• Profile logout login

#philbronstein

Gawker

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #stalker,
  • #opencaption,
  • #internalmemos,
  • etc.

New York, 8:37 AM
Fri Nov 27
11 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip Your Editors:
tips@gawker.com
Tipline: 646-214-8138

Editor-in-Chief:
Gabriel Snyder | Email

West Coast Editor:
Richard Rushfield | Email

Contributing Editors:

Valleywag:
Ryan Tate | Email

Media:
Hamilton Nolan | Email

Politics:
Alex Pareene | Email

Investigations:
John Cook | Email

Entertainment:
Brian Moylan | Email

Nights:
Adrian Chen | Email
Azaria Jagger | Email
Ravi Somaiya | Email

Weekends:
Foster Kamer | Email

Video Editor:
Richard Blakeley | Email

SUBSCRIBE TO Gawker RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
4260 Subscribers
Gawker
  • posts about #philbronstein more →

    Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!

    Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers

    Investigations Don't Require Ink, or Actual Investigation

    Former San Francisco Chronicle Editor Calls Google 'Evil Queen'

    Can't a Cool Mom Like Sharon Stone Share Some Botox With Her 8-Year-Old Son?

    Sharon Stone Wants Her Baby Back, Baby Back, Baby Back…

    Angelina Jolie Almost Left Brad Pitt

    Craig Newmark angles to take Phil Bronstein's livelihood, woman

    The future of Jonathan Zittrain (and how to stop it)
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of raincoaster raincoaster
    10/28/09

    In reply to Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!
    The last time Michael Wolff was in touch with anything contemporary was when he was boffing that junior writer. #arguments
     Reply
    raincoaster was starred raincoaster was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    10/28/09

    In reply to Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!
    Shoot, I think the SF Chron has a great business plan! Fabulous. They set records the last six months for over a quarter drop in circulation, but they raised the price of the paper 33% on the street, so they claim to be swimming in cash. Eventually there will be one old rich diehard on Nob Hill paying $25K per diem for one each and the only autographed copy of the paper that was the Chronicle. #arguments
     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of Anthony_Underscore Anthony_Underscore
    10/28/09

    In reply to Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!
    I thought the headline read "Superfluous Semitic Smackdown." Which would have been a different kind of battle entirely. #arguments
     Reply
    naugahydeinplainsight promoted this comment Anthony_Underscore was starred Anthony_Underscore was unstarred
    Image of depardoo depardoo
    10/28/09

    In reply to Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!
    Did Wolff bring his little chippie? #arguments
     Reply
    depardoo was starred depardoo was unstarred
    Image of Foster Kamer Foster Kamer
    10/28/09

    In reply to Carr vs. Wolff in Superfluous Semantic Smackdown!
    Michael Wolff needs to get got more often. Carr's a rock star and the only thing he's missing for the gig are Michael Wolff's Steven Tyler-esque lips. A cockwaffle if there ever was one. #arguments
     Reply
    Foster Kamer was starred Foster Kamer was unstarred
    Image of jackvinyl jackvinyl
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    If i was in college, i could see carrying around all my textbooks and notes in one computronic device -- is this Kindle utilized thusly?
     Reply
    jackvinyl was starred jackvinyl was unstarred
    Image of ifstone ifstone
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    A Kindle that brought you the full web, even in grayscale, without video and for a price, would be a killer product. You have to wonder why Scamazon hasn't done this for chrissake.


    I'm reading Gawker right now on a heavy laptop that's tethered to an AC outlet and too awkward to take outside on a beautiful day. I print out articles from magazine websites so I can take them with me, and it's a PIA. I have little interest in carrying around a dozen Dan Brown novels, but reference books would be pretty nice.

     Reply
    ifstone was starred ifstone was unstarred
    Image of Perhaps Not Perhaps Not
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    Good post, except for the phrase "doing more with less." You don't do more with less. You do less with less. It's like "work smarter, not harder." (my God, if I'd only been working smart all this time, I could be in Tahiti by now!)
     Reply
    Perhaps Not was starred Perhaps Not was unstarred
    Image of Tremonius Tremonius
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    You take five books to the beach? Really? I can barely work through one Gawker article before I'm fried.


    Newspapers are like the ticking biological clock pressing on her live-in boyfriend for a proposal.

     Reply
    Tremonius was starred Tremonius was unstarred
    Image of OMG! Ponies! OMG! Ponies!
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers


    $360 plus tax for the Kindle plus $14 per month for each newspaper.


    This is why Kindle fails.

     Reply
    OMG! Ponies! was starred OMG! Ponies! was unstarred
    Image of Aaron Altman Aaron Altman
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    It is possible - though not probable - that newspaper and magazine sites will stop allowing free access to current and archived content... which is how they should've done it in the first place if they wanted to survive. Because relying on people to pay hundreds of dollars for a device in order to read stuff you have to subscribe to to get is just fucking stupid.
     Reply
    Aaron Altman was starred Aaron Altman was unstarred
    Image of BadUncle BadUncle
    05/04/09

    @Aaron Altman: what if a newspaper device were free, like cellphones (with subscription)?
     Reply
    BadUncle was starred BadUncle was unstarred
    Image of Peter Feld Peter Feld
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    And extra points for saying "the old" rather than "the olds."
     Reply
    Peter Feld was starred Peter Feld was unstarred
    Image of narnio narnio
    05/04/09

    @Peter Feld: yeah, that was really close.
     Reply
    narnio was starred narnio was unstarred
    Image of Cheap Shot Cheap Shot
    05/04/09

    In reply to Why the Large-Format Kindle Is Not a Life Raft for Newspapers
    Very good post. That last part about building better magazine sites and newspapers is spot on. I really can't see users being into e-papers with no links. Perhaps the middle ground is that the links will stay within their domain? Kind of like when AM NY prints links to there own site?
     Reply
    Cheap Shot was starred Cheap Shot was unstarred
    Image of joe_gillis joe_gillis
    04/03/09

    In reply to Investigations Don't Require Ink, or Actual Investigation
    I won't get upset until Bill Keller says that the Times is bigger than the Beatles.
     Reply
    joe_gillis was starred joe_gillis was unstarred
    Image of krismry krismry
    04/03/09

    @joe_gillis: At this point the Times is barely bigger than the Oregonian, where Keller used to come from.
     Reply
    krismry was starred krismry was unstarred
    Image of TedSez TedSez
    04/03/09

    In reply to Investigations Don't Require Ink, or Actual Investigation
    A power struggle at a Pacifica station is like a fight between Stalin and Bukharin: You know these things are always going on behind the scenes at Party Headquarters, and you never know who to root for.
     Reply
    TedSez was starred TedSez was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gawker account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.