newspapers - Gawker

posts about #newspapers more →
David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
Another New York Observer Editor Leaving
'The Profession I've Dedicated My Life to Is Slowly Evaporating Before My Very Eyes'
Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
Reporter Doesn't Want His Super-Secret Interview Technique Outed
Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
New York Times Co. Successfully Busting Its Own Union
Unauthorized Alien Movie Promotion Will Save Newspapers
Tips For Banging Hot College Sluts Is Landmark of Journalistic Freedom
Moonie Times Collapsing

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
Mr. Rohde's situation in this video is a lot like the one he faced when held captive. The picture he painted of that experience was a dark and undecipherable as you can imagine. His insight that our view of the Taliban as some static organization is wholly inaccurate was chilling. It seems to be an ever-changing mass, coming together almost transactionally, and then spinning itself into its next iteration. This kind of inherent confusion was buttressed by the realization that the man who kidnapped Rohde was the man he was supposed to interview, a fact he didn't come into possession of until well into his captivity.

I don't know what a shit storm looks like, but the more I read about Afghanistan/Pakistan and the marauding hordes that rule its nether regions, I am definitely getting an image.

And it is not pretty. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: It frustrates me when Rohde gives the impression that everyone thinks of the Taliban as a strict hierarchy. I know that when I was in Afghanistan, none of the people I worked with thought of it that way, and we all worked to get a better understanding of the various networks and the differing operational methods between each. For Rohde to come back and say how foolish we all are, and please, let him tell us how it really is, is incredibly irritating. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy promoted this comment Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

@Adah: I appreciate your frustration, but what if what he is reporting is accurate in the sense that our perceptions are inherently flawed because the thing we are trying to perceive defies static perception? That it is morphing every day into something that defies categorization, let alone a coherent policy for engaging militarily.

I, for one, wouldn't want Mr. Rohde's job, not so much for the obvious danger posed but because the act of communicating what he is learning as the result of being embedded as he is has to be beyond comprehension to most people. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: Well, of course the insurgency is constantly changing. But from reading Mr. Rohde's five part series from a few weeks ago, I'm not sure his understanding of it is as great as he thinks it is. He was kept in various rooms for seven months, and his main source of information appears to come from the low level men guarding him. The appearances of high level leaders in Rohde's narrative were remarkable because, by his own admission, they were fairly rare. Now, who knows, maybe when his book inevitably comes out, I'll be proven wrong and Rohde will reveal some remarkable details from these conversations with high level leaders. But he certainly didn't have anything terribly revealing in his Times piece that hasn't been said better and with a greater understanding in many other books. #davidrohde
Reply

Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

TheSometimesWhy
11/13/09

@Adah: I don't see how you can take issue with Mr. Rohde for the lack of high-level leaders being conspicuously absent from his narrative. I dare say he was playing the cards he was dealt, so to speak. I think you're losing sight of the fact that his core mission was to interview the man who ultimately kidnapped him as part of an on-going series of reports. A reporter in the field functioning as Mr. Rohde did is per force sending back a mosaic of what he sees. Over-arching analysis isn't the immediate by-product of the kind of reportage he was responsible for. He is essentially a scout, hopefully a very insightful, well-informed one, but given the environmental obstacles to performing that task, i.e., staying alive, I think he did yeoman's work. What his pieces as they appeared in the NYTs revealed was the insanity of our presence there as currently constituted.

I would hope that people like yourself would wait for Mr. Rohde to have the luxury of some time to distill the sheer viscerality of that experience, and then see what analysis he puts forth. Given what he has been through, it not only seems fair but necessary if we are going to learn anything beyond what he has already imparted. #davidrohde
Reply

TheSometimesWhy was starred TheSometimesWhy was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@TheSometimesWhy: I think it's unlikely that he got the larger picture of how the insurgency functions from talking to some guards. I understand he goes in for a mosaic piece, but you seem to think this will contribute to ground-breaking changes in how we view the Taliban and the Haqqani Network. I disagree. Rohde went in with an outdated and inaccurate impression of Afghan culture and local Taliban politics. That's what got him kidnapped - that and his threat assessment appeared to be limited to asking the advice of one French reporter who'd interviewed the same Taliban leader a few years ago. Rohde failed to update his own understanding of how the Taliban works. I'm not sure that reflects on the U.S. government's or even better informed citizens and reporters' impression of the Taliban.

I would recommend Seth Jones's book In the Graveyard of Empires for a much better understanding of our situation in Afghanistan right now, and how our actions along with local Pashtun culture and history have contributed to the rise of the insurgency in the last few years.

[www.amazon.com] #davidrohde
Reply

Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: Bollocks. Most Afghanis aren't kosher with the Taliban's world view. The Taliban are a foreign influence on Afghanistan from the tribal regions. In the 1970s Afghanistan was a place where hippies used to go to listen to live music and smoke hash. Afghans don't burn down girls schools, the influence of outside Islamist forces (and first-world foreign occupiers) have led to that.
Reply

Edited by gawkimo at 11/13/09 7:08 PM gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

Adah
11/13/09

@gawkimo: In the cities, sure. But the country has always been more traditional and rural, even predating the Soviet invasion. The Afghan monarchy basically controlled the large cities and left huge areas of the population for the local tribes to control. When the Soviets invaded, and during the war that followed, those middle and creative classes left the country en masse, most never to return. Those cities are all a lot less hippie-ish today. About one million fled to Iran, about three million to Pakistan. The Taliban emerged out of those Pakistani refugee camps along the border, from Peshawer down to Balochistan. In that instance, I suppose you're right, but the Taliban was always a Pashtun power, and in some ways that's more important than what side of the border it originated on. Most Pashtuns consider the Pashtun area of Pakistan to practically be part of Afghanistan anyway. In addition, many of these insurgents were already radicalized in the 1970s. It's not al Al Qaeda coming in and changing the poor defenseless Pashtun people. See Gulbuddin Hekmatyr in the 1970s and 1980s.

I didn't mean to imply that all Afghans are Taliban sympathizers. In this you are correct. But they're a lot more scared of the Taliban than they are of us. If the Taliban (and I'm using Taliban as shorthand for the various insurgent networks active in Afghanistan) tells them to never breathe a word when Americans are around or they'll kill their family, you can bet they're not going to be overly helpful. On top of this, the rural areas are still much more conservative and more likely to be sympathetic to the Taliban than they are to us. Our COIN strategy, if we choose to keep following it, has us supposedly withdrawing from these areas as they are so hard to control. These are the areas where you get your battles of Wanat or battle at COP Keating. #davidrohde
Reply

Edited by Adah at 11/13/09 7:34 PM Adah was starred Adah was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: Even in the traditional, rural countryside: they don't like the Taliban any more than the foreign occupiers. These are tribal folks who will side with anyone (Muslim or otherwise) who a.) Leave them alone and b.) pay them more. These folks don't sympathize with the Taliban for being "more conservative" -- they sympathize with anyone who adheres to a.) and b.). #davidrohde
Reply

gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

gawkimo
11/13/09

@Adah: I would also point out that the Mughal Empire basically began in Afghanistan (well, Samarkand, but mostly in what we call Afghanistan today) and those Muslims drank alcohol and depicted Muhammad in paintings. Afghanistan is not the Whahabbist Kingdom we portray it to be. They are moderates when it come to religion -- they are radicals when it come to foreign intervention -- we can thank the Russians for that. #davidrohde
Reply

gawkimo was starred gawkimo was unstarred

Cecil's Wielder
11/13/09

In reply to David Rohde: There Are More Kidnapped Journalists Still in Pakistan
But who is going to play him in the movie adaptation?! #davidrohde
Reply

Cecil's Wielder was starred Cecil's Wielder was unstarred

badasscat
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
2nd Amendment! #charlieleduff
Reply

badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred

Mr.choppers - Delenda Carthago Est
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
Is there a Green Zone? #charlieleduff
Reply

MrInBetween
11/13/09

In reply to Reporter Doesn't Want His Super-Secret Interview Technique Outed
When public officials feared people who bought ink by the barrel, this kind of journalistic hubris/hypocrisy might anger people. But now, Skelton's complaint sounds like the final, weak yelp of the last dinosaur. #journalismism
Reply

MrInBetween was starred MrInBetween was unstarred

onehotjuggler
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
How bad is it, that read the headline as
"Murder, Death, Kill"
What an awful movie
Reply

A Message To Rudy promoted this comment onehotjuggler was starred onehotjuggler was unstarred

A Message To Rudy
11/13/09

@onehotjuggler: It's on a double bill with "Truly, Madly, Deeply" #charlieleduff
Reply

A Message To Rudy was starred

Dickdogfood
11/13/09

In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
I won't be convinced that Time is at all serious about their brand of stupid unless they name Glenn Beck Man of the Year. Even "The Angry American" won't cut it. #media
Reply

Dickdogfood was starred Dickdogfood was unstarred

Magister
11/13/09

In reply to Reporter Doesn't Want His Super-Secret Interview Technique Outed
Good point about the hypocrisy, but his complaint really doesn't have a lot of merit, anyway.

It appears that this records release was a one time event; The spokesperson no longer works for Mr Brown. There will be no future recordings created.

So, how long does Mr. Skelton sit on information or contemplate a response's meaning?
Reply

Edited by Magister at 11/13/09 2:06 PM Magister was starred Magister was unstarred

Michael Bauser
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
Another fun "How violent is Detroit?" factoid: Half the City Council plans to be carrying concealed weapons next year:

[www.freep.com]

Even the minister who was elected says he receives death threats.

(I actually work a lot in Detroit's residential neighborhoods. The only safety precaution my employer allows is... a rape whistle. I get some laughs when I tell the locals that.) #charlieleduff
Reply

Michael Bauser was starred Michael Bauser was unstarred

sanyucat
11/13/09

In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
How is Time still in print? It's the journalistic equivalent of scrapple. #media
Reply

sanyucat was starred sanyucat was unstarred

Steverino Begins
11/13/09

In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
Wouldn't be surprised if their POTY was a hashtag. Like #iranelection. #lame #media
Reply

Steverino Begins was starred Steverino Begins was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/13/09

In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
Have you watched the CNN online newscast? It's two college kids doing the news from the bridge of the Enterprise but with most of the props missing. #media
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

AzureTexan
11/13/09

@TheBusinessGuy: It's dead, Jim. #media
Reply

TheBusinessGuy promoted this comment AzureTexan was starred AzureTexan was unstarred

Magister
11/13/09

@TheBusinessGuy: If there was no event that I was watching on one of their live channels, I've actually been known to leave the stationary shot of the White House or some other quiet thing open, rather than listen to the newbies blather. #media
Reply

Magister was starred Magister was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/13/09

@Magister: Yeah, they make Wolf Blitzer sound like Edward R. Murrow. #media
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

Magister
11/13/09

@TheBusinessGuy: More like Wolf Blitzer's producer because whenever I watch him, I can totally imagine Holly Hunter in his ear. #media
Reply

Magister was starred Magister was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/13/09

@Magister: I know what you mean. I love Blitzer's idiotic tags to stories. For example, if Earth were blown up by the Martians, Blitzer would say on the outro, "The Earth has been blown up. Certainly a tragedy, and we will be following this." Jack Cafferty always looks at him as if he's a fly in Cafferty's soup. #media
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

Magister
11/13/09

@TheBusinessGuy:
What gets me is when he's "interviewing" a reporter or analyst to provide background and asks questions which he should be able to answer, if he's half as smart as his audience, but some producer's obviously telling him there's an interesting factoid somebody, somewhere may not have heard.

The anchors on cnn.com were much the same way, except unlike Blitzer, I never expected them to know.
Reply

Edited by Magister at 11/13/09 3:14 PM Magister was starred Magister was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/13/09

@Magister: After watching Blitzer for five minutes, you really don't expect him to know much of anything. Actually, the only CNN headliners with real heft are Amanpour and Zakaria--especially Zakaria, whose Sunday show always feel like the ideal seminar at the Kennedy School. #media
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

Lincolnsbeard33
11/13/09

In reply to Early Favorite For Time Person of the Year: Something Stupid
what no bailout for playboy? #media
Reply

SidAndFinancy promoted this comment Lincolnsbeard33 was starred Lincolnsbeard33 was unstarred

SidAndFinancy
11/13/09

@Lincolnsbeard33: Yes, but only for the articles. #media
Reply

SidAndFinancy was starred SidAndFinancy was unstarred

A Message To Rudy
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
I would pile on more on Detroit, but I live in Chicago, so... #charlieleduff
Reply

A Message To Rudy was starred

AndPreciousLittleofThat
11/13/09

In reply to Detroit: Murder Murder Murder, Kill Kill Kill
It bears repeating: "Robocop" was a documentary. #charlieleduff
Reply

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion