<![CDATA[Gawker: mysteries: solved!]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: mysteries: solved!]]> http://gawker.com/tag/mysteriessolved http://gawker.com/tag/mysteriessolved <![CDATA[The New York Times Solves Sarah Jessica Parker's Park Slope Mystery, And The Answer Is "Google"]]> Speculation regarding Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick moving into ginormous Park Slope digs was wrong! Via some crack NYT investigative reporting, Brooklyn teasing, and reportage bragging, the occupants who ended up in it are just as interesting: Google Bazillionaires.

Okay, so maybe not Bazillionaires, but they were definitely around before the Google IPO. Reports the Times on who actually ended up on what was rumored to be the pad SJP and Matthew Broderick were migrating to from the West Village: Google employees who declined to be named. And why all the anonymity?

The buyers asked that their names not be published - not to keep autograph seekers at bay, but because of the office culture at Google. It seems that the first generation of employees, who earned millions from stock options awarded when the company went public, sit side by side with colleagues who were hired later.

Ouch. Somewhere in the Google offices, someone who lives in a mansion is sitting side-by-side with someone stuck in a one-bedroom in the land of the hoi polloi. Meanwhile, the Times took this time to stick their tounge out at, uh, lesser outlets who rested their reporting on purely speculative efforts:

Ina Treciokas, a spokesman for Ms. Parker, said that as of last week she had received only two calls about the town house, and had unequivocally denied that Ms. Parker had any connection to it. She also said that none of the scores of entertainment and real estate Web sites that picked up the story bothered to call to ask about Ms. Parker's real estate plans.

In your face, entertainment sites! But it gets better: the Times also took a moment to swipe at what's - truth be told - another borough that isn't Manhattan. Clearly fit for a Google employee, not movie stars. Duh.

In the last few days, real estate and entertainment bloggers and columnists have been twittering en masse over rumors and reports that the ultimate Manhattan girl, Sarah Jessica Parker, and her husband, Matthew Broderick, had decided to abandon Manhattan, and their 20-foot-wide West Village town house, for a larger place in what, truth be told, is still an outer borough.

We may be a speculative entertainment blogger, but the reporters at the Times are still, truth be told, kinda assholes. No matter where they live.

Further reading: Brooklyn Loses Sarah Jessica Parker, Gains a Super Rich Googler [All Things Digital]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5312673&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Our friends at LAist claim to have identified...]]> stripper-messenger-s.jpgOur friends at LAist claim to have identified the Speedo-clad courier delivering scripts for Chris Pontius' Untitled Male Stripper Comedy we wrote about last week as actor Branden Williams, but it's still not clear to us if his services were a favor to a friend or part of a regular Strip-o-Gram gig so many struggling thespians use to pay the rent. [LAist]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291514&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA['TNR' Blogger Reveals Himself, But 'Weekly Standard' Not Impressed]]> Today, the New Republic's Iraq soldier-blogger revealed his true identity—he's Private Scott Thomas Beauchamp, of the Alpha Company, 1/18 Infantry, Second Brigade Combat Team, First Infantry Division. (Questions had been raised as to whether the blogger was actually a soldier, and also whether the gruesome events he described were true.) So that's a huge relief for 'TNR' editor Frank Foer and his new online editor Ben Wasserstein, we're sure! But the Weekly Standard, those fun-loving conservative bastards, aren't letting TNR off the hook quite yet.

It's good to finally know the author's name, but there is nothing here to confirm the events as described by Beauchamp. Right now, we have no reason to believe that his stories are anything other than what we first suspected them to be: a "pastiche of the 'This is no bullshit . . . stories soldiers like to tell."... That Beauchamp chose to reveal himself at this point also seems a bit disingenuous, since the military has already launched an investigation and, courtesy of JD Johannes, we'd already identified his unit four days ago. If we'd gotten that much information, it was only a matter of time before somebody besides his editors started asking him "hard questions."
Oh, snap! They're basically calling a Jukt Micronics on TNR's asses!

A STATEMENT FROM SCOTT THOMAS BEAUCHAMP [TNR]
"Scott Thomas" Revealed [Weekly Standard]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282868&view=rss&microfeed=true