@Bunsy: Sure, you can. But if the person being charged is me - who can take it, repurpose it in my own language, and make it more profitable (the cost of paying for the NYT vs. the cost of reporting the NYT) - the value of the information drops dramatically, as quickly as I can make it my own. And I just don't think you can't protect the value of something like a huge scoop to justify what it costs to get it anymore. You've got to offer something else.
@Bunsy: Because eventually the information makes its way into the public space. In other words, if information has any value at all, that value pretty much disappears the instant it hits the air. The pay wall only works if you can control, in a very narrow way, the limits of the medium (in this case the internet). #peterkaplan
I kind of love the quote about how it takes a single day to decipher whether a reporter is worth his or her weight. That really speaks to an intuitiveness amongst quality journalists, something that perhaps cannot be taught at school but merely refined (or alternately, stunted) by grooming.
And Tina Brown is a lot [many things-er] than all of us, but that does not make her in any way something we should continue thinking about. #peterkaplan
@ampersandparade: True, on both points. But Tina Brown's going to be someone we're going to have to keep thinking about. The question remains: when (or if) Diller will tighten the purse-strings on her operation. #peterkaplan
Actually, what I heard from a close relative of Sorkin's -- I can't be more specific without blowing that person's identity -- is that one of Sorkin's ambitions is to go into finance and work for a private equity group. That's what this person told me about a year ago.
Obviously a lot has happened since then, so his plans might've changed, or maybe that was just one of several things he was considering. But that's what this person told me. #newyorkobserver
Sorkin is a star. Too much so to go to the Observer, unless it were to be remade into a real newspaper, maybe focusing on real estate and finance (and the incestuous relationship between the two). But that would take an investment by Jared, which he doesn't need to do if his whole point is to promote his wife. #newyorkobserver
I'd heard a reasonably well-sourced estimated that Sorkin was making about $200,000 a year. But that included something for DealBook.
The real question would be this: what is the nature of Sorkin's fee for running the financial blog and email newsletter?
Even if it's only a flat amount, other New York Times writers would start asking questions about compensation for their own blogging.
And if these "unusual incentive arrangements" included some kind of bonus for hitting targets for DealBook subscriptions, for instance? That would go against Times orthodoxy, the belief that journalism is necessarily compromised by any obvious quest for popularity. #newyorkobserver
At this juncture, the Gawker night editor jobs are significantly more appealing than editing the Observer. At least Denton seems to be a competent overlord. #newyorkobserver
The WSJ covering NYC could be interesting, depending on whether its beat structure consists of Plutocrats and Their Pleasures, or actual investigative work.
This sucks. Everyone I know/have talked to there genuinely enjoyed working with Tom and they product they put out. Considring the job he had (that of filling Peter Kaplan's shoes), this is pretty impressive. And now: sad. #newyorkobserver
It's truly a shame (to me) that the Observer has become the paper it now is. It went from witty, irreverent and, yeah, sort of fun, to this glorified real estate and socialite pamphlet. Kushner has neutered the content to such an extent that I go straight to the crossword puzzle and then throw it away. And sidebar: you lose Andrew Sarris but keep Rex Reed? #newyorkobserver
The extraordinary thing about the relationship between Kushner and McGeveran: neither of them even pretended to have much time or respect for the other. It's a testament to the misery of this economic downturn and the paucity of other options that they stayed hitched even this long. #newyorkobserver
12:25 AM
01:36 AM
01:42 AM
11/08/09
And Tina Brown is a lot [many things-er] than all of us, but that does not make her in any way something we should continue thinking about. #peterkaplan
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/06/09
Obviously a lot has happened since then, so his plans might've changed, or maybe that was just one of several things he was considering. But that's what this person told me. #newyorkobserver
11/06/09
11/06/09
The real question would be this: what is the nature of Sorkin's fee for running the financial blog and email newsletter?
Even if it's only a flat amount, other New York Times writers would start asking questions about compensation for their own blogging.
And if these "unusual incentive arrangements" included some kind of bonus for hitting targets for DealBook subscriptions, for instance? That would go against Times orthodoxy, the belief that journalism is necessarily compromised by any obvious quest for popularity. #newyorkobserver
11/06/09
I am sure he loved being approached by Kushner, very flattering; enough so to continue to appear interested in the gig. #newyorkobserver
11/05/09
11/04/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09
10/28/09