• Profile logout login

#onlinevideo#taylorinccompanyhistoryhtml

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 1:58 AM
Fri Nov 27
15 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of LauraBooga LauraBooga
    05/04/09

    In reply to Yahoo Video: The $6 Billion Black Hole Implodes
    Isn't it interesting that with all the missteps, Yahoo's digital home or TV Widgets or whatever they're calling it these days is still, more or less, intact, even though they've not done much?
     Reply
    LauraBooga was starred LauraBooga was unstarred
    Image of Owen Thomas Owen Thomas
    05/04/09

    @LauraBooga: But they have such lovely equipment!
     Reply
    Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred
    Image of spraytanman spraytanman
    05/04/09

    In reply to Yahoo Video: The $6 Billion Black Hole Implodes
    In about 2-4 years Facebook and Twitter will suffer the same fate.


    Its a pretty simple equation killer app or not - Cash Inflow must be greater then Cash Outflow - imagine that!

     Reply
    spraytanman was starred spraytanman was unstarred
    Image of Krashstar Krashstar
    05/05/09

    @spraytanman: Right, and and when your outflow exceeds your income, your upkeep becomes your downfall.
     Reply
    Krashstar was starred Krashstar was unstarred
    Image of lobstr lobstr
    05/04/09

    In reply to Yahoo Video: The $6 Billion Black Hole Implodes
    DFW programmers always get a good laugh at the idea of Cuban being some sort of coding visionary.. He lucked out with an awesome domain name and a set of balls in the right place at the right time. When they label him as a "dot com billionaire", it really is just that.. he had a great .com.
     Reply
    lobstr was starred lobstr was unstarred
    Image of shag_carpet_bomb shag_carpet_bomb
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    I had a really disturbing experience with the BART police, and I'm a white, 125lb, woman. Those guys are a scary joke. They have weapons and attitudes and man, you had better not look at them wrong, or answer the question wrong or catch them on a bad day. I had a 'streetclothes' cop follow me through the fruitvale station, run up behind me at night, grab me and start screaming in my face, because I took a bike on the escalator in an empty station. If I still carried mace, it would have surely turned into them using some weapon on me. I fucking hate those guys, they don't make BART safer, they harass people who are unfortunate enough to get off at the 'bad stations. You'd never see that shit at Pleasanton or Walnut Creek.
     Reply
    shag_carpet_bomb was starred shag_carpet_bomb was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Jesus H., people bring out the profound stupidity when it's time to defend cops. He reached for his gun (what, he doesn't know his gun from his taser?) pulled it out, released the motherfucking safety and fired into a restrained man's back. It's murder. Not manslaughter. Not accidental discharge. Not Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter's favorite whine, media bias. It's murder. Committed by a thug in uniform. He should go to jail to be among his own kind.
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of abmw abmw
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    A nervous cop makes the ill advised decision to unholster a weapon in an inappropriate situation to use a firearm, at close quarters, the subject rears up, bumps the muzzle, and the gun discharges.


    1) the safety should have been on in a non-firearms confronting situation,


    2) the officer's finger should have been outside of the trigger guard.


    3) he should have said something tot he effect of "covering", thus letting the other officers know he was un-holstered.


    4) you never use a gun like that in such a scrum.


    5) I'll bet it was accidental discharge - or rather, stupid as shit discharge, resulting in jail for the cop.

     Reply
    abmw was starred abmw was unstarred
    Image of Xylo Xylo
    01/12/09

    @abmw: There is no "safety" on most police pistols.
     Reply
    Xylo was starred Xylo was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Further proof that most cops are profoundly stupid in addition to being seething rageaholics who get off on lording their power over other people. How stupid did they have to be not to realize that the crowd of young people watching them had camera phones, digital cameras, etc.


    Homicidal dumbasses.

     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of Iceland Spar Iceland Spar
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: Actually, I would call that further proof that this one individual cop is so.
     Reply
    Iceland Spar was starred Iceland Spar was unstarred
    Image of jonasgrumby jonasgrumby
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto:


    "Further proof that most cops are profoundly stupid in addition to being seething rageaholics who get off on lording their power over other people."


    It's hard to put in words how offensively stupid your comment is (oh wait, i just did). Keep making your sweeping generalizations about a bunch of people you don't know doing a job you know nothing about. Hopefully, you won't ever be thrust into a situation of dangerous activity where you will be able to appreciate first-hand how conscientious and courageous most police officers are.

     Reply
    jonasgrumby was starred jonasgrumby was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    @jonasgrumby: My opinion might be coloured by the many police shootings I've covered in my career that involved stupid, trigger-happy and short-tempered cops who had no business firing their weapons. So don't assume I don't know cops and don't know anything about their jobs, thanks. As well, every thug I went to high school with is now on the Toronto police force, and three of them are homicide detectives. They dropped out of school at 16 because they were failing miserably, and were renowned for being bullies, racists and pricks. So yes, when I see a cop take out his weapon and shoot someone in the back of the head for no apparent reason, I tend to think he's a dumb thug as well.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: And I should add they fired their weapons almost always at men or boys of colour. And they were white.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: second.
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    @if_i_only_had_a_heart: In Toronto they blew a black kid's head off (back of the head, natch) because he was in a stolen car. Seriously? Really? Let him have the car and catch up with him later, you know? He's not going to keep the car. He's going to leave it somewhere, and you dust it for prints, and eventually you get the kid. But executing him for being in someone's stolen, beat-up Honda or whatever it was? Sheesh.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: that's harsh just for DWB


    also: the number of injuries to civilians and to cops from high speed chases is ridiculous; they shouldn't do that. so a car is stolen, so what. it's just property. it can be taken back another time. no more 90 mph jaunts down highways in the wrong direction with head on collisions with innocent people; no more 60 mph racing through residential neighborhoods. it's real life, not tv. you know?

     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Hydroceph Hydroceph
    01/11/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: No kidding. How about tack strips to pop the tires? Then you get car and thief and--here's the bonus--no wrongful-death suit.
     Reply
    Hydroceph was starred Hydroceph was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    @if_i_only_had_a_heart: The high-speed chases drive me nuts. Just let them keep the car, for God's sake. They're going to abandon it somewhere at some point because they know it's been reported missing and the cops are on the lookout for it. Jesus. And why is executing people or killing innocent people while trying to catch the bad guys viewed as effective crime prevention?
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of sdangerfield sdangerfield
    01/12/09

    @Trixie from Toronto: look, nobody here is trying to defend this officer's actions, clearly. what's been done here is indefensible. But for god's sake, for cop that shoots a black kid, there are thousands that miraculously manage not to. To qualify this officer as the norm for police officers is no different than somebody assuming that all dark skinned males in the inner city are in gangs. it's ignorant, and it contributes absolutely nothing useful to this particular issue.


    if that's all you have to say, it'd be preferable that you say nothing at all. honestly. it's useless. there's nobody here in favor of police brutality. there are, however, people here in favor of having a reasonable discourse on the topic, and that's something that your statement makes impossible.

     Reply
    sdangerfield was starred sdangerfield was unstarred
    Image of Xylo Xylo
    01/12/09

    @sdangerfield: Ask Oscar's mom and dad if they care that thousands of cops (really?? the ratio is 1:thousands??) miraculously manage not to kill other black kids.
     Reply
    Xylo was starred Xylo was unstarred
    Image of ambitious ambitious
    01/12/09

    @Xylo: Yeah - do people really deserve to be celebrated for NOT shooting people in the back?


    That's some sick fucking logic.

     Reply
    ambitious was starred ambitious was unstarred
    Image of sdangerfield sdangerfield
    01/12/09

    @ambitious: i'm speechless. who said anything about celebrated?


    eh, nevermind. i give up. it is, apparently, impossible to argue that not every police officer fits Trixie's initial summation without angry people reading it as my attempting to justify police brutality.


    sorry i tried. carry on irrationally judging an entire group of people based on the actions of a few.

     Reply
    sdangerfield was starred sdangerfield was unstarred
    Image of Xylo Xylo
    01/12/09

    @sdangerfield: I don't think Trixie said all cops are rage-aholics. I think she said she knows of a lot of Toronto cops who are rage-aholics. Living in Toronto as well, I can concur completely with her - there are FAR TOO MANY black kids and adults harrassed, shot and/or tasered to death in this city.
     Reply
    Xylo was starred Xylo was unstarred
    Image of ambitious ambitious
    01/12/09

    @sdangerfield: "But for god's sake, for cop that shoots a black kid, there are thousands that miraculously manage not to. "


    And . . . So, what? What do those thousands that don't have to do with the dozens that do? I don't agree with Trixie's assessment regarding MOST cops (but I dare say, it does fit more than a few I've come across) but I also don't see how your quest for stats on the miraculously manslaughter-free (which would prove what, exactly?) contributes anything.


    No need to martyr yourself.

     Reply
    ambitious was starred ambitious was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/12/09

    @sdangerfield: Thanks, Dad. I'll go to the corner and shut up now since clearly you know better and only your opinions are worth sharing.


    Piss off.

     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/12/09

    @ambitious: Yes it is but apparently I'm the asshole.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of abmw abmw
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Did anyone notice that each and every police officer (and I hope the one that did the shooting gets it good), seemed startled and surprised at the shot?


    That's the first thing that leaped out at me, even the cop that had him on the ground jumped at the shot. Accidental discharge?

     Reply
    abmw was starred abmw was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    01/11/09

    @abmw: So. What.


    Accidental discharge or not, he shot a guy in the back who was lying on the ground.


    I really couldn't care less why he did it and I don't much see how it's relevant.


    We spend way too much effort in this country trying to figure out people's intent when all we really need to do is judge the results of their actions. The problem with that mentality is that you can end up excusing pretty much anything. The mentality that says this guy should be excused because he "accidentally" shot a guy in the back as he was lying on the ground is the same mentality that says George Bush should be excused for torturing people, getting us into an unnecessary war and illegally wiretapping citizens because he was only trying to protect the country.


    There's no mystery here. A guy was shot in the back as he lay on the ground. And we know who did it. End of investigation.


    What ever happened to personal responsibility? You carry a gun, you are responsible for what you do with it.

     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of Super1984 Super1984
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Utterly chilling. I exclaimed in horror after watching the video.


    Johannes Mehserle is a cold-blooded MURDERER.


    That he wanted to Tase the man sounds and looks like a complete lie - this wasn't a split second action - he pulled out and aimed the gun and squeezed the trigger. And on a side note, we SHOULD NOT TASE people who are are not posing a serious threat. Tasing should not be a punishment. It should be last resort before pulling your gun.


    Why didn't the other cops stop Johannes?


    How many other instances like this were swept away because there were not civilian videos?

     Reply
    Super1984 was starred Super1984 was unstarred
    Image of badasscat badasscat
    01/11/09

    @Super1984: Yes, it's amazing how many people are trying to excuse this.


    Dude killed another guy by shooting him in the back as he was lying on the ground with another cop's knee in his neck.


    If you or I did that, we'd get the goddamn chair. What uniform a person is wearing at any given time has no relevance to whether or not they need to adhere to basic morality and law.

     Reply
    badasscat was starred badasscat was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Owen, your Wikipedia entry gives the following quote:


    In New York, it's all about sucking up to your editor so you can get the cover and sucking up to other writers. The page-views system says you're answerable to your readers.


    Do you still stand by that statement?

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of Calraigh Calraigh
    01/11/09

    @i'm_a_bottle: HA. He can't even stand by a thread.
     Reply
    Calraigh was starred Calraigh was unstarred
    Image of Owen Thomas Owen Thomas
    01/11/09

    @i'm_a_bottle: I think you've confused "answerable to your readers" with "willing to coddle them."
     Reply
    Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @Owen Thomas:

    First off, let me say that I completely understand the need for page hits and how they are central to a business strategy. I understand that the cultural-media stuff doesn't always generate as many page hits as, for instance, a silly celebrity death story or something like that. I see that it's necessary to write stories that will be widely read.


    Now, the way I understand the situation to be right now is that this attempt to widen the readership was done to pay the bills, and youre saying that the readers ought to just accept that and keep only to the posts that they like. Furthermore, you are saying that for a writer to try to indulge and pander to the segment of readers who don't like some of the posts that are being written would be "coddling." Okay, I accept that.


    I agree that coddling should be out of the question. As far as I'm concerned, I don't care that there is more of an emphasis on celebrity news. I don't think that was the issue. I think the issue was finding the right tone in the article. Also, it is imperative that they are as well researched and fact checked as your Valleywag stories are.


    Moreover, I hope for a level of decorum when dealing with grieving people. (This criticism doesn't just apply to you.) I'm a fancy jerk in that respect. It's embarrassing for me to be associated with a site that points fingers in mean ways -- I think that the message has been received, though, and that we can just let the issue drop. It's still all right, and encouraged, to point fingers in funny ways.


    Thanks for engaging a little with us to try to explain what's going on here and make your position clearer.


    On a completely unrelated note: Would it be asking to be coddled to hear more dirt about Boing Boing, Xeni Jardin and Cory Doctorow? That stuff is always gold.

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of mikesilv mikesilv
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    And why exactly would it be OK if he was reaching for a Taser? Those things kill too. The guy was clearly already restrained with one cop on his legs, and another on his head.


    Ever since 9/11 we've had to put up with chubby cops in dress blues with white gloves at baseball games singing Oh Danny Boy, and everyone blowing smoke up their ass about being 'America's Heroes'. It's like the Stanford Prison experiment writ large. A good number of them now think they are superman, and the law, rather than mere enforcers of the law...also subject to it.


    This is what happens when society goes from anointing people a hero after they do an uncommonly valorous act, to slapdash applying it to a whole class of people because they wear a certain uniform, regardless of whether they are mere donut eating dolts, abusive assholes, corrupt, or an actual asset to their community.

     Reply
    mikesilv was starred mikesilv was unstarred
    Image of Iceland Spar Iceland Spar
    01/11/09

    @mikesilv: I think the general good feelings towards cops and firefighters comes from the fact that they are employed in jobs in which they put themselves in danger in order to bring about a public good. The heroism of individual police and firefighters on 9/11 brought the nature of those job into a greater spotlight. Though, as with any group of people, there are bad apples and then there are people who do things beyond understanind (which seems to be the case here). However, that fact isn't unique to the police.
     Reply
    Iceland Spar was starred Iceland Spar was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @Iceland_Spar: Yes, very lucidly stated.
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of mikesilv mikesilv
    01/11/09

    @Iceland_Spar: Are you attempting to counter my argument by affirming it? Interesting tactic.
     Reply
    mikesilv was starred mikesilv was unstarred
    Image of Iceland Spar Iceland Spar
    01/11/09

    @mikesilv: perhaps. and also to put it into less inflammatory rhetoric.
     Reply
    Iceland Spar was starred Iceland Spar was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @mikesilv: No, he wasn't attempting to counter, per se -- he was just refining.


    Your point was also good, though it was more vitriolic, which might put a bee in some peoples' bonnets.


    I used to live abroad, and I can tell you that in Western Europe, the police force has a completely different view of itself. They see themselves as servants of the state, charged with the task of keeping the citizens from killing and stealing from each other, not as some badass cowboys who constitute "the thin blue line between law and disorder."

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @i'm_a_bottle: people's instead of peoples'
     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of Justifan Justifan
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    the cop reached for taser, he grabbed the wrong weapon and fired.


    you cannot honestly argue police brutality, if a cops going to murder someone hes certainly not going to do it in front of a crowd of angry people with cameras. its disingenuous of people to use this as something to spark protest or riots. especially when it is the hostility towards law enforcement that plagues oakland communities that helps lead them to having one of the worst crime rates in the area. frankly they should be protesting themselves, their culture of tolerating thug culture is what gets them into such situations in the first place.

     Reply
    Justifan was starred Justifan was unstarred
    Image of ionu ionu
    01/11/09

    @Justifan:


    "frankly they should be protesting themselves, their culture of tolerating thug culture is what gets them into such situations in the first place."


    What "situation" are you talking about? Oh yeah, getting shot in the back while laying face down on the ground.


    You are making excuses because YOU simply cannot believe,comprehend, fathom that a cop would shoot someone in cold blood.Not possible! Has to be an "accident"! A mistake!


    What I saw was a cop pull his weapon, aim and shoot a young black man,but who would ever believe that a cop would intentionally murder someone in front of others? I do.

     Reply
    ionu was starred ionu was unstarred
    Image of If_I_Had_a_Poodle If_I_Had_a_Poodle
    01/11/09

    @Justifan: cops definitely shouldn't have tasers. ban them. now.
     Reply
    If_I_Had_a_Poodle was starred If_I_Had_a_Poodle was unstarred
    Image of Justifan Justifan
    01/11/09

    @ionu:

    you are stretching credibility to the breaking point, and insulting everyones intelligence if you believe that the cop didn't know he was being watched..filmed..and decided to murder someone in cold blood anyways. your entire argument is based on this absurdity. you might as well tell us that cops are so brazen that they'll rape someone in front of a news crew. give me a break.
     Reply
    Justifan was starred Justifan was unstarred
    Image of CheetoBurrito CheetoBurrito
    01/11/09

    @Justifan: You know what I do think entirely reasonable? That there are racist fuckin' cops out there that have so much pent up violence toward young black men especially, that when caught up in an adrenaline-fueled moment they'll go straight for the nearest weapon and shoot, tase, beat, etc.
     Reply
    CheetoBurrito was starred CheetoBurrito was unstarred
    Image of Trixie from Toronto Trixie from Toronto
    01/11/09

    @CheetoBurrito: Exactly.
     Reply
    Trixie from Toronto was starred Trixie from Toronto was unstarred
    Image of Mediahohoho Mediahohoho
    01/11/09

    @Justifan: Besides which, his skin should have been able to withstand the bullet, what with all that extra melanin and whatnot.
     Reply
    Mediahohoho was starred Mediahohoho was unstarred
    Image of unkle_jeremy unkle_jeremy
    01/12/09

    @Justifan: tasers are generally holstered lower on the leg than a pistol, and weigh a lot less. in many cases they are also bright orange.


    i'm sure being a cop is a lot harder of a job than i could imagine, but the suggestion that this trained police officer couldn't tell the difference between a taser and a pistol is... well, you know, fucking retarded.

     Reply
    unkle_jeremy was starred unkle_jeremy was unstarred
    Image of Xylo Xylo
    01/12/09

    @unkle_jeremy: Exactly. A cop who can't tell the difference between a taser and a pistol should be immediately removed from his duties.
     Reply
    Xylo was starred Xylo was unstarred
    Image of forwardmotion forwardmotion
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    As others have pointed out, some of your facts are wrong. He was shot after fighting with some other individuals on BART New Year's Day, early in the AM. His shooting is what started as a largely peaceful protest which split off into several groups, one group being a bunch of people just destroying things. Of course, the group destroying things are the only people that get national media attention.

    You sometimes stretch a little too much from specifics to generalizations in your posts without the proper information.
     Reply
    forwardmotion was starred forwardmotion was unstarred
    Image of rubyruby rubyruby
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Also, Owen? Hell no I'm not watching that video. Out of respect for the victim's family and because the world is fucking sad enough.
     Reply
    rubyruby was starred rubyruby was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @rubyruby: I don't see how it is disrepectful to the family of the victim for anyone to watch the video. (And I'm not just saying that because I watched the video.) On the contrary, I would think they would want everyone to know about it.


    Has the family issued a statement about the video? Did they request that it not be watched?

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of rubyruby rubyruby
    01/11/09

    @i'm_a_bottle: It's the hits that are trying to be generated here that bother me. It's the publicity that's shameful. That's just my opinion. I'm not saying I'm right. I'm saying Gawker rubbed me the wrong way.
     Reply
    rubyruby was starred rubyruby was unstarred
    Image of i'm a bottle i'm a bottle
    01/11/09

    @rubyruby: Oh, yeah, you're right. I think it's really bad how Owen is feebly trying to connect problems in the media with this extremely controversial and sad issue. I also hate myself for continuing to read his posts.


    But, F.Y.I., clicking on the YouTube video won't generate page hits for Owen.

     Reply
    i'm a bottle was starred i'm a bottle was unstarred
    Image of CheetoBurrito CheetoBurrito
    01/11/09

    @rubyruby: No, you're right. Just ignore it and go on with your day, its just a sad fact of life that nothing can be done about.
     Reply
    CheetoBurrito was starred CheetoBurrito was unstarred
    Image of forwardmotion forwardmotion
    01/11/09

    @rubyruby: I hear you. Sometimes the grasping at anything that people will comment on can go over the line.
     Reply
    forwardmotion was starred forwardmotion was unstarred
    Image of jrhys jrhys
    01/11/09

    @CheetoBurrito: Ha!
     Reply
    jrhys was starred jrhys was unstarred
    Image of jrhys jrhys
    01/11/09

    In reply to The Shot That Sparked the YouTube Riots
    Owen, I'm not sure of your point, since doesn't this very scandal make the case that images of cold blooded shooting by cop aren't in danger of disappearing into the 'mind numbing morass.' Do you have other examples of similar footage and images in the USA that have disappeared into that morass?
     Reply
    jrhys was starred jrhys was unstarred
    Image of Owen Thomas Owen Thomas
    01/11/09

    @jrhys: I'll humor you. Here's a cop shooting on YouTube that I have not seen widely reported:

     Reply
    Owen Thomas was starred Owen Thomas was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.