newspaperwars - Gawker

posts about #newspaperwars more →
Wall Street Journal Takes on Local News
Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
WSJ Scolds 'Confused' Simpletons at Times
NYT Slams WSJ Editor's 'Strange Analysis'
High School Journalists Are So Immature, Says College Journalist
'Times' Staffer Sez 'Journal's' New Publisher Is Secretly Editing
Murdoch's 'WSJ' Will Destroy the 'Times'—With Journalism!
How The NYTimes Will Conquer Murdoch's Journal
'LIFE' is Dead; Long Live 'LIFE'

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

daveyjonesisdead
11/03/09

In reply to Wall Street Journal Takes on Local News
Well, I have been wondering what's going on at Community Board meetings in Ridgewood.

But seriously - why take a perfectly good business and finance paper and turn it into something else? #wallstreetjournal
Reply

daveyjonesisdead was starred daveyjonesisdead was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/03/09

@daveyjonesisdead: Yes, the city is hungering for another general interest newspaper. Just ask the former employees of New York Newsday and the Sun. #wallstreetjournal
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

TheBusinessGuy
11/03/09

In reply to Wall Street Journal Takes on Local News
Wait: are you implying that the Times has serious local news coverage? That's a much bigger story! Who knew? #wallstreetjournal
Reply

TheBusinessGuy was starred TheBusinessGuy was unstarred

Uncle_Billy_Slumming
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
So is this why Rupert and Vivi Nevo are friends?
Reply

skahammer
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
What exactly does "cellphone hacking" involve, anyway? Can't you pick up cellphone transmissions with shortwave radios and the like?
Reply

skahammer was starred skahammer was unstarred

gooneruk
07/09/09

@skahammer: What they actually did was get into the voicemails of a mobile phone. They couldn't listen to calls live, see what numbers were called/calling, nor read incoming/outgoing text messages.

The private investigator(s) hired by the journos simply dialled the mobile phone number, and then when it went to voicemail they used the network standard PIN to log in as if they were the phone's owner. Most people don't change that PIN (or know how to), so the investigator then had access to all of the voicemails for that mobile phone.

Then it was a simple case of logging in every day or so to listen/transcribe, and then use that info for stories.

At no time were live phone calls bugged or eavesdropped on. And it's not really a hack. It's taking advantage of people not changing their PINs, the same as people who use "password" as their, erm, password.
Reply

gooneruk was starred gooneruk was unstarred

Aaron Altman
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
Any bets that an investigation is already underway here in the US as to what Murdoch's news ops are up to? I mean, I DOUBT that, say, any decent Post or Fox News reporter would let this happen if they knew it was going on, but the HP "pretexting" case has surely made the Feds less tolerant about this sort of thing.

Either way, oy veysmir.
Reply

Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred

Limitedappeal
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
So our newspapers are keeping phonetapping secrets and the head of MI6 is putting everything on facebook. What a hilarious mix-up!
Reply

Limitedappeal was starred Limitedappeal was unstarred

BBooms
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
Looks like this summer is shaping up to be the age of reckoning for the hypocritical lowlifes who make up the conservative movement. About fucking time.
Reply

BBooms was starred BBooms was unstarred

Choire
07/09/09

@BBooms: Seriously. Except Murdoch & Co. may get off easy-peasy free. It's astounding though, isn't it? To see a media company operating like the NSA? I have to say, I am really jaded and my mind is BLOWN over this.
Reply

Choire was starred Choire was unstarred

Pope John Peeps II
07/09/09

In reply to Rupert Murdoch's UK Papers in Huge Phone Hacking Scandal
Hmm. A Baron of Business found to have so much hubris that they start to simply flout the law, believing themselves to be untouchable. After the Conrad Black case, there's a lot of reason to think that if this actually does go to trial then maybe even Murdoch himself will be held accountable.
Reply

Pope John Peeps II was starred

aMagnificentBasterd
07/09/09

@Pope John Peeps II:

Who is going to arrest Murdoch? He will be deep in his bunker underneath Ayers Rock.
Reply

Xylo
07/09/09

@aMagnificentBasterd: It's aboriginal land nowadays, isn't it? It'd be expensive to be beholden to them, heh heh.
Reply

Xylo was starred Xylo was unstarred

fileunder
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
Fight, ombudsmen, fight!
Reply

fileunder was starred fileunder was unstarred

Aaron Altman
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
I think the Post should just order up a Weekender sub and be done with it.
Reply

Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred

Perhaps Not
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
I honestly don't remember - did the Post shit a brick over Judy Miller? Somebody should have, certainly.
Reply

Perhaps Not was starred Perhaps Not was unstarred

J. Henry Waugh
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
When in doubt, blame the flier.
Reply

J. Henry Waugh was starred J. Henry Waugh was unstarred

MisterHippity
07/06/09

Damn those overzealous underlings! They cause so many big organizations to screw up!

Remember the Abu Graib torturings? Overzealous underlings ... again! They're everywhere, and their screwups are legendary!
Reply

MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred

SidAndFinancy
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
NYT: "WP went (morally) bankrupt first!"
Reply

SidAndFinancy was starred SidAndFinancy was unstarred

naugahydeinplainsight
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
And Pinch and the edit side of the Times will give the Post plenty of opportunity for payback. "Suck my hot type and die"? Revenge is a dish best served in cold type.
Reply

MisterHippity
07/06/09

In reply to Washington Post Screwed Up Bad, Reports New York Times Over and Over
To the Times' credit, this stance on Washington Post's apology (not strong enough) is consistent with the way the Times has historically behaved when it has to apologize itself.

When the Times does one of it's own "sorry statements," it goes all out. It apologizes profusely, and then apologizes some more. It wears a three hair shirts, grovels and says "we are not worthy of being read by you ever again, we are so ashamed and VERY SORRY!" Then it bangs its head against the floor repeatedly.

When it comes to apologies, the New York Times is kind of like the Dobby of newspapers.

Reply

MisterHippity was starred MisterHippity was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment