I did those obama bags, they were mediocre at best! As a former dopey dope currently on suboxone, I have to say, I've thought of this b4. Does that make me a scientist?
Someone just linked to this story over at Gizmodo and mentioned that the original is up here. Thought I'd come over and mention that this doesn't surprise me at all, as there isn't actually any proof that heroin is harmful in and of itself. Blackmarket heroin? that's a different story.
Want some proof? Read this: (you can skip the slightly rambling introduction if you want): [www.badscience.net]
And this (an article from the same reporter Goldacre mentions in his introduction above): [www.flatearthnews.net]
That second article is pretty interesting stuff, the gist of which is that drug prohibition is quite clearly and demonstrably doing more harm than good, but you simply aren't allowed to talk about that in the media.
MissNormaDesmond promoted this comment
Edited by Yossarian Threepwood at 08/20/09 6:30 PM
Yossarian Threepwood was starred
Yossarian Threepwood was unstarred
@Yossarian Threepwood: Well, there's something to the argument that heroin's being extremely addictive is a problem; that second source is a little disingenuous, as it races past that point to get to the condemnation of the War on Drugs (about which it's entirely right). However, that doesn't function as sufficient justification for the amount of idiocy that's currently committed in the name of keeping it illegal. A thoroughgoing review of drug policy is long overdue.
By the way, I actually liked the preface to the paper in the first source, and it's pretty on-topic for one of Gawker's major concerns (media critique).
@Yossarian Threepwood: I believe Mr. Threepwood is referring to the adulternats used in street heroin. Street heroin is usually less than 2% pure and the rest is Mannitol, lactose or worse it could be Fentanyl. Most heroin OD's are usually due to the high amount of adulterants rather than the potency of the heroin.
@Poppymann: I understand what he's referring to. The fact remains that heroin, adulterated or not, is extremely addictive, and that that's a valid concern that invalidates the claim that it's not harmful in and of itself. I'm not saying that this justifies the ridiculousness of the way it's dealt with legally, but there needs to be less hyperbole and more accuracy from both sides of the debate.
@Poppymann: As a former Heroin addict, I can vouch for this. I've had friends almost die from bags with fentanyl in them, and I've had allergic reactions to other adulterants. Sniffing Lactose is a surefire way to fuck up your nose, or worse, your veins.
Just as I was tellin' Rahm E. the other day: "I wouldn't need money to pay the mortgage if you just gave me some man! I mean, the mortgage, man!!!" Free cash ends Poverty
Most methadone programs exist to replace a heroin addiction with a methadone addiction, not get heroin addicts off of all drugs entirely. As a matter of fact, methadone detox programs actually increase the dose of methadone given to the patient over the course of the 'detox' so it is virtually impossible to detox from the methadone without serious withdrawal symptoms from that drug, practically ensuring the patient will opt to go on long term methadone maintenance. Long term methadone use is actually much harder on the body than heroin. Epic fail.
A controlled heroin addiction with access to consistant quality of drug, education and treatment, and overall harm reduction is actually a big improvement to the methadone game.
@SanchaliLazork: no, no, i see his point. i tried storks, ibis, even loons when i was really in the gutter. heron's the only thing that really did it for me.
This is not surprising. In fact, I recall that there were studies 20-30 years ago indicating that most heroin adicts didn't die from the drug addiction, per se, but rather from getting bad stuff, using dirty needles, etc. Moreover, given access to heroin for 10 years or more, addicts actually "matured out" of the drug -- were just no longer addicted.
Now, no one ruin my day by telling me that was all a farce.
Wow, just think, if we supplied free drugs to everyone the violence caused by the cost of drugs would cease! And endless supplies of land and energy would end war, morons.
@pony_express: That would only function as an argument against their way of dealing with things if they have a higher rate than we do. I don't think that's the case, is it?
@MissNormaDesmond: I do not know the figures, I only saw a cable documentary on all these junkies who had pretty much overrun a major public park in Switzerland; it mentioned that Switzerland's users had a high rate of HIV. From the way the film skewed it, it was far from ideal set up. I think legalizing something like heroin would have to be supplemented by an extreme outreach program that got users to purchase a clean needle with each baggie, or got a $5 off coupon for returning used needles.
@nathanst: Eh, anytime you're doing stuff like editing the story to the point of unrecognizability to make sure everyone sees it your way, you want to check yourself before you wreck yourself.
08/22/09
08/20/09
Want some proof? Read this: (you can skip the slightly rambling introduction if you want): [www.badscience.net]
And this (an article from the same reporter Goldacre mentions in his introduction above): [www.flatearthnews.net]
That second article is pretty interesting stuff, the gist of which is that drug prohibition is quite clearly and demonstrably doing more harm than good, but you simply aren't allowed to talk about that in the media.
08/20/09
By the way, I actually liked the preface to the paper in the first source, and it's pretty on-topic for one of Gawker's major concerns (media critique).
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/22/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
A controlled heroin addiction with access to consistant quality of drug, education and treatment, and overall harm reduction is actually a big improvement to the methadone game.
08/20/09
All true. They've been doing this for years any many European countries. It's not perfect, but it's better than we're doing.
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
MORE COWBELL
(same logic)
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
@jasonelias: I couldn't agree more!
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/21/09
The crane, boss, the crane.
Or pelican if you're feeling adventurous.
08/20/09
Now, no one ruin my day by telling me that was all a farce.
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/23/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
Also the story lacks a cutaway shot to bikini girls.
08/20/09