<![CDATA[Gawker: nudity]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: nudity]]> http://gawker.com/tag/nudity http://gawker.com/tag/nudity <![CDATA[The Week We Went Rogue]]> This week, everyone was naked and fighting in public and also there was a book no one read but everyone kept talking about.

A pornography company offered a famous beauty contest loser lots of money to distribute video tapes they already possess of her masturbating. Google has scooters. And hellishly lengthy weddings. Adam Lambert wants to lick your gross vagina. He will turn back into a pumpkin if he appears too gay, obv. Ivanka Trump does not like it when you point out that she and her husband are terrible businesspeople.

Goin' Rogue is a wonderful read, as long as you don't actually read it. (And please don't judge it based on its skin. Though you should judge Newsweek for cruelly taking a publicity photo Palin arranged to present herself in what she thought would be a flattering light to one audience and presenting it to a less fawning audience. It is sexist to think she looks ridiculous! Also it is sexist to be Nicole Wallace!)

January Jones is the worst. The word of the year is still "barely rewritten press release." Make sure to buy someone on your list the popular "Twilight Vampire Guy Sock Puppet." The weirdo playboy guy is maybe a front for some sort of private security firm. Everyone at AP has been laid off. Lady Gaga was on Gossip Girl. No one wants to see Naomi Watts' stupid stroller ever again! Growing up in Canada, young Graydon Carter loved nothing more than his beloved sled. And Eddie Haskell. It is still totally fun to be a dictator's son. Malibu estate! Rodeo Drive shopping sprees! Whee!

Nowadays we can't even bother to pay attention to the scripted-for-the-cameas mock fights between people we aren't sure we're supposed to know why they're famous when they happen right before our very eyes. Thank god we have our faith to guide us. Our faith that god will kill the president, because we dislike him. It's on a t-shirt and everything. Brooklyn Decker is the real-life name of a real-life human who is on tv. The Hills is apparently Apartment 3G. Michele Bachmann's still got it! You probably shouldn't advertise booze with pictures of people driving. Mississippi: still racist after all these years. Haaa McDonald's doing the McCafe thing again. (There is totally an untouched McCafe McDonald's somewhere down in Gowanus or something. Bleeding edge!)

Barry is so skinny and it worries Matt Drudge so much. Texas banned marriage, which seems fair enough. Page Six is going after this naked teenager from Alaska, for some reason. The obvious Top Chef finalists became the official Top Chef finalists. Facebook is getting sued for all the money in the world. The kids on the Glee show are still singing. Sing sing sing. I dunno. People seem to be pretty into it? Limelight is going to be a shopping mall. HAH.

People keep putting Sandra Bullock in movies!

James Franco won all the National Book Awards because he is dreamy. Oprah decided to kill the concept of daytime television. Courtney Semel is not a very nice friend. Fox News won't stop digging. Someone, somewhere, actually wrote something truthful on their YouTube profile. (It was a murderer.) Restaurant owners are dicks, especially ones who email everyone to yell at them. Don't look at Jude Law. 30 Rock was just OK last night. Thank christ this season of Project Runway is over, though.

Hope you all enjoy your Florida Honeymoon! Just don't venture too far from home, because you will end up stranded.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5409664&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[This Naked Dude Wants to Be Your Next Senator from Massachusetts]]> His name is Scott Brown. He fathered an American Idol contestant, and he hates the Gay Marriage, and right now he is a Massachusetts State Senator. Also he was naked in Cosmo in 1982!

He is such a hunk, too. Look at him! Do ladymags still feature hairy naked Republican dudes? Anyone? Jezebel?

Wonkette first discovered this hot piece in 2007, when Brown was reading obscenity-laced Facebook comments to horrified youths.

Now he's throwing his hat and tiny white shorts into the ring and running for the late Ted Kennedy's US Senate Seat.

Newsweek asks if perchance there would be a little more attention paid to a lady who posed for naked pictures back in the day running for office, but it didn't stop Hillary Clinton!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5360218&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[With This One Topless Picture We Forgive Sharon Stone for Basic Instinct 2]]> It's amazing that in America, people get all uptight when Miley Cyrus poses in a sheet, but in France, 51-year-old Sharon Stone can show off her magnificently-preserved bosom on the cover of a magazine. Stupid Puritans.

This week's Paris Match has a number of pictures of Ms. Stone shot by Alix Malka in which she rocks a corset and little else. We would say she looks good for her age, but she just looks good! There's an accompanying article but — zut alors! — it's in French. At least there are pretty pictures. [Fleshbot, NSFW]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5334981&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vanessa Hudgens Is a Big Star. It's the Naked Pictures That Got Small!]]> See Vanessa Hudgens, famous mostly because of leaked naked pictures, naked again. [Fleshbot NSFW]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5330722&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Magazine Newsstands: Hos Before Brünos]]> We knew that newsstands have been treating GQ's July cover, featuring a nude-but-not-all-hanging-out Sacha Baron Cohen is like porn. But a tipster at a Hudson News in Manhattan has noticed the decision has lead to some interesting juxtapositions.

At left In this picture taken near Grand Central Station is an as-the-good-lord-made-her Bar Refaeli on the cover of Esquire. At right is dirty, dirty pornography. Below is the uncensored GQ cover. You can't even see his penis!The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5310095&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sell It All and Flee]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.The Way We Live Now: Free! The rich are selling off their possessions and "going minimalist." We've stopped building any new houses. Everyone take to the land! Nude!

The Wall Street Journal declares the Gilded Era "Gone," which would seem more meaningful if it was in the context of some solemn, ponderous front page screed on the folly of late Twentieth-Century capitalism, rather than a story about rich people in Florida auctioning off their wildebeest heads and Ferraris so they can go buy a cabin in the mountains.

But that's significant too! Who are you kidding? Anything that would make a rich retiree in Vero Beach wake up one morning, smack himself in the head, and say, "We don't need all this stuff any more" is bound to be a good, meaningful thing. Having sold off all their accumulated crap for pennies on the dollar, the formerly rich retreat to the countryside. Where they will probably live in a prefab home or some sort of trailer, since new home construction just hit an all time low.

Luckily there are rotting home carcasses by the thousands available all across America! Back to nature—or at least back to suburbia—is the comforting wave of the future, for those still rich enough to afford it. For the poor, it's nudity and camping. Which is good, because NUDITY PAYS. Economic revival is as close as woodland sex orgies with former wealthy Floridians!
[Pic via]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5261102&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Barack Obama's Nipples Are an Outrage!]]> This month's Washingtonian features a four-month old paparazzi photograph of our president in a bathing suit. This is apparently an occasion for outrage, or concern, or an excuse to run a picture of Obama shirtless.

The photo was taken—and widely circulated—last December, while the Obamas were on vacation in Hawaii. The Washingtonian's decision to put it on the cover was unadulterated outrage-bait, and the gambit has succeeded.

ABC News' Karen Travers and Jake "The Octogon" Tapper wondered last night whether a nation "in the throes of an economic crisis and two wars...want[s] more headlines about a 'Pec-tacular' 'Buff Bam'." The horribly named FishbowlNY asks, "Are we the only ones worrying this is sort of inappropriate?" The even more horribly named WoWoWow asks its readers, "Is it innocent? Fun? Disrespectful? Degrading?"

These questions are false. There is nothing wrong with running a shirtless picture of Obama, especially four months after everyone in the world already ran the picture. And no one who's asking these questions actually cares about the answer. (Though, no doubt, they would be happy to jump right into a cab if you'd like to book them on your cable show to discuss this pressing issue.) When they saw the Washingtonian cover, various editors and writers thought, "Cool! I'd like to run that photo, too, because people will be interested in it since it's interesting that we have a potentially sexually attractive president." But they think too highly of themselves to simply say, "Hey, look at Barack Obama's chest again, just like in December." So—voila!—it's an ethical issue to present to their discriminating readers.

FIshbowlNY presents its fauxtrage in gender terms: "Now imagine someone deciding to run a similar cover of Michelle." Trust us, we've been imagining it. Too bad it will never happen because Michelle Obama has female breasts.

But we certainly could imagine someone running similar pictures of Ronald Reagan! In fact, here, for your edification, is a photo illustration of almost every post-war president shirtless, made out of real photos taken by the awful media.

What we have more trouble imagining is someone changing the color of the president of the United States' clothes in Photoshop, as the Washingtonian did—his swimming trunks were black in the original photo and maroon on the magazine's cover—so it would fit their design scheme better. But no one seems to care about that.

The consensus, Washingtonian, you savvy marketers you, is that you are stretching at the limits of appropriate journalism and ought to get back to the real news that people care about. You've put your reputation at risk with this prurient prank. We hope you've learned your lesson.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5221797&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gay Heroine Katy Perry Found in the Nude?]]> My favorite singer, riot princess Katy Perry, maybe took a nude photo of herself. And, you know, liked it! Our smutty cousin, that dad says we shouldn't talk to, has the (maybe fake?) pic. [Fleshbot]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5132837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Royal Scepter]]> Well, there it is. Prince William's crotchal region. While he's in mid-pee. NSFW, obviously. [GayDailyHot] Update: The site's down, but we got a screen grab. It's blurry, but there's... something there. After the jump.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5095104&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First High-Def 'Survivor' Episode Also Provides First CBS Full-Frontal Nudity]]> For seasons, fans of Survivor have been awaiting the day when CBS would finally start broadcasting episodes of the long-running reality competition in HD. With so much beautiful scenery on display in every episode, what better way to notice new, unforeseen details of the show to appreciate? Unfortunately for CBS, their first HD episode of Survivor bore full-frontal fruit, as eagle-eyed watchers of this past Thursday's two-hour premiere noticed that hunky doctor Marcus Lehman showed off a little bit more of his own personal immunity idol than the network had doubtlessly intended.

The unblurred wardrobe malfunction (courtesy of Survivor Sucks), after the jump (NSFW):

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056586&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nude Marilyn Monroe Photos: The Gifts That Keep On Giving]]> Over three days in June 1962, photographer Bert Stern took some 2,500 photos of actress Marilyn Monroe, just six weeks before she died. You know, the pictures where she's naked. The ones that inspired Lindsay Lohan to go nude for New York magazine (Stern shot those, too). They became the iconic images of Monroe, the Tragic Star, and Stern has been making bank on them since. Three days of work have essentially funded his entire life. And now he wants more!

He's suing the men who ran the old magazine Eros, claiming he lent some of the photos from the collection (called The Last Sitting) and these gents never returned them. So he's demanding that the precious, irreplaceable photos be returned or, you know, they could just give him $700,000 and do whatever they want with 'em. Hell, either way he's asking for an additional $1,000,000 in punitive damages. (Man, 45 years after her death, the Marilyn economy is booming! Some dude in Australia just paid $14,500 for 2 1/2 minutes of Marilyn footage. That's 90-something dollars a second!)

I think we can all learn a little something from Mr. Stern, who hasn't stopped working entirely, but cashed in early and never looked back (or, I guess you could say he looks back all the time). Someone will still be interested in hokey philosophical musings on The Hills in 40 years, right? 'Cause I don't have any savings.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054961&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Naked Harry Potter Will Teach You Things About Yourself]]> It's sort of gauche to post a theatre "review" while the show is still in previews, so consider the following not so much of a review as a...um...preview. I managed to score a ticket to Equus last night, the new Broadway production of Peter Shaffer's 1973 play about the sometimes disastrous confluence of religion and sex, and the perils of "modern" psychiatry. But really, the play is important because Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe is naked in it. For a good amount of time! Though I should caution that the nudity is exactly as sexy as the ensuing frenzied horse blinding sounds. It's not a gimmick or a parlor trick, just a way to communicate the raw bewilderment and wildness of Radcliffe's character, the troubled young Alan Strang. So yeah, the play about the nudity isn't so much about the nudity at all, rather it's an interesting, if curiously unmoving, intellectual deep dive into an idea of faith and science—reason, really—as two warring acts of the same mind.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5050524&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What Vogue "Super Model" Is Suing Over Nude Photos?]]> Nude supermodel photo scandal lawsuit alert! An anonymous model has filed suit in Miami against Egotastic.com and Splash photo agency for taking pictures of her sunbathing in her birthday suit (NAKED) in her own backyard—"as is often done by professional models to avoid tan lines." Invasion of privacy and emotional distress! But who is this mysterious, super-beautiful plaintiff? She helpfully includes several clues [UPDATE: the case may already be cracked!]:

She says she was protected by "a wooden fence approximately five feet tall" in her yard, but the defendants nevertheless trespassed to photograph and expose her unclothed body to the wilds of the internet. For shame!

We couldn't find any definitive candidates while digging around Egotastic. The closest Miami shots appear to be Helena Christensen (but she was at the beach with her boyfriend) or Brooke Hogan (but she's not nude, or a supermodel). So who is it? Guesses about this matter of legal import in the comments.

UPDATE: Elsa Benitez?

[Courthouse News]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044990&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Regrettably Spotted: Real Housewives' Alex McCord and Simon, Nude On St. Barth's]]> Not sure what you did this lovely Labor Day weekend—saw your family, or headed off to the beach, or maybe just wandered the temporarily-empty city—but I can bet that you were not having as nearly as much wonderfully disgusting fun as our tipster. He managed to catch glimpses of the terrifying Alex McCord, from Bravo's Real Housewives of New York City reality horror, and her dopey (and apparently well-endowed) husband Simon in the nude while on, of course, the topical tropical island of St. Barth's. With, ew, their children. (To be fair, Alex is often naked, but this sighting was in the flesh!) Read the effusive report after the jump.

on sunday my partner and i were walking down saline beach and who do we see??? that crazy climbing 'social' bitch alex mccord and her gay husband simon... with their kids. they were at the end of the beach, in a sort of wash area where runoff gets trapped in a pool. walked over, and was freaked out because they were butt as naked. kids too. i mean, really. saw simon's junk, and the bare ass and tits of the REAL HOUSEWIFE. they weren't trying to hide their ASSets at all. listen, this is st barts, and naked it ALL OVER, and i love that the french are so free... but it ALWAYS creeps me out when americans go topless here because i know it's not really our custom... but
DAMN, completely nude?? a 'celebrity'??? PS - simon's cock kind of big, just too bad it's attached to such a douche.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044207&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[American Apparel Ad Spoofer Strikes The Heart Of The Beast]]> The anonymous, sex-positive American Apparel ad spoofer's latest conquest: the windows and front door of an upcoming Soho American Apparel store. Verily, our wayward artist has decided to strike Dov Charney right where he lives. Is this further evidence that the spoofer might be in cahoots with the company—the manifestation of the CEO's inner desire for ads unfettered by his dreary clothing? It's time to reveal yourself, poster-person. Click through to see the, um, seductive (?) re-imagining of the store's entrance:

[Stereo Hell via Copyranter at Animal]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5040711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Showbiz Has-Beens James Blunt and Gary Dourdan Enjoy An Excellent NSFW Adventure]]> How's this for an unlikely couple? Former CSI star-turned-drug-runner Gary Dourdan and the singer responsible for the most annoying song of the decade, James Blunt, have apparently pooled together whatever cash they have left in their respective bank accounts and gone on holiday together. While on an Ibizan vacation of sin, the heroin/ecstasy enthusiast and the notorious player teamed up to stage a far racier version of Miley Cyrus’ homemade porny photo spreads, as they posed alongside at least three topless prostitutes female friends who were overjoyed to fake anal sex and engage in a little lesbian chic foreplay for the paparazzi. The NSFW photos, including a particularly fun shot of the blondest, nude-iest girl for hire who appears to be delighted to have her head shoved towards the third wheel's crotch, after the jump:

While James' blonde co-star in grainy quasi-sex tape magic does admittedly have one hell of a (fake) rack, we fear this aspirational photo shoot most likely filmed in an effort to turn Blunt into the next Dirk Diggler and Dourdan into the next Buck Swope will flop — mainly due to that extraneous boat-climbing fellow with the overly tight Hawaiian trunks and Blunt's far-from-beautiful paunch.

[Photo credits: X17]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027998&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Famous Photographers Woo Stars Into Lewdness]]> A-list stars are extremely selective about how they're portrayed in pictures. They routinely have specific language in their contracts for movies and photo shoots dictating just how much flesh can be shown, and in what way. But magazines have figured out a way around this: get one of the world's most prominent photographers to do the shoot, and hey, the stars let it all hang out! New York got Lindsay Lohan to strip for Bert Stern, the photographer who once shot Marilyn Monroe in the same poses. And Vanity Fair used Annie Leibovitz's cachet to goad the young Miley Cyrus into a creepy come-hither pose. And now, sadly, supermodel and man-curse Gisele Bundchen has fallen victim to the same trend. Oh no!

V Magazine got veteran fashion photographer Mario Testino to convince Gisele to pose for these pictures, which she said "only Mario could make me take." Boy, let's hope so. What makes you think everyone wants to see your body, you tart?

[via Fashion Week Daily]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025443&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Shocking Tom Ford Ads No Longer Shock]]> tomford.jpegTom Ford is using nudity in his advertising! Hard to believe, I know. Mr. Ford may be one of the world's most influential designers, but his latest ads have largely completed the evolution from provocative to simply boring. Which is a difficult stunt to pull off, considering the subject matter. But these three spots, starring Brazilian Alex Schultz, are so in-your-face that they lose the sense of allure which should, ideally, accompany any fashion ad—penis-showing or otherwise. Also hard to pull off when using naked people: making your target audience think about clothes. See the disconnect there? We're ready for the cultural needle to swing back towards fully clothed models, thank you. After the jump, the three ads—which are all, predictably, NSFW.

tomford2.jpeg


tomford3.jpeg


tomford4.jpeg

[Made in Brazil via Queerty]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394618&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Jodie Foster's Girlfriend Can Still Appreciate a Naked Man]]> We all know that HBO producer Cynthia Mort is probably actress Jodie Foster's new girlfriend. But we forgot that she was such a defender of naked man-buttocks! She told the Observer last fall, in an article about male nudity in TV and film, that male on-screen nakedness was the new frontier in television she fully intended to conquer:

Mort said of a scene in her show, the sexually frank "Tell Me You Love Me," where we see a man's penis:

"A guy's penis is the same as a woman's breast or vagina. I don't understand the difference in respect to showing something. But people really do freak out about the guys."

"There is a moment of shock," she admitted. "But I really believe it's less about women having to do it, or men having to do it, but more that there is no reason any longer to not show what you need to show—male or female. Guys just have to get used it. That's just the way it is."

Hear that, guys? Get used to it.

On another note, there seems to be some confusion about Mort's age: the Observer reported it as 47, the Daily Mail reported her to be 33, and another gossip site said she was 51.

Members Only [NY Observer]
[Photo: Daily Mail]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393351&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Liquor Ad Dispenses With Clothing Entirely]]> 052008 18 (1)The outline on the model at left is not a bathing suit; that would be a tan line. The woman is completely naked. The ad for Cabana Cachaça was accepted not only at Playboy but also at Details, Men's Vogue, Esquire and GQ. Yes, this says something about eroding publication standards and the financial desperation of magazines amid the current advertising downturn. But more critically, it says that Cabana Cachaça is probably some really, really crappy liquor. Larger shot of the ad, marginally NSFW, after the jump.

052008 18 (1)-1

[WWD]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009883&view=rss&microfeed=true