By the by, you don't actually have to show ID to the police in New York State unless they are detaining you.
I am not a lawyer, but I've read New York State's stop-and-identify law (NY CLS CPL ยง140.50(1)), and it refers to officers detaining suspects, which requires "reasonable suspicion" that you've committed a crime.
See also the case People v. De Bour, which lays out four tiers of police intrusion and what the police are allowed to do, and what justification they need to prove to allow them to do it. Simply put, they can approach anyone and talk to them. And cops can ask for ID and other information, but you don't necessarily have to show it to them. If a cop has "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot", they can ask more intrusive questions, but still can't compel you to identify yourself, and you're free to leave at any time.
Under the third tier, if there's "reasonable suspicion", it's the equivalent of a Terry stop, and they can compel you to show ID, and they can detain you.
The fourth tier requires "probable cause" and is essentially an arrest, if i'm reading it correctly.
However, the upshot is that lots of people get arrested and worse for "contempt of cop", and I wonder how far flexing your rights and asking police to adhere to the law will go. If the cops arrest you, rightly or wrongly, and the judge throws it out, you'll still have gone to jail and have your evening/day/weekend ruined.
@i'm a bottle: That's exactly right, and why a lawyer is a better person to talk to than li'l ol' me. But it remains that a police officer has a higher hurdle to clear when detaining you or making you show ID than when he's just talking to you or asking you questions.
"I do not consent to a search" and "Am I free to go?" are good things to remember. That's no guarantee that it won't antagonize the cop, however...and like I said, being arrested would ruin your day, regardless of whether or not it's a bogus arrest.
Repeat after me: "I don't consent to any search." That is all you have to say. No more, no less, whether you have anything illegal on you or not! Watch the ACLU Busted video. Get all of your friends to watch it - the more we know about our rights, the better we are as a country.
@hibiscusflower: The problem is that all the cop has to state to establish probable cause -- the prerequisite for a body search -- is that the person's eyes were bloodshot or glassy, or that the person was slurring his/her words. The DA will take the cops statement as a fact and you'll have to try your luck -- and shell out thousands of dollars -- to fight that supposition in front of a jury, which will probably believe the cop if s/he actually finds something. It's a fucked up system. It all comes down to the policy that we arrest people for minor things like having a few drinks or smoking a little dope.
@cockeyed: That's not true. Here's the scoop:
No Requirement to Carry ID
TX Penal Code: Sec. 38.02. Failure to Identify.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
(1) lawfully arrested the person;
(2) lawfully detained the person; or
(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time of the offense, the offense is a Class B misdemeanor.
Ed. Note: Here's what this law means in plain English.
(1) You don't have to carry a driver's license or other ID, if you're not driving.
(2) If you've been arrested you have to give your name, address, and date of birth to a police officer who requests it. (They'll police ask you for lots more than this, but these three items are all you're legally required to give them.)
(3) If you've just been detained, not arrested, you don't have to give thm squat. But refusing to identify might cause them to arrest you anyway and take you downtown so they can determine who you really are. If this happens, you still won't be charged with failing to carry ID, because there is no such crime.
(4) It's a crime to give false information about your identity, whether you've been arrested or just detained..
late to the game, but for new yorkers who spend more time walking about, riding public transit and whatnot when they might otherwise be "compromised", try not carrying identification. it's the first thing nypd ask for when they suspect anything. you could also try affecting a foreign accent, and they'll probably pass you up for most anything--too much paperwork.
A Cop that pulled over... [cough cough] a few friends of mine in Duchess County asked them if they had anything 'illegal' and said that he "probably wouldn't even write a ticket" if they were were honest with him. Unfortunately they had expired out of state registration, so he was already Kosher to search the car. Knowing Cops to be liers, and already in 'bracelets,' they did exactly as this article suggests and when he found what he was looking for he wrote them all tickets and told them that "if you had only been honest, you'd already be on your way right now." In short, you can't win. Luckily, a few phone calls later, Duchess County realized how wealthy and white they were, and all was fine.
Good rule of thumb: It never helps to volunteer information about yourself to the police (beyond maybe name and ID which can be the difference between a summons and a trip to the precinct). If they want to arrest you and they can arrest you, you can not talk yourself or help yourself out of it, no matter how much they say that you can. If they want to arrest you but they can't arrest you, you can, however, talk yourself and help yourself into it. And most people do.
Having lived in greater New Dork (pun implied) for quite some time now, I have found that the best place to stash your stash while in public is in your bloodstream.
And it sure does make wandering around at night much, much more interesting.
In Texas, the State Alcohol Commission officers ask slightly but not illegally inebriated bar patrons to step outside for a talk, only to arrest them for public intoxication once on the street.
@onebadclam: I'll raise you that: In Dallas, they recently gave public intoxication citations to men IN a bar. That it was a gay bar and the cops beat the shit out of a couple of the patrons while arresting them (for being drunk--IN A BAR) only made it that much more suspect.
A lawyer I knew once said something along the lines of never taking a breathalyzer or doing the drunk-walk dog and pony show on the street if you're stopped. The cops are actually only by law asking that you comply, but it is at your discretion to do so. Tell them you'd be happy to do the breathalyzer down at the station. You may get a few extra minutes to get a bit more sober, you know if you weren't already so shitfaced you thought you already were at the station, and you'll test whether or not the cop really wants to go through the hassle of dragging you in. Please note: I've never actually tested this theory, but I believe it to be true, since most of us don't really know the laws of the land in which we live.
@Spirit Fingers: In New York State, I'm fairly certain refusing to take a breathalyzer on the spot is the legal equivalent of failing the breathalyzer.
@Plawf: In this instance you're not refusing to take a breathalyzer. You're refusing to take one on the street, where you're more apt to not know your rights, not be able to consult legal counsel, and basically incriminate yourself. You're saying you'll take a breathalyzer, but down at the station.
@Spirit Fingers: On those various cops shows it's funny to see their tricknology with drunks who refuse the test. "Look, I'll make you a deal. Take the test and if you pass, I'll let you go." As if passing the test without the special deal would result in a DUI.
@Spirit Fingers: In Texas, they can now forcibly draw blood from DWI suspects. Granted, they do it down at the station, but it's a much more sensitive and accurate test than a breathalyzer. I'm not opposed to catching drunk drivers, but the prospect of being forcibly held down down while the government takes blood from you to use against you in a court of law just makes by ACLU sirens go off.
@Spirit Fingers: I once got pulled over for an imminent DUI. I say imminent, because the only evidence that the cop needed was the 45 mph- generated streak of puke all over the left side of my Jeep.
I can't quite recall, but I might have used the "that's not my Puke" defense, which for future reference kids, doesn't work.
@Spirit Fingers: I would advise the same, at least in Texas: Never take a breathalyzer. It is a test that cannot be reproduced and is notoriously untrustworthy. Do not take a field sobriety test either -- they can use anything to say you failed it. You have to get out of the car if they ask you, but be sure not to lean against your vehicle. Just stand there with your arms at your side. Calmly, if possible.
If the police are asking you to do these things, they are going to arrest you pretty much no matter what. So wait until you get booked and they get a warrant to draw your blood. Yes, you will likely have your license revoked on the basis that you refused the tests, but that is a lot better than getting a DUI conviction, which is what you will almost certainly get otherwise.
@J. Frank Parnell: That's damn funny. Also, the whole "don't incriminate yourself" thing was soooo far beyond your reach, apparently. I say this because if it was on the side of the car, I can only imagine your pants leg and at least the right shoe. Oh, yes. I'm sure no one wanted to touch you, let alone book you. *Hork!
My roommate came back from the Jersey Shore last year, and was like "I got a ticket for public urination."
I go, "Oh man, you're lucky, Corey got arrested for that a year ago."
My roommate replied, "Oh, they only arrest the black people."
@Colander: I do feel bad about this shitty double standard, but that's why (as a white person) I'm never too worried about breaking the law. I can handle a ticket.
11/13/09
#newsyoucanuse #journalismism
10/19/09
08/11/09
I am not a lawyer, but I've read New York State's stop-and-identify law (NY CLS CPL ยง140.50(1)), and it refers to officers detaining suspects, which requires "reasonable suspicion" that you've committed a crime.
See also the case People v. De Bour, which lays out four tiers of police intrusion and what the police are allowed to do, and what justification they need to prove to allow them to do it. Simply put, they can approach anyone and talk to them. And cops can ask for ID and other information, but you don't necessarily have to show it to them. If a cop has "a founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot", they can ask more intrusive questions, but still can't compel you to identify yourself, and you're free to leave at any time.
Under the third tier, if there's "reasonable suspicion", it's the equivalent of a Terry stop, and they can compel you to show ID, and they can detain you.
The fourth tier requires "probable cause" and is essentially an arrest, if i'm reading it correctly.
However, the upshot is that lots of people get arrested and worse for "contempt of cop", and I wonder how far flexing your rights and asking police to adhere to the law will go. If the cops arrest you, rightly or wrongly, and the judge throws it out, you'll still have gone to jail and have your evening/day/weekend ruined.
08/11/09
08/11/09
"I do not consent to a search" and "Am I free to go?" are good things to remember. That's no guarantee that it won't antagonize the cop, however...and like I said, being arrested would ruin your day, regardless of whether or not it's a bogus arrest.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
No Requirement to Carry ID
TX Penal Code: Sec. 38.02. Failure to Identify.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
(1) lawfully arrested the person;
(2) lawfully detained the person; or
(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time of the offense, the offense is a Class B misdemeanor.
Ed. Note: Here's what this law means in plain English.
(1) You don't have to carry a driver's license or other ID, if you're not driving.
(2) If you've been arrested you have to give your name, address, and date of birth to a police officer who requests it. (They'll police ask you for lots more than this, but these three items are all you're legally required to give them.)
(3) If you've just been detained, not arrested, you don't have to give thm squat. But refusing to identify might cause them to arrest you anyway and take you downtown so they can determine who you really are. If this happens, you still won't be charged with failing to carry ID, because there is no such crime.
(4) It's a crime to give false information about your identity, whether you've been arrested or just detained..
08/11/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
And it sure does make wandering around at night much, much more interesting.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
I can't quite recall, but I might have used the "that's not my Puke" defense, which for future reference kids, doesn't work.
08/10/09
If the police are asking you to do these things, they are going to arrest you pretty much no matter what. So wait until you get booked and they get a warrant to draw your blood. Yes, you will likely have your license revoked on the basis that you refused the tests, but that is a lot better than getting a DUI conviction, which is what you will almost certainly get otherwise.
08/10/09
08/10/09
I go, "Oh man, you're lucky, Corey got arrested for that a year ago."
My roommate replied, "Oh, they only arrest the black people."
08/10/09