• Profile logout login

#onlinenews#popular

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 4:39 AM
Sun Dec 6
14 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:

Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder |

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield |

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate |

Media:
Hamilton Nolan |

Politics:
Alex Pareene |

Investigations:
John Cook |

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan |

Nights:
Adrian Chen |
Azaria Jagger |
Ravi Somaiya |

Weekends:
Foster Kamer |

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley |

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Novaload Novaload
    10/31/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Biden was the most inscrutable choice, ever, for VP. Instead of "change" Obama brought out an old hack, who had trouble with both truth telling, even during the campaign, and with inserting his foot into his mouth. Oh, to know what kind of negotiation that was, to get him on the ticket---except, perhaps to allay terrified old white guys who feared a woman and a (half)black man on the ticket would bring on the apocalypse. #joebiden
     Reply
    Novaload was starred Novaload was unstarred
    Image of Thistledew Thistledew
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    apparently I am in the minority, but I love Joe Biden! I think he's like the lovable Steve Urkel of the White House. He comes in, says stupid stuff, knocks shit over, and is like "Did I do that?" Oh Joe. #joebiden
     Reply
    applejuice promoted this comment Thistledew was starred Thistledew was unstarred
    Image of ModestProposal ModestProposal
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Joe Biden is everything thats wrong and fucked up with congress. This dope won his seat in the Senate when he was 29 and has never had another job until being VP. He has learned about as much about how the country works from his perch in DC as Palin learned about Russia from staring at it. He is walking proof we need term limits.

    And he doesn't drink. I don't trust people who don't drink, unless they've already been alcoholics. #joebiden
     Reply
    ModestProposal was starred ModestProposal was unstarred
    Image of Motoko Kusanagi Motoko Kusanagi
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Why is it that I feel compelled to defend Gawker's subject matter against the editors/writers at least once a day lately?

    Either this new crop of staff writers is utterly fucked, or the editorial direction has taken a nosedive, or both.

    Is there some negative correlation between the quality of stories and the quality of AJAX/CSS? #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi was starred Motoko Kusanagi was unstarred
    Image of romulus romulus
    10/30/09

    @Motoko Kusanagi: From where I'm standing, it would appear to be a positive correlation. It's a good day when I get tripped up by fewer than five unresponsive scripts, infinite waits for comments to load or what have you. #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi promoted this comment romulus was starred romulus was unstarred
    Image of Motoko Kusanagi Motoko Kusanagi
    10/30/09

    @romulus: The site gets prettier, and the content gets lamer. Just callin it as I see it. #joebiden
     Reply
    Motoko Kusanagi was starred Motoko Kusanagi was unstarred
    Image of romulus romulus
    10/30/09

    @Motoko Kusanagi: Oh yeah, I didn't mean to quibble. I agree that the site gets fancier all the time, but features seem to break often. I should have added before that it could well be my OS and browser causing headaches most readers don't experience. And in all fairness, I haven't been reading long enough to judge contemporary content against the past. #joebiden
     Reply
    romulus was starred romulus was unstarred
    Image of meerkat meerkat
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Not sure what point you're trying to make, Amrita... that you think Cheney's worldview makes some sense? That Cheney was initially popular, before everything he did brought his popularity rating to a low of 28%? I love it that Biden is willing to call a moron a moron. This is a ridiculous post. #joebiden
     Reply
    meerkat was starred meerkat was unstarred
    Image of Conchie Birdie Conchie Birdie
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    Oh, and if you're trying to poke fun at Vice Prez Biden for weeping during the debate when he spoke about his first wife and baby daughter who died, well then, that's just messed up. #joebiden
     Reply
    Conchie Birdie was starred Conchie Birdie was unstarred
    Image of Novaload Novaload
    10/31/09

    @Conchie Birdie: One might argue that it was the worst kind of political hackdom for him to bring them up expressly to show his "empathy" side and try to squeeze a tear out of his plastic-surgeryized eye slots. #joebiden
     Reply
    Novaload was starred Novaload was unstarred
    Image of Conchie Birdie Conchie Birdie
    10/30/09

    In reply to Nobody Loves Weepy VP Joe
    I'm absolutely NOT a supporter of ANYTHING Dick says... but, Good Lawwd, Biden, Bin Laden will always BE a part of the issue. I'm sorry, I guess if you had the prez saying this I could understand... but, uh, Joe? Nope.

    That being said, why are we posting crap from Fox News anyway - I thought we weren't supposed to take this stuff seriously?
    #joebiden
     Reply
    Conchie Birdie was starred Conchie Birdie was unstarred
    Image of Shelwood Shelwood
    12/03/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    Hilariously, MSNBC.com currently has the Gregory-to-MTP story on its site... the AP story. Guess those network execs will talk to AP, but not their own reporters.
     Reply
    Shelwood was starred Shelwood was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    You remember the kids game where we were all in a circle? No, not that one, the earlier version, where a secret was whispered and it became multiple-sourced around the horn. There was a great digression from the first to the last repeating, but it didn't really matter, because nary a version from first to last was true!
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    I was raised in a small town out on the lonesome prairie where gossip was a much better source of news than the local paper, hands down. Like, the grocer who delivered and took longer at some houses than others? You think the Daily Favorite printed that? You think we didn't know it anyway?


    Besides, all art, beit Grand Opera, fiction, or pop music, is gossip. It tells stories, and not all of them are true neither. Like old man Clayton always said, "If the narrative flows, that's all anybody ever knows!"

     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    But everything is new and different now! Online "news" outlets are not all as professional as we are around here.


    The point is you guys don't pretend to be and thus you are, whereas they pretend to be and thus are not.


    But now that you mention it, it reminds me: Remember when Jimmy Kimmel condescendingly castigated Gawker for having no journalistic integrity. That shit was hilarious! ("Visibly intoxicated!!!")


    Since he has positioned himself as the guardian of journalistic ethics, I wonder whether he is going to take Judith Miller to task?

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of blogissuchanuglyword blogissuchanuglyword
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    Like anyone cares about "facts" anymore.
     Reply
    blogissuchanuglyword was starred blogissuchanuglyword was unstarred
    Image of NotChoinski NotChoinski
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    Dick Cheney pulled this shit on Meet the Press. Leak anonymously to the NYT there are WMDs in Iraq, then point to the NYT that because they printed it, it must be true.
     Reply
    NotChoinski was starred NotChoinski was unstarred
    Image of Mr. Kim Gordons Panties Mr. Kim Gordons Panties
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    I come here for unverified rumors about celebutards I've never heard of and long, opinionated rants, not this "hard news" stuff. But, heck, someone has to teach tomorrow's journalists and it doesn't really look like the J-schools are doing that so much. Servicey delicious.
     Reply
    Mr. Kim Gordons Panties was starred Mr. Kim Gordons Panties was unstarred
    Image of Kid Twist Kid Twist
    12/02/08

    In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
    So she's Deep Throat?
     Reply
    Kid Twist was starred Kid Twist was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.