Dear Fox News: As a secret Muslim, Obama doesn't appoint Czars. He appoints Viziers. Beneath those are his sultans. Please make this correction in your next broadcast.
Only Fox News could find a peaceful way to resolve historical revolutionary conflict between the Imperialists and the Bolsheviks by smashing both pegs into Obama's hole at the same time.
So wait... their title isn't actually Czar, but Foax News is calling them a Czar and then complaining that all these people are called Czars? That seems rather restrained. If they are making up the title they should be able to do better than that! How about Foax calling them the Car Pimp, the Drug Hoe, the Bank Pimp and the Energy Hoe... Then they complain that this is what we get for electing a negro to the White House... Plus the Energy Hoe sounds like someone I'd like to meet.
Yes. Czarist Russia was exactly like Communist Russia. Except for the fact that they were polar opposites. And anyway, shouldn't Faux News be ecstatic about a pseudo-reactionist return to czaristry and centralized government? I'm getting my tarot cards ready like Nancy Reagan: now there's a lady (under whose husband's presidency the phrase "drug czar", father of all later czars, was coined) who would've made Rasputin, himself, proud.
Finally, we shouldn't torture because it to do so is a betrayal of who we are and what we believe as a people. It negates everything we say we stand for. Hell, if we're going to torture and deny even our enemy the basic human rights upon which our country was founded, we may as well have stayed British. Or folded at Bull Run or in France or during World War II. Why fight for something that isn't different and doesn't aspire to be better than other ways?
How seductive to hear Lord Cheney--a man who chose not to serve his country in battle out of, as he admits, pure self interest--decree that now we must "work" the dark side, when what he really means is we must "serve" the dark side.
Must. Must we? We must. Why? Because the enemy has decreed it is so. And so did the enemy within cede the biggest victory al Qaeda--the enemy we created with billions of taxpayer dollars--will ever win: our soul as a nation. No small victory, either, considering that we ourselves have been fighting over since our founding, paying dearly with hundreds of thousands of civil war dead.
But just like that, one man says we now have one fucking guy who says we have to torture (with the world on our side and the world's law enforcement organizations at our service) and one or two extremely creative but apparently not very competent lawyers to write memos saying it's all okay, our guys can inflict anything that will not immediately lead to death (oops--I guess "pulping" a man's legs, as was done to an innocent taxi driver in Abu Ghraib--can cause death, um, our bad) is legal.
And like that, the ideal that, if we didn't always attain we could at least say we aspired to, was no longer something we cared to live up to.
The torturers--well, the scapegoats who went to jail for it because they were so comically easy to demonize--at Abu Ghraib were acting within guidelines provided by the non-military personnel in charge of the interrogations. Those shadowy figures, who operated outside the command structure of the prison itself, were under the direction of a chain of command that led directly to Donald Rumsfeld. It's easily one of the travesties of the torture program that enlisted personnel are the only ones to do time for compromising America's ideals: but that's America circa 1980 - 2009 for you--screw the little guy.
Personally, I don't expect you to (or care if you do) believe me. But you really should take this guy's word for it:
MSNBC put me on air as a "Martha Stewart expert" during her trial. I had written one column (that was actually about the Stepford Wives remake) that referred to Martha for about 50 of the piece's 800 words.
For whatever reason, I can't link back to my own comment, but I meant to say that I doubt conservatives who get their information on this issue will read this book, but...go ahead, prove me wrong about your ability to challenge your own assumptions.
It never gets boring refuting bullshit with a simple link. I doubt any of the conservatives who get their information on this issue from 24, but the following links to a book by an interrogator in Iraq who not only knows that torture doesn't work, he also knows how many American lives our torture program has cost among his fellow soldiers. Torture doesn't work, it works against us. But don't take my word for it, read this book.
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
04/20/09
How seductive to hear Lord Cheney--a man who chose not to serve his country in battle out of, as he admits, pure self interest--decree that now we must "work" the dark side, when what he really means is we must "serve" the dark side.
Must. Must we? We must. Why? Because the enemy has decreed it is so. And so did the enemy within cede the biggest victory al Qaeda--the enemy we created with billions of taxpayer dollars--will ever win: our soul as a nation. No small victory, either, considering that we ourselves have been fighting over since our founding, paying dearly with hundreds of thousands of civil war dead.
But just like that, one man says we now have one fucking guy who says we have to torture (with the world on our side and the world's law enforcement organizations at our service) and one or two extremely creative but apparently not very competent lawyers to write memos saying it's all okay, our guys can inflict anything that will not immediately lead to death (oops--I guess "pulping" a man's legs, as was done to an innocent taxi driver in Abu Ghraib--can cause death, um, our bad) is legal.
And like that, the ideal that, if we didn't always attain we could at least say we aspired to, was no longer something we cared to live up to.
And the terrorists won.
04/20/09
Personally, I don't expect you to (or care if you do) believe me. But you really should take this guy's word for it:
[en.wikipedia.org]
[www.newyorker.com]
Go ahead. Educate yourself.
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
"Ah, he doesn't stutter too much. Call that Sarcastro guy about Martha." I actually told them no, but they called back twice.
04/20/09
04/20/09
[www.amazon.com]
04/19/09