Plagiarism lesson: Write for years, get a NYT column, win a Pulitzer and THEN start stealing from people. Kids today just don't want to put in the time.
She is a second year college student, and I am supposed to be surprised that she cheats on assignments? Not so much. What happened to that other young woman who did not graduate from her journalism program because of a snafu over submitting the same work to two profs? These two need to hook up.
Can't find anything on Google, but if I were at home with my stack of old Spy magazines, I'm relatively sure I'd find it somewhere in there, maybe with Henry Kissinger?
@raincoaster: No I just think the whole interview itself is made up. Maybe for an assignment, maybe just for her own kicks. At best she had a couple of minutes with him on the phone.
But I've done a LOT of interviews, with a lot of people, and no one has ever "turned the tables" on me with personal, salacious questions. Especially not another professional.
And to use your interview to insinuate that Talese - who's married to the fabulous Nan Talese - is interested in you and suggests a "meet up" seem to me to be the height of egotism and asshole journalism. Making journalism touch on the personal is endearing in stories. I do it too. But then there's this bullshit, where the journalism becomes about you.
This is fake. The more I read it, the more I'm convinced it's absolutely fake.
Really? A whole post dedicated to the dismissal of an intern -- intern -- at some middling newspaper in Colorado. Really? And she's worthy of national humiliation ...why? Is this someone's ex-girlfriend at Gawker?
@robrob9: Okay, so, I just read her blog bio. Maybe a national frying pan to the face was in order after all. Still not totally convinced this merited the esteemed Gawker snarkification (you've got her sandwiched between items about Sarah Palin and Michael Jackson, for chrissakes), but that bio definitely makes me want to yell at her. If that was what pushed you over the edge to post this, well, I guess I can understand.
@robrob9: So if someone famous does something stupid and dishonest they should be grilled for it, but if someone unknown does it it's okay? I wouldn't accept that in reverse, so I don't know why I should accept it forwards. Being an intern is hardly an excuse for egregious plagiarism; grade school kids know you're not supposed to copy other people's work.
Amazing how your digital footprint doesn't quite expire in equal measures.
She definitely can write, but the underwear bit is pathetic. Her savy is questionable, as she plagarised the NYT, and not something smaller and less well known.
@jorel845: I think you have to give her a bit of a pass for the underwear bit. She's young, a second-year student, and quite naive. She's obviously got some growing up to do.
@The Cajun Boy: She hasn't grown out of the cutesy, I-think-I'm-being-refreshingly-honest-wh... kind of thought process. Unless she thinks of herself as the next Carrie Bradshaw.
For the most part, her writing was brisk, showed a lot of personality, and was interesting. It's a shame she felt she had to lift from another publication.
@jorel845: Never have I ever... written about my underwear in J-School.
I don't care how cute you think you're being, or how young you are. Age shouldn't be a pass for an interview piece with serious gag factor. And anyone who gets into writing to be the next Carrie Bradshaw should quit now.
@ThatMother-Chucker: Not so fast chucker. This ain't your dad's journalism; writers and bloggers with colorful writing styles rule the day -- the 5 Ws and beat checks are dead. Before this cluster-chuck, she would have likely gone further playing the spunky, passionate, young writer than being a hard-bitten reliable newshound. Right? No. Realistic? You bet yur ass.
@jorel845: That was my thought, too: dilettante. Thus is not how you rip sh*t off. You grab a foot-tall stack of Playboys and Esquires from the 60s and 70s--where some of the most brilliant American long-form journalism or criticism ever has been published--and steal from there. Or lift off ideas for heds, ledes, etc. None of that stuff is archived online so it's practically untraceable these days. Plus, it's brilliant.
Anderson should be given his due for what he's accomplished with Wired. It is ... a formidable title.
Whew. Sounds like someone wants to work at Wired.
Wired was Tired fifteen years ago. Formidable? Maybe compared to Gawker and Gizmodo, Wired might seem formidable. The rest of us see it as vacuous pap.
i'm sorry, but you're missing the point. it's not ironic when someone takes free content and uses it on a book about free content. it's practicing what you preach.
we live in a copy and paste world and that's that.
Actually, I'm doing my masters in new media communications and I regularly use Wikipedia as a reference to find primary sources.
Most people don't realise that it is becoming common practice for experts in given fields to contribute to their field's Wikipedia entry. Often its expected that PhD students contribute something. Yes, Wikipedia is open to everyone, but there are pretty strict editorial policies that the site has to deal with spamming and uncited sources.
When looking at an entry, use your brain. Does it have have an extensive reference list? Are these references solid? How is the writing style of the entry? These things will tell you about the quality of the entry. A well-written, well-researched Wikipedia article can be extremely useful to scholars. Of course, like any reference, they should not be relied on exclusively.
Anyone who thinks the Internet and wikis are the first media texts to undermine 'facts' and critical thinking are in for a shock.
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/08/09
[hlmacarthur.wordpress.com]
Can't find anything on Google, but if I were at home with my stack of old Spy magazines, I'm relatively sure I'd find it somewhere in there, maybe with Henry Kissinger?
07/08/09
But I've done a LOT of interviews, with a lot of people, and no one has ever "turned the tables" on me with personal, salacious questions. Especially not another professional.
And to use your interview to insinuate that Talese - who's married to the fabulous Nan Talese - is interested in you and suggests a "meet up" seem to me to be the height of egotism and asshole journalism. Making journalism touch on the personal is endearing in stories. I do it too. But then there's this bullshit, where the journalism becomes about you.
This is fake. The more I read it, the more I'm convinced it's absolutely fake.
07/09/09
07/08/09
Cajun Boy, you're an asshole.
07/08/09
I'm sorry Ole Miss fired your dad.
07/08/09
07/08/09
That's a level of wrongness beyond plagiarism, and beyond unforgivable.
07/08/09
07/07/09
07/08/09
07/07/09
She definitely can write, but the underwear bit is pathetic. Her savy is questionable, as she plagarised the NYT, and not something smaller and less well known.
07/07/09
07/07/09
For the most part, her writing was brisk, showed a lot of personality, and was interesting. It's a shame she felt she had to lift from another publication.
07/08/09
I don't care how cute you think you're being, or how young you are. Age shouldn't be a pass for an interview piece with serious gag factor. And anyone who gets into writing to be the next Carrie Bradshaw should quit now.
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/08/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
06/25/09
Whew. Sounds like someone wants to work at Wired.
Wired was Tired fifteen years ago. Formidable? Maybe compared to Gawker and Gizmodo, Wired might seem formidable. The rest of us see it as vacuous pap.
06/24/09
06/24/09
we live in a copy and paste world and that's that.
06/23/09
Most people don't realise that it is becoming common practice for experts in given fields to contribute to their field's Wikipedia entry. Often its expected that PhD students contribute something. Yes, Wikipedia is open to everyone, but there are pretty strict editorial policies that the site has to deal with spamming and uncited sources.
When looking at an entry, use your brain. Does it have have an extensive reference list? Are these references solid? How is the writing style of the entry? These things will tell you about the quality of the entry. A well-written, well-researched Wikipedia article can be extremely useful to scholars. Of course, like any reference, they should not be relied on exclusively.
Anyone who thinks the Internet and wikis are the first media texts to undermine 'facts' and critical thinking are in for a shock.
06/24/09
Really? Does your source on this assertion happen to be...Wikipedia?