Virginia never ceases to disappointment me. Cantor is obviously vying for a seat at the GOP grown ups table. Someone seriously needs to retire the "NO NEW TAXES" signs.
Le Sigh. Bonjour Tristesse. One is so tired of this no tax increase nonsense when it's obviously aimed at relieving the country's top earners of their responsibility to give back in recognition of their fabulous success.
Tell ya what. How about no tax increases for anyone who earns less than $100k per year? Hm? How's that look for ya, you sniveling boot-licker of the uber-wealthy? Hm?
@Miss Anita Manbadly: That's CLASS WARFARE. We don't want CLASS WARFARE. Then we'll all be SOCIALISTS. And have to go to DEATH PANELS! KENYAN DEATH PANELS!
etc.
Look, I have to admit I am probably on the side of stop taxing people like crazy, but this guy is completely full of crap. If there were ever a ploy to get attention when you have no new ideas, this is it.
Next up "Only capital punishment until there are no more homicides, then let's keep capital punishment on the books for convicted ________ ."
@Swifter: Look, this is not about his theory. I also think the government is very inefficient. It is the way that he goes about producing nothing and saying that it is something new.
@Swifter: This is a remarkably helpful and insightful comment, which sheds light on exactly how clueless, pointless and childish the current "conservative" argument in the United States is these days.
Anybody see the rerun of This American Life last night, the one with the independent candidate who ran against Cantor on a platform of extreme honesty? He had absolutely no campaign, and he still won 25% of the vote in Virginia.
I'm still trying to figure out what the purpose of the "hoax" is supposed to be.
Maybe I'm not lurking the right conspiracy sites, but the only thing I've been able to determine, based on a passing Alex Jones quote, is that environmentalism (as a whole?) is an attempt to steal your land. And then... I don't know.
Can anyone explain to me why anyone could be so angrily against curbing pollution?
That's what it really boils down to, as far as I can tell. Even if you don't believe that global warming/climate change is real, why would you choose to be against efforts to slow down/half pollution?
"$94 billion that HSBC Bank estimates has been spent globally this year on what it calls "green stimulus"—largely ethanol and other alternative energy schemes—of the kind from which Al Gore and his partners at Kleiner Perkins hope to profit handsomely."
@ConAir34: Last I checked, none of the organizations you cited actually do any research. Yes there are some opportunists but that doesn't change physics
@The Van Buren Boys: But the only reason this business exists is due to tis research. Not to mention grants. From that same WSJ article.
"Consider the case of Phil Jones, the director of the CRU and the man at the heart of climategate. According to one of the documents hacked from his center, between 2000 and 2006 Mr. Jones was the recipient (or co-recipient) of some $19 million worth of research grants, a sixfold increase over what he’d been awarded in the 1990s.
Why did the money pour in so quickly? Because the climate alarm kept ringing so loudly: The louder the alarm, the greater the sums. And who better to ring it than people like Mr. Jones, one of its likeliest beneficiaries?"
@ConAir34: cause only oil companies can profit handsomely right? Only carbon-based energy companies get all the "money and control"? Cause if you're a green company, you're trying to "force" me to consume something I'm not used to!?! Quelle horreur!
If these energy companies are so scared of lost profits, maybe they should invest in "green" technologies too. It's not anyone else's problem but their own that they put all their eggs into a non-renewable resource.
@ConAir34: I should have said earlier that I wasn't pro-cap and trade, precisely for the reason you cited (that it creates yet another derivatives market) but where did I say anything about green companies being more noble? I just prefer there be more options available. What's wrong with diversifying the ways we power our lives?
Furthermore, it seemed to me that you, or whoever your friends are that are concerned over "money and control," are not acknowledging that energy companies already have substantial "money and control" yet you (or they) defend them in spite of this new technology. Sure, it may be expensive/inefficient now, but the price of oil will only go up, and once it reaches $100, will I hear you bitching about windfall profits from Exxon Mobil?
@Helio: I am not really trying to defend energy companies. I just don't want Cap and Trade type legislation to emerge and I am very tired of global warming talk.
If oil goes up again Americans will respond as we did before and stop using as much. There are vast amounts of untapped oil and gas we would need to use up before this becomes a real worry.
@Helio: I am sure we will. 100 years ago we had no idea what would provide a good amount of power (nuclear). 100 years from now imagine how different it will be.
@ConAir34: You understand that this is what virtually every scientist in the country does, right? They are all competing for grant money in order to pay for their projects, so they write grant requests in order to make their cases. To argue that "ringing the alarm" (i.e. stating your case) implies that you are ginning it all up, simply because there's project money to be gotten for doing so, is specious at best. I mean, was this scientist pocketing the money and buying mansions with it? Where is the impropriety here?
@ConAir34: Of course, part of finding and developing new energy sources is criticizing the unsuitability, or noting the winding down, of current ones. In order to understand that we need something new, we first have to understand how what we have right now is insufficient.
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: I absolutely agree but the message can get lost on those who need to heed it most when those delivering it are shown to talk the talk, but not walk the walk, as the Times article shows.
Christ, I am having cabbage for dinner.
@Buttafooco: The proof of the bad intentions of the deniers is this: if some portion of global warming is part of a natural cycle, shouldn't that make us redouble our efforts to keep from adding to it?
@Buttafooco: The proof of the bad intentions of the deniers is this: if some portion of global warming is part of a natural cycle, shouldn't that make us redouble our efforts to keep from adding to it?
@If_I_Had_a_Poodle: apparently, many don't share the notion that we should sometimes nip things in the bud......rather, they prefer to wait until the point of no return. Unfortunately, having read some of the cap and trade proposals, there are way too many loopholes for exploitation by corporations.
OK, as the sole Romanian-American Gawker commenter--there might be others who have yet to emerge out of the woodwork--this saddens me. I mean, every time Romania makes the news in Western media outlets, it's always to a negative effect: Romanian-bred Roma people entrapping and eating the swans gliding on the lake at the Schönbrunn Castle in Vienna! Paint thinner-snuffing "children of the streets" in Bucharest! Dracula-related BS! Even my adored Tony Bourdain barfed forth a ridiculously sarcastic and mean-spirited episode about Romania for his "No Reservations" show.. Now the news of the Romanian prime minister punching a little kid in the nose circles the world..
@snugbug: Snuggles, you are not alone! We come out at night, (to comment on Gawker) and offer blood toasts to our over-loard Andre Codrescu. And every time he goes on NPR to talk about his youth shtupping on tombstones, me, Irina Lazareanu and Bella Caroli do a shot of ţuică with a stuffed cabbage / bag of glue chaser. Care to join us? Ce pula mea?
@MyrtleWilloughby: Hey there, fellow vampire! You forgot to mention among the Romanian notables that O-Zone techno-meets-nonsense band that inspired the immortal "Numa Numa Kid" video.
Fac si eu ce pot sa apar patria mioritica! Ţuică si sărmaluţe FTW!
@snugbug: You are my favorite - ciorba just shot out my nose! I had no idea our proud people could claim the Numa Numa song. Tristan Tzara, Eugene Ionescu, Numa Numa and the Cheeky Girls? The lower Danube clearly had one hell of an ancient civilization.
My real problem with the game isn't hte gay sex, but that the hetero sex option involves a secretly evil woman who wants to have your baby in order to turn it into some sort of dark god. That's some fucked up shit there.
06:06 PM
05:39 PM
05:28 PM
05:09 PM
Tell ya what. How about no tax increases for anyone who earns less than $100k per year? Hm? How's that look for ya, you sniveling boot-licker of the uber-wealthy? Hm?
05:20 PM
etc.
05:06 PM
These guys are completely morally bankrupt.
05:10 PM
05:03 PM
Next up "Only capital punishment until there are no more homicides, then let's keep capital punishment on the books for convicted ________ ."
05:09 PM
05:14 PM
However, please send thinking folks. We need more.
05:45 PM
04:59 PM
05:03 PM
05:14 PM
05:21 PM
05:22 PM
05:47 PM
06:19 PM
08:21 PM
04:54 PM
05:01 PM
03:48 PM
Maybe I'm not lurking the right conspiracy sites, but the only thing I've been able to determine, based on a passing Alex Jones quote, is that environmentalism (as a whole?) is an attempt to steal your land. And then... I don't know.
Can anyone explain to me why anyone could be so angrily against curbing pollution?
That's what it really boils down to, as far as I can tell. Even if you don't believe that global warming/climate change is real, why would you choose to be against efforts to slow down/half pollution?
05:57 PM
The #1 backers for Cap and Trade originally were Goldman Sachs and Enron.
It creates a whole new derivatives market in Carbon trading.
06:03 PM
"$94 billion that HSBC Bank estimates has been spent globally this year on what it calls "green stimulus"—largely ethanol and other alternative energy schemes—of the kind from which Al Gore and his partners at Kleiner Perkins hope to profit handsomely."
That is from a WSJ article.
It's always money and control.
06:20 PM
06:30 PM
"Consider the case of Phil Jones, the director of the CRU and the man at the heart of climategate. According to one of the documents hacked from his center, between 2000 and 2006 Mr. Jones was the recipient (or co-recipient) of some $19 million worth of research grants, a sixfold increase over what he’d been awarded in the 1990s.
Why did the money pour in so quickly? Because the climate alarm kept ringing so loudly: The louder the alarm, the greater the sums. And who better to ring it than people like Mr. Jones, one of its likeliest beneficiaries?"
06:31 PM
If these energy companies are so scared of lost profits, maybe they should invest in "green" technologies too. It's not anyone else's problem but their own that they put all their eggs into a non-renewable resource.
06:46 PM
You seem to think it is more noble for "green" companies to make money based off of bad research than oil companies.
"Green" technology will be embraced when it can produce cheaper and better energy. Technology still needs to catch up to that.
07:01 PM
Furthermore, it seemed to me that you, or whoever your friends are that are concerned over "money and control," are not acknowledging that energy companies already have substantial "money and control" yet you (or they) defend them in spite of this new technology. Sure, it may be expensive/inefficient now, but the price of oil will only go up, and once it reaches $100, will I hear you bitching about windfall profits from Exxon Mobil?
07:10 PM
If oil goes up again Americans will respond as we did before and stop using as much. There are vast amounts of untapped oil and gas we would need to use up before this becomes a real worry.
07:15 PM
07:39 PM
09:05 PM
09:08 PM
03:03 PM
03:11 PM
Christ, I am having cabbage for dinner.
07:43 PM
07:55 PM
08:14 PM
02:58 PM
[women.timesonline.co.uk]
12/01/09
Give my people a break, will ya?
12/01/09
Twilight isn't your fault?
Damn. Now we need to find someone else to blame...
12/01/09
12/01/09
Fac si eu ce pot sa apar patria mioritica! Ţuică si sărmaluţe FTW!
01:18 AM
12/01/09
Russia loves children more than Romania.
12/01/09
12/01/09