<![CDATA[Gawker: netflix]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: netflix]]> http://gawker.com/tag/netflix http://gawker.com/tag/netflix <![CDATA[Vice Blows Entire Paycheck on Drugs]]> In your retro Thursday media column: Vice is having a Halloween party, laid-off journalists get an award, 'Netflix for magazines' is doomed to fail, and the Wall Street Journal is finally as prestigious as USA Today.

Bucking the current media trend of "Everybody's broke," Vice is throwing a nice $250,000 Halloween party in Williamsburg to celebrate its 15th anniversary, complete with "two floors of chaotic nostalgia, scary punk bands, full-on rave DJs, a skate ramp, glow sticks, grunge, big pants, gangsta rap, marijuana-scented flannel, and serious slacker vibes." Our costume is "Terrified old Polish lady who wonders what the hell happened to her neighborhood."


This is a nice thing: The Columbia Journalism Review is giving fellowships to four laid-off journalists, "that will provide downsized professionals with a writing position as well as support to help them choose how best to use their experience in the years ahead." Hopefully a living wage is include? We support this! Why should the lucky employed people get all the cushy academic awards?


Since magazines started dying 438 years ago, people have been talking about developing a successful "Netflix for magazines" thing (we're not counting the unsuccessful attempt, already made). Hey, what does the founder of Netflix think?

When asked if magazines should try a model similar to his, Reed Hastings, the founder of Netflix, said, "It's certainly worth a shot."
But does Hastings subscribe to magazines? "No, I read them online," he said.

Magazines: fucked.


The Wall Street Journal has reportedly won the "coveted" Newspaper Circulation title, besting USA Today. Rupert Murdoch will celebrate by only staying at a Holiday Inns from now on, and never reading anything longer than 400 words ever again.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5382511&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Meet the Postal Worker Who Stole Your Netflix DVDs]]> Wondering why that one Lost DVD never arrived? If you live in New England, blame the Netflix Nabber. Myles Weathers pinched more than 3,000 DVDs from the mail distribution center where he worked. He faces five years in prison.

Weathers will probably do more like one year, according to The Smoking Gun, although the time will be hardened by the fact that Weathers will have the least intimidating criminal record in the joint. "What are you in for?" "Mugging the shit out of a bunch of people. You?" "I stole DVDs from the mail and put them into my backpack everyday at work, until Netflix tipped off the USPS and I was busted on a surveillance video. I was caught RED HANDED. Geddit? Ha?"

A page of the plea agreement reprinted by the Smoking Gun refers to "the 3,012 recovered DVDs," implying that Weathers couldn't even fence the property he stole from the DVD mailing service, which is just as well: He faced $38,000 in restitution if he couldn't cough up the goods. Worst. Heist thriller. Ever.

(Pic via HackingNetflix on Flickr)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5365944&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix Set to Award Prize in Questionable Recommendation Philosophy]]> Looks like Netflix might have a winner in their million dollar improve-our-movie-recommendations-software sweepstakes. And it's not some nerd toiling away with a protractor in his nerd room (nerd!). It's a whole bunch of nerds.

BellKor's Pragmatic Chaos (My God, how can chaos be pragmatic?! How?!), a group of math and computer people from around the world (who've been making the most contest progress over the last two years), say they've improved the accuracy of the software by 10.05%. Now the other contestants have 30 days to do better, otherwise, BellKor gets the million.

But how effective do you think their recommendation system? Or any recommendation system, for that matter?

Regardless of how this all shakes out, any improvement on a system that can prevent us from accidentally watching The Stepfather (Sela Ward, how could you?) in the future is welcome.

(Pic via shannonpatrick17 on Flickr)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5303190&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Recession Winners Win]]> Last month we predicted ten companies and industries that would actually come out as recession winners (crazy, right?). It's time to check on how our predictions are doing! (Hint: f'in awesome):

Just a few of our winners:

Anecdotal evidence also indicates that Crystal meth dealers and Online porn are doing just as well as expected. [Previously]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5140991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix raising prices, with Blu-ray as the excuse]]> Every Netflix subscriber who's ever added a Blu-ray disc to their queue — which triggers a setting for Blu-ray movies — is getting a $1 a month fee added to their bill for "access" to the high-def movie discs on the rent-by-mail service, even if they didn't intend to watch Blu-ray movies. Users can log into their account and remove the fee if they change the setting to stop all Blu-ray movies. So what this really is: A tax on laziness. [Silicon Alley Insider]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061149&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix streaming service goes from bad to "Superbad"]]> In a deal with premium cable channel Starz, Netflix will now be able to offer Walt Disney and Sony Pictures films to its streaming video service. (Netflix's films play in a browser or on your television through a set-top box made by Roku.) It's an important step — what's been holding back better content from many online sources aren't technological hurdles, but contractual hurdles. Starz and other premium cable channels have had rights to on-demand distribution locked up for some time. [Los Angeles Times]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057513&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Netflix Of Magazines Is Here]]> It's about time the magazine world jacked Netflix's business plan. Maghound is Time Inc's new service that lets you, the consumer, choose which magazines you want to receive every month—with no hassles, and one low price! (Runs hand, model-like, over selection of 240 glossy magazines). Seriously, this may not save the magazine industry, but it's a good product for anyone who likes magazines. For these three reasons!

1. Gladiator Wars: Assuming Maghound takes off, it will offer a pure look at what consumers want to read (at least within the limited, non-Hearst pool of 240 magazines) when offered a broad array of choices. It could become the Billboard charts of magazine popularity. Plus you can watch magazines get dropped from subscriber lists immediately when people find out their content sucks! Now we just have to ask Time Inc. to make all this data public.

2. Price: Three titles for five bucks a month, five for eight bucks, seven for ten bucks. It's a deal and a half. If Maghound takes off it should cut into news stand sales, because it allows you to sample issues without paying the price of a subscription or the higher price of a news stand copy.

3. Expansion: The roster of magazines available now lacks big names like The Atlantic, The Economist, Esquire, and a bunch of others. But if Maghound proves to be a successful business, that list is bound to expand, because magazines—except very high-end titles—will see that it's in their economic interest to be included. So it's fair to expect more choice in the future.

Or the thing will fold, but you only lost five bucks a month. So who cares?

[Folio, Paid Content]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050486&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Blockbuster desperately seeking ex-customers]]> A tipster reports that Blockbuster is blast-emailing former customers to Total Access, its DVDs-by-mail Netflix knockoff. The offer: $25 if customers sign up again using PayPal. Odd, since Blockbuster CEO Jim Keyes recently bragged about how the company was cutting off online advertising for its money-losing rent-by-mail business in favor of promoting its stores. Has he not talked to his marketing department recently?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044532&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Blockbuster CEO won't buy Netflix — he can't afford it]]> Blockbuster has abandoned advertising TotalAccess, its also-ran DVD-by-mail competitor to Netflix. CEO Jim Keyes would like you to think his company's still a contender, though, and PaidContent's Rafat Ali is happy to oblige in a softball interview. Ali's far-from-knockout closer: "This is a hypothetical one. Would you be ever interested in buying Netflix?" We won't bother giving you Keyes's pat response about how he doesn't need Netflix. Instead, we'll just point you to PaidContent's handy financial summary included in the post. Blockbuster is worth $312 million. At $1.93 billion, Netflix is worth six times as much as Keyes's company.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037721&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix Chaos Terror]]> Ap06072409420(2)-Tm"The company didn't ship DVDs to any of its customers Tuesday, and hadn't made shipments as of midday Thursday, Mr. Swasey said. Netflix made only a partial shipment from about half of its 55 nationwide distribution centers on Wednesday." [WSJ]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037414&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix crash caused by botched Oracle upgrade]]> How did Netflix end up with massive delivery delays? "Because of massive database corruption in their Oracle cluster caused by a botched upgrade," according to a tipster. But don't blame Oracle (or Microsoft), necessarily. The tipster believes Netflix's own database adminstrators who bungled the upgrade. Why not just roll back the system?

I believe it's more complicated than that — probably transactions that happened *after* the upgrade that they now need to reconcile manually.

The theory would explain why Netflix seemed to know it received DVD returns from particular customers, but can't figure out what next from the queue to ship. (Photo by AP/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037267&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix shipping system crashes for two days running]]> Woe be unto Netflix if my parents don't get the latest installemnt of Foyle's War. In an email sent out to customers and a notice posted to the site, the DVD-by-mail company says it is having problems with its shipping system affecting around a third of the company's customers. It has now persisted for two days. So if your friendly mail carrier doesn't show up with a red envelope or three today, don't blame it on a Postal Service "blue shorts of death" error. Graciously, the company has preemptively offered a credit for any delays. Why not tout its online-video offerings, like Watch Now streaming on its website or the Roku set-top box? Oh, right, website outages and inventory problems. But hey, at least if your request gets returned "404 Not Found," it won't cost you a stamp. Netflix's alert, after the jump:

We're Sorry DVD Shipments Are Delayed

Dear [Netflix customer],

Our shipping system is unexpectedly down. We received a DVD back from you and should have shipped you a DVD, but we likely have not. Our goal is to ship DVDs as soon as possible, and we will keep you posted on the status of your DVD shipments.

We are sorry for any inconvenience this has caused. If your DVD shipment is delayed, we will be issuing a credit to your account in the next few days. You don't need to do anything. The credit will be automatically applied to your next billing statement.

Again, we apologize for the delay and thank you for your understanding. If you need further assistance, please call us at 1-888-638-3549.

-The Netflix Team

(Photo by Seth Anderson)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037125&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vudu sexes up its set-top box, but is it too late?]]> Vudu, a startup which sells a set-top box for downloading HD movies over the Internet, has finally added adult content to the mix through a partnership with AVN. Neither Netflix nor Apple will let you watch folks bump uglies — in stunning 1080p resolution, no less. Vudu rival FyreTV won't let you download anything but porn, so it's certainly a differentiator. But is it enough to save Vudu's business model? Unlikely. At $299 (marked down from $399), the box is pricey, the selection of videos still limited, and the premise that viewers will spend up to $20 to virtually "own" Ashlynn Goes to College 3 questionable. And of course, the real competition isn't other paid services — it's the millions of hours of free porn available on the Internet.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033948&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Today in Indie Carnage: Netflix Executes Red Envelope Entertainment]]> The independent-film slaughterhouse revved back into action this morning with news that Red Envelope Entertainment, the acquisitions and financing division of Netflix, shut its doors after three years. The division helped underwrite and/or release titles including the Maggie Gyllenhaal drama Sherrybaby, the Oscar-nominated documentary No End in Sight and Julie Delpy's directorial debut Two Days in Paris; it's last film appears to be the psychosexual Ben Kingsley/Penelope Cruz drama Elegy, opening next month.

Red Envelope boss Liesl Copland appears to be on her way out as well, marking roughly the 674th job lost in the indie sector in 2008. RIP, of course — but what does it all mean? And when, when will the carnage end?

REE had partnered with distributors like IFC Films and Samuel Goldwyn since 2005, at one point splitting acquisition and theatrical distribution costs in exchange for DVD rights and half the profits. As noted today in The Hollywood Reporter, that all changed this past January when Red Envelope pared back its operation; its closure Tuesday wipes out yet another player in the indie market following the dissolution of Picturehouse, Warner Independent and Tartan Films, with ThinkFilm, The Weinstein Company and Sidney Kimmel Entertainment on life-support close behind.

Bleak, huh? On the bright side, at least Paramount purports to still be in the game despite its overt genrefication last week. Take your silver linings — and your résumés, we suppose — where you can find them.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=399119&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix sells out of Roku set-top boxes, but could it have been intentional?]]> The $99 box from Roku that allows Netflix customers to watch videos on their televisions streamed over the Internet is all sold out, and there won't be any more shipped until at least July and possibly August. Which could be a deliberate strategy — underproduce the initial batch, sell them out, and look for the business press to bite on the hype. At least, that's what Scott Kirstner at Cinematech suggests. I just think that if Netflix has any shot at making this box ubiquitous, partnering with a company that can't sustain a supply line for six to eight weeks at a time isn't going to help. But then, such are the woes that have bedeviled all potential IPTV providers — thanks to the mysterious curse of the set-top box.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5015927&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix DVD-rental business to peak in 2013]]> The trade in DVDs by mail that Netflix pioneered will be a business in decline within five to ten years according to CEO Reed Hastings. But he's bullish about online delivery, not surprising considering the recent release of the Roku set-top box. "Our key challenge is growing earnings per share and subscribers while funding streaming (online video) which should give us years of subscriber and earnings expansion." [Reuters] (Photo by AP/Paul Sakuma)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393791&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What If Websites Were Realistic?]]> What if Facebook let you properly express your rage against the tool who just added you to the "Buying and Selling Friends" app? What if Netflix knew you'd skip to the dirty bits? I paid Jay Hathaway a slave's wage to draw up what this would look like.




]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393804&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Netflix and Roku hope to avoid the curse of the set-top box]]> What makes Netflix's new living-room box for Internet video downloads different from all the other set-top flops? Everything. The price is low: At $99, it's much cheaper than the $229 Apple TV. It connects to regular TVs as well as HDTVs, and can stream video in variable quality depending on your Internet connection speed. And you can eat all you want from the buffet of available titles on Netflix, with movies available online that happen to be in your Netflix queue already lined up and ready to go. Hardware partner Roku has introduced it with a chipset that other manufacturers can license, and Netflix has a huge domestic subscriber base as potential customers. So what three things could doom this product to the same fate as every other Internet-video set-top?

  • Internet service providers: Comcast is a cable provider and AT&T has its U-Verse and HomeZone IPTV offerings, and both companies have their own set-top boxes and on-demand movie and television offerings. Plus the two generally compete only against each other in many markets. Which means neither has much of an incentive to increase speeds to those that could provide the Roku box with the HDTV signal it reportedly supports. Comcast has shown that it will throttle bandwidth for specific applications, and then lie about it to the FCC.
  • Movie studios: I've used the Netflix feature to watch movies online and the selection isn't particularly impressive. Reports peg available titles at 10,000, with a handful of television shows thrown in. Netflix will have to go over the heads of the DVD distributors it has relationships with directly to the studios if it wants current content.
  • Surly adopters: Fool me once with Akimbo, the Apple TV, or Unbox over TiVo, shame on you. Fool me twice with the Roku? Shame on you. The gadgetophile market is probably wary of cluttering their home theaters with yet another clunker. The key will be to get the chipset Roku has developed for the box built into new TVs. Only then can Netflix count on the kind of mainstream audience that will convince the studios and the ISPs that the project can't be ignored.
So while various gadgeteers remark how inexpensive and easy to use the new product is, remember that more than a few movies-over-the-Net pioneers have gotten arrows in their back trying to explore the living-room frontier.]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392100&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Regional DVD Rentals Reveal Citizenry's Collective Psyche]]> Former Gawker Joshua "Joshy" Stein, ever-enamored of his new 'hood of Williamsburg, points out that a new Netflix feature allows people to see what films others in their zip code are renting. For 11211, he's found that the top five movies are La Jetée, The Holy Mountain, Blow Up, Do The Right Thing, and Solaris. (As Stein puts it, "Despair, pretension, easy sex, pop music, violence, hate, photography, isolation, trouble.") We put this search function to the test. What are they watching in Bridgeport, Connecticut? San Francisco? Do they conform to regional stereotypes?

In rough-and-tumble Bridgeport, CT:

#1: "I Think I Love My Wife"
#7 is "Why Did I Get Married?"

Theme: Oh noes. Families are disintegrating.

San Francisco:
#1: "24 Hours on Craiglist"
#3: "Commune"
#7: "Burning Man: Beyond Black Rock"

Theme: Techies and hippies!

In the geek-boy Google capital of Mountain View, CA:

#1: "Tell Me You Love Me, Season 1"
#2 and #6: "Battlestar Galactica

Theme: We work for Google. There aren't a lot of girls here and we're sad.

In fancy Easthampton, NY:

#1 is "Becket": "When King Henry II (Peter O'Toole) names his friend and former drinking partner Thomas à Becket (Richard Burton) the new Archbishop of Canterbury, he counts on his unbending loyalty when it comes to religious matters..."

Theme: Inaccessibility, old money.


[Photo: librarygeek's Flickr]


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=391841&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rank tech's 10 best workspaces]]> tocquigny04.jpgAfter reviewing our post "Tech's top 10 workspaces" commenter Dweezil complained that our choices were full of "to much modernism bullshit." Commenter Web2PointOhShit tore at everybody:

Six Apart's offices seem pretty ordinary to me. Their meeting space is *tiny*. Googleplex's niceties are all about enticing their workers to stay at work longer — yeah, that's real HAWT!. Valleywag offices look like a dump to me.
So, OK, not everybody goes for our taste in brick, exposed ceilings and Googley amenities. Let's find out who's in the minority. Below, vote for your favorites and help us rank tech's 10 best workspaces.

Click on each company name for its full galleries.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389741&view=rss&microfeed=true