<![CDATA[Gawker: on beauty]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: on beauty]]> http://gawker.com/tag/onbeauty http://gawker.com/tag/onbeauty <![CDATA[Bruce and Emma Willis' Newlywed S&M Gift to All of Us]]> Bruce Willis, 54, and his new wife, model Emma, 32, recently did a sexy-pex S&M nudie pictorial for W magazine. Go there for more pictures. (Two might not be SFW).

The essential crux of this photo shoot is this: Actors and models are weird. Really. While photographer Steven Klein was shooting these, and a crew hung around watching, the Willises stood naked and stretched in strange positions and, well, that was a Tuesday. To boot, they'd just come back from their food and wine heavy wedding getaway in the Turks & Caicos, so Bruce wanted some barbells around to do last minute toning and who knows what Emma did. The two met at the gym, so we're sure she did something. Bruce said of the shoot, "vanity dies hard," referencing his movie from a hundred years ago before going to stretch out in his black underpants while his new wife straddled him wearing a robot-wolf costume and everyone watched. So, it couldn't be that hard.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5291335&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Oh, Scarlett, We Were Talking About Your Tits]]> Scarlett Johansson's assistant wrote about the media's dangerous weight obsession in the Huffington Post today, and it sounds like she didn't like a post of ours. But that wasn't the weight we were talking about.

She critiques Us Weekly and the other glossy rags on the newstands she whizzes by in a black SUV. She urges that even though, yes, she is a big time celebrity training to play a latex-clad superhero in a big, big movie, she is just like us. And she offers some statistics from the unfortunately named National Eating Disorders Association that are, of course, sobering: 10 million women and 1 million men suffer from dangerous eating disorders in this stupid country of ours.

So, she'd like to dissuade girls from trying to crash diet like their favorite shiny celebrities. (Don't try this at home, we're professionals.) To drive home the point that she works hard for whatever body she does have, but that she does it healthily and that exercise is good for everyone and magazines lie and ohhh We Are One.

Which is all well and good! If a bit self-important. But at the end she adds the little dig that, we suspect, sparked the whole rant:

I'm not normally the type to dignify toilet paper rags with a response, but in this case I feel it's my responsibility to comment. In a way, I'm glad some dummy journalist (and I use the term "journalist" loosely) is banking on my "deflating" so that I can address the issue straight from my healthy heart.

The 'deflate' refers to this post, written by our own Journalist Ryan Tate, who, tipped off by a Page Six item, noticed some shrinkage. Of boobs.

We support your non-crash-dieting advocacy and condemnation of gross fattie-fat-fat stories.

But we were just talking about your cans, love. Your precious, precious, career-making cans.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5210264&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow Implicated in Deflation of Scarlett Johansson]]> So who put Scarlett Johansson on that strict diet that reduced the starlet to a shadow of her former self? Gwyneth Paltrow, the noted medical expert who last year hallucinated from undereating.

At least, that's what Star magazine hears. Via The Sun:

[Johansson] has reportedly lost over 14lbs since she began working out with her Iron Man 2 co-star in preparation for the movie.

A source told Star magazine: "The pair have been doing daily workouts with Gwyneth's personal trainer TRACY ANDERSON."

Maybe Johansson can complain further about the extreme weight loss plan (as she did a couple of weeks ago in London) on Paltrow's website Goop, cementing its position as the definitive online shop of body-image horrors.


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5201724&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Yes, Seth Rogen Has Lost Some Weight]]> This week in press tours: Seth Rogen! Poor guy's been doing the rounds all week promoting his new movie Observe & Report and all anyone wants to talk about is that he lost some weight.

Though we hear that the movie is darker and stranger than you'd imagine, really that's secondary to the fact that, probably because of The Green Lantern Hornet!! It's Hornet!!! I'm sorryyyy!!!!!!, the once-portly comedian has slimmed down to a more Hollywood size. And now he'll have to talk about it for the rest of his life.

(Thanks go to intern Whitney Jefferson for the clip.)

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5197512&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Beth Ditto Should Know a Good Picture When She Sees One]]> Rocker grrl Beth Ditto is none too pleased about her new Out magazine photo shoot. We hear that she is unhappy with how it came out. Though, considering the alternative, we think it's pretty flattering.


Ditto has been ruthlessly mocked for her appearance by respected periodicals like the National Enquirer—Bad Beach Bod pictures and whatnot.


So sure you can't see much of her on the Out cover, but at least it's subdued and tasteful enough. And the inside picture is serene and downright elegant. We're not sure why she'd be unhappy with it.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5196061&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson Deflates]]> Scarlett Johansson complained about the "rigid diet" she's on when she showed up "very slim" to a London film party Tuesday, says Page Six's source. The starlet does seem streamlined.

The left halves of these pictures are from Tuesday's event. The right halves are from the Met's Costume Institute Gala in May, nearly a year ago.

Perhaps the actress is prepping for a film role. Maybe she's tired of people talking about "The Johanssons." But the sudden weight loss does make one wonder whether Johansson has changed her opinion about America being "obsessed with dieting rather than focusing on eating well, exercising and living a healthy life."

Particularly if one is insane with jealousy at Johansson's frankly elegant new look.


]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5184991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Most Important Change in the White House Is the Fashion]]> First Lady Michelle Obama will be featured on the cover of the March Vogue, photographed by (sigh) Annie Leibovitz. Because she's a new fashion icon, of sorts.

So says the fashion book's editress, Anna Wintour:

Change was the clarion call of Barack Obama's election campaign, though I don't think any of us at Vogue initially realized that would include the difference that was going to be made by First Lady Michelle Obama's wardrobe.

It's true, though. Michelle wears fun spider-dresses and loud colors and garments by lesser-known designers like Isabel Toledo and Jason Wu. She's a new American hero! In terms of fashion. Which is why she's the first presidential wife to grace the magazine's cover since Hillary Clinton. And, heh, all that means is that poor old Laura Bush got skipped. Probably because she never thought outside the boxy suit. Anna agrees:

It wasn't just that [Obama's] choices projected a simpler, streamlined, more modern attitude, rejecting the ridiculous idea that the only way for a First Lady to dress is in the dreaded White House standard-issue uniform — the boxy, anonymous suit that always managed to look as appealing, and as comfortable, as armor.

The only problem now, though, is that Michelle has to keep this up for four or possibly eight years. A daunting task. How long before she's inevitably downgraded to Redbook covers?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5150821&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Devorah Rose: Delicate Island Flower]]> For the latest installment in the infrequent Gawker Pin-Up series, meet Devorah Rose, editor of purported magazine Social Life and hopeful reality star, in St. Barths apparently channeling Sigourney Weaver's undies in Alien.

Thanks, Facebook! If you have Gawker Pin-Up nominees, please send them our way.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5146640&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Is Scientology Turning Katie Holmes Yellow?]]> It could be! If a concerned reader and some troubling information about the cult is to be believed. The actress and Cruise-wife was at the SAG awards on Sunday, looking a bit... yellow.

The reader writes to us:

Usually such skin color is indication of impending liver failure (jaundice), most likely caused by high doses on Nicain. The yellow pigment is from bilirubin, a byproduct of old red blood cells that don't get filtered out by the liver.

Niacin is the vitamin that is used in high doses as part of a Scientology body cleanse detox program that hubby Tom Cruise was pushing on Ground Zero workers after 9/11. And "yellow skin or eyes" is a potential side effect of "prolonged use of extended-release niacin."

So, we found some recent pictures of Ms. Holmes and there does seem to be a slight tinting of her eyes. Or maybe we're just crazy. As for her skin, it could just be another tale of When Spray Tans Attack. Look at some pictures and judge for yourself.


Holmes' Eyes, Jan. 25th (at the SAGs)


Holmes' Eyes, Jan. 21st


Holmes' Skin, Jan. 25th


Holmes' Skin, Jan. 21st

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5140196&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why Mr. President-Elect, How Fit You Are]]> Oooh, look at him! President-elect Barack Obama is on vacation in Hawaii right now and a stressful campaign and glorious victory seem to have done a body good. He's trimmer than he was in August!


Back then we gawked at his slimmer, more toned physique, and it seems only to have gotten better. Will Barry not only unite the people under a terrific, fiery banner of lip service devotion to gays and eager hand-holding of those that dislike them, but also erase the memory of the long, corpulent national nightmare that was President Taft? Here's hoping. Above is the new pic, from arch political site TMZ, and below is the old one for comparison.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5115756&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[So the Lion Sheared the Lamb]]> Twilight star gets haircut, America speaks out. [People]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5115727&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gossip Girl Author Cecily von Ziegesar On Aaron Rose: 'He's So Slimy!']]> The gross Aaron Rose character on teen soap Gossip Girl is just that: gross. A greasy, judgy young artist, it makes no sense that the blonde, be-titted Serena would fall for the likes of him. Heck, even Cecily von Ziegesar hates him! She told New York Mag that she finds the TV Aaron just plain old icky:

“I do not believe that Serena would go for icky Aaron as he is portrayed on the show,” she says. “He’s so slimy! He’s just … ick.” In the books, she insists, Aaron Rose isn’t so bad. “He smokes herbal cigarettes and eats vegan and has cute mini-dreadlocks,” she says. “He is not an artist. He’s more like a happy suburban hippie. He gets in early to Harvard, infuriating Blair. He and Serena fall in love, but it only lasts for about one book.”

Which, hah. Yes. As silly (but ridiculously enjoyable) as they are, at least the books had the presence of mind to not fashion objects of teen girls' lust after things they would never lust after. A shaggy hippie-dip smoker who is secretly smart? That sounds like a teenage boy that a certain kind of senior in high school would truck for. But a pretentious, rat-faced (it's no fault of the actor's, really, it's just the way he's styled) self-centered artiste type? That boy doesn't really exist in high school. There are some boys on their way to becoming that, but why force an adult-type like that on a (mostly) non-adult audience? That is not what a girl wants.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5110128&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Done Up In Noir]]> Otherworldly celebrity power couple Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise, who fashioned a baby out of stardust and moonbeams one windy night up in their attic, are on two different covers of T magazine, the New York Times' fashion and fancy stuff publication, this month. They're lovely photos, but... isn't there something oddly menacing about them? Maybe it's the harsh black and white or the vaguely Germanic face pose (is that a thing?) struck by Mr. Cruise. Or maybe it's just that I know so much (or think I know so much) about their wild and woolly lives. What do you think? [via Us] Click through for larger.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5102166&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Anderson Cooper's Baby Pics Worth Thousands]]> You young people probably once sat farting in a hollowed-out pumpkin for your Anne Geddes baby pictorial, but old timer silver foxes like CNN anchor Anderson Cooper posed for the real deal: legendary maverick and possible Furry Diane Arbus. Yes, at left is a strange, somewhat unpleasant photograph by Ms. Arbus—Coop's skin looks thick and almost Plasticene, his lips appear painted—but it's going to fetch a lot of clams no matter what! (Unlike Cooper, who will never fetch clams for any reason.) It's up for auction today at Christie's for around $8-12k. You should probably buy it and add it to the rest of your shrine. (I'm talking to you, Sam Champion.) Click for larger baby-to-adult comparison. It's pretty uncanny.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063316&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[James Franco Is Perfect, Gushes Robot]]> Or computer program or whatever. Not like we need anyone to tell us, really, but actor James Franco has the most perfect face in the world. So says science, at least. A new computer program uses mathematical formulas to take one photo (left) and turn it into a more traditionally aesthetically pleasing face (right). And, um, Franco's face pretty much stayed exactly the same when the New York Times conducted the experiment. So good for him. Getting his MFA, has movie star riches, and is, as proven by science, perfect looking. Now if he could just get rid of those pesky rumors... (Oh, and if you put this dude's picture in the machine, it explodes). [via Cityfile, image via NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061358&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Beauty Tricks Of The Candidates]]> Remember when John Edwards got a couple of $400 haircuts and everyone made fun of him and called him a spendthrift pretty boy? Rush Limbaugh said he might be the "first woman president"! Har har! (And, remember, when Edwards slept with that lady and maybe had a love child and how the hair didn't seem like such a big deal after all?) Well, Edwards, in truth, isn't the only of the recent candidates to undergo special, fancy, or expensive cosmetic treatment. Sarah Palin maybe has lip tattoos! John McCain has the same makeup artist as Clay Aiken! Joe Biden maybe gets Botox! And Barack Obama... um... covers up his gray hair? Indeed. If you're curious to know more, we've put together a little compendium of these bits of cosmetic detritus for you, after the jump.

Sarah Palin's Bridge To Beauty
Wonkette received a tip that the Alaskan governor once got lip liner tattooed on her face, according to a lady from a Wasilla, AK styles salon. The HuffPo picked up on the story and analyzed some photos. It looked legit to them so they put it to a poll. America decided, with a 45% majority, that the pittbull's lipstick was indeed inked. It's pretty compelling stuff, though not more so than the governor's obvious use of the Topsy Tail hairstyling device. I didn't know those even existed anymore. If I find out that she uses a Flowbee too, I might start liking her. Oh and then, heh, there was also that $30,000 governor's mansion tanning bed.

Yeah Dawg, Your Makeup Is Off The Chain, Senator McCain
Hey that rhymed, Randy! Yes, far eclipsing Edwards' Little Lord Fauntleroy haircuts is the Arizonan senator's shameful $5,500 makeup habit. Evidently he has Tifanie White under his employ, who has done the cosmetic work on the hit singing competition (the neighborhood kids tell me), American Idol. Which makes sense. He can be as gurgly and not-make-sensey as Paula Abdul, as silly and shallow as Randy, and is often grumpy, like Simon. Though we've not heard his singing (yet!), we can imagine that he'd blow it out the box, in the style of fellow Arizonan and American Idol winner Jordin Sparks, on "I (Who Have Nothing... But Like Ten Houses)".

Delaware Are Your Wrinkles, Joe?
Say it ain't so! The Post went slinking off to a plastic surgeon the other day, and showed him photos of Senator Biden from a couple of years ago compared with photos of the dude at last Thursday night's big dance debate. "Yes, absolutely, and I would bet my next paycheck," the doctor said when asked if Joey had gotten some Botox on the foreheadal region of his upper face plate (medicine!). Which is fine. If you want to inject botulism into your face, you should be free to do so. And that's what Joe Biden is all about, dammit. Joe Biden says so, and Joe Biden brought you this message.

Masai Gray
Much has been made of Obama's perpetually graying hair. Though, to us, his coif seems to have brightened a bit lately. His stylist or whatever denies ever having dyed. I'd wager that more gray might make him look a little less cubbish, a mite more authoritative. Obama's relative youth works for him on some occasions, but if he looks a little more long in the tooth, maybe people will associate him with experience, thus voting for him. Because if there's one thing you can say about America, it's that we respect our elders.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5059513&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[What a Plastic Surgery-Free Michael Jackson Might Look Like]]> Accompanying an astoundingly sad-on-all-accounts article about former pop singer Michael Jackson (on forgetting that he's turning 50 years old, not 40: "It all went by so fast, didn't it? I wish I could do it all over again, I really do." Devastating) is an image of what the King of Pop may have looked like had he not had alllll that plastic surgery. It's a well done imagining, a believable cross between Usher and Billy Dee Williams, rather than the ghost of Joan Crawford that you see on the left. A rare vision of one's life had a different turn in the road been taken. Unfortunately, Mr. Jackson, I've not seen your childhood, perhaps it's collecting dust somewhere up in that crumbling personal theme park of yours. But an alternate adulthood? Yes, that's right here. [Mail via LA Rag Mag] Click through for larger image.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043017&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth Looks Fantastic in Her Swimsuit]]> Helen Mirren is a hundred and eleven years old and she looks great! (Actually, she's a spry 62). The many, many awards-winning actress (most notably, perhaps, for The Queen) was photographed recently in Puglia, swimming and climbing rocks in a bikini. And, quite frankly, she looks better than half the ladies half her age who wear similar bathing costumes. Mirren is pretty free with her body—appearing nude in a raft of films from Caligula in 1980 to the recent film about naked old British ladies, Calendar Girls, and writing a book about the subject—and, well, now we see why. So, there you go. Simple dame objectification midday on a Wednesday. [via BrianVan] Click thru for larger image.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Make-Up Free Blonde Lady Terrorizes Vacation Town]]> Because it's been a slow news month, here is a picture of benevolent-looking actress and orchardist Gwyneth Paltrow with no make-up on. I like her earrings. She's in the Hamptons. She probably had some white wine and swayed a bit to an Allman Brothers song and then maybe picked up one of her little ones and pointed at some birds and then went home and went to bed. ISN'T IT HIDEOUS??? [LA Rag Mag] Click thru for larger, soul crushing, city-destroying image.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025496&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Disabled Models Compete In New Reality Show]]> Bodies are beautiful, even if parts of them are missing. This is thesis for a new show called Britain's Missing Top Model, a competition series featuring contestants with disabilities, including amputees and a paraplegic. The show has been a hit in the UK, some are praising its bold mission, calling it revolutionary and groundbreaking and all that. These girls are all lovely, no matter what, "you just have to position them in a different way," says Jonathan Phang, the show's Jay Manuel. Hiding it! It's as easy as that! Well, on the show it's that easy. Is this whole premise really all that empowering, or are irregularities, yet again, simply being exploited?

I mean, it's probably mostly all well and good and I hope it makes people with disabilities feel more recognized and enfranchised. But, sigh, are we the only ones hearing the feint lilt of a carnival freak show organ grinding? Once the victor is done with her four-page spread in the UK edition of Marie Claire, will she be welcomed into the ranks of the modeling world? Or will she just be the girl missing an arm who won that weird show once?

Earlier: Meet the girls.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023029&view=rss&microfeed=true