• Profile logout login

#mitchzak

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 10:01 PM
Wed Dec 9
61 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #mitchzak more →

    Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Accidental Billionaire Accidental Billionaire
    03/30/09

    In reply to Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
    This woman clumps on makeup like nobody's business.


    Petroleum jelly futures are spiking.

     Reply
    Accidental Billionaire was starred Accidental Billionaire was unstarred
    Image of forwardmotion forwardmotion
    03/30/09

    In reply to Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
    I guess I'm supposed to be grateful that she at least supports civil unions, or...? What a bunch of bullshit.
     Reply
    forwardmotion was starred forwardmotion was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    03/30/09

    @forwardmotion: Stupid coward, she is.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of sassenach sassenach
    03/30/09

    In reply to Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
    From her official site:

    She respects the beauty of the California landscapes -- the beaches, the lakes, the redwoods, the palm trees and the golden poppies that cover the hills and fields throughout the state.


    Just no pansies...

     Reply
    sassenach was starred sassenach was unstarred
    Image of Accidental Billionaire Accidental Billionaire
    03/30/09

    @sassenach:


    She hasn't respected nature much prior.


    If she wants to be a forest ranger, she can start doing janitorial work at the arboretum.


    Leave governance to the professionals.

     Reply
    Accidental Billionaire was starred Accidental Billionaire was unstarred
    Image of Nesbiteme Nesbiteme
    03/30/09

    In reply to Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
    She's and ass-clown of epic proportions. Why the fuck doesn't she spend more time with her family and leave the Governorship of California to the professionals- you know like actors and such.
     Reply
    Nesbiteme was starred Nesbiteme was unstarred
    Image of ChillbearLatrigue ChillbearLatrigue
    03/30/09

    @Nesbiteme: You're unusually worded entry makes a good point. Can we divide California into three seperate states to mitigate the threat of its political lunacy?
     Reply
    ChillbearLatrigue was starred ChillbearLatrigue was unstarred
    Image of Hydroceph Hydroceph
    03/30/09

    @ChillbearLatrigue: yes, but the pieces are even wackier, whether you divide the state horizontally or longitudinally. It seems we all cancel each other out, more or less. OK, not the parts that grow things, but they don't have anything interesting to say anyway.
     Reply
    Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred
    Image of skahammer skahammer
    03/31/09

    @ChillbearLatrigue: @theMoJo: So you're proposing that California receive four more Senators? OK, interesting....
     Reply
    skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred
    Image of Richard Lawson Richard Lawson
    03/30/09

    In reply to Meg Whitman Was for Gay Rights Before She Was Against Them
    I can't wait until her gubernatorial bid closes.
     Reply
    Richard Lawson was starred Richard Lawson was unstarred
    Image of BookishLookish BookishLookish
    03/30/09

    @Richard: It is so fitting that she is running in California; her neck has as many rings as a redwood.
     Reply
    BookishLookish was starred BookishLookish was unstarred
    Image of Wrapitup Wrapitup
    03/30/09

    @Richard: She's picked the wrong place at the wrong time. Fingers crossed.
     Reply
    Wrapitup was starred Wrapitup was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.