"Update: Following a two-day search, Elizabeth's body has been found. Police have a juvenile person of interest in custody have haven't released his name. All they'll say is that he knew Elizabeth, lived not far away, and was older than the girl. "
"His"/"he" .. so sexist and judgmental, the press! :p
Anytime I see a story like this, I think of the song "Westfall" -
"Now, with all these cameras focused on my face,
you'd think they could see it through my skin.
They're looking for evil, thinking they can trace it,
but evil don’t look like anything."
I don't think that believing she should be tried as a juvenile is an "excuse" for her actions, which are obviously evil. And she might be irredeemably evil, too.
But has anyone ever seen the movie Heavenly Creatures or know the true story it's based on? In it, two young teenagers kill one of their mothers. Now, one of those girls is a successful and seemingly normal crime novelist. Another is a nun.
This story makes me sick, but it's impossible to know if this girl could be rehabilitated. She might be a psychopath for the rest of her life. Or she might change.
@harvey_birdman: First, your proposition assumes that children are children and adults are adults and never the 'twain shall meet. A 16 year-old is far more capable of moral responsibility than a 6 year-old. To treat them the same is quite literally paternalistic.
Second, children are regularly punished. It is part of child-rearing. Misbehavior is met with punishment; this is how social mores are developed.
Third, the punishment should fit the crime. While I don't believe that a 16 year-old should serve 15 years for selling crack cocaine (partially because I feel that drug sentences in general are overly harsh), for the crime of matricide - the killing of one's on mother - through bludgeoning someone to death with a rock, the person who commits such a heinous crime should be punished, even if she is 27 months younger than the age of majority.
The legal age of majority is an arbitrary number, evidenced by the fact that 16 is old enough to be entrusted to drive a 2,000 lb. vehicle, 18 is old enough to be conscripted into military service and used to be old enough to smoke and drink, yet, until a quarter century ago, suffrage belonged to those at least 21 years of age. Now, 18 is old enough to vote but you need to be 21 to drink or smoke.
Before you can make an assertion like yours, you must first answer "Who is a child? Are a children equal children? Should any child ever be punished?"
This girl is a borderline (self-harm), possibly even a psychopath (allegedly killing for the heck of it). The depression she's experienced has probably come from having no true inner emotional life. Both borderlines (who can sometimes be helped) and psychopaths (who can't) experience depression. For one it is often due to unstable relationships and a sense of self, for the other it can be due to their inability to ever really connect to another person, because they have no empathy.
This also reminds me why I no longer want to write about this stuff after 5 years of doing it professionally. After a while, teen killers - hell, killers in general - all seem to fit the same templates. And yes, it's incredibly depressing.
It's a good thing they are trying her as an adult. The only good place for this kid, sadly, is probably jail. And unless the depression overtakes her and she succeeds at suicide, she'll continue to run game on the people around her in there, too.
@RandomLunatic: Agreed. I know that certain things aren't generally diagnosed in children because they aren't fully developed yet but once in a while there are some evil ones... This little girl may be one of them. Her and Patrick Bateman from "American Psycho". There really may not be a way to rehabilitate her and she'll probably continue to hurt herself and others.
@Miss_Teacher: (Spoiler alert: Please do not read this comment if you have not yet read American Psycho or watched the film version.)
You realize that the fictional character Patrick Bateman was a serial killer only in his own mind, don't you? He never actually comits any of the murders--they're just deranged fantasies.
Although his motives parallel those of this all-too-real teen killer: For Bateman, too, the fantasy of killing people was the only way he could summon any sort of passion, ie, "feel something." That's how I always interpreted the book, anyway.
@snugbug: I know he's fictional and that his behavior was fanatsy. Just making a point about the similarities in the 2 personalities... and the fact that while he may be fake there are in fact real people (some children) that definitely act out the same way.
Maybe I'm overly influenced by all of the false confession literature I've read, but something seems fishy about this story. The AP story makes a point to show that the police have withheld all corroborating evidence besides this online profile. Assuming there is little or no corroborating evidence, the story about digging the graves seems exactly like the kind of fantastical confessions innocent people can be influenced into giving. I wish there were a way to read the indictment to find out more.
My good southern mama will argue that a middle name is how you can separate the serial killers from the rest of us; she advised me to never go out with anyone whose middle name was Dean, Dale, or Wayne.
When things like this happen, I seriously question the motives of poeople who insist on "protecting our young people" or who assume children are inherently good/innocent. Serial killers (and their attendant pathologies) emerge quite early. As does sexuality for that matter and I think it only causes more damage to shield, or flat out ignore, future-adults from life's nasty realities.
While I'm not advocating for lowering the age of consent law to 10, (in this case I think it's wise to try her as an adult) I think we can all agree it's a pretty arbitrary number. You don't know how fumed I was at 13, that I couldn't vote for Al Gore in 2000 not to mention that I would have been way more informed than half my mother's friends who "didn't like the way Al Gore talked."
@Helio: Because you wanted to vote for Al Gore when you were 13, 13 year olds are adults? Does that really make sense to you? Do you really not understand that a child can be intelligent while lacking the impulse control and experience necessary to being fully responsible for their actions? Or that their brains are nowhere near done growing, that important neural connections are still in the process of being formed, that they literally lack the capacity to make sound judgments based on accurate assessments of the outcome of their actions?
I don't think children are inherently good or innocent. I think they are, however, inherently children, and trying them as adults is stupid and vindictive. Meanwhile, a child who's clearly seriously mentally ill presents yet another layer of complexity. We know almost nothing about this child's full story. What she did was horrendous, but compounding the tragedy by rushing to judgment serves no purpose.
@MissNormaDesmond: I don't think this girl needs to be let out for a long time. I'm not saying send her to prison for life, but a mental health facility perhaps.
I'm not saying I was an adult at 13 but are not 13yrs old capable of doing adult-like (whatever that means) things and committing adult like crimes. The consequences of one's actions are not different/better when that person is a teenager.
@MissNormaDesmond: The most shocking thing about it is that, reading this article, she comes off just like any one of the millions of people who have profiles on a social networking site.
Even with the gift of hindsight, I'm not sure if anyone could've gotten a read on that girl. She seems like a sociopath in the truest and most textbook sense.
Another blogger's accumulated some more info regarding the story here, including some of Bustamante's tweets:
"drinking generic dew and chillin at mah house:)" (Jul 27)
"ahh! we just got kittens! they’re adorable
"holy shit, i almost died last night xD" (Aug 4)
"addiction takes over your whole life. it’s not something easily overcome, therefor i embrace me addiction." (Aug 27)
"encompass’d with a thousand dangers; weary, faint, tremblinng with a thousand terrors; i in a fleshly tomb, am buried above grounnd. – William Cowper" (Sept 9)
"the world goes by my cage and never sees me." (Sep 13)
"bad decisions make great stories.." (Sep 17)
"this is all i want in life; a reason for all this pain." (Sep 28)
"drivin in a car bitches." (Sep 30)
And on the morning of Elizabeth Olten’s murder:
"sittin in classss. bored as fuck. i miss my cell phone :,["
Reading this, two things become apparent:
1) With hindsight, sure, you can read into these messages and construct a story. But I've got 80 people I follow on Twitter who fill my feed with this sort of self-involved rhetoric every moment of every day from the time I wake up to the time I fall asleep. I can't feign shock that this sort of online behavior was overlooked when I myself am confronted with it every day.
2) At the end of it all, Bustamante was resuming life as normal. A typical day in her world, unfazed by her actions, completely numb. I believe her when she says that she committed this horrifying act to see "what it felt like." This simultaneously simplifies and complicates the situation.
Simply, she must be removed from society, at least until remedied. But trying her as a juvenile means that regardless of what the jury finds, she could be released again in only 6 years, which to be frank, I'm not comfortable with knowing there's potentially a time limit on her treatment - especially upon reading that Bustamante dug two graves.
While I agree that trying her as an adult can be vindictive if she's immediately just cast aside, the benefit of the situation is that if she's given to a mental care facility, they can hold on to her as long as they feel it takes to properly rehabilitate her.
There's a chance that day may never come, but at the same time, we're as responsible for everyone else in society as we are for Bustamante. Given the rules that the justice system has to work within, this might be as close to justice as we can offer.
@Helio: Sentencing somebody to a stay in a mental health ward in a penitentiary can be an even more effective method (and one requiring even less accountability from the judicial system) of keeping somebody "behind bars" for his/her entire life. From what I understand, the bar is a lot lower, and as long as they can demonstrate that your mental issues are a threat to society, they can keep you in funny farm limbo forever without having to worry about convicting you to life in prison.
@MissNormaDesmond: I get what you are saying, but I'd like you think about it differently for a second.
You're getting into the nurture vs. nature debate.
The entire biological function of a human changes throughout its life, not just at that age. Alzheimer's is a prime example of the physical aspects of the brain evolving long after tweenster dreamster days.
I believe in mental illness, but I also believe that there is a combustible combination of lifestyle demands/foreign substances entering the body (think hypoglycemia if you eat the wrong nutrients) that can impact decision making.
Even consider hormonal issues with the mythical period in women.
I think his positing whether a number is arbitrary is both valid and a starting point for discussion.
@MissNormaDesmond: You're right on. This is a horrible crime, and she obviously needs to be incarcerated, but she also needs treatment. That's just as much for her good as for society's.
"the world goes by my cage and never sees me." (Sep 13)
"bad decisions make great stories.." (Sep 17)
"this is all i want in life; a reason for all this pain." (Sep 28)
I'm pretty sure this was around the time she decided to do it and started planning. Those three tweets in that time span just scream:
"no one pays attention to me, or so I like to believe"
"if i do something horrible, people Will pay attention and I'll be all over the news as a killer!"
"if i kill someone and get put in jail or in a MH institution, I'll have a reason to be miserable and hate everything"
I'm pretty sure that by the time of the tweet on the the 17th she had thought about what she could do and how. By the 28th I'm pretty sure Elizabeth's fate was sealed. Seems like the murdering cunt was already commited to and probably excited about getting it done at that point. Sorry, I had to call her that to make me feel better. I'd rather kick her in the face.
@Poop Cooper: Maybe I lack imagination, but I can't wrap my mind around the "two graves" part. I don't want to contemplate this, but did she also dismember that child? Surely the police would not have been able to contain information like that. If not, then what are the two graves for?
@AnnaZed: From what I understand the graves had been dug 4 days prior to the murder and that the body hasn't been dismembered. It appears that Bustamante likely had intent to fill the second grave with another body.
@Helio: Spent much time around teenagers? Most of them think we parents just don't "get it". And when we say that we know where they're coming from and what they're experiencing? Well, that's just patronization. Even the most well-adjusted of them still don't have a full grasp on reality--they're still forming it.
Even though they have the ability to commit adult-like crimes, they may NOT have the ability to discern how far off the social mark they are. Crazy stuff is par for the teenage course, and that's why decisions on mental maturity can be nothing but one case at a time. That said, this poor girl is a sociopath and is, sadly, irredeemable.
The worst part of this article is that last sentence. I remember when my girls were that age. Breaks my heart.
@Helio: But in what's supposed to be a justice system, the issue isn't the consequences of an action, it's the cause. If your foot slips off the brake and you run over a pedestrian, you aren't tried for murder. If you are seriously impaired by mental illness such that you lack the ability to make sound judgments and to control your impulses, you are not, or should not be, judged by the same standard as someone for whom these conditions do not obtain. If, in addition, you are fifteen years old, so that we would expect you developmentally to be poor at impulse control even were you not impaired, judging you as we would a sane adult is in my view criminal in itself.
Obviously, for her own and others' safety, she needs to not be in society for a good long time, if ever again. Please note that John Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity nearly 30 years ago, and is still in an institution.
@Poop Cooper: John Hinckley could have been released at any time during the last 20+ years. You'll note that he hasn't been. Do you really think, particularly given the notoriety this is bound to generate, that anyone will be letting her out anytime soon?
Also, do you genuinely believe that all of someone's thoughts go on their Twitter feed and Myspace page, or that everything they say there is true?
@KA_editor: I don't think you begin to get what I'm saying. There is no valid debate between nature and nurture; it's a false dichotomy promulgated by the simple-minded. Anyone with half a brain (heh) knows that our mental status is a complex combination of nurture and nature (and, for that matter, that nurture changes nature -- trauma affects brain chemistry and structural development). The entire reason that number is stupid is that the brain will be maturing for at least another decade. Take a look at why so many states, after lowering the drinking age to 18, raised it back to 20 or 21, and then tell me we should consider 15-year-olds adults.
@SteveDaveMcQueen: I think you should do this professionally. Your ability to psychically interpret the thoughts and motivations of mentally ill teenagers should be shared with the world.
@MissNormaDesmond: Please check the source I've linked. The state's juvenile system would have her released at the age of 21, regardless of whether or not she has been properly rehabilitated within the given time frame. This isn't only doing a disservice to society, but also to Bustamante.
On the topic of the Twitter feed, I agree with you that what someone's tweets do not necessarily reflect their true thoughts or intentions - that's why I wrote that "I can't feign shock that this sort of online behavior was overlooked when I myself am confronted with it every day." Everyone writes tweets like Bustamante and I can't hold anyone guilty for not taking it seriously.
I think you and I are on the same side on this one, it's just that ironically, in order for Bustamante to get the sort of long-term attention and mental health care she will undoubtedly need for many years to come as her mental state continues to develop, she needed to be charged as an adult.
You might find that unfair, but as much as there is a responsibility for Bustamante, there is an even greater responsibility to prevent this from happening again. If that means that there's a possibility that Bustamante might not be able to rejoin society, and the trade-off is that we won't lose another Elizabeth Olten, I can sleep with that at night. It's on Bustamante at this point to earn her position in the world.
@SteveDaveMcQueen: I'm not. My point is that we don't know. She may turn out to be exactly what you think she is. She may not. Until we know a lot more than we do at the moment, being sure we know exactly what was going through her mind is extremely premature.
@Poop Cooper: If that's indeed the case with respect to Missouri law -- that is, that there are no mental health facilities available for juveniles, and no ability to sentence a juvenile found guilty by reason of insanity to such facilities -- then I may agree that on an ad hoc basis trying Bustamante as an adult is necessary. I'm not certain that I accept the assertion of the prosecutor that that's the case, but I don't have the time or inclination to try to look up the relevant law.
However, we probably then need to stop referring to what we have as a justice system, and just call it an incarceration system.
You know, after more than a few incidents with friends who "joked" "ironically" about things nowhere near as evil as this, but nasty to say the least, I’m pretty much convinced that someone who wishes or airs their "ironic" wishes over and over... Well, there is no irony... They are truly stating their wishes...
@SpyMagician: My Alice Cooper isn't really ironic. I admit I love bad hair rock (occasionally) and guys comfortable enough with themselves to dance around with Muppets and appear in Mike Myers movies. Even if they're Republicans. But I digress...
@pureblarney: Cooper, Schmooper... I’m talking about people I have known for a while who joke about wife beating, yet actually engage in it. You know, things like that... Saying their kids are stupid, followed up by them saying "I’m only joking..." which is then followed up by them actually treating their kids/family like crap.
You know that stuff mired in ironic denial but when you take an objective look at their behavior, they are anything but ironic? Remove the pose and the tone and they are what they are, Popeye.
Anytime I ever hear someone say they didn't know a person would do/done something I say to myself, "Bullshit, you all saw and knew something and just hoped for the best to the point of denial..."
@pureblarney: I tried commenting before but must have gotten lost in translation. The look she's going for in that photo is Juggalette. If you research Insane Clown Posse their followers call themselves Juggalos and Juggalettes. A huge departure from shock rocker Alice Cooper. I don't know that he actively encouraged his followers to form "families" etc. Pretty scary stuff!
@phlox✔: Evil is a concept born for civilization, not nature. So in essense you don't have to be evil to do what society believes is evil. Since society, not nature, labels what it believes to be evil, it can only be something you 'do'.
@Benny: Yes, but the quality of a person's behavior is decided collectively by society. Accepted behavior was only created so that conflicting people could have common ground and that the weak don't succomb to natural selection. Although, I guess the development of a democratic society (in early days) was a product of our evolved larger brains, thus also a product of evolution, but the relitively rigid guidelines, laws, taboos, and etiquette that we have formed are artificial, made up guidelines created by the compromises of several human minds, not nature.
11/26/09
11/23/09
11/20/09
"Update: Following a two-day search, Elizabeth's body has been found. Police have a juvenile person of interest in custody have haven't released his name. All they'll say is that he knew Elizabeth, lived not far away, and was older than the girl. "
"His"/"he" .. so sexist and judgmental, the press! :p
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
"Now, with all these cameras focused on my face,
you'd think they could see it through my skin.
They're looking for evil, thinking they can trace it,
but evil don’t look like anything."
11/20/09
But has anyone ever seen the movie Heavenly Creatures or know the true story it's based on? In it, two young teenagers kill one of their mothers. Now, one of those girls is a successful and seemingly normal crime novelist. Another is a nun.
This story makes me sick, but it's impossible to know if this girl could be rehabilitated. She might be a psychopath for the rest of her life. Or she might change.
11/20/09
Sorry, but prison is not just for rehabilitation. It is also for punishment.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Second, children are regularly punished. It is part of child-rearing. Misbehavior is met with punishment; this is how social mores are developed.
Third, the punishment should fit the crime. While I don't believe that a 16 year-old should serve 15 years for selling crack cocaine (partially because I feel that drug sentences in general are overly harsh), for the crime of matricide - the killing of one's on mother - through bludgeoning someone to death with a rock, the person who commits such a heinous crime should be punished, even if she is 27 months younger than the age of majority.
The legal age of majority is an arbitrary number, evidenced by the fact that 16 is old enough to be entrusted to drive a 2,000 lb. vehicle, 18 is old enough to be conscripted into military service and used to be old enough to smoke and drink, yet, until a quarter century ago, suffrage belonged to those at least 21 years of age. Now, 18 is old enough to vote but you need to be 21 to drink or smoke.
Before you can make an assertion like yours, you must first answer "Who is a child? Are a children equal children? Should any child ever be punished?"
#tips
11/20/09
This also reminds me why I no longer want to write about this stuff after 5 years of doing it professionally. After a while, teen killers - hell, killers in general - all seem to fit the same templates. And yes, it's incredibly depressing.
It's a good thing they are trying her as an adult. The only good place for this kid, sadly, is probably jail. And unless the depression overtakes her and she succeeds at suicide, she'll continue to run game on the people around her in there, too.
11/20/09
11/20/09
You realize that the fictional character Patrick Bateman was a serial killer only in his own mind, don't you? He never actually comits any of the murders--they're just deranged fantasies.
Although his motives parallel those of this all-too-real teen killer: For Bateman, too, the fantasy of killing people was the only way he could summon any sort of passion, ie, "feel something." That's how I always interpreted the book, anyway.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
@KentuckyBabe: Ah, I glossed over that paragraph. That's the kind of corroborating evidence I was talking about.
I went to an Innocence Project function this weekend, and obviously I'm still in the mood.
11/20/09
My good southern mama will argue that a middle name is how you can separate the serial killers from the rest of us; she advised me to never go out with anyone whose middle name was Dean, Dale, or Wayne.
Dailene. Girl never had a chance.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
While I'm not advocating for lowering the age of consent law to 10, (in this case I think it's wise to try her as an adult) I think we can all agree it's a pretty arbitrary number. You don't know how fumed I was at 13, that I couldn't vote for Al Gore in 2000 not to mention that I would have been way more informed than half my mother's friends who "didn't like the way Al Gore talked."
11/20/09
I don't think children are inherently good or innocent. I think they are, however, inherently children, and trying them as adults is stupid and vindictive. Meanwhile, a child who's clearly seriously mentally ill presents yet another layer of complexity. We know almost nothing about this child's full story. What she did was horrendous, but compounding the tragedy by rushing to judgment serves no purpose.
11/20/09
I'm not saying I was an adult at 13 but are not 13yrs old capable of doing adult-like (whatever that means) things and committing adult like crimes. The consequences of one's actions are not different/better when that person is a teenager.
11/20/09
Even with the gift of hindsight, I'm not sure if anyone could've gotten a read on that girl. She seems like a sociopath in the truest and most textbook sense.
Another blogger's accumulated some more info regarding the story here, including some of Bustamante's tweets:
"drinking generic dew and chillin at mah house:)" (Jul 27)
"ahh! we just got kittens! they’re adorable
"holy shit, i almost died last night xD" (Aug 4)
"addiction takes over your whole life. it’s not something easily overcome, therefor i embrace me addiction." (Aug 27)
"encompass’d with a thousand dangers; weary, faint, tremblinng with a thousand terrors; i in a fleshly tomb, am buried above grounnd. – William Cowper" (Sept 9)
"the world goes by my cage and never sees me." (Sep 13)
"bad decisions make great stories.." (Sep 17)
"this is all i want in life; a reason for all this pain." (Sep 28)
"drivin in a car bitches." (Sep 30)
And on the morning of Elizabeth Olten’s murder:
"sittin in classss. bored as fuck. i miss my cell phone :,["
Reading this, two things become apparent:
1) With hindsight, sure, you can read into these messages and construct a story. But I've got 80 people I follow on Twitter who fill my feed with this sort of self-involved rhetoric every moment of every day from the time I wake up to the time I fall asleep. I can't feign shock that this sort of online behavior was overlooked when I myself am confronted with it every day.
2) At the end of it all, Bustamante was resuming life as normal. A typical day in her world, unfazed by her actions, completely numb. I believe her when she says that she committed this horrifying act to see "what it felt like." This simultaneously simplifies and complicates the situation.
Simply, she must be removed from society, at least until remedied. But trying her as a juvenile means that regardless of what the jury finds, she could be released again in only 6 years, which to be frank, I'm not comfortable with knowing there's potentially a time limit on her treatment - especially upon reading that Bustamante dug two graves.
While I agree that trying her as an adult can be vindictive if she's immediately just cast aside, the benefit of the situation is that if she's given to a mental care facility, they can hold on to her as long as they feel it takes to properly rehabilitate her.
There's a chance that day may never come, but at the same time, we're as responsible for everyone else in society as we are for Bustamante. Given the rules that the justice system has to work within, this might be as close to justice as we can offer.
11/20/09
11/20/09
You're getting into the nurture vs. nature debate.
The entire biological function of a human changes throughout its life, not just at that age. Alzheimer's is a prime example of the physical aspects of the brain evolving long after tweenster dreamster days.
I believe in mental illness, but I also believe that there is a combustible combination of lifestyle demands/foreign substances entering the body (think hypoglycemia if you eat the wrong nutrients) that can impact decision making.
Even consider hormonal issues with the mythical period in women.
I think his positing whether a number is arbitrary is both valid and a starting point for discussion.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
"the world goes by my cage and never sees me." (Sep 13)
"bad decisions make great stories.." (Sep 17)
"this is all i want in life; a reason for all this pain." (Sep 28)
I'm pretty sure this was around the time she decided to do it and started planning. Those three tweets in that time span just scream:
"no one pays attention to me, or so I like to believe"
"if i do something horrible, people Will pay attention and I'll be all over the news as a killer!"
"if i kill someone and get put in jail or in a MH institution, I'll have a reason to be miserable and hate everything"
I'm pretty sure that by the time of the tweet on the the 17th she had thought about what she could do and how. By the 28th I'm pretty sure Elizabeth's fate was sealed. Seems like the murdering cunt was already commited to and probably excited about getting it done at that point. Sorry, I had to call her that to make me feel better. I'd rather kick her in the face.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Even though they have the ability to commit adult-like crimes, they may NOT have the ability to discern how far off the social mark they are. Crazy stuff is par for the teenage course, and that's why decisions on mental maturity can be nothing but one case at a time. That said, this poor girl is a sociopath and is, sadly, irredeemable.
The worst part of this article is that last sentence. I remember when my girls were that age. Breaks my heart.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Obviously, for her own and others' safety, she needs to not be in society for a good long time, if ever again. Please note that John Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity nearly 30 years ago, and is still in an institution.
11/20/09
Also, do you genuinely believe that all of someone's thoughts go on their Twitter feed and Myspace page, or that everything they say there is true?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
On the topic of the Twitter feed, I agree with you that what someone's tweets do not necessarily reflect their true thoughts or intentions - that's why I wrote that "I can't feign shock that this sort of online behavior was overlooked when I myself am confronted with it every day." Everyone writes tweets like Bustamante and I can't hold anyone guilty for not taking it seriously.
I think you and I are on the same side on this one, it's just that ironically, in order for Bustamante to get the sort of long-term attention and mental health care she will undoubtedly need for many years to come as her mental state continues to develop, she needed to be charged as an adult.
You might find that unfair, but as much as there is a responsibility for Bustamante, there is an even greater responsibility to prevent this from happening again. If that means that there's a possibility that Bustamante might not be able to rejoin society, and the trade-off is that we won't lose another Elizabeth Olten, I can sleep with that at night. It's on Bustamante at this point to earn her position in the world.
11/20/09
11/20/09
However, we probably then need to stop referring to what we have as a justice system, and just call it an incarceration system.
11/20/09
Sick and sad.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
You know that stuff mired in ironic denial but when you take an objective look at their behavior, they are anything but ironic? Remove the pose and the tone and they are what they are, Popeye.
Anytime I ever hear someone say they didn't know a person would do/done something I say to myself, "Bullshit, you all saw and knew something and just hoped for the best to the point of denial..."
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Or something you do?
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
#speakup