As has been mentioned in this thread, that silly "don't be evil" mantra may have been good for getting go-goody devs into the building (combined with the volleyball sand pit and free m&m's), but let's not confuse corporate rhetoric and corporate behavior.
Google wants to be in charge and will do what it needs to do to make its products the most used and most profitable.
Which brings up another sore spot with me- reading about the perquisites of the High Technocracy. Seems a well-known computer game design House has a break room with gratis commissary, classic pinball machines, and Dabo girl-quality fluffers wandering around making themselves useful.
On the Finance side, we're reduced to gloating like spoiled children when management shows up to the morning meeting with complimentary Panera bagels and coffee. And there's talk of putting treadles under our desks to help our cardio and to offset the office energy bill.
As my home computer is something purchased on the overheard gossip of office geeks ("we didn't say actually buy the thing!") it is structured exactly as if I'd read the manual in greek. Therefore, Chrome is fast, it doesn't crash on me and it's doesn't make me relearn how to put navigation bars in every time they do an upgrade. Firefox is still needed for paying the bills but Chrome keeps me from losing my mind.
In related news, a party of fox-hunting billionaires which included Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are being excoriated for 'deuced bad form'. Apparently, the 'Hounds of Google' ripped to shreds a small red fox in direct view of a stalled school bus full of horrified and improbably photogenic children.
I think this will be bad PR for them. I'd love to have a Linux version of Chrome, but it is also very valuable to have a browser out there that is both Open Source, and not affiliated with a company selling other things, whether those other things be ads or operating systems.
Mozilla (Firefox) was doing OK before Google started providing so much money to it. They could probably readjust to getting funding from a multiplicity of sources.
Why don't they just eat Firefox instead of murdering it and wasting it. I use Chrome but probably everybody uses Firefox, and I imagine they would be annoyed with this.
@DeadliestSin: Hm. My Firefox keeps going wrong when I play videos in it - the sound won't work. So I'm forced to reload the vid in Chrome - guess what, it works! Is Google sabotaging them... or do I have a weird laptop?
@Greasy Thumb Guzik: @pufflehuff: I had that problem with streaming videos and radio but once I installed the Navigational Sounds add on in Firefox everything worked as it should.
03/31/09
Meanwhile, Google wants to take over the world. NARF!
03/31/09
Google wants to be in charge and will do what it needs to do to make its products the most used and most profitable.
03/31/09
Which brings up another sore spot with me- reading about the perquisites of the High Technocracy. Seems a well-known computer game design House has a break room with gratis commissary, classic pinball machines, and Dabo girl-quality fluffers wandering around making themselves useful.
On the Finance side, we're reduced to gloating like spoiled children when management shows up to the morning meeting with complimentary Panera bagels and coffee. And there's talk of putting treadles under our desks to help our cardio and to offset the office energy bill.
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
Mozilla (Firefox) was doing OK before Google started providing so much money to it. They could probably readjust to getting funding from a multiplicity of sources.
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
Plus, I always wanted to say that.
03/31/09
03/31/09
Everything in this post is anchored around this one line right here, and I have no idea what it means.
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
03/31/09
You're not alone.
I can't play a lot of videos in FFox & have to use IE Tab to see them.
Nothing I try makes them work, but at least YouTube works.
04/01/09
04/01/09
03/31/09