online news - Gawker

posts about #onlinenews more →
The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

Shelwood
12/03/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
Hilariously, MSNBC.com currently has the Gregory-to-MTP story on its site... the AP story. Guess those network execs will talk to AP, but not their own reporters.
Reply

Shelwood was starred Shelwood was unstarred

Tremonius
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
You remember the kids game where we were all in a circle? No, not that one, the earlier version, where a secret was whispered and it became multiple-sourced around the horn. There was a great digression from the first to the last repeating, but it didn't really matter, because nary a version from first to last was true!
Reply

Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred

Tremonius
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
I was raised in a small town out on the lonesome prairie where gossip was a much better source of news than the local paper, hands down. Like, the grocer who delivered and took longer at some houses than others? You think the Daily Favorite printed that? You think we didn't know it anyway?

Besides, all art, beit Grand Opera, fiction, or pop music, is gossip. It tells stories, and not all of them are true neither. Like old man Clayton always said, "If the narrative flows, that's all anybody ever knows!"
Reply

Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred

i'm a bottle
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
But everything is new and different now! Online "news" outlets are not all as professional as we are around here.

The point is you guys don't pretend to be and thus you are, whereas they pretend to be and thus are not.

But now that you mention it, it reminds me: Remember when Jimmy Kimmel condescendingly castigated Gawker for having no journalistic integrity. That shit was hilarious! ("Visibly intoxicated!!!")

Since he has positioned himself as the guardian of journalistic ethics, I wonder whether he is going to take Judith Miller to task?
Reply

i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred

blogissuchanuglyword
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
Like anyone cares about "facts" anymore.
Reply

NotChoinski
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
Dick Cheney pulled this shit on Meet the Press. Leak anonymously to the NYT there are WMDs in Iraq, then point to the NYT that because they printed it, it must be true.
Reply

NotChoinski was starred NotChoinski was unstarred

Mr. Kim Gordons Panties
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
I come here for unverified rumors about celebutards I've never heard of and long, opinionated rants, not this "hard news" stuff. But, heck, someone has to teach tomorrow's journalists and it doesn't really look like the J-schools are doing that so much. Servicey delicious.
Reply

Kid Twist
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
So she's Deep Throat?
Reply

Kid Twist was starred Kid Twist was unstarred

Aaron Altman
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
Off the record, on deep background, this can't have come from me, I'm dead if you tell them this came from me, not for attribution, use "source" if you to but my name cannot be anywhere on this thing, if I tell you this will you sleep with me?
Reply

Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred

PandoraSpocks
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
Chuck Todd, if he wants it, is the best choice. But who knows if the suits want him.
Reply

PandoraSpocks was starred PandoraSpocks was unstarred

it takes a lot to laugh
12/02/08

In reply to The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule
That's Murdoch and his wife, right?
Reply

BullfightsOnAcid
12/02/08

@it takes a lot to laugh: "Oh Ruppie, please buy me the Wall Street Journal."
Reply

BullfightsOnAcid was starred BullfightsOnAcid was unstarred

Aaron Altman
12/02/08

@it takes a lot to laugh: No, it's Buck Henry.
Reply

Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#onlinenews

Gawker

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker

The New Version Of The Two-Source Rule

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment