic for doing that is surprise," Kinsley writes. "If they are expecting X, you say minus X."

But how do you know when it's working? That's where Kinsley's counter-intuitiveness rating system—based, it seems, on simple punctuation games—comes in handy. Declaring you're against abortion, for instance, gets an "Interesting!" Revealing a Jewish mother tops that with "Interesting!!" Hating on Bill Clinton, "Interesting!!!" Supporting the Iraq war, "Interesting!!!!"

How to break the five exclamation point threshold, after the jump.

Trouble is, Hitchen's new book about why religion—er, "god-worship"—is bad is not 'minus X' at all. It is totally completely X. Isn't that... interesting!!!!!?

See, that's the trick. Kinsley writes:

Well, ladies and gentleman, Hitchens is either playing the contrarian at a very high level or possible he is even sincere. But just when he had us expecting minus X, he confounds us by reverting to X.
Apparently getting the cover of the NYT Book Review just requires some meta-level flip-flopping.

Sadly, all this "reason" might work on paper, but in the rough and tumble world of amazon.com sales rankings, it only gets you so far. Advance orders of the seventh Harry Potter book (!!!!!!!) are currently trouncing Hitchens' God Is Not Great for the number one spot. Interestingly (...?), Rhonda Byrne's The Secret, the book that explains how you can cure cancer by thinking special thoughts, is currently in third.

The lesson here is that people like hearing about magical things, have gotten over god, and want to prevent bad things from happening to them with their minds. So remember, aspiring authors: logically doing double-opposite things might get you exclamation points from the Times, but what's really in demand is... pretending?—LUX

In God Distrust [NYTBR]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259990&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Media Bubble: Putting the Jew in "Judith Regan"]]> judyr.gif
  • Apparently, what finally got Judith Regan canned was making anti-Semitic comments. When are people going to learn that you cannot fuck with the Jews? Also, if anyone out there knows what she said specifically, get in touch. We'll pay top dollar to either of you Jew lawyers who were on the other end of the phone. [NYT]
  • But like the poor - or Jews, come to think of it - Judith Regan we will always have with us, says David Carr. [NYT]
  • Especially if her own Jew lawyers have anything to say about it. [WSJ]
  • Atoosa Rubenstein launches "Big Momma Productions Inc., the catchall for her soon-to-launch businesses, including a consultancy to help companies from airlines to financial services better serve young adults." It gets worse. "Since Big Momma's open for business, any tech- and digital-savvy Little Mommas who want to help girlkind should look me up on MySpace.com. In other words, yes, I'll be hiring in the new year." Yes, it's only Monday. [WWD]

  • Will the Chandlers team up with Ron Burkle to buy the Los Angeles Times? [LAT]
  • What those recent British privacy decisions mean for gossipy Brit mags. [Guardian]
  • Time adds four new names to its roster: Michael Kinsley, Bill Kristol, Walter Isaacson, David Von Drehle. Coincidentally, all four happen to be Time's person of the year. [WaPo]
  • Here comes the NME. [Guardian]
  • Miami Herald editor Tom Fiedler is retiring; he'll be replaced by Anders Gyllenhaal, editor of the Minneapolis Star Tribune. [Miami Herald]
  • You didn't actually listen to Air America; why in God's name would you want to listen to all the bitching that went on behind the scenes? [NYT]
  • Sun source bites a quote from Luc Sante's Low Life, which is, incidentally, one of the best books ever written about New York. [VV]
  • Nice collection of Guardian pieces on the year ahead in media brings news of Monkey, "a multimedia facsimile of a weekly lads' magazine" from Felix Dennis. Also, the newspapers of the future will all be free. [Guardian]

    ]]> http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222549&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[JoeJournalist Had Better Be James Fallows, Because We're Getting Pretty Goddamned Tired Of This Story]]> So, JoeJournalist: We figured this scintillating story had run its course but, unfortunately, no. In a segment on the consistently incendiary BloggingHeads.tv, suspected self-aggrandizer Mickey Kaus claims that he knows who the solipsist is, and that it isn't Andrew Sullivan (or Kaus). Mickey won't give up the name, but he does volunteer that the journalist in question is "an important figure in the New America Foundation."

    Well. We went to the NAF's website, and, quite frankly, we know what we're going to do the next time we're having trouble sleeping. Should you be made of sturdier stuff, we invite you to explore and send us your suggestions. One name, however, did pop up before the silky fingers of Morpheus danced about our eyes: James Fallows, Atlantic Monthly National Correspondent and tech-savvy mofo. (We understand that he's currently in Shanghai.) We're actually pretty sure this is your man, but suggestions to the contrary can be sent to the usual address.

    Mickey: It Wasn't Me [BloggingHeads]
    New America Foundation
    At Home In Shanghai [Slate]

    Earlier: JoeJournalist.com: Could One Of These Men Be JoeJournalist? Yeah, Maybe.

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218247&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[JoeJournalist.com: Could One Of These Men Be JoeJournalist? Yeah, Maybe.]]> This morning we asked you to help us identify the mystery journalist who had the effrontery to start his own website in the early days of the Internet. While the general consensus remains fixated on Andrew Sullivan, there are a few other ideas out there. We present them after the jump.

    • "Perhaps Joe Journalist was Tom Wolfe? Would fit the description. TomWolfe.com was created July 20, 1998. Gladwell's site went up in September of 2004, BTW."
    • "Reeks of Brit Hume. He was a computer geek before most of the world knew what a computer geek was. But don't quote me on that!"
    • "I'd always assumed that stupid Kinsley column was referencing Josh—excuse Joshua Micah Marshall's—excruciatingly self-infatuated blog"
    • Isn't it Adam Nagourney?
    • "Wouldn't it be Matt Drudge?" [No. —ed.]
    • "It's definitely Andy Glass."

      We'd actually be inclined to buy that last one, assuming we knew who the fuck Andy Glass is. Thanks for playing. More on this stunning story if it ever develops.

      Earlier: JoeJournalist.com: World's Most Boring Guessing Game Continues

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218108&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[JoeJournalist.com: World's Most Boring Guessing Game Continues]]> Okay, so that Kinsley piece: We'll start you off with the "blind item" in question:

    The first person I knew who had a Web site of his own was a fellow Washington journalist. This was when many journalists were still just getting into e-mail, but the URL for this Web site quickly circulated around town and around the world. Why? Well, we were all impressed by the technological savvy. But we were absolutely astounded by the solipsism. What on earth had gotten into Joe (not his real name)? This was a modest, soft-spoken, and self-effacing fellow, yet his Web site portrayed him as an egotistical monster. Or so it seemed at the time. All of the elements that struck us as obnoxious maybe eight years ago no longer seem that way. In fact, they are now virtually required for any writer's Web site. The Web address, of course, was his name: JoeJournalist.com. It's hard to recapture why that even seemed pretentious. But it did. Then there was his deadpan list of books he'd written and awards he'd won. And quotes from other journalists about how wonderful he is.
    So who's the mystery journalist?


    biopic.jpgSpeculation, naturally, has centered around Andrew Sullivan and Mickey Kaus. (Kaus denies that it's either of him, although his disavowal of Sullivan is more a case of getting a dig in at Andrew, which is pretty much Mickey's raison d' tre these days.) In any event, a well-connected tipster raises another possibility: "Kinsley's talking about Gladwell, I believe. When www.malcolmgladwell.com first appeared — 97? 98? — it caused much twitter in such circles. Gladwell was modest and self-effacing at the time, and may well still be — I never see him." (Note to tipster: You can't miss him; it's the hair. Ba dump bump.) Sounds good to us, except that Kinsley mentions the "deadpan list of books he'd written"; did Gladwell write anything before Blink? Could Kinsley be changing a few of the details around? Is this maybe the least interesting blind item guessing game ever? Answers or further candidates here.

    Like I Care [Slate]
    Michael Kinsley Holds Our Interest For Record One Paragraph [Wonkette]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217951&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Here Is The Internet]]>

    • We think it's kind of tacky to mock a Parkinson's patient for writing a doddering, fogeyish column about the Internet. So we'll let Wonkette do it. Anyway, our guess as to the mystery journalist is Kaus. [Slate]
    • Boo hoo hoo, Washington Post reporters now have to go through the same appraisal system everyone else in the white collar world goes through annually. [NYO]
    • Allison Benedikt officially named Voice film editor. [The Reeler]
    • Military fantasist/departing Cond Nast Steve Florio to open a restaurant. Damn it, Graydon, see what you started? [NYP]
    • Tribune wants to delay its buyout, presumably because no one was dumb enough to pay the premium on what they're selling. [LAT]
    • "Tomato-haired beauty" Maureen Dowd "has the greatest job in America." Also, she is not Tony Dungy. There's a reason some stuff is only published on the Web. [The Nation]
    • Jon Friedman is the meat in a Julia Allison/Melissa Lafsky sandwich. Yes, there's a reason we didn't throw the picture up here. [ETP]
    • We're just gonna quote Romenesko on this one: "Dobbs overdose." [Mother Jones]
    • What we need more of is Tory Burch profiles. Thanks for making that dream come true, Vanity Fair. [WWD]
    • Portfolio should just buy the Wall Street Journal and be done with it. [NYP]
    • "Fuck IvyGate." [NYO]
    • Correction of the Day: "An article and headline on Saturday about the Staten Island Museum, which is celebrating it's 125th anniversary, referred incorrectly to one item in the museum's collection of curiosities. It is a four-legged - not four-headed - chicken." [NYT]
    • Bonus Correction: "An article last Wednesday about Jim Leff, a founder of the Internet discussion group www.chowhound.com, misstated the number of continents on which the food writer Mimi Sheraton has searched for bialys. It is five, not two." [NYT]
    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217920&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA['Slate' Wants To Bore You To Death Off-Line Too]]> mrexcitement.jpgGot fifteen bucks and a tremendous amount of self-hatred? Then you'll want to spend it on the provocatively titled discussion "Online Media and the Future of Journalism" at the Public Library on June 22. That's right, as a celebration of Slate's tenth anniversary, the online mag has put together a panel to consider the ways in which the Internet has affected the delivery of news. In accordance with federal laws concerning the approximately three thousand panels each year on this subject, Arianna Huffington is a participant. Other members include Malcolm Gladwell, Michael Kinsley, Norman Pearlstine, and Jacob Weisberg, which, in other circumstances, would make for the world's most annoying poker game. Don't get us wrong - we're pleased as punch for Slate. Has it really been ten years? So many memories: Learning about the joys of monkeyfishing, watching Judy Shulevitz apply for a job at The Times, seeing every prediction made by Mickey Kaus turn out to be comically wrong... we could go on and on. As for the panel, though, we're going to take Gladwell's advice: Our first instinct says this may be the most boring event at the library since Frank Rich's play about Adolph Ochs. We've got to believe that instinct is correct.

    Online Media and the Future of Journalism [Slate]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=180951&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Michael Kinsley Wants a Date With Tom Friedman]]> You already know about the Times' "Win a Trip With Nick Kristof" contest. On Slate today, Michael Kinsley wonders why things should stop there, and he considers similar contests with other Times op-edsters. Fist, he cites Nick's pitch:

    "I'm looking for a masochist. If your dream trip doesn't involve a five-star hotel in Rome or Bora-Bora, but a bedbug-infested mattress in a malarial jungle as hungry jackals yelp outside—then read on." He adds, "Don't expect comfort so much as diarrhea." How on earth did Kristof know about my bedbugs-and-jackals-and-diarrhea fantasy? Bob Woodward promised me he wouldn't tell anyone else.

    Then he imagines the come-on for "Win a Trip With Tom Friedman":

    "The world, as you know, is flat. If you're not afraid to fall off the edge, if you dream of running up travel expenses that would finance Hannibal's army, if you fantasize about meeting presidents and prime ministers and reminding them that the world is flat, if you can go to Davos and Aspen and Bilderberg and still get it up for the Bohemian Grove, then you may be the right person to accompany me on a unique 'World Is Flat World Tour.' We will be staying in the best hotels and interviewing world leaders day and night. You may find yourself discoursing in Arabic about the flatness of the world with a group of Saudi princes, or even asking the Pope himself, 'Do you agree with Tom Friedman that the world is flat?' All it takes to apply is a 700-word essay on 'Why the World is Flat.'" Tom himself will choose the winner, and they'll immediately be off to St. Petersburg, where you will get to operate the PowerPoint for Tom's presentation titled: "Flatter Will Get You Nowhere: The Limits of World Flatness."

    There's more.

    Like, "Win a Trip With Maureen Dowd":

    "Are you girl enough to come shopping with me and my best friend, Jill? Can you dis the defense department and find the shoe department at the same time?"

    And some Washington Post equivalents, like "Win a Trip With George Will" ("Finally admitting his uncanny resemblance to Mr. Peabody, the scholarly time-traveling dog on the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon show, George takes a lucky companion back to the 18th century, where they will explain the original meaning of the Declaration of Independence to its signers" and "Win a Trip With David Broder" ("You'll interview more lieutenant governors than there are stars on the flag").

    But we know which contest we most want to enter: "Win a Trip With Michael Kinsley." That's where you sit at home and make toss off bon mots and witticisms about stuff in the news.

    Wonder what that would be like?

    Win a Date With E.J. Dionne [Slate]
    Earlier: Win a Romantic Getaway With Nick Kristof!

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=168922&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Objectivity, Shmobjectivity]]> &#8226; Michael Kinsley thinks newspapers should give up on objectivity. We, of course, despise that idea of subjective coverage. We really despise it. [Slate]
    &#8226; The latest Times/TimesSelect op-ed/website combo: Columns from Judith Warner. [NYTCo.]
    &#8226; Sales are finally picking up at OK! America, and so Sarah Ivens gets a new contract. [NYP (second item)]
    &#8226; Is CBS using Public Eye to take potshots at NBC? One can hope. [LAT]
    &#8226; John Huey has good taste in lip balm. [WWD]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=164395&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Because We Don't Hear Enough from Martha Already]]> &#8226; Martha Stewart to launch fashion mag. Oh, the endless opportunities for orange-jumpsuit jokes. [NYP]
    &#8226; New Orleanian Doug Brinkley, who made his pundit name on his pal JFK Jr.'s death, unsurprisingly signs first Katrina book deal. [MSNBC]
    &#8226; Hearst and Hachette — gasp! — work together on an ad deal. [NYT]
    &#8226; What's new about the new Paris Review? Um, what isn't? [NYO]
    &#8226; Michael Kinsley leaves LAT editorial page after a little more than a year; no one was considerate enough to leave news of his firing in a Xerox machine so he could learn about it in advance. [NYT]
    &#8226; Wenner Media redecorates, and Jann isn't happy with the paint colors. [NYO, second item]
    &#8226; NYT, WP give each other sneak peaks of their front pages. Sputters E&P's scoopy Joe Strupp: "Are you aware of what a serious breach of security that would be? They'll see everything, they'll — they'll see the Big Board!" [E&P]
    &#8226; ASME barely slaps The New Yorker on the wrist for Target single-advertiser issue, and crazy columnist in Chicago bursts a blood vessel. [CS-T]
    &#8226; The lowest blow: In wake of Katrina, public dislikes Bush more than it dislikes press. [E&P]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=125590&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: Listening to Horace Greeley]]> &#8226; Former Timesman Dean Baquet continues to be newly crowned LAT editor, as Tom Scocca goes west to confirm. [NYO]
    &#8226; And Michael Kinsley did "a pretty horrible job" at LAT, says Nikki Finke. Come on, Nikki, what do you really think? [L.A. Weekly]
    &#8226; RIP, Post's Hamptons Dairy, more or less. [Media Mob]
    &#8226; Syd Schanberg teaches the right way to read the paper and watch TV. We can't believe we've been so woefully undertrained all these years. [VV]
    &#8226; More virgins in Manhattan: Richard Branson considers free NYC daily. [Forbes]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=114603&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[Media Bubble: It's Better to Live in the City Where You're Editing the Editorial Page. Who Knew?]]> &#8226; Michael Kinsley likely to stop running Los Angeles Times editorial page. Displaying his legendarily razor-sharp analytic skills, Kinsley says: "This living in Seattle and editing the editorial page is not an ideal arrangement." [NYT]
    &#8226; TV Guide to slash rate base, pull back on listings, increase lifestyle and entertainment coverage — that is to say, to become like every other magazine. [AP via Newsday]
    &#8226; In terms of prison fabulosity, Judy Miller's no Martha Stewart. [Newsday]
    &#8226; Two Source execs charged with attempted murder. Oy. [Vibe]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=114321&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[New York media party]]> Jacob Weisberg was unveiled as...

       The first media party since I arrived in New York, the Slate event at which Jacob Weisberg was unveiled as the online magazine's new editor. I have to gush.
       Sure, the crowd were bitchy. A New York Sun reporter was overheard dishing the dirt on the embryonic newspaper to Kurt Andersen, formerly of Inside, who will of course keep the information entirely to himself. And it was all inside baseball. What did Ned Desmond's new title at Business 2.0 really mean? As if anyone really cares. Everybody hates Wired's Chris Anderson except for James Truman and Si Newhouse. Not true, actually. Most people who know Anderson think he's a smart and charming guy.
       But, dammit, New York media people are witty, and that isn't a word I've used in a while. Even the speeches - by Weisberg and Michael Kinsley, his predecessor - were entertaining. Kinsley, who said the change in editors was what Microsoft called a reorg, told a couple of good Redmond jokes. My walker for the evening, recently transplanted from San Francisco, said she was exhausted. Too many smart people, and the obligation to make intelligent conversation.
    &#183; Slate's new editor based in New York [Seattle Times]

    ]]>
    http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=10087&view=rss&microfeed=true