<![CDATA[Gawker: p.j. o'rourke]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: p.j. o'rourke]]> http://gawker.com/tag/pjorourke http://gawker.com/tag/pjorourke <![CDATA[Did John McCain And P.J. O'Rourke Share A Love Triangle With This Lady?]]> This is Amy Lumet, the California socialite daughter of filmmaker Sidney Lumet (and granddaughter of chanteuse Lena Horne!) As you might have noted, she is voluptuous! Three years ago she told the Village Voice she wanted to be in Playboy; she apparently used to model. We bring her up today because of some highly unsubstantiated internet rumors that she had an affair with John McCain during the Gulf War while she was married to cancer-stricken conservative pundit P.J. O'Rourke and O'Rourke was on assignment in the Middle East, where John McCain's wife was coincidentally consuming some of the aircraft carriers worth of Percocet she took to cope with the pain of her loveless marriage. We might wait for more evidence as to the veracity of such a rumor if the mere existence of Amy Lumet were not so fascinating in itself.

For instance, did you know…

  • Amy Lumet was briefly of a fixture in Republican Washington social life in the late eighties.
  • When she started dating O'Rourke, possibly while still in college at some unspecified school in New Hampshire.
  • They married in late 1990 after living in sin for two and a half years, when O'Rourke was 43 and Lumet was 26.
  • Because O'Rourke thought that if he died covering the Gulf War, it "would make everything simpler if we had been married. It seemed much simpler to be a widow than a girl with a dead boyfriend."
  • In 1991 Lumet began working for John McCain in some unspecified capacity.
  • At which point this would have presumably happened.
  • By 1992 she was a budding public intellectual herself! (Other dreams would bud later.) She wrote about uniting her generation of "Baby Cons" in the National Review. In an essay that did not appear to make much sense.
  • In 1992 John McCain's marriage "of convenience" to Cindy was known to be somewhat less than blissful.
  • By 1993 the couple had moved to New York and Lumet was a columnist for Seventeen.
  • So Julia Allison of the Right with the career trajectory, yes?
  • Okay, by the end of the year they'd split up, in part supposedly because O'Rourke hated New York.
  • Fifteen years later she is married to the son of Gregory Peck.
  • Sharon Osborne, for what it's worth, has gone on record as liking the boob job.
  • And O'Rourke can lavish praise on the Republican presidential candidate in a Weekly Standard essay wherein:
    Supposedly the "women's vote" is . . . well, let's not go too far with this. I can speak to John's honor, duty, valor, patriotism, etc., but I'm not sure how well his self-discipline would have fared if he'd been on an aircraft carrier with more than 500 beautiful women sailors the way I was. At least John likes women, which is more than we can say about Hillary's attitude toward, for instance, the women in Bill's life, who at this point may constitute nearly the majority of the "women's vote."
  • Whoa.

So if indeed McCain came between O'Rourke and the jailbait first wife he later admitted he married because it seemed like the "honorable" thing to do, he seems to have graciously forgiven the old guy. That, too, shows a kind of honor; if of a starkly different stripe from the sort we commonly associate with the presidential candidate who so famously endured years of torture only to sign up for a few more out of loyalty and honor but can't let go of a two-year-old ethics bill brush-off for long enough to freaking shake his opponent's hand for more than half a second? Sure, John McCain would sooner lose an election than win a war, suspend his campaign than ignore an economic crisis, bomb Iran preemptively than look Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the eye, but it also increasingly seems like he'd sooner hand the reins to Stalin himself than Barack Obama. You know, just out of principle. It it hard, I am saying, to imagine that were the roles reversed, John McCain would prove capable of summoning such sentiments for the man who wrecked his marriage as:

Some say John McCain's character was formed in a North Vietnamese prison. I say those people should take a gander at what John chose to do—voluntarily. Being a carrier pilot requires aptitude, intelligence, skill, knowledge, discernment, and courage of a kind rarely found anywhere but in a poem of Homer's or a half gallon of Dewar's…

Some people say John McCain isn't conservative enough. But there's more to conservatism than low taxes, Jesus, and waterboarding at Gitmo. Conservatism is also a matter of honor, duty, valor, patriotism, self-discipline, responsibility, good order, respect for our national institutions, reverence for the traditions of civilization, and adherence to the political honesty upon which all principles of democracy are based. Given what screw-ups we humans are in these respects, conservatism is also a matter of sense of humor. Heard any good quips lately from Hillary or Barack?

Ha ha, in fact yes! Whereas the charitable, self-deprecating and straight-talking funny guy the media romantics fell for is just not there anymore. He's angry and distant and standing next to Sarah Palin.

And if this scurrilous rumor has no basis in fact, aren't you glad you learned Amy Lumet existed?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5058219&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[P.J. O'Rourke Will Probably Survive Anal Cancer]]> P.J. O'Rourke: is there a writer we more heartily wished had a blog right now? The country is in the throes of an ideological earthquake, and P.J. O'Rourke is a right-wing free-market ideologue who is too smart not to allow himself to be tossed around a bit, and too entertaining a writer to elicit much of our indignation in the case he doesn't end up landing that much closer on the spectrum to raging creative class Bolshevism. Well, we'd been wondering where the writer and Rolling Stone "foreign affairs desk" chief had been during the End of Capitalism, and it turns out today that he has been preoccupied getting ass cancer. (His phrase, not ours!) The good news is that it seems to have been detected early: he assures us he has a 95% chance of survival. The other good news: it's good material! From today's LA Times:

Furthermore, I am a logical, sensible, pragmatic Republican, and my diagnosis came just weeks after Teddy Kennedy's. That he should have cancer of the brain, and I should have cancer of the ass ... well, I'll say a rosary for him and hope he has a laugh at me. After all, what would I do, ask God for a more dignified cancer? Pancreatic? Liver? Lung?…

No doubt death is one of those mysterious ways in which God famously works. Except, on consideration, death isn't mysterious. Do we really want everyone to be around forever?…Napoleon was doubtless a great man in his time — at least the French think so. But do we want even Napoleon extant in perpetuity? Do we want him always escaping from island exiles, raising fanatically loyal troops of soldiers, invading Russia and burning Moscow?

Well, at the moment, considering Putin et al, maybe we do want that. But, century after century, it would get old. And what with Genghis Khan coming from the other direction all the time and Alexander the Great clashing with a Persia that is developing nuclear weapons and Roman legions destabilizing already precarious Israeli-Palestinian relations — things would be a mess.

Then there's the matter of our debt to death for life as we know it. I believe in God. I also believe in evolution. If death weren't around to "finalize" the Darwinian process, we'd all still be amoebas. We'd eat by surrounding pizzas with our belly flab and have sex by lying on railroad tracks waiting for a train to split us into significant others.

As for that last sentence, I don't know quite what it means, and I am tempted to say if anyone would I'd be that person. But the important part is, P.J. O'Rourke thanks God for death (and to that end, whiskey.) Taxes can't be very far behind.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056620&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "There's a great story to be told about...]]> "There's a great story to be told about the success of Starbucks. But we'll have to wait to hear it from somebody other than Taylor Clark," begins P.J. O'Rourke's review of 'Starbucked: A Double Tall Tale of Caffeine, Commerce, and Culture.' Ooh, burn! But then halfway through the review, after rambling about how he wishes he'd bought Starbucks stock at the right time, P.J. does a 180, helpfully announcing first that "here comes that 180 degree turn in critical appraisal that so often happens in the middle of a book review." He goes on to praise the book's "astonishing examples of open-minded intellectual honesty, arguments from evidence and cleareyed reporting." Which seems sort of an unfair move to pull a few hundred words after writing an opening paragraph that makes anyone remotely interested in the book immediately cross it off their reading list. [NYT]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334913&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Separated at birth?]]> [Comic writer] P.J. O'Rourke and [Former Attorney General] Janet Reno...
P.J. O'Rourke Janet Reno
[Fark]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=11898&view=rss&microfeed=true