Someone sent me this on Saturday! I felt super privileged and insidery. And I think the best part about the video is the fact that everyone but one guy just keeps on moving as if nothing had happened (and a few even snicker at the smashee).
Of course. And I'll bet you any amount of money in the world that house ob/gyn Inhofe has preformed any number of procedures for his philandering friends. After all, this is a cult that believes its leaders are exempt from the dogma they lay down for others. And this is exactly why I know that Glenn Beck is full of shit: if he gave two shits about this country, this is the first place he'd look for shenanigans. It's an open sore of corruption. #cstreet
@Go Like Hell Machine: Thanks. I have a hard time keeping my Oklahoma testicles in their proper compartments in the ball sack that is the Republican Party. #cstreet
@Mediahohoho: Indeed. I grew up in Oklahoma; Inhofe in particular has been a fuckwit shitbag for as long as I can remember. Same goes for Creepy fucking Coburn. Oklahoma has a pretty decent Governor and a whole lot of stupid ass gas bags for legislators at both the local and national level. #cstreet
@fuckingoldman: You know me. I make very little distinction between Republicans and Democrats from red states who vote with the minority party on every issue. #cstreet
of course he added that amendment. The only reason this piece of scum lives is most likely because his mother didn't have the cash to abort him.
Can I say things like that?
I guess I already did.
I'm just so sick of rich white guys telling the po ladies what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.
Somebody PLEASE dig up the mistress who he paid to have an abortion! #cstreet
@manchops: You just know there's pics of him with his dominatrix.
Also, shouldn't the fact that a woman can't afford $300 to pay for an abortion also mean she can't afford to pay for prenatal care or the cost of raising a child for 18 years? But I guess that's her tough luck.
@manchops: I think you're missing the point--he has no problem with women getting abortions as long as they they are funded by individual congressmen, and not directly by the federal government. #cstreet
Wow. We need more info on this loser, including some nice photos, so I can take them to the hoo-doo people to send a fetch after his sorry ass. #cstreet
@LeftCoastLady: Thanks and OMG! Central Casting couldn't have done it better. The porcine features. The high helmet hair. The suspicious, squinty eyed smile.
OK, I'm off to the hoo-doo people. #cstreet
@LeftCoastLady: Thank you so much for the photo. No one hates the ladies more than the fat old ugly white guy with a "winning, compassionate personality" who will never ever again get laid #cstreet
I think Matt Fong in 1998 was a half legit challenge to Boxer. She ended up winning by something like 10 points, but I remember some Boxer supporters being at least a little nervous in the weeks before the election. Bill Jones, on the other hand.... #2010
How about this... he's a Muslim. He's a terrorist. He said lots of anti-American things and then snapped and killed a bunch of people while shouting 'Allah Ackbar'.
@Han Valen: Agreed. By not simply acknowledging this, we sound like the crazy right-wing nut jobs who insist that the murdered census worker who had the word "FED" carved in his chest may have been killed for reasons other than anti-government sentiment. #nidalmalikhasan
Let's be thankful that Hasan survived so he can settle this bullshit for once and all. The worst thing that could've happened was if he had died and we'd be left with wackos like Lieberman to put words in his mouth or use his image to sell some freakish agenda (see: Pat Tillman)
I think the truth is that Hasan was a very incompetent and dissolusioned soldier turned wannabe radical Islamist. If this guy is the boogieman, then a real terrorist like Scott Roeder is Godzilla, Freddie, and Jason rolled up in to one. Only no one's talking about him. #nidalmalikhasan
@pepelicious: Right. We should believe the guy who just murdered 12 unarmed soldiers and a civilian, rather than Joe Lieberman. Because Lieberman's not liberal. #nidalmalikhasan
@pepelicious: Who gives a flying fig what this man has to say? And are you attempting to say that the murder of 13 people is somehow less significant or horrifying than the murder of an abortion doctor, because it had nothing to do with an issue that is important to you? #nidalmalikhasan
@pepelicious: You're assuming that he's going to talk.
As for his radicalization, he was attending that mosque (the same one attended by 2 of the 9/11 terrorists and run by a radical, terrorism-supporting imam) before 9/11.
The big problem for both parties is balkanization. There aren't very many reliable voting blocks any more, and candidates on both sides have shown they're willing to do almost anything necessary to get those blocks "locked up."
That being said, I think the increasing prevalence of "purity tests" among the Republicans and the lack of a coherent party message will ensure that they continue to marginalize themselves. Bill Buckley's characterization of conservatism as a force standing astride history shouting "stop" is frighteningly correct, and right now it feels like the whole Republican party is just yelling "STOP." That's not a party slogan, but the reds are working hard to make it one. #2010
@Niko Bellic: I truly hope that's how, in the end, he's portrayed. Those who would call Republican or Democratic Senators "Traitors" because they vote for a damn health care bill need to be reminded of the utter seriousness of the term, and need to have pointed out to them that it's a pretty specific and harsh term designed for, oh, someone in uniform who turns a military base into a shooting gallery.
notsofresh promoted this comment
Edited by Go Like Hell Machine at 11/09/09 3:54 PM
Go Like Hell Machine was starred
Go Like Hell Machine was unstarred
@Fuzzy Dunlop: I did not say they are exclusive, but I don't think he is a terrorist, and here is why:
If this has happened in a base in a foreign country, than you could argue that his motivation was to inflict terror on the US public. But, if that was his motivation, and he was in US, wouldn't it be more effective to hit a school, or a mall or something?
I think his target was (at least in his mind) a military one. So, I think it's a classic case of treason: he had conflicting loyalties, and he finally picked the other side.
@Niko Bellic: There is no universally-accepted definition of "terrorism." But I would think the fact that he tried to contact a terrorist organization beforehand, and attacked unarmed people outside of a combat zone, would be enough for the colloquial use of the term. Quibbling over how to define "terrorist" in this circumstance is just that, quibbling, and I don't understand why it's necessary here. To be honest, it makes our side look like a bunch of fucking smarter-than-thou jackasses. "Oh no, the man who slaughtered all those people wasn't a terrorist you silly red-staters. Let me explain why over a nice Merlot." #nidalmalikhasan
@Fuzzy Dunlop: Well, but seriously, if this can be construed as "terrorism"; an attack on actual state actors by a single rogue individual with, what sounds like, a fairly loose set of objectives, then we're defining terrorism really loosely. Isn't there usually some sort of will to influence political decisions, at least to a degree?
I mean, I know that Islamic fundamentalism is nihilistic, but this seems much more so than even that. Even OBL wanted to influence the US Government, even if he wasn't sure exactly how the US would respond. It doesn't sound like this guy had an objective beyond killing a bunch of military service persons. #nidalmalikhasan
@Go Like Hell Machine: I'd say you're imposing too stringent a requirement if you say that there needs to be some express will to influence specific political decisions in order to qualify as terrorism. Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, was certainly a terrorist, but I doubt that nutjob could articulate specific political positions beyond "die, infidels!" In any case, I think the "political motivation" prong is pretty strong here - he didn't want US troops to be deployed to the Middle East, so he killed people on an army base from which US troops were to be deployed to the Middle East.
Again, maybe there's an esoteric argument that no crime against military personnel should be considered "terrorism" under any circumstances, but my main point is why the hell do we want to have that argument, now or ever? It's just a really dumb time to be arguing over semantics. It makes liberals look like disconnected boobs, and it achieves no purpose. #nidalmalikhasan
@Fuzzy Dunlop: I can sympathize, but also, respectfully disagree. I think that the difference in terminology is important and profound, and we'd be better off having an esoteric discussion on the meaning of "terrorism" now, rather than defining it as we see it, which, historically hasn't worked very well when trying to apply standards of rule of law. #nidalmalikhasan
07:22 PM
Geezus fuck, this line of Fort Hood stories on Gawker is weak. #nidalmalikhasan
06:06 PM
05:50 PM
06:10 PM
07:39 PM
07:52 PM
07:53 PM
07:53 PM
07:56 PM
07:57 PM
07:59 PM
05:48 PM
05:37 PM
05:19 PM
05:05 PM
Can I say things like that?
I guess I already did.
I'm just so sick of rich white guys telling the po ladies what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.
Somebody PLEASE dig up the mistress who he paid to have an abortion! #cstreet
05:14 PM
Also, shouldn't the fact that a woman can't afford $300 to pay for an abortion also mean she can't afford to pay for prenatal care or the cost of raising a child for 18 years? But I guess that's her tough luck.
05:31 PM
i think we'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who'd do this fat, pasty turd of a man. #cstreet
07:07 PM
05:00 PM
05:08 PM
@Novaload: His official photo is most unfortunate, even by "DC -- Hollywood for the Ugly People" standards. #cstreet
05:18 PM
OK, I'm off to the hoo-doo people. #cstreet
05:23 PM
07:23 PM
04:58 PM
Yeah, let's go with rehab. #2010
04:57 PM
04:06 PM
How about this... he's a Muslim. He's a terrorist. He said lots of anti-American things and then snapped and killed a bunch of people while shouting 'Allah Ackbar'.
Yep, he's a 'Muslim Terrorist'. Case closed. #nidalmalikhasan
04:13 PM
04:00 PM
I think the truth is that Hasan was a very incompetent and dissolusioned soldier turned wannabe radical Islamist. If this guy is the boogieman, then a real terrorist like Scott Roeder is Godzilla, Freddie, and Jason rolled up in to one. Only no one's talking about him. #nidalmalikhasan
05:16 PM
05:27 PM
07:32 PM
As for his radicalization, he was attending that mosque (the same one attended by 2 of the 9/11 terrorists and run by a radical, terrorism-supporting imam) before 9/11.
Also, according to ABC News, he tried to contact some people in al qaeda. [www.abcnews.go.com] #nidalmalikhasan
04:00 PM
That being said, I think the increasing prevalence of "purity tests" among the Republicans and the lack of a coherent party message will ensure that they continue to marginalize themselves. Bill Buckley's characterization of conservatism as a force standing astride history shouting "stop" is frighteningly correct, and right now it feels like the whole Republican party is just yelling "STOP." That's not a party slogan, but the reds are working hard to make it one. #2010
03:31 PM
03:31 PM
03:52 PM
03:53 PM
04:34 PM
If this has happened in a base in a foreign country, than you could argue that his motivation was to inflict terror on the US public. But, if that was his motivation, and he was in US, wouldn't it be more effective to hit a school, or a mall or something?
I think his target was (at least in his mind) a military one. So, I think it's a classic case of treason: he had conflicting loyalties, and he finally picked the other side.
06:03 PM
06:25 PM
I mean, I know that Islamic fundamentalism is nihilistic, but this seems much more so than even that. Even OBL wanted to influence the US Government, even if he wasn't sure exactly how the US would respond. It doesn't sound like this guy had an objective beyond killing a bunch of military service persons. #nidalmalikhasan
06:33 PM
Again, maybe there's an esoteric argument that no crime against military personnel should be considered "terrorism" under any circumstances, but my main point is why the hell do we want to have that argument, now or ever? It's just a really dumb time to be arguing over semantics. It makes liberals look like disconnected boobs, and it achieves no purpose. #nidalmalikhasan
06:59 PM
Merlot? I discuss things over Pino. Merlot is for when it comes to breaking bottles over heads. Pfff...
Having said that: I respectfully disagree that you and I should dumb down our conversations so that we wouldn't offend the dumb. #nidalmalikhasan
07:28 PM